
Consumers Prefer American-Made, But Aren't Willing to Pay
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
A recent survey shows that Americans are widely in favor of purchasing products "made in America," but are less willing to stomach the cost increases that may come as a result.
According to the poll conducted by IT firm Integris, 75 percent of U.S. consumers have a preference for U.S.-made goods, a rate that has been boosted thanks to the temporary disruptions in supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, 62 percent said that other factors, including quality and price, are more important in dictating their purchasing decisions.
Why It Matters
Reshoring American manufacturing and increasing the competitiveness of domestic industries has been a central element of President Donald Trump's economic agenda, and forms one of the rationales behind his sweeping tariff plans. The administration has maintained that the import taxes will prove an incentive for businesses to relocated their production lines to the U.S., and for American consumers to opt for domestically made products.
However, given labor costs, outmoded infrastructure, and the reliance of even domestic manufacturers on imported goods, experts have said that the U.S. will ultimately fall short of achieving this dream.
A General Electric washing machine with a label advertising it was made in America is displayed in retail stores in Cranberry Township, Pa.
A General Electric washing machine with a label advertising it was made in America is displayed in retail stores in Cranberry Township, Pa.
Keith Srakocic/AP Photo
What To Know
Integris gathered responses from 700 American consumers in its survey. While three quarters said they would either strongly prefer (36 percent) or somewhat prefer (39 percent) U.S.-made goods, a quarter said they would not pay more for American-made, and 92 percent said they would only be comfortable with a premium of 10 percent or less.
This mimics the results of other experiments which tested the appetite of consumers for American-made goods, especially if these come at significantly higher prices.
In April, when the 145 percent tariffs on Chinese imports were still in place, entrepreneur Ramon van Meer sold two identical showerheads on the website Afina.com. One of these was manufactured in China with a price tag of $129, while the other came from a U.S. supplier and was priced at $239. Van Meer said the price differential correlated with the costs of relying on a domestic supplier, and the experiment found that none of the over 3,500 customers who purchased the showerhead opted for the American-made version.
What People Are Saying
Gary Gereffi, professor of Sociology and Director of the Global Value Chains Center at Duke University, questioned the feasibility of totally reshoring American manufacturing, and the use of tariffs to accomplish this, telling Newsweek: "I have worked for many years on global supply chains (aka global value chains), and the bottom line is that virtually all products today rely on inputs from cross-border supply chains."
"A few years ago, Adidas and Nike both tried to reshore the production of certain (simple) models of athletic footwear, and they failed," he added. "Adidas had to rely on an automaker in Germany to make shoe components, and within a couple of years closed its factory. Nike did the same with a Mexican factory attempting to make shoes for the U.S. market."
Abe Eshkenazi, CEO of the Association for Supply Chain Management, recently told Newsweek that it would be extremely challenging to bring manufacturing back, in particular for industries such as apparel and textiles due to labor costs and the reluctance of the U.S. workforce to accept these jobs.
"We will have those individuals, but the labor is just not there right now," he said. "The domestic supplier ecosystem, transportation, rail warehousing, talent development, all need to be developed. The infrastructure just isn't there in the short term."
White House adviser Stephen Miller, following Trump's remark that tariffs could mean children getting "two dolls instead of 30 dolls" as a result of the tariff-related price increases, said: "If [consumers] had a choice...between a doll from China that might have, say, lead paint in it, that is not as well constructed as a doll made in America that has a higher environmental and regulatory standard, and that is made to a higher degree of quality, and those two products are both on Amazon, that, yes, you probably would be willing to pay more for a better-made American product."
What Happens Next
Tariffs on Chinese imports are currently at 30 percent, thanks to the 90-day pause agreed between the two countries in May, which also saw China reduce the rate for U.S. goods to 10 percent. Trump's reciprocal tariffs, meanwhile, have been brought down to a baseline 10-percent for 90 days as of April 9.
