logo
Lululemon's best-selling black leggings pile up at outlet stores

Lululemon's best-selling black leggings pile up at outlet stores

Business Times17-07-2025
[NEW YORK] Lululemon Athletica is facing slowing sales, fewer store visitors and waning demand for its iconic black leggings as the yogawear retailer tries to pull itself out of a rough patch.
Lululemon's core black leggings, which are vital products that rarely are discounted, are piling up at outlet stores, according to Randal Konik, an analyst at Jefferies. That's an alarming issue for Lululemon, he added, showing erosion in core demand for the brand's clