
‘Still fresh in minds': Vietnamese community marks 50 years since fall of Saigon
EDMONTON – Seventy-year-old Tan Hoang vowed he would never return to Vietnam after fleeing the country with his family on a makeshift wooden boat.
Officers in Vietnam remind him of the communist soldiers who once stormed and captured Saigon, the former South Vietnam capital now called Ho Chi Minh City.
The fall of Saigon 50 years ago — on April 30, 1975 — marked the end of the two-decade-long Vietnam War.
North Vietnamese and Viet Cong guerrilla troops captured the city to unify the country under a single communist regime, modelled after those of the Soviet Union and China. The Communist Party of Vietnam still rules the country.
'I miss my country too much, (but) I'm scared,' Hoang said at his pho restaurant in Edmonton's Chinatown.
'I don't want to see something like that.'
Hoang's family is part of the large exodus of people from Vietnam after the fall of Saigon, referred to as the 'boat people.'
Canada welcomed about 200,000 refugees fleeing Vietnam, as well as Cambodia and Laos, between 1975 and the 1990s.
Hoang said he plans to gather Wednesday with Vietnamese Canadians at a community centre for a sombre event marking the anniversary.
Hoang, who some affectionately call 'Mustache Man' because of the curled hair above his lips, says they will be sharing their stories from 50 years ago.
He was 20 when the chaos erupted.
'I was scared, of course,' recalled Hoang.
But he couldn't hold back his curiosity. He rode around Saigon on his Honda motorcycle from the morning until the afternoon.
He saw soldiers shooting at people, arresting others, he said.
At Saigon's harbour, he saw hundreds fleeing on a large ship. Many fell to their deaths in the sea as they tried to climb on the moving vessel.
He saw a group blow themselves up with a grenade.
Looters were everywhere.
In the days that followed, he said life under the communist regime became more difficult. The government rationed food and extreme starvation was common.
Hoang fled Saigon a decade later with his wife and newborn son. He secretly built a boat on a river with his brother and other relatives. They bribed communist soldiers to look the other way.
The family's four-night journey on the water was rough. They crossed paths with a tornado but eventually made it to Indonesia.
They lived in a refugee camp there for a year before immigrating to Edmonton.
In 1995, Hoang opened his restaurant, King Noodle House, where a photo of that handmade boat hangs on the wall.
Nhung Tran-Davies, a doctor in Calmar, Alta., fled Vietnam to Malaysia in 1978 with her mother and five older siblings on a boat. She thinks her father died in the war.
Eight months later, an Edmonton church sponsored the family.
After the fall of Saigon, she said starvation in Vietnam became unbearable.
'My mother was raped by soldiers,' she said.
'People (were) being robbed and killed for a bag of rice. My older brothers and sisters often had to forgo eating so that the little ones could eat.'
Her mother found others who were planning to escape on a boat and took the family with them.
Tran-Davies was four and said she doesn't remember much about the journey, other than feeling nauseous and smelling vomit everywhere on the boat.
'For some people, it's still fresh in their minds,' said Linh Vu, also a 'boat person,' who runs a Vietnamese street food restaurant in Edmonton with her mother.
'It changed a lot of lives.'
Vu was a toddler when her mother carried her on her shoulders to Saigon from a northern town a few days before the city was captured. Vu's mother wanted to be closer to her parents in Saigon, as communist soldiers had warned they were coming.
The 300-kilometre hike, she said, would be the same as walking from Edmonton to Calgary.
When they arrived at her grandparents' house, they were so dirty her grandfather didn't recognize them, Vu said.
It took four years, but her grandfather built a wooden boat for the family to flee.
While at sea, a British cargo ship found them and took them to a refugee camp in Singapore.
During Elections
Get campaign news, insight, analysis and commentary delivered to your inbox during Canada's 2025 election.
They arrived in Edmonton about three months later and, years after that, opened Mai Mai Viet Street Kitchen.
Vu said her grandfather died in 2019, having never returned to Vietnam because he, too, believed he had lost his homeland to communists.
Vu and Nhung Tran-Davies said they will be marking the anniversary by talking to their relatives about the day.