On Friday, Trump said that he planned to double tariffs on steel imports to 50 percent, after announcing a "blockbuster" partnership between U.S. Steel and Japan's Nippon Steel. The president said that the move would "even further secure the steel industry in the United States. Nobody's going to get around that."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business of Fashion
9 minutes ago
- Business of Fashion
Surprise! Why Apparel Prices Are Actually Falling
A little over a month into President Donald Trump's new tariff regime, the verdict is in: Clothes are getting cheaper. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics on Wednesday reported that apparel prices fell 0.4 percent between April and May, and were down 0.9 percent from a year prior. Inflation overall was estimated at 2.4 percent, in line with expectations. The data likely reflects pain delayed rather than avoided. Many retailers stocked up before Trump announced a 10 percent tariff on all imports, as well as an additional 30 percent levy on Chinese goods. Inflation figures also don't account for hikes that were announced but have yet to kick in. E.l.f. Cosmetics, LVMH, Nike and many others have said they plan to raise prices this summer. But the downward trend speaks to another truth about fashion's approach to pricing: The tariffs came at a time when brands were already working overtime to convince reluctant shoppers to keep spending. Rather than pass along costs, many companies' instinct is to explore every other option first. Urban Outfitters, Gap and Abercrombie & Fitch fall in that camp, saying they'll hold off on increasing prices even as they warn of shrinking margins. And for brands that engaged in years of post-pandemic price hikes, discounting even in the face of tariffs is still the best way to win back customers. Many luxury labels fall in this category, though plenty of mass-market brands are more expensive than they used to be, too. 'Retailers don't want to scare consumers or the market and suggest they're [raising] prices,' said Sonia Lapinsky, partner at retail consultancy Alix Partners. 'They're refraining as much as possible, they're not talking as much as possible.' Fashion's Falling Prices Apparel prices fell month on month between April and May, and nearly 1 percent in May year on year. The rate of price increases began slowing in 2023, and then declining early this year. This doesn't account for the full impact of tariffs on retailers' margins, which won't be realised until late summer or fall. That is when prices could get 'wildly volatile,' because of brands' individual approaches to pricing in the face of rising costs, said Michael Prendergast, managing director of Alvarez & Marsal Consumer and Retail Group. Some brands will look at this moment as a time to sacrifice margin to gain market share. With expanded margins, thanks to years of rising prices, many retailers are well positioned to absorb the impact. For now brands are doing everything in their power to keep people shopping and drive traffic, said Lapinsky, including upping discounting throughout April and May. Beyond categories like footwear that are highly susceptible to tariffs, brands will get specific about where they raise prices — fashion items may have elasticity, but shoppers would see a more obvious change in basic pieces, for example. Likely, after years of experimenting, brands have learned where their limits are. Planning for the rest of the year is filled with extra risk. Raise prices too much, and kill demand; plan for lower demand and potentially end up with empty shelves. That conundrum will likely come to a head for retailers during back-to-school shopping season. 'We're likely going to have an inventory issue on one end or the other,' said Lapinsky. 'Either we've got inventory in the stores that had to be priced at a point that they can't clear, or retailers may have pulled back and just don't have what customers are looking for.' Mood-Swing Shopping As they make inventory and pricing decisions for the rest of the year, retailers are watching consumer sentiment closely to try to determine whether they'll have the appetite to spend — and to what degree. 'You have to be cautious of exactly what inventory you're taking in, given consumer sentiment and how much they're shopping,' said Jessica Ramírez, co-founder of research firm The Consumer Collective. 'If you're just churning inventory that isn't a priority on your consumers' list, you're not going to do very well.' After falling to its lowest point in years, consumer sentiment got a slight boost in May. Part of that may be thanks to a comparative settling of the news cycle from April, when Trump first announced, and then temporarily paused, levies. But even just the feeling of rising prices and uncertainty can put a damper on shoppers' moods. Plus, more generally, price inflation in other categories will have an impact on consumer appetite to spend on apparel. 'Food and gas prices affect discretionary income,' said Prendergast. 'Gas prices are coming down, that's the good news. The not great news is food continues to rise — that pinches the wallet.' Trouble is Brewing Elsewhere The picture of softened demand is clearer in China, the second biggest fashion market after the US. Earlier this month, China reported consumer prices overall — not just apparel — fell for a fourth consecutive month in May, raising concerns that deflation is here to stay. Meanwhile, wage shrinkage and property value slumps continue. It's already having an impact on fashion, reported Reuters: Amid raging price wars, stores are putting merchandise on steep discount — $30 for a Coach handbag at Super Zhuanzhuan, for example. US-based apparel companies operating in China will face more uncertainty in an already challenged market. Trouble abroad could even be felt back home. 'The more that's happening in the macro, the more concerned the consumer in America is going to be,' said Lapinsky. 'We don't see any end to that in the next few months.' Though, starting in March, China began ramping up fiscal stimulus. And much remains to be seen about how the Chinese consumer will react, said Ramírez. Fashion is still in a wait-and-see phase when it comes to price hikes and planning, but the moment of truth could be getting closer. 'Overall retailers are underplaying the effect of what tariffs and inflation are going to do to their sales and EBITDA,' said Prendergast. 'We're advising clients, take the next two years of your revenue and margin plans down, like, take them down and again, use this opportunity to cut costs internally.'


