Proposed bill would require P.E.I. school boards to report sexual misconduct complaints
P.E.I.'s Green Party has introduced legislation that would require school boards on the Island to report complaints of sexual misconduct to the province's Education and Early Years Department.
If the bill passes, both the Public Schools Branch and the French-language school board would have to provide the number of allegations to the education minister on an annual basis. The reports would not have to include the identifying information of anyone involved in the complaint.
Karla Bernard, the Greens' interim leader, tabled the bill for first reading Tuesday after using her time during question period to ask the governing Progressive Conservatives if they'd support it.
"[I] can't change what was done in the past, but we can move forward," P.E.I. Education Minister Robin Croucher said in response. "Absolutely, I think we can support your bill."
The Greens introduced a similar amendment five years ago in light of the case of Roger Jabbour, the former band teacher at Colonel Gray High School who had been convicted in 2018 of sexually touching three female students.
In 2020, Bernard put forward a proposed amendment to the province's Education Act that would require school boards to report annually on the number of sexual misconduct complaints.
At the province's insistence, that amendment was turned into an order to be brought forward by then-education minister Brad Trivers, but that never happened.
On Tuesday, Bernard said her party was able to put together a similar amendment in the wake of the case of former substitute teacher Matthew Alan Craswell.
Craswell, 40, pleaded guilty on April 29 to sexual interference in a case involving an elementary student at Stratford's Glen Stewart Primary School in the spring of 2024.
He was first arrested last summer on an unrelated charge of possession and distribution of child pornography, and RCMP learned of the Glen Stewart incident during their investigation.
It was later revealed that another complaint of sexual touching had been made about Craswell's actions while he was teaching at Charlottetown's West Kent Elementary in 2023.
In neither of the primary school complaints were police or Child Protective Services contacted, because school officials deemed Craswell's actions to be non-sexually motivated.
The province has ordered a third-party review of the PSB's handling of the case that will be conducted by former P.E.I. chief justice David Jenkins.
'Leave school officials out of it'
Bernard said Tuesday that while her bill wouldn't have prevented the Craswell incidents, it would be an important step in holding school officials accountable.
"It's the very start of a centralized reporting mechanism, which is exactly what was identified as something that's been missing in P.E.I.," she said. "If there's been a complaint with a specific person named, they'll be able to see if there's been more than one… [and] if there's any trends that's happening."
WATCH | Questions raised around 2020 pledge to provide transparency around misconduct complaints in schools:
Questions raised around 2020 pledge to provide transparency around misconduct complaints in schools
4 days ago
Duration 2:28
Back in 2020, after a P.E.I. high school band teacher was convicted of sexually touching three female students, the PEI government said it would start requiring school boards to report annually on the number of sexual misconduct complaints. A directive requiring that was drafted but never put in place. Interim Green Leader Karla Bernard (shown) wants to know why. CBC's Kerry Campbell reports.
The bill will be called for a second reading on Wednesday after the Official Opposition Liberals gave Bernard some of their time in the legislature to introduce it on Tuesday.
Premier Rob Lantz also indicated that he would likely support the amendment.
Bernard also urged the government to create an independent body to review annual reports submitted by the school agencies, something that experts have said is a best practice.
"In a lot of cases, it seems we're asking [school administrators] to be investigators, and that's just not their skill set. They're not trained to do that, nor is it a part of their job," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
40 minutes ago
- CTV News
Mother, toddler drown in Lachine swimming pool
A 34-year-old woman and her three-year-old son are dead after drowning in a residential swimming pool in Montreal's Lachine borough. (Cosmo Santamaria/CTV News) A 34-year-old woman and her three-year-old son are dead after drowning in a residential swimming pool in Montreal's Lachine borough Tuesday night. First responders received a 911 call at 9:35 p.m. about the incident on 20e Avenue near Provost Street. 'They located two unresponsive persons,' said Caroline Chèvrefils, a spokesperson with Montreal police. 'Paramedics performed CPR on both the victims, but unfortunately, they were pronounced dead at the scene.' She adds that investigators determined that there was 'no criminal element' in the incident. 'It was an accident,' Chèvrefils affirmed. The file has been transferred to the coroner's office.
