
Why Mumbai's Jain community is up in arms against BMC while Opposition makes hay
The temple demolition sparked off a massive protest by the Jain community in Mumbai. On Saturday, thousands dressed in white clothes marched to the K-East ward office in protest, wearing black bands. Protesters alleged that despite a pending stay order by the court, the BMC demolished the temple while devotees were inside. In an urgent hearing, called on the same day, the Bombay High Court ordered a status quo till the next hearing on 30 April.
On 16 April, a BMC team from the K-East ward demolished the Shri 1008 Parshwanath Digambar Jain Mandir, allegedly illegally built inside Neminath Cooperative Housing Society on Nehru Road in Vile Parle East.
Mumbai: The demolition of a Jain temple in Mumbai's Vile Parle by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has kicked up a political storm, ongoing for the past four days. All parties, including sections of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), have slammed the civic body over the demolition.
K-East ward in-charge Navnath Ghadge Patil, who ordered the demolition, was transferred later in the day, according to BMC Municipal Commissioner Bhushan Gagrani. Meanwhile, H-East ward assistant commissioner Swapnaja Kshirsagar took additional charge for the K-East ward until further notice. On Sunday, for devotees to continue prayers and religious rituals, the idols were restored on a small canopy.
Summoned to a hearing on the matter Tuesday, Gagrani did not attend the Maharashtra State Minority Commission meeting neither did he visit the temple site. After the minority commission ordered a site survey to assess the temple damage, the minority commission's vice chairman, along with now-ward in-charge Swapnaja Kshirsagar and DCP (Zone-8) Maneesh Kalwaniya, inspected the demolished-temple site.
A day earlier, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Engineers' Union condemned Ghadge Patil's transfer, alleging 'political pressure' in the discharge of official duties. Seen by ThePrint, the union's letter, dated 21 April and addressed to the BMC commissioner, said that the temple issue was already in court, and Ghadge Patil was only following court orders. 'If this situation continues, Mumbai, which is known as a world-class city, will soon be known as a city of illegal construction,' the letter said.
ThePrint met the K-East ward officials with questions, but they did not respond.
ThePrint also contacted BMC Commissioner Gagrani over calls and text messages, and this report will be updated if and when he responds.
Also Read: Amid 'Hindi imposition' cry against Fadnavis govt, why Raj Thackeray's voice is the loudest
Why temple was demolished
Members of the Jain community have alleged that the civic body demolished the temple under the influence of a local businessman, who wanted to expand his hotel business to the temple premises.
Speaking to ThePrint, temple trust secretary Anil Bandi said, 'Until 15 April, we did not have a stay order post-midnight. However, the court ordered a stay [on demolition] at 11 am on 16 April. The only thing illegal here is a restaurant and bar, run by the local businessman on the temple premises.'
The BMC demolition squad reached the temple on 16 April morning.
Bandi said the temple trust had received notices earlier, too, but had requested the BMC not to demolish the temple.
'If we did not interfere with their business, why did they have to demolish the temple of a peace-loving community, carrying out their prayers?' he asked.
He added that past governments had saved the temple from demolition, but this time, the BMC acted without informing the government.
'The local business wants to redevelop the entire premises and remove the temple to build malls, restaurants, and hotels,' said Bandi.
Another member of the temple trust, Dinesh Jain, said, 'The officials did not spare any of our idols and damaged everything, from the ceilings to the walls. They broke our idols into two pieces and disrespected our sacred texts.'
Speaking to ThePrint, Jain said that the officials forcefully entered the temple while devotees wearing their traditional attire were praying. The officials allegedly pushed women out, with some of them even fainting during the demolition.
'We requested them to be gentle as the idols were present inside the premises, but they did not listen to our requests,' Jain said.
According to Bandi, the temple incurred damages worth crores of rupees, with several damaged idols and religious texts recovered from the site later.
'We do not want any money, but only want our land back. We will not stay quiet till we rebuild the temple here itself. However, the ward officer responsible for this act should be suspended,' he said.
Even though Navnath Ghadge Patil was transferred, the Jain community demanded his suspension after the BMC unearthed multiple damaged idols from the site during the removal of debris.
Speaking to ThePrint, advocate Dhanpal Solanki Jain, a member of the All India Jain Minority Forum, said, 'Since the BJP came to power in 2014, the Jain community has faced a hidden Brahminical agenda, fostering resentment among us. Jains are not traditionally BJP supporters, and many align with parties like Congress. Given that the BJP is ruling the state and the BMC, they must uphold minority rights as outlined in the Constitution.'
'We have witnessed illegal hawkers and structures flourishing under the BMC's watch. There is a power imbalance in how the BMC demolished a 30- or 40-year-old temple, without proper oversight or communication. This is an instance of money power playing out. As minority representatives, we demand that the BMC rebuild the temple, restoring our rights as guaranteed under the law,' said the advocate.
Political Bickering
Politicians from all parties have demanded action against the BJP. Opposition leaders are questioning why the ruling alliance, Mahayuti, which administers the BMC, let the demolition happen in the first place.
