Personal injury, trucking lawsuit bills die
AUSTIN (KXAN) — A pair of bills backed by Texans for Lawsuit Reform, aimed at reducing large jury verdicts in personal injury and trucking accident cases, died this legislative session.
Senate Bill 30 — filed with the goal of 'curbing nuclear verdicts' — and Senate Bill 39 were two of Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick's priority bills for this legislative session.
Under SB 30, a jury would have heard if an attorney referred their client — and others over the past two years — to a specific doctor. That provider would have had to submit an affidavit that treatment was reasonable and disclose any agreement guaranteeing they are reimbursed for treatment costs in a settlement. Medical expenses would be reimbursed based off rates paid by Medicare and workers' compensation insurance. Critics said the bill would have required victims to introduce evidence unrelated to their case or care and could have unintentionally made it harder for sexual assault survivors to hold abusers accountable.
Deadly truck crash foreshadows fight between business, safety at Capitol
The bill was amended in the House, but those changes were not approved by the Senate.
'Today, a kind of fraud is occurring in courtrooms across Texas, as personal injury attorneys and collaborative doctors manufacture medical bills and present them to jurors as if they are legitimate,' said TLR President Lee Parsley. 'This unethical activity is increasing insurance premiums for every business operating in Texas. Ultimately, the increased cost of doing business is being paid by every Texan. We are disappointed the legislature did not enact laws necessary to stop this well-documented, barely hidden abuse of our legal system.'
Another bill, SB 39, took aim at commercial vehicle lawsuits. Patrick said the bill was about 'protecting Texas trucking.' Critics said it would have presented new legal hurdles to make it harder for injured victims to introduce evidence about a company's alleged negligence. Debate about the bill occurred at the same time a truck driver was arrested for causing an 18-vehicle pileup on Interstate 35 in north Austin, killing five people and injuring 11 others, according to Austin Police.
Last year, a KXAN investigation first revealed the intention of TLR and a coalition of businesses to back bills this legislative session aimed at lawsuit reforms as a way to stop what it called 'nuclear verdicts' and bring down rising insurance rates.
'For four decades, Texans' legal rights have been under constant assault by corporate lobbyists at the Texas Capitol. This session, lawmakers said 'no more,' rejecting SB 30 and SB 39,' countered consumer advocate Ware Wendell, with the nonpartisan group Texas Watch. 'The bills' backers sought to undermine the Rules of Evidence, putting their thumbs on the scales of justice. Juries deserve to hear the whole truth upfront, and judges deserve to rule on these matters. Our independent judiciary was protected when these bills died.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk didn't have to defeat the swamp, he had to defeat Maga and he failed
Elon Musk's mistake, it seems, was believing Republicans and Donald Trump when they told him they cared about America's debt. Just a week or so ago, when Musk was taking leave of the White House, he had a ceremony in which Trump praised him and his efforts, and gave him a pretty model of a key, saying he could come back any time. But now Musk has broken ranks and broken silence, calling Trump's only significant piece of legislation a sham. Musk's right. It is. But it might be too late to save America's fiscal position. For a hundred and thirty days, Musk and his boys prowled the bureaucracy, looking for fat to trim. They got access to databases and to bank accounts. They found – in their own estimation – hundreds of millions of dollars of, for instance, redundant annual subscriptions for unused software. And they were used as a battering ram and an excuse for many very dubious cuts, some of which will cost lives: cuts to USAID, cuts to disease prevention, cuts to things that cost very little but have such extraordinary externalities in terms of keeping African birth rates manageable by decreasing child mortality that cutting them is the falsest of false economies. But let's take Musk at his word. He wants to cut the budget so the US government can control its debt. Interest rates are rising – returning to historically normal levels. This is murder, it's death, it's failure, to countries like Britain and America who are currently borrowing more than ever before and running unsustainable deficits on top of that borrowing. Debt interest will drown us. Our states will collapse. Everything will cost more than it has ever cost. This is inevitable without a sound fiscal policy. But most Republicans only say they care about that in an election year. They want to increase spending in their districts. They want their favoured groups to get subsidies. They all have squeaky wheels in mind that need the grease. Trump's headline piece of legislation, the Big Beautiful Bill, is guaranteed to jack up American borrowing to end of the world levels. Musk correctly calls the bill a 'disgusting abomination.' He correctly says that those with conscience must 'kill the bill.' He threatened those Republicans in the House of Representatives who voted for the bill with primary challengers; he said they have betrayed their country and there will be consequences. But apart from three all House Republicans voted for the bill. Even a man as rich as Musk can't fund that many primary opponents. There is safety in numbers, particularly if you are exploding the national debt for selfish, short-term reasons of your own popularity. Musk is right. America's national debt is terribly large. He's right that the federal budget is insane and needs radical surgery. He's correct that the trend in American fiscal policy is one of deranged adding to the debt at all times. Correct, too, that democracy dies when the people – or the vested interests – discover they can vote themselves more money until the state capsizes. (The same thing has been happening in Britain since the First World War.) But Musk was wrong when he believed Donald Trump or those of his surrogates. Trump has declared corporate bankruptcy a number of times. He is continually receiving cash injections from supporters, from people who want things. His previous presidency precipitously increased America's national debt, even as – for most of those four years – the economy boomed and roared ahead. Trump loves debt. Trump loves borrowing. He'll borrow until the end. Musk ought to have learnt that lesson by now. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wall Street's potential winners and losers from Trump's tax bill
