EU prepares €100bn no-deal plan to match Trump's threat of 30% tariffs
The European Commission said on Wednesday it now planned to combine two previously prepared separate lists of US goods to be included in any retaliatory moves against the US president's import tariffs.
If Brussels follows through on the threat, it would mean tariffs on US imports to the EU including poultry and alcohol in the first €21bn list, as well as the more recent list of €72bn of goods, which featured cars and planes.
If agreed by EU member states, through a vote expected in the coming days, the €93bn of counter-tariffs could be imposed from 7 August.
'The EU's primary focus is on achieving a negotiated outcome with the US,' said Olof Gill, a trade spokesperson for the European Commission,adding that it would 'continue in parallel to prepare for all outcomes'. To make countermeasures 'clearer, simpler and stronger we will merge lists 1 and 2 into a single list', he said.
The EU trade commissioner, Maroš Šefčovič, was due to talk to the US commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, before a briefing to EU ambassadors on Wednesday afternoon.
Diplomats say the mood is hardening in Brussels towards Trump after the US president rejected an agreement in principle 10 days ago while at the same time upping the ante by threatening 30% blanket tariffs from 1 August in the event of no deal.
Germany, which has publicly pushed for a quick deal to end the crippling 27.5% tariffs on its car industry, is now favouring the use of the anti-coercion instrument (ACI), an EU regulation considered its 'nuclear deterrent' against economic coercion.
The ACI would enable the EU to retaliate with an arsenal of measures including tariffs, but also a potential ban on US services, which would hit the tech sector hard.
The European car industry has been particularly impacted by the tariffs. Stellantis, the owner of Jeep and Vauxhall, this week said Trump's tariffs have cost it €300m and Volvo reported a sharp decline in second-quarter operation.
The French president, Emmanuel Macron, has long argued that the EU needs to be prepared to retaliate and counter Trump's threats in a tougher fashion.
Both Germany and France spoke about the ACI at a meeting of ambassadors last Friday.
'It was certainly a shift in rhetoric, but it is not clear whether they would be advocating pressing the actual button,' said one diplomat in Brussels.
Tobias Gehrke, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations thinktank, said the EU had missed an opportunity by not warning that it would use the ACI after a trade ministers summit early last week, two days after Trump sent the EU a letter threatening 30% tariffs.
Sign up to This is Europe
The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment
after newsletter promotion
'There is a sense that the bloc has fumbled its hand, despite holding decent cards,' he said.
'The EU should have immediately retaliated against US tariffs. While the mantra 'negotiate from a position of strength' was oft-repeated in speeches, any associated actions never materialised,' he added.
He argues the only move to break the impasse is a face to face meeting between Merz, Macron and Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni and Trump, who is in Scotland this weekend.
The latest EU move comes ahead of a summit with China on Thursday between European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the EU council, Antonio Costa, and China's president Xi Jinping.
China maintains a dominant position in the trade relationship – its trade surplus for the first six months of 2025 stood at €143bn, up 20% year on year, with exports of hybrid electrical cars tripling from January to May. These do not attract the punitive tariffs introduced in 2023 by the EU. Electric car imports dropped 32% for the same period.
At the same time, China's restriction on rare earths is hitting the German car industry which needs magnets for window and boot opening mechanisms.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion United
20 minutes ago
- Fashion United
Ted Baker reportedly eyeing return to UK high streets
Following its descent into administration in 2024, British retailer Ted Baker is reportedly set to return to UK high streets next year. After relaunching its website in the region back in November, the brand is now said to be eyeing a store opening in London, planned for early 2026, according to The Sun. The media outlet said no further details have been released. The operator of Ted Baker's UK stores, No Ordinary Designer Label (NODL), had fallen into administration last year, resulting in the closure of the brand's 46 stores across the region. The closures coincided with exits from international markets like North America and the Netherlands, where bankruptcy proceedings were also taking place. Since then, however, Ted Baker's parent company, Authentic Brands Group, has slowly been building the brand back up, establishing new wholesale, distribution and licensing partnerships with various third parties across a number of regions. Pace Partnership London, for example, acquired the brand's wholesale business in the UK and Europe, while United Legwear & Apparel was appointed to manage Ted Baker's e-commerce operations. On the back of its e-commerce relaunch in the UK, Ted Baker unveiled its dedicated EU platform on July 1, 2025, offering customers in regions like Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands and Spain access to a localised shopping experience. At the time, a press release issued by Ted Baker said: 'Germany and Ireland have long been key markets for the brand, consistently representing a strong and engaged audience for Ted Baker. This new chapter reflects Ted Baker's commitment to serving its loyal EU customer base with elevated product storytelling, curated experiences, and improved service capabilities.' FashionUnited has contacted Authentic Brands Group with a request to comment on The Sun's report.
Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
US-Japan trade deal guarantees lowest tariff rates for chips, pharma, Japanese official says
TOKYO, July 29 (Reuters) - Japan's leading trade negotiator said on Tuesday that the trade deal Tokyo agreed with the United States last week guarantees Japan will always receive the lowest tariff rate on chips and pharmaceuticals of all the pacts negotiated by Washington. "If a third country agrees with the United States on lower rates on chips and pharmaceuticals, those lower rates would apply to Japan," Ryosei Akazawa told a news conference. The European Union secured a 15% baseline tariff as part of a framework trade deal with the U.S. this week, averting looming new tariffs on chips and pharmaceuticals. Japan last week struck a trade deal with the U.S. that lowers tariffs on cars and other goods to 15% in exchange for a U.S.-bound $550 billion Japanese investment package including equity, loans and guarantees. Asked why there has been no joint statement on the agreement, Akazawa said Japan is prioritising having President Donald Trump sign an executive order to bring the agreed 15% tariff rate into effect. "We want to concentrate our efforts on getting the tariffs lowered first, and then we can consider whether an official document on the agreement is necessary," he said.
Daily Mirror
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
7 explosive moments in Donald Trump's years-long feud with London Mayor Sadiq Khan
US President Donald Trump has a fraught history with London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan - The Mirror takes a look back at some of the standout moments from their long-running feud Donald Trump reignited his feud with Sir Sadiq Khan yesterday as he branded the London Mayor a "nasty person" in a televised sit-down. Mr Trump, who is on a golfing trip to Scotland, took a shot at Sir Sadiq when he was asked if he will visit London during his state visit in September. The Republican politician said he didn't know, before hurling abuse at the mayor: "I'm not a fan of your mayor. I think he's done a terrible job. He's a nasty person." It was an an uncomfortable moment for Keir Starmer, who was sitting next to the President and was forced to lean over and interject, saying: "He's a friend of mine." But it was not the start of tensions between Mr Trump and Sir Sadiq. The US President has a fraught history with the London Mayor dating back to his last presidency. The Mirror takes a look back at some of the standout moments from their long-running feud. IQ test jibe In 2016, Mr Trump challenged Sir Sadiq to an IQ test after he said the US President's views on Islam were ignorant. The then newly elected London Mayor branded Mr Trump's views on Muslims "ignorant" and said: "I'm clearly hoping Hillary Clinton wins." Sir Sadiq criticised Mr Trump after he vowed to ban Muslims from the US during the 2016 presidential campaign. He said: "Donald Trump's ignorant view of Islam could make both of our countries less safe. It risks alienating mainstream Muslims around the hands of extremists." In an interview with Piers Morgan, Mr Trump later said he was offended by Sir Sadiq's comments and even challenged him to an IQ test. "He doesn't know me, hasn't met me, doesn't know what I'm on about," he said. "I think they're very rude statements and frankly tell him I will remember those statements. They're very nasty statements." Trump's astonishing 'pathetic' comment In 2017, Donald Trump launched an astonishing Twitter attack on Sir Sadiq Khan following a terrorist attack in London, calling the London Mayor's response "pathetic". Eight people were killed and 48 injured when terrorists drove a van into pedestrians on London Bridge before launching a deadly knife attack. In the aftermath, Sir Sadiq sought to reassure Londoners, telling people there would be an increased police presence in the capital but that there was "no reason to be alarmed". The US president took issue with the comment, tweeting: "Pathetic excuse by London Mayor Sadiq Khan who had to think fast on his "no reason to be alarmed" statement. MSM [mainstream media] is working hard to sell it!" Sir Sadiq's office initially responded by saying the London mayor had 'more important things to do than respond