District MLA and co-guardian minister Mangal Prabhat Lodha posted on the microblogging site X, 'The removal of the Jain temple of Pujya Shri Parshvanath Bhagwan in Vile Parle has hurt the sentiments of the Jain community. It was not just a religious place, but a centre of faith and devotion of the community.'
Worli MLA and former cabinet minister Aaditya Thackeray also took to X, saying, 'The co-guardian minister is just playing a game! The chief minister is from his party. The BMC is run by the chief minister's office.
He is the co-guardian minister of the district. Who took the action? The BMC that the CMO runs. Where? In the district where he [Lodha] is the co-custodian minister. So what exactly are they protesting?'
'They had every right to tell @mybmc not to take action until the case is heard. Why didn't they do so? They are lying to the Jain community and citizens! The question is, as usual, the officer was changed, but when will action be taken against the real culprits?' Thackeray asked in his post.
Similarly, in a post on X, MP and Mumbai Congress President Varsha Gaikwad said, 'Is it a crime to be a minority in BJP-ruled states? A 30-year-old Parshwanath Digambar Jain Mandir, located on Nehru Road in Vile Parle (East), Mumbai, was suddenly and brutally demolished. This was not just a building—it was a symbol of the Jain community's faith, tradition, and identity. What's even more disturbing is that the idols of Jain Tirthankaras, sacred scriptures like the Jinvani, and other revered religious texts were also desecrated.'
Pooja Bhatia is an intern with ThePrint.
(Edited by Madhurita Goswami)
Also Read: Uddhav, Raj hint at uniting 'for Maharashtra'. Will it be a Thackeray redux or yet another paper tiger

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
SC allows manufacturing unit's closure, orders ₹15 cr ex-gratia for workers
The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed the closure of a unit manufacturing biscuits for Britannia Industries Limited (BIL) for over three decades by overruling a Bombay High Court verdict. Justices Sanjay Karol and Prashant Kumar Mishra passed the verdict on an appeal of Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd (HSML) against the high court's February 17, 2023 order. While HSML initially offered Rs 10 crore as a goodwill gesture to its employees, the court enhanced this amount to Rs 15 crore and ordered its payment within eight weeks. Considering that some of the employees may be, with the closure of this concern, losing the only job they have known and still others would be, for no fault of their own, rendered unemployed, we appreciate the gesture made by HSML. Such a statement is taken on record," the court said. Senior advocate Mukul Rohtagi, appearing for HSML, had left it to the court to decide on the enhancement. We deem it just and proper to further enhance the appellants' offer by a sum of Rs 5 crore, thus, making it Rs 15 crore instead of Rs 10 crore, as mentioned in our order... Let the amount be released forthwith, as per their entitlement, in favour of the employees and, in any case, not later than eight weeks from the date of the judgment, it said. HSML was engaged in biscuit manufacturing exclusively for BIL for over three decades under successive job work agreements and the latest agreement of May 22, 2007 was terminated by BIL with effect from November 20, 2019, following a six-month notice period. In response, HSML applied for closure of its operations under Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, submitting the application on August 28, 2019, and notifying its workers shortly thereafter. The case reached the Bombay High Court through petitions after the Maharashtra State Government allegedly failed to respond to the closure application within the statutory period. The state government said that a letter of September 25, 2019, amounted to a refusal of permission. HSML contended that the delay triggered the deemed approval clause under the relevant provision of the Industrial Disputes Act. Justice Karol, who authored the verdict, considered whether the state government's communication of September 25, 2019, qualified as a valid refusal order under the Industrial Disputes Act. The bench also dealt with the question whether the deputy secretary, who issued the communication, was legally empowered to do so. The verdict ruled in favour of HSML and held that the letter of September 25, 2019 did not constitute a valid or reasoned order of refusal as mandated by law. The deputy secretary, it held, was not the 'appropriate government' under the Act, and had no authority to seek resubmission or revision of the closure application. The bench then held since no valid order was passed within 60 days of the application, permission to close must be deemed granted, effective from October 27, 2019. We hold that the application dated August 28, 2019 was complete in all respects, and the 60-day period for the deemed closure to take effect would be calculable from said date," it said. Secondly, the deputy secretary was not the appropriate government who could have asked HSML to revise and resubmit the application for closure as the authority was only vested with the minister concerned, it said. "The minister did not, even in the slightest, consider the merits of the matter independently, much less with or without any application of mind. Subdelegation to the officer was not permitted by law, and, therefore, any communication made by him would be without any legal sanction, the verdict said. The bench reiterated the constitutional right to trade and business under Article 19(1)(g) and closures must still adhere to statutory procedures that safeguard public interest and employee rights. The bench acknowledged the humanitarian aspect of the case and appreciated HSML's willingness to provide additional compensation. The amount was ordered to be disbursed among the affected employees within eight weeks from the date of the judgment.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Kamal Haasan thanks Tamil Nadu for standing by him amid Kannada language row; promises to respond in a press meet