By Shashwat Chauhan (Reuters) -As President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill heads to the Senate, analysts examine how his broad-ranging policies could turn the fortunes of U.S. companies if the package is enacted as law. What Trump has dubbed a "big, beautiful bill", narrowly passed the Republican-controlled House on May 22. The bill seeks to extend tax breaks, set during Trump's first term in 2017 and on track to expire at the end of 2025, for multinational corporations. It is also expected to fulfill many of Trump's populist campaign pledges, including an immigration crackdown and ending some green energy incentives. The tax breaks are largely expected to be positive for the U.S. stock markets, but some analysts see only a modest upside. "Since the 2025 tax cuts are primarily an extension of the current tax code, we expect changes to provide only marginal benefits to equity performance," Morgan Stanley analysts said in a note last month. Overall, the bill is expected to add about $2.4 trillion to the $36.2 trillion U.S. debt pile, the Congressional Budget Office said on Wednesday. Here is a list of industries and companies that are likely to be affected by the bill: AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE - WINNERS Defense companies could see renewed interest from investors as the new bill looks to step up spending on air and missile defense, munitions and border security. "There should be some benefit there to the defense contractors," said Chris Haverland, global equity strategist at Wells Fargo Investment Institute. "We currently rate industrials at a neutral. There'll be some offsets there, but there should be some benefits to the defense area." Brian Mulberry, client portfolio manager at Zacks Investment Management, named defense contractors RTX and General Dynamics as potential beneficiaries. The iShares US Aerospace & Defense ETF is trading at all-time highs. RENEWABLE ENERGY - LOSERS Shares of U.S. solar companies slumped on May 22, as the bill aims to cancel funding for green-energy grant programs, which were established under the Biden administration in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. "If the bill passes, that's going to be a huge negative for renewable (energy stocks)," said Dave Grecsek, managing director of investment strategy and research at wealth management firm Aspiriant. "We could have a little bit more downside to the renewable energy space, but a lot of it is already priced in." Companies including First Solar, Enphase Energy and Sunrun are all in the red for the year. HEALTH INSURERS - LOSERS The bill includes substantial funding cuts for the U.S. Medicaid program, with fiscal hawks pushing for cuts to partly offset the cost of the bill's tax components. "Reductions to Medicaid funding also shift the cost to state and local governments that may be burdened by increased health care costs. This may cause notable revenue losses for hospitals, potentially pressuring (the) credit quality of both state and nonprofit health care municipal bonds," Morgan Stanley said. Shares of major health insurers CVS, Humana, UnitedHealth, Elevance and Cigna would be in focus. The S&P 500 managed healthcare index is down 30.6% year to date. HOUSING & REAL ESTATE - LOSERS BofA Global Research said it expects interest rates to remain high if the bill does not meaningfully address deficit reduction, and flagged several companies that could be hurt by higher rates. SBA Communications, Equinix and Alexandria Real Estate Equities are some of the real estate-linked companies that are at risk, BofA Global Research said. "Homebuilders need to take a margin hit on the house to increase affordability. So that's a very simple translation of how fiscal stimulus is leading to a negative consequence for the stock market," said Viresh Kanabar, macro strategist - asset allocation at Macro Hive. DOMESTIC PRODUCERS - WINNERS The bill also includes legislation to extend or expand Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) provisions that are set to expire at the end of 2025. The provisions include 100% bonus depreciation for equipment investment, immediate deduction of domestic research and development (R&D) expenses and looser business interest expensing through 2029. BofA Global Research named a slew of S&P 500 companies with no overseas sales that could benefit from these items, including utility firms Alliant Energy, Ameren Corp and American Electric Power Company. Sign in to access your portfolio
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Republican on ‘big, beautiful bill': ‘As long as everybody takes their meds, we'll get it done'
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) on Wednesday described the House-passed GOP policy package as a 'work in progress' but projected confidence that President Trump's legislative agenda would make it through the Senate in some form. In an interview on right-leaning Newsmax's 'Rob Schmitt Tonight,' Kennedy addressed criticism from tech billionaire Elon Musk, who the show's host said has 'become such a hero and has done such a great job in trying to expose government waste but is now 'really calling it a disgusting abomination.' 'I think it's left a lot of MAGA voters, a lot of Trump voters, a lot of conservatives in a place of– they're a bit confused on this thing,' Schmitt said, before noting that the White House has defended the bill as a responsible way of cutting waste. 'Well, this is a work in progress,' Kennedy said in the interview. 'If you're confused, you understand the situation perfectly. The House bill did the best it could do. The bill is now before us in the Senate. We're going to try to improve it — and improve it substantially. The Louisiana Republican noted there are many complexities to getting the bill across the finish line. He said he agrees with Musk that 'we're not reducing enough spending,' but stressed the importance of extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts, which is one component of the larger policy bill. 'We're working hard, I'll put it that way,' the senator added. 'And as long as everybody takes their meds, we'll get it done.' The interview comes the president's agenda is seemingly beginning to lose momentum in the upper chamber of Congress in the face of sharp attacks from Musk and other outspoken conservatives. Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) warned colleagues at a special conference meeting Wednesday afternoon that there are two likely 'no' votes on the bill within the Senate GOP conference, which means just one more defection would derail the legislation. That comes as the Congressional Budget Office on Wednesday projected that the 1,116-page House passed bill would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade.