to Donald Trump's ill-informed tweet that deliberately takes out of context his remarks'. Sir Sadiq allows giant 'Trump Baby' In 2018, Sir Sadiq granted permission for a giant blimp depicting Mr Trump as an angry, orange baby to fly over London during the US President's visit. The mayor said he supported the decision taken by the Greater London Authority, adding that it was not for him to be a "censor". In a frank exchange with Piers Morgan on Good Morning Britain at the time, Sir Sadiq said: "My views are irrelevant. The issue is 'Do they have freedom to protest, freedom to assemble and should they be allowed to do so?' If it's peaceful and it's safe they should, Piers." The 20ft (6m) high inflatable, dubbed "Trump Baby", was granted permission to rise above Parliament Square Gardens. 'Stone cold loser' In 2019, moments before he landed in the UK for a three-day state visit, Mr Trump launched a vicious attack on Sir Sadiq, branding the mayor a "stone cold loser who should focus on crime in London". Tweeting from the plane, the US President wrote: "Sadiq Khan, who by all accounts has done a terrible job as Mayor of London, has been foolishly 'nasty' to the visiting President of the United States, by far the most important ally of the United Kingdom. He is a stone cold loser who should focus on crime in London, not me." Misspelling Sir Sadiq's name, Mr Trump continued: "Kahn [sic] reminds me very much of our very dumb and incompetent Mayor of NYC, de Blasio, who has also done a terrible job - only half his height." A spokesman for the mayor at the time said the "childish insults should be beneath the president of the United States". '20th Century fascist' Mr Trump's "loser" comment came a day after Sir Sadiq had compared President Trump to a "20th Century fascist", saying he was guilty of "defending white supremacists, neo-Nazis and anti-Semites" in Charlottesville and "amplifying messages from racists in this country". He wrote in The Observer: "President Donald Trump is just one of the most egregious examples of a growing global threat. The far right is on the rise around the world, threatening our hard-won rights and freedoms and the values that have defined our liberal, democratic societies for more than 70 years. "Viktor Orbán in Hungary, Matteo Salvini in Italy, Marine Le Pen in France and Nigel Farage here in the UK are using the same divisive tropes of the fascists of the 20th century to garner support, but with new sinister methods to deliver their message. And they are gaining ground and winning power and influence in places that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago." Trump branded 'racist bigot' Also in 2019, Donald Trump launched an attack on Sir Sadiq over knife crime in London after three killings in the capital in less than 24 hours. The US President was branded a "racist bigot" after also amplifying a racist tweet The US President branded the British politician "a disaster" while re-tweeting far-right activist Katie Hopkins. He said: "LONDON needs a new mayor ASAP. Khan is a disaster - will only get worse! He is a national disgrace who is destroying the City of London!" It sparked a furious backlash from now-Energy Secretary Ed Miliband saying: "What is it about Sadiq Khan and what he stands for that leads the President to be tweeting rubbish about him? Oh yes, Trump's a racist bigot, who tried to ban Muslims from America and hates anyone who stands up to him." Critics - including Jeremy Corbyn - also slammed Mr Trump for re-tweeting a post by Hopkins in which she referred to London as 'stab-city' and 'Khan's Londonistan'.. 'Trump is racist' Last year, London Mayor Sadiq Khan labelled Donald Trump a "racist" and claimed that the then President-elect singled him out because of his skin colour. Mr Khan, who was repeatedly attacked by Trump during his first term in the White House, said his policies were "sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic, racist". He said: "He's coming for me for my ethnicity and my religion, so it's incredibly personal to me." Speaking to the High Performance podcast before November's Presidential Election, the London Mayor said: 'It's personal, let's be frank. If I wasn't this colour skin, if I wasn't a practising Muslim, he wouldn't have come for me.