Kamal Haasan expressed heartfelt thanks to the people of Tamil Nadu for standing by him during the backlash sparked by his recent remarks on the Kannada language. Although he avoided a direct response to the ongoing controversy, he assured that a detailed statement would follow shortly. Kamal Haasan's gratitude speech During a recent release event of 'Thug Life' in Chennai, Kamal was heard expressing his deep respect for his fans: 'I should thank the entire state of Tamil Nadu, which stood behind me. I completely understand the meaning of the phrase 'Uyire, Urave, Tamizhe (my life and family are Tamil)' that I use during public addresses. And I stand by it,' he said in Tamil. Kamal Haasan Faces Ban in Karnataka Over Kannada Language Row, Minister Demands Apology | Thug Life Kamal refused to address the language row Kamal refrained from delving into the language row following his remark that 'Kannada was born out of Tamil' during the event. He acknowledged that there were important matters beyond the film that needed to be addressed.'But this is not the stage for it. It is my duty to talk about those issues in a separate (press) meet, and I will organise it,' he added. Kamal also shared his deep admiration for director Mani Ratnam , calling 'Thug Life' a transformative experience. About the controversy The controversy began when Kamal Haasan stated that 'Kannada was born out of Tamil' during a promotional event for Thug Life. The statement drew sharp criticism from pro-Kannada organisations, and the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce (KFCC) issued a statement declaring support for those demanding a ban on the film's release in Karnataka . Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 180k traders turn to IC Markets for optimum CFD trading conditions | Sign up today IC Markets Sign Up Undo They demanded an apology from Kamal to settle the issue and allow the film to be released in the state. However, the 'Nayakan' actor refused to apologise, stating that he had not said anything wrong. Kamal later approached the Karnataka High Court seeking protection for the film's release in the state. The court, however, criticised him and advised that he express regret over his comments. The matter has been adjourned to June 10. Thug Life is scheduled to hit theatres tomorrow (June 5). Check out our list of the latest Hindi , English , Tamil , Telugu , Malayalam , and Kannada movies . Don't miss our picks for the best Hindi movies , best Tamil movies, and best Telugu films .


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Thug Life advance booking: Kamal Haasan's film to open with ₹12.46 cr, 2 lakh+ tickets sold despite Karnataka blockage
Thug Life advance booking: Kamal Haasan's film Thug Life is ready to debut on Thursday despite no show across Karnataka. The actor recently found himself at the centre of a controversy, which led to the film being blocked from release in the state. However, the film is set to see a decent opening day. However, missing out on the Karnataka circuit is undoubtedly going to cost Kamal Haasan who is also jointly backing the film. According to film industry tracker Sacnilk, Thug Life has collected a gross of ₹ 5.02 crore from ticket sales in all languages. The film will be out in Tamil, Hindi and Telugu languages. It will also be available in IMAX 2D format. Considering all formats, Kamal Haasan's film has so far sold 2,95,456 tickets for 10,678 shows across India, excluding Karnataka. Considering blocked seats, Thug Life is set to see a massive opening with ₹ 12.46 crore gross earnings. The film is set to clash with Sajid Nadiawala's Housefull 5 which has now generated way less money from advance booking. The movie is likely to premiere with ₹ 5.67 crore gross earnings. While Karnataka is out of the picture for Thug Life, states like Kerala, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra, followed by Gujarat, top the list with maximum revenue from the advance booking for the first day in all versions. Thug Life is a gangster action drama film, directed by Mani Ratnam. It is co-written by Kamal Haasan, who is also jointly producing the film under his banner Raaj Kamal Films International. Madras Talkies and Red Giant Movies are also backing the film. Besides Kamal Haasan, it also features Silambarasan, Trisha Krishnan, Abhirami, Aishwarya Lekshmi, Ashok Selvan, Joju George, Nassar, Ali Fazal, Rohit Saraf and Baburaj. The film marks the reunion of Haasan and Ratnam after they collaborated on their 1987 film, Nayakan. The film landed in controversy after Haasan said, "Kannada was born out of Tamil' during the film event. Predicting the fate of the film amid the row, film trade insider Ramesh Bala posted on X, formerly Twitter, 'The anticipation is huge for the biggest film of the year #ThugLife. The promotional material impressed everyone. We can expect, solid action and Phenomenal performances from leads #KamalHaasan, #SilambarasanTR, #Trisha, #JojuGeorge & others. With themes rumored to explore action, identity, and rebellion, #ThugLife is expected to be more than just a commercial entertainer. Excited for tomorrow.' However, trade analyst Sumit Kadel claimed underwhelming numbers for the Thug Life Hindi version. He wrote, 'Advance booking for #KamalHaasan's #ThugLife is underwhelming in the Hindi belt, with current projections indicating a Day 1 opening in the ₹ 80L–1Cr range across North India. The film has just Thursday to register any meaningful biz before #Housefull5 takes over the bulk of showcasing from Friday.'