Husband's Attempt at Humor During Ultrasound Backfires. Now He Is ‘Banned' from Speaking in Other Appointments
A husband decided to accompany his wife to her ultrasound appointment
The pair were excited to hear their child's heartbeat for the first time
However, the wife and doctor were not amused by the husband's joke after hearing the soundExpecting a child is one of life's most emotional and transformative experiences.
For one Reddit user and his wife, both 31, the journey to parenthood took an unexpectedly awkward — yet humorous — turn during a routine ultrasound appointment.
What began as a joyful, exciting day quickly became a moment of comic misfire that will likely be remembered for years to come.
'We went in for the 12-week scan. Everyone's in a good mood, the tech is sweet, and everything looks great,' the soon-to-be dad writes in the post, setting the stage for what was supposed to be a tender milestone in their pregnancy journey.
But then came the moment that often brings tears to parents' eyes: the first sound of the baby's heartbeat. 'She puts the wand over my wife's belly, and the room goes quiet. Then: Lub dub. Lub dub,' he recalls.
It was then, caught up in the emotion and the surreal quality of the moment, that the expectant father said what he thought would be a lighthearted comment to break the silence.
"Without thinking, I blurt out, 'Sounds like a tiny rave in there,'' he recalls.
Unfortunately, his attempt at humor didn't land. 'No one laughs. Not the tech. Not my wife,' he recounts. 'The tech just says flatly, 'It's a heart, not a party.' My wife, God bless her, gives me that 'please stop breathing for a second' look.'
The silence that followed was deafening. What was meant to be a bonding moment through shared laughter turned into a lesson in timing — and the unwritten rules of ultrasound etiquette.
Recognizing the situation, the dad decided to stay quiet for the rest of the appointment. Although no one found his comment funny at the moment, Reddit users flooded the comments in support of the poster.
'Ehhh they just don't have a sense of humor, that's pretty funny,' one person commented. 'Dad joking it up before you are officially a dad.'
The fallout, however, didn't end at the clinic. Later that night, his wife sent him a text from another room.
'Tiny rave. Really?' she asked.
The poster noted that he has since been 'permanently banned from speaking during future appointments."
While the joke didn't garner any laughs, it did lead to an unofficial nickname for their future son. 'We're naming the baby Oliver,' he writes, 'but I know the real nickname will be DJ Heartbeat.'
In the end, this expectant father learned a valuable — and slightly embarrassing — lesson: sometimes, the best thing to say during a poignant moment is nothing at all.
Still, it's clear that his heart was in the right place, even if his timing was not.
Read the original article on People
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
3 Reasons You Wake Up Just Before Your Alarm Goes Off, According to a Sleep Expert
Has this ever happened to you? You set your alarm for, say, 7:30 a.m., drift off to sleep, and in the morning your eyes shoot open at 7:28. You may be resentful that your body has robbed you of an extra two minutes of precious sleep—or you may be wondering whether you have a supernatural ability to tell time while unconscious. We asked a sleep medicine physician what exactly is going on when we wake up right before our alarm goes off. She gave us three explanations, and surprisingly, one of them does involve something of a Matsumura, MD, spokesperson for the American Academy of Sleep MedicineCongratulations—you may be waking up right before your alarm rings because you've got your sleep routine down pat. "If you go to bed around the same time every night, get at least seven hours of sleep, and wake up around the same time every morning feeling refreshed, then your body is in tune with its circadian rhythm," says Andrea Matsumura, MD, who specializes in internal medicine and sleep medicine. Our circadian rhythm, described as our 24-hour internal clock, tells our body when to sleep and when to wake up. It's partly controlled by a region of the brain that's sensitive to external cues, like light and dark. "When darkness falls, melatonin is released, which gets us drifting off to sleep. Light—like sunlight filtering in through your blinds—triggers your circadian wake cycle for the day," Matsumura explains. So keeping regular bedtime and wakeup hours, and especially properly cueing your body with dark and light, will help your circadian rhythm run like a professional orchestra—on time, every time. Related: Good Sleep Hygiene Promotes Better Physical and Mental Health—Here's How to Improve Yours You could be so nervous about sleeping through your alarm—you have a plane to catch or an early meeting, for example—that your body wakes you up prematurely. "When the body anticipates waking up earlier, it can release stress hormones like cortisol and ACTH in preparation for the day, even before the alarm goes off," Matsumura says. In this case, you might be waking up briefly throughout the night, not just in the minutes before your alarm, though you may not remember doing so. If this happens to you regularly and you're always waking up anxious and foggy-headed, your circadian rhythm could be out of whack. "When somebody is a night owl and goes to bed after midnight, say, but they have to wake up for work at 6 a.m., they'll develop this kind of hypervigilance in their sleep and feel like they're sleeping with one eye open," Matsumura says. Luckily, you can take steps to realign your circadian rhythm. Related: 8 Common Signs of Sleep Deprivation You Shouldn't Ignore This is a weird one: Some people may be able to will themselves to wake up at a certain time, Matsumura says. "There is neuroscientific research behind manifestation and the power of persuasion," she says. "We see it all the time with athletes. They've trained their brain to visualize an outcome on the field, for example, and have it become reality. So it's possible that people can develop the ability to wake up at a certain time without using an alarm clock." How exactly can we train ourselves to wake up when we choose? "I have no idea," Matsumura says. "That hasn't been studied. But we can extrapolate that the power of manifestation can help us adjust our sleep timing, as long as it's in line with our circadian rhythm." Try setting an intention tonight and see what happens! (But keep that alarm clock on just in case.) Read the original article on Real Simple
