&w=3840&q=100)
SC allows manufacturing unit's closure, orders ₹15 cr ex-gratia for workers
Justices Sanjay Karol and Prashant Kumar Mishra passed the verdict on an appeal of Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd (HSML) against the high court's February 17, 2023 order.
While HSML initially offered Rs 10 crore as a goodwill gesture to its employees, the court enhanced this amount to Rs 15 crore and ordered its payment within eight weeks.
Considering that some of the employees may be, with the closure of this concern, losing the only job they have known and still others would be, for no fault of their own, rendered unemployed, we appreciate the gesture made by HSML. Such a statement is taken on record," the court said.
Senior advocate Mukul Rohtagi, appearing for HSML, had left it to the court to decide on the enhancement.
We deem it just and proper to further enhance the appellants' offer by a sum of Rs 5 crore, thus, making it Rs 15 crore instead of Rs 10 crore, as mentioned in our order... Let the amount be released forthwith, as per their entitlement, in favour of the employees and, in any case, not later than eight weeks from the date of the judgment, it said.
HSML was engaged in biscuit manufacturing exclusively for BIL for over three decades under successive job work agreements and the latest agreement of May 22, 2007 was terminated by BIL with effect from November 20, 2019, following a six-month notice period.
In response, HSML applied for closure of its operations under Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, submitting the application on August 28, 2019, and notifying its workers shortly thereafter.
The case reached the Bombay High Court through petitions after the Maharashtra State Government allegedly failed to respond to the closure application within the statutory period.
The state government said that a letter of September 25, 2019, amounted to a refusal of permission.
HSML contended that the delay triggered the deemed approval clause under the relevant provision of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Justice Karol, who authored the verdict, considered whether the state government's communication of September 25, 2019, qualified as a valid refusal order under the Industrial Disputes Act.
The bench also dealt with the question whether the deputy secretary, who issued the communication, was legally empowered to do so.
The verdict ruled in favour of HSML and held that the letter of September 25, 2019 did not constitute a valid or reasoned order of refusal as mandated by law.
The deputy secretary, it held, was not the 'appropriate government' under the Act, and had no authority to seek resubmission or revision of the closure application.
The bench then held since no valid order was passed within 60 days of the application, permission to close must be deemed granted, effective from October 27, 2019.
We hold that the application dated August 28, 2019 was complete in all respects, and the 60-day period for the deemed closure to take effect would be calculable from said date," it said.
Secondly, the deputy secretary was not the appropriate government who could have asked HSML to revise and resubmit the application for closure as the authority was only vested with the minister concerned, it said. "The minister did not, even in the slightest, consider the merits of the matter independently, much less with or without any application of mind. Subdelegation to the officer was not permitted by law, and, therefore, any communication made by him would be without any legal sanction, the verdict said.
The bench reiterated the constitutional right to trade and business under Article 19(1)(g) and closures must still adhere to statutory procedures that safeguard public interest and employee rights.
The bench acknowledged the humanitarian aspect of the case and appreciated HSML's willingness to provide additional compensation.
The amount was ordered to be disbursed among the affected employees within eight weeks from the date of the judgment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
15 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
PixxelSpace-led consortium to build first Indian private earth observation satellite constellation
The consortium led by PixxelSpace will spend Rs 1,200 crore to build 12 satellites in the next five years, the Indian National Space Promotion and Authorisation Centre (IN-SPACe) said.


Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pixxel-led consortium bags L1 bid in India's first EO-PPP, Rs 1,200 crore project
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills In a first for India's space ecosystem, Bengaluru-based space startup Pixxel and its partners Piersight Space Satsure Analytics , and Dhruva Space have won the bid to design, build, and operate the country's first fully indigenous commercial earth observation (EO) satellite constellation under the Indian National Space Promotion and Authorisation Centre's (IN-SPACe) public-private partnership (EO-PPP) programme will help reduce India's reliance on foreign sources and ensure data space promoter-cum-regulator on Tuesday said three consortia were shortlisted after rigorous technical evaluation: Astra Microwave Products with Bharat Electronics, Sisir Radar and Spectragaze Systems, and GalaxEye Space with CoreEL and PixxelSpace , along with its other three Pixxel consortium emerged as the lowest bidder (L1), surpassing the other two by a wide margin. PierSight's cofounder Vinit Bansal confirmed the same without revealing the exact amount of the bid. Pixxel's founder Awais Ahmed declined to disclose the consortium's exact bid a response to an ET query, GalaxEye founder Suyash Singh, part of the selected consortium, confirmed that their bid value was Rs 97 crore. Singh said GalaxEye, which is gearing up for the maiden launch of its EO Drishit satellite, was proud to be the youngest company to lead a consortium and qualify the next four years, the winning team will invest more than Rs 1,200 crore to deploy 12 satellites carrying optical, hyperspectral, and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sensors. These will provide high-resolution data for agriculture, urban planning, disaster management, climate monitoring, and national security.'Once operational, it will be among the most advanced EO systems in the world, designed, built, and operated entirely in India by Indian talent,' IN-SPACe said in a statement. The EO constellation will be deployed in a phased manner to ensure continuous service upgrades and expanded winning Pixxel-led consortium brings together complementary strengths. 'This PPP is about outcomes and execution speed. Our modular, software-defined radar electronics and deployable antenna heritage let us iterate quickly and align to IN‑SPACe's phased milestones,' Ahmedabad-based PierSight's Bansal known for its hyperspectral imaging expertise, will spearhead satellite design and integration. SatSure will contribute with its knowledge in geospatial analytics and value-added services for sectors such as agriculture and infrastructure, while Dhruva Space will provide its expertise in satellite platform and ground segment solutions.'Operated on a satellite-as-a-service model, the programme will provide guaranteed national access to advanced EO data while leveraging private-sector agility to deliver it at scale,' the winning consortium said in a Goenka, chairman, IN-SPACe, said the initiative signals the coming of age of India's private space industry in the space sector. 'It demonstrates the capability and confidence of Indian companies to lead large-scale, technologically advanced, and commercially viable space missions that serve both national and global markets.'As per a report by market research consulting firm Modor Intelligence, the global EO market is projected to grow from $4.3 billion in 2025 to $5.9 billion by 2030. India's push for EO capability through the EO-PPP aligns with its broader ambitions to scale its space economy from $8.4 billion to $44 billion by 2033.

The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Aadhaar, voter ID not proof of citizenship, says Bombay High Court rejecting bail plea of alleged Bangladeshi man
The Bombay High Court on Tuesday (August 12, 2025) rejected the bail plea of Babu Abdul Ruf Sardar, accused of illegally entering India from Bangladesh and obtaining forged Indian identity documents, citing national security concerns, ongoing investigation, and the risk of absconding. Passing the order, Justice Amit Borkar observed, 'In my opinion, the Citizenship Act, 1955 is the main and controlling law for deciding questions about nationality in India today. Merely having documents such as an Aadhaar card, PAN card, or Voter ID does not by itself make someone a citizen of India. These documents are meant for identification or availing services, but they do not override the basic legal requirements of citizenship as prescribed in the Act.' Mr. Sardar is facing charges punishable under Sections 335 (causing grievous hurt), 336(3) (endangering life or personal safety of others, aggravated form), and 340 (wrongful confinement) read with Section 3(5) (aggravated offence relating to the above) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, along with offences under Sections 3(a) (prohibition on entry without valid passport) and 6(a) (penalty for entry without passport) of the Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1950, and Sections 3(1) (restriction on entry of foreigners), 3(2) (conditions for lawful stay), and 14 (penalty for contravention) of the Foreigners Order, 1948. Appearing for the applicant, advocate Jyotiram S. Yadav argued that Mr. Sardar is 'a bona fide citizen of India' and that the recovered birth certificates are 'unverified and do not even mention the applicant's name.' He added that these were received via WhatsApp from an unidentified sender and that the applicant holds multiple valid Indian documents linked to tax records, bank accounts, and utility services. 'Nothing remains to be recovered from him, and continued custody serves no useful purpose,' Mr. Yadav said. Digital evidence Opposing the plea, Additional Public Prosecutor Megha S. Bajoria contended that the accused 'entered the country without valid permission and is residing illegally by using forged identity documents.' She pointed to the digital evidence suggesting Bangladeshi origin and argued that Mr. Sardar's release could allow him to abscond, obtain another false identity, or destroy evidence. Ms. Bajoria further warned of possible links to 'a larger organised network involving illegal immigration and identity fraud.' Justice Borkar, after reviewing the evidence, observed that citizenship claims must be tested strictly under the Citizenship Act and that the burden of proof lies with the accused when credible evidence raises doubts about nationality. 'The allegations in this case are not small. It is not just about staying in India without permission or overstaying a visa. It is about making and using fake and forged identity documents like Aadhaar card, PAN card, and Voter ID, with the aim of pretending to be an Indian citizen.' Highlighting that verification of Mr. Sardar's Aadhaar card and other documents is still pending with the UIDAI and other authorities, the court concluded that releasing him at this stage would be 'neither proper nor prudent.' The judge also noted, 'The danger of the applicant running away from the law or interfering with the investigation is real.' The bail application was dismissed, but the court allowed Mr. Sardar to renew his request for bail if the trial is not completed within one year.