Forbes
10 minutes ago
- Forbes
Japan's Largest Companies 2025: Rare Interest Rate Hikes Lead To A Volatile Year
Toyota and other Japanese automakers have been hampered by Trump's tariffs. Getty Images Japan's stock market has been on a roller-coaster ride over the past 12 months. Its benchmark Nikkei index reached an all-time high in July 2024, driven by corporate governance reforms and robust company earnings, then crashed more than 25% in less than four weeks on a surprise interest rate hike by the Bank of Japan. Though the index rebounded shortly after, its gains were trimmed in early 2025 as U.S. President Donald Trump ignited his trade war. Japan has 180 companies on this year's Forbes Global 2000 ranking of the world's largest public corporations, down slightly from 182 in 2024, making it the third most-represented country after the U.S. and China. The list weighs market value, revenue, profit and assets equally, using the latest 12 months of data as of April 25. Toyota Motor, the highest-ranking Japanese company, is in a sector particularly hard hit by Trump's sweeping tariffs. The U.S. in early April imposed a 25% tax on foreign-made cars, followed in early May by the same levy on auto parts, a blow to Japan's mainstay industry and its export-led economy. The world's top-selling carmaker slipped three places to No. 14 after its stock tumbled 22% over the year. Though its revenues and profits in the year through December were roughly flat at $309 billion and $34 billion, respectively, Toyota warned that the tariffs would result in a $1.3 billion hit to operating profit in April and May. Some of Toyota Motor's peers suffered even steeper declines. Nissan Motor, long plagued by deteriorating financials, sank 366 spots to No. 707 after its profit in the 12 months through December plunged 76% to $702.6 million. After the cut-off date for the list, the automaker posted a $4.7 billion loss for the three months ended March. Nissan is struggling to restructure after merger talks with larger rival Honda Motor collapsed in February. The failed tie-up, together with the tariffs, relegated Honda to No. 117 from No. 91 as its stock fell 17% over the year. Mitsubishi Motors, whose biggest shareholder is Nissan, tumbled 379 places to No. 1,562 as its shares skidded almost 10%. Companies in the AI space were a bright spot. Billionaire Masayoshi Son's SoftBank investment powerhouse climbed 331 spots to No. 130 on a 425% surge in 12-month profit through December to $5.6 billion, driven partly by increases in the value of portfolio companies such as ByteDance, the Chinese parent of TikTok. SoftBank is ramping up its AI bet, with plans to invest up to $30 billion in U.S.-based ChatGPT maker OpenAI while also investing $100 billion to build AI infrastructure stateside as part of its Stargate Project joint venture with OpenAI and Oracle. The AI boom also lifted Advantest, the world's largest semiconductor testing equipment maker by market share and a supplier to AI-chip giant Nvidia. It scaled 509 places to No. 1,231 as its profit in the year through March more than doubled to $1.1 billion on a 52% surge in sales to $5.1 billion. Other notable climbers included companies in the defense industry. IHI Corp, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) and Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) were among the best performers on the Nikkei over the year as Japan ramped up military spending. IHI, an engineering company that makes everything from turbines for power plants to rocket systems for space travel, debuted on the Global 2000 at No. 1,349 after its stock skyrocketed 176%. A more than doubling in MHI stock elevated the company 75 spots to No. 372 while KHI vaulted 513 places to No. 1,331 on a 52% share increase.


Bloomberg
10 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner Crashes Shortly After Takeoff
Good morning. A Boeing airplane crashes in India. Donald Trump's getting ready to lay out his latest tariffs. And space proves it's not the final frontier when it comes to cost cuts. Listen to the day's top stories. A Boeing 787 Dreamliner operated by Air India bound for London from Ahmedabad crashed shortly after takeoff and exploded into a huge fireball, in what's set to be the worst accident involving the US planemaker's most advanced widebody airliner. The flight was carrying 242 passengers and crew. Boeing shares slumped premarket as the crash highlighted other accidents involving its planes.