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
G.O.P. Bill Has $1.1 Trillion in Health Cuts and 11.8 Million Losing Care, C.B.O. Says
Republicans' marquee domestic policy bill that is making its way through the Senate would result in deeper cuts and more Americans losing health insurance coverage than the original measure that passed the House last month, according to new estimates from the Congressional Budget Office. According to a report published late Saturday night, the legislation would mean 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034. Federal spending on Medicaid, Medicare and Obamacare would be reduced by more than $1.1 trillion over that period — with more than $1 trillion of those cuts coming from Medicaid alone. The fresh estimates make official what many analysts had already predicted and some Republican lawmakers had feared. The size and scope of the health care cuts in the bill, particularly from Medicaid, have been hotly debated, with fiscal hawks pressing for bigger reductions and other Republicans resisting them as they consider the impact on their constituents and health providers in their districts and states. They are also at odds with President Trump's vow not to touch Medicaid except to do away with waste and fraud. The scale of the proposed reductions in Medicaid is unprecedented in the history of the program, which has tended to expand coverage over time since its creation in 1965. The cuts in the bill are achieved through numerous provisions, but the bulk of the Medicaid savings come from two big features. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
US supreme court ruling sets stage for more politicized science under RFK Jr
A US supreme court decision affirming the constitutionality of Obamacare sets the stage for more politicized science in the future, health law experts said about the court's decision. The court's majority opinion in Kennedy v Braidwood Management found that an expert panel – the preventive services taskforce – convened under the Affordable Care Act is under the direct oversight of the health secretary. 'This is your classic good news, bad news,' said Lawrence Gostin, a professor of global health law at Georgetown Law. 'In a sane world, with a secretary of health that believes in science and doesn't bring in conspiracy theories and agendas, you would applaud this decision.' With health policy now in the hands of the Trump administration, 'it gives Secretary [Robert F Kennedy Jr] complete power about what to recommend and what not to recommend,' Gostin said. The court issued the opinion only hours after an expert vaccine advisory panel (ACIP) handpicked by Kennedy subverted the scientific consensus by recommending against vaccines containing thimerosal, a preservative overwhelmingly considered safe. Thimerosal has been a subject of misinformation and anti-vaccine advocacy for decades. Much like the expert panel in question in the Braidwood case, the recommendations of the vaccine advisory committee are a key link in the treatment distribution pipeline. Recommendations from both panels are typically affirmed by the leadership of the health department, and then become the basis on which insurers base coverage decisions. In the case of the ACIP, those recommendations typically concern vaccines. In the preventive taskforce context, they include a wide range of treatments – from statins to cancer screenings to HIV prevention. It was widely recognized that Kennedy had the authority to hire and fire people for the vaccine panel – but legal controversy existed about whether health secretaries have the same power over the preventive services taskforce. 'The president and the Senate are accountable 'for both the making of a bad appointment and the rejection of a good one',' wrote Justice Brett Kavanaugh for the six-vote majority. In other words, the court said, if you don't like it, go to the ballot box. MaryBeth Musumeci, an associate professor of health law management at the George Washington University Milken Institute of Public Health, told the Guardian: 'We have that structure in place – and that is a really great structure if the folks in charge are actually deferring to the experts and the science and what the evidence says.' She added: 'To the extent that we are going to make decisions based on bad science – that has really serious public health implications.' The panel at the center of the vaccine decision is the ACIP vaccine panel. Until June, the advisory panel was made up of 17 experts vetted by CDC career scientists. Their recommendations, while not binding, were almost always approved by CDC leadership. Kennedy fired all 17 members unilaterally in June and stocked the panel with eight ideological allies – including vaccine skeptics and medical professionals with little experience in vaccines. One panelist withdrew after a government financial review, and after it was widely publicized that the secretary's claims about the panelist's affiliation with two universities was false. Wayne Turner, a senior attorney for the National Health Law Program, which advocates for the medically underserved, said that he and others were 'certainly breathing a sigh of relief with the court's decision today' because a key provision of Obamacare was found to be constitutional. 'But that sigh of relief is really short-lived,' Turner said. 'We have long anticipated with the appointment of RFK Jr, and certainly with his actions with the ACIP, that we can fully expect the preventive services taskforce to be the next battleground in the ideological war this administration seems to be waging. And the war is against science.' The subject of the Braidwood case provides a salient example. Plaintiffs were suing the government to claim that the taskforce was wrongly appointed. Although their legal argument was thorny, one treatment they specifically cited as wrong was insurance coverage of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), an HIV prevention drug. Although the plaintiffs' claim that the taskforce was unconstitutional was swatted down, it provides activists with a roadmap to get what they want – if they can convince Kennedy to appoint more ideological allies to the taskforce. The preventive services taskforce may have one protective mechanism: a requirement that they be guided by evidence written into Obamacare, the legislation that impaneled them. Gearing up for another fight, Turner said: 'That's going to be an important thing for us to point to in the weeks and months ahead, and years, quite frankly.'