National Post
41 minutes ago
- National Post
Canadians reject that they live on 'stolen' Indigenous land, although new poll reveals a generational divide
A majority of Canadians reject the idea they live on stolen Indigenous land, and the older people are, the more likely they are to say they don't, according to a new public opinion poll. Article content Among all respondents across Canada, 52 per cent said they did not live on stolen Indigenous land, with 27 per cent saying they do. The remaining 21 per cent said they didn't know or declined to answer. Article content Article content Article content Notably, there was a significant generational divide among those who answered the national opinion survey, conducted by Leger Marketing for the Association for Canadian Studies and provided to Postmedia. Article content Article content More respondents in the youngest cohort, 18-to-24-year-olds, agreed they did live on stolen Indigenous land (41 per cent) than rejected the idea (37 per cent). That contrasts with those in the oldest age group of 65 years or older, who overwhelmingly said they did not live on stolen land (65 per cent) with only 15 per cent agreeing they did. Article content In between them, the remaining age groups were on an unbroken sliding scale in their answers: the older they were the more likely they were to reject the statement they lived on stolen land, and, conversely, the younger they were the more likely they were to agree that they did. Article content The sentiment rejecting the idea they live on stolen Indigenous land was a low majority regardless of the respondents' region in Canada, except for in Atlantic Canada, where most people still rejected the idea, but at a nationally low rate of 44 per cent, with 29 per cent of Atlantic respondents saying yes, they do live on stolen land. Article content Article content The type of land people live on also impacted their feelings on the issue. Article content Article content Canadians living in rural areas were the least likely to agree they live on stolen Indigenous land, with urban dwellers the most likely to agree. Article content When asked to agree or disagree with the statement 'I live on stolen Indigenous land,' 56 per cent of respondents living in a rural area said they disagree, 24 per cent said they agree, and 20 per cent said they didn't know or didn't answer. For those living in a suburban area, 50 per cent said they disagree, 29 per cent said they agree, and 21 per cent didn't give an answer. For urban dwellers, 46 per cent disagreed, 34 per cent agreed and 20 per cent didn't answer. Article content Those living in Calgary were the most vociferous in rejecting that their land is 'stolen' among the cities named in the polling data. In Calgary, 69 per cent said no, 20 per cent said yes, and 11 per cent didn't answer. Article content That differs sharply from those living in Edmonton, just 300 kilometres away in the same province, where respondents were the most amenable to the idea: 41 per cent said no, 32 per cent said yes, and 27 per cent didn't answer.
National Post
41 minutes ago
- National Post
Opinion: Mixed fleet of fighter jets not the answer for Canada's Air Force
By Alexander Lanoszka, Richard Shimooka and Balkan Devlen Article content The proverbial canary in the mine of U.S.-Canada defence co-operation is grey, flies as fast as Mach 1.6, and has a very low radar signature. Article content Article content Canada has named the F-35 — Lockheed Martin's fifth-generation multipurpose fighter jet — not once, not twice, but thrice as the CF-18s' intended replacement. Alas, the stealth fighter's procurement has come under scrutiny again in view of U.S. President Donald Trump's repeated wish to see Canada become the 51st state. Article content Hence, in his first days on the job, Prime Minister Mark Carney ordered yet another review. However, there was a ray of hope on June 10, when David McGuinty, Carney's new defence minister, issued a statement that made no mention of reviewing the contract. Instead, he said, 'this project will provide Canada with an invaluable air defence capability … well into the future.' Article content Article content Let's hope the government sticks with that plan. Given the history of this procurement, it continues to merit close scrutiny. Article content Politicians and international security analysts from across the political spectrum have supported Carney's temporizing. From their perspective, the U.S. now represents at best an unreliable ally and at worst a territorial menace. Canada would thus be better off acquiring other aircraft made by purportedly more trustworthy European allies. Recognizing that it may be too late to cancel, some propose Canada should acquire a mixed fleet — with either French-made Rafales or Swedish-made Gripens — so as not to rely exclusively on the U.S.-produced aircraft. Article content As Ottawa considers the implications of the June 10 auditor general's report, which found the estimated cost of replacing the F-18s has ballooned to $27.7 billion, it should note that a mixed fleet of fighter jets remains a terrible idea. Much of the costs are exogenous to the F-35 (like rebuilding dilapidated infrastructure), and would be borne by any fighter selected. It further underestimates the complex technologies involved, and takes too optimistic a view of what European defence contractors can provide. Tens of billions of public money could be wasted if Canada chooses a mixed fleet. Article content Article content The idea may sound reasonable. By many attributes — speed, payload, range — the Rafale and Gripen seem comparable to the F-35, thereby making them appear interchangeable. Moreover, diversity in suppliers makes sense to provide resilience over matters related to sovereignty. Article content First, despite overlapping capabilities, these aircraft have become so technologically complex that they have little interchangeability. Each aircraft has its own training program: F-35 pilots and support personnel cannot simply operate Gripens. The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) would have to offer two distinct training pipelines. Considering it already suffers from a severe pilot shortfall, a bifurcated training regime would further strain personnel capacity. Similarly, each aircraft requires its own logistical supply chain. Aircraft inevitably suffer from wear and tear, even in benign conditions, and their components are not interchangeable between fleets.