'I'd like to remind my kids where they come from, and what grandma had gone through to bring her children to find freedom,' said Nhung Tran-Davies.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 30, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Globe and Mail
4 days ago
- Globe and Mail
Is the U.S. still a ‘safe' country for refugees?
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, tens of thousands of American citizens sought, and gained, refuge in Canada. They weren't technically refugees – most applied for landed immigrant status – but what they were seeking was, in effect, a safe place to avoid the draft during the Vietnam War. The official policy of Canada's 'Department of Manpower and Immigration' was not to ask about applicants' military status; these were mostly young, educated, middle-upper-class men, after all – making them precisely the type of 'desirable' immigrant seen to offer benefits to Canada. There hasn't been anything close to that major influx of American 'refugees' to Canada since then, of course, but individuals from the U.S. never stopped trying. There was a small wave when George W. Bush's invasion of Iraq sent U.S. Army deserters such as Jeremy Hinzman fleeing to Canada. Since 2013, there have been 3,142 claims filed by asylum-seekers alleging persecution in the U.S., according to the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, including 102 filed in the first three months of 2025 alone (by comparison, 118 were filed in all of 2022). There was a significant spike in applications after Donald Trump was inaugurated for the first time, both from American asylum-seekers alleging persecution in the U.S. (869 in 2017) and from foreign nationals seeking refugee protection in Canada by way of the U.S. We can likely expect the same jump in applications now. Canada is now trying to make the process a little bit harder. This week, the Liberals tabled an omnibus bill that, among many other things, would render ineligible for asylum those who have been in Canada for more than a year (which addresses the spike in applications from international students who filed refugee claims after the government changed student visa rules in 2024), and would prohibit those who entered Canada via an irregular border crossing to file for refugee protection after 14 days. These are necessary changes that may help to bring Canada's current four-year-backlog for refugee hearings down to manageable levels. But some people will still try. Ottawa's proposed immigration reforms will restrict asylum seekers access to hearings Opinion: The tightening of Canada's asylum laws was an inevitability There are two types of would-be U.S. refugees. The first are American citizens like the draft dodgers of the 1960s and 1970s, the war resisters of the early aughts, and the anti-Trumpists of 2017 onward. Earlier this week, The Globe and Mail reported the story of Hannah Kreager, a trans woman from Arizona, who is seeking asylum in Canada because of alleged gender-identity-based persecution in the U.S; in March, CBC News reported that a family from Illinois had made a similar claim. These individuals cite Mr. Trump's edict on the U.S. government's official recognition of only two genders, among others, as evidence of the harms they face, but they will likely have a tough time proving their persecution rises to the level of 'serious harm,' particularly when there are regions of the United States that are far more inclusive to trans individuals than others. The other type of refugees from the U.S. are foreign nationals seeking asylum in Canada. They might have a much better shot at staying in the country if they challenge the legitimacy of the Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA). The Supreme Court of Canada already heard a case challenging the STCA on constitutional grounds in 2023, and it essentially declared that the process of sending refugees back to the U.S., which is based on the requirement that they apply for asylum in the first safe country they arrive in, does not breach the right to life, liberty and security of the person under section 7 of the Charter. The SCC wrote that any violations because of deportation would have to be a 'foreseeable consequence of Canada's actions' and that even though returnees face a risk of detention, there are 'mechanisms that create opportunities for release and provide for review by administrative decision makers and courts.' 'In my view,' Justice Nicholas Kasirer said, writing for the court, 'the record does not support the conclusion that the American detention regime is fundamentally unfair.' But now, those without legal status in the U.S. are being picked up off the streets, thrown into detention centres and, in many cases, deported to third countries without a hearing. The Trump administration is doing that in defiance of court orders, as in the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, and resisting even the U.S. Supreme Court, which said that the government must "facilitate" the return of those deported in error. This matters for Canada because of the principle of non-refoulement under international law, which holds that refugees should not forcibly be returned to countries where they are likely to face cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. It used to be hard to argue that migrants sent back under the STCA would face that, but the case seems much easier to make now. Canada should prepare for another challenge to the STCA – and possibly, a different result.


CBC
31-05-2025
- CBC
One man's harrowing journey from Vietnam to Saskatoon after the fall of Saigon
True freedom Fifty years after the fall of Saigon, Dong Van Tran is grateful for the life he has in Canada. His journey here wasn't Graphics Jeffery Tram May 31, 2025 Dong Van Tran opens Facebook Messenger on his phone every morning. It's the only way he can speak to his family in Vietnam. He hasn't seen his mother since 2011, his only visit since he fled Vietnam on a boat nearly three decades ago. He tried to visit his homeland in 2013, but Vietnamese authorities turned him away at the airport because of his family's history. It was the final confirmation of what he'd long suspected: he would never be allowed back. Tran was born in 1964 in Quảng Ngãi, a city in central Vietnam. At the time, the Vietnam War was well underway. The country was divided. Communism ruled the north, while the south followed a capitalist model. That divide had been formalized by the 1954 Geneva Accords, after the end of French colonialism and the First Indochina War. Although the war officially ended on April 30, 1975, with the fall of Saigon and the reunification of the country under communist control, it was another night, about a month before, that Tran remembers most vividly. Fifty years after the fall of Saigon, Dong Van Tran is grateful for the life he has in Canada. His journey to Saskatoon wasn't easy. This year marks the 50th anniversary of the end of the war. All over Vietnam, people marked the reunification of a country after years of bloodshed and foreign occupation, and celebrated a country that has now become a rising economic power in southeast Asia. Memories of Vietnam, 50 years after the war With a median age of 33, according to the World Factbook, many Vietnamese people weren't yet born when the war was going on. But the refugees who fled the nation and are now settled in countries like Canada, the United States, Australia and France — especially those who fled the south — still carry the trauma and memories of what was lost. The fall Tran was 11 years old when his family decided to flee their home as communist forces descended upon their hometown on March 24, 1975. The family was split. Tran and his three siblings, all under 17 years of age, crammed onto a Honda 68 motorbike. The plan was to get to the shorelines of Quảng Nam, get on a boat and escape to the southern city of Saigon. The route took them directly into crossfire between the two sides. 'We had to lie down in the grass,' Tran said. 'South Vietnamese soldiers told us, 'Don't move.' We were hidden there.' Time crept by, with Tran anxious about the fate of his siblings. 'I crawled out of the ditch and called my brother. 'Brother Hai, Brother Hai.' I felt relieved when he replied, 'Dong, where are you?'' As the fighting eased, he and his siblings tried to continue their escape, but a soldier stole their motorbike, forcing them to flee on foot alongside other people. Tran said the images of that night have stayed with him ever since. 'I saw skulls, bodies, blood still dripping,' he said. 'Some people were hanging from a truck. Civilians, too. Many people died.' By dawn, communist forces had taken control of the region and forced everyone back to their towns. Saigon fell just over a month later. No future The end of the war marked a new beginning for Vietnam, but it brought hardship for Tran's family. His father had worked as a police chief under the South Vietnamese government and had ties to the CIA-backed Phoenix Program. Tran was 12 years old when he and his family were targeted through the government's 'New Economic Zones' program, where people with connections to the old South Vietnamese government were sent to live in the jungle after the communist regime took over their homes. 'I couldn't study,' Tran said. 'One teacher in Grade 11 told the whole class my dad killed his father. He tried to kill me.' Tran moved to live with his uncle in the city of Dalat to complete his education, but the difficulties continued. When he looked for employment, he was turned away every time. Under the new government, he was required to show paperwork identifying him and his family. Over the years, Tran was forced to work numerous illegal jobs due to his father's ties. At one point, Tran was caught and was sent to a prison camp in the mountains, where he nearly died of malaria. Tran was able to escape when he was sent to a clinic to treat malaria. That's when he realized he had no future in Vietnam. He had to escape. Losing hope Tran made his way to the coastal city of Vũng Tàu, hoping to escape by boat. He had worked as a fisherman and knew he could captain a boat. In August 1989, at age 25, he visited his family for one last time, then boarded a boat with 65 others. What followed was a harrowing 20-day journey at sea. 'For 11 days, no food, no water,' Tran said. 'Two young men fell into the sea and died during a storm. Two children died of thirst.' Eventually, a Singaporean ship rescued the group near an oil station off the coast of the Philippines. Tran was taken to the Philippines First Asylum Camp in El Nido on Palawan island, where he applied for resettlement through the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. His claim — like thousands of others — was denied. Tran remained on Palawan Island until 1996, when the UNHCR closed its camps. He moved to Manila and took on various jobs to survive. Tran and the remaining Vietnamese refugees built a community in the Philippines, but as years passed, his dreams of moving to the west were dwindling. 'We were losing hope,' Tran said. His chance finally came in 2008, when Canada launched the 'Freedom At Last' program to resettle the last 250 stateless Vietnamese refugees who had been stranded in the Philippines since the 1970s. Tran said he'll never forget the moment he arrived in Canada. 'When I put my foot down in Vancouver, I felt true freedom,' he said. He eventually settled in Saskatoon, where the small Vietnamese community welcomed him with open arms. 'About 20 people came to the airport,' he recalls. 'One of them was someone I knew from the refugee camp. She had already prepared dinner.' Strong connections Despite his difficult journey, Tran remains proud of his heritage. 'I always say that Vietnam is my first country, Philippines is my second country, and Canada is my third country.' Since arriving, Tran has worked extensively within his community. He served as president of the Vietnamese-Canadian Federation, the same organization that helped bring him to Canada, as well as locally with the Saskatoon Vietnamese Association. Vietnamese community in Alberta marks 50 years since fall of Saigon Tran said he wants to rejuvenate Vietnamese heritage for those without direct history or a strong connection to the motherland. As the Vietnamese community in Saskatchewan continues to grow, Tran hopes younger generations will continue to honour their heritage, remember the difficult journeys that brought their families here and live with gratitude for the privileges they have in their adopted nation. 'I am so happy to now be in a free country.' About the Author Footer Links My Account Profile CBC Gem Newsletters Connect with CBC Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram Mobile RSS Podcasts Contact CBC Submit Feedback Help Centre Audience Relations, CBC P.O. Box 500 Station A Toronto, ON Canada, M5W 1E6 Toll-free (Canada only): 1-866-306-4636 TTY/Teletype writer: 1-866-220-6045 About CBC Corporate Info Sitemap Reuse & Permission Terms of Use Privacy Jobs Our Unions Independent Producers Political Ads Registry AdChoices Services Ombudsman Public Appearances Commercial Services CBC Shop Doing Business with Us Renting Facilities Accessibility It is a priority for CBC to create a website that is accessible to all Canadians including people with visual, hearing, motor and cognitive challenges. Closed Captioning and Described Video is available for many CBC shows offered on CBC Gem. About CBC Accessibility Accessibility Feedback © 2025 CBC/Radio-Canada. All rights reserved. Visitez


Winnipeg Free Press
27-05-2025
- Winnipeg Free Press
Supreme Court rejects appeal of Massachusetts student who wanted to wear ‘only two genders' T-shirt
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected the appeal of a Massachusetts student who was barred from wearing a T-shirt to school proclaiming there are only two genders. The justices left in place a federal appeals court ruling that said it would not second-guess the decision of educators in Middleborough, Massachusetts, to not allow the T-shirt to be worn in a school environment because of a negative impact on transgender and gender-nonconforming students. Educators at the John T. Nichols Middle School barred the student from wearing the T-shirt and an altered version with the words 'two genders' covered up by tape with the word 'censored' written on it. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented. The court should have heard the case, Alito wrote, noting that 'the school permitted and indeed encouraged student expression endorsing the view that there are many genders,' but censored an opposing view. 'This case presents an issue of great importance for our Nation's youth: whether public schools may suppress student speech either because it expresses a viewpoint that the school disfavors or because of vague concerns about the likely effect of the speech on the school atmosphere or on students who find the speech offensive,' Alito wrote. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said it was reasonable to predict that the T-shirt will 'poison the educational atmosphere' and disrupt the learning environment. The school district's decision was in line with a landmark Supreme Court ruling from 1969, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, that upheld the right of public school students to wear black armbands to protest the Vietnam War when it did not create a substantial disruption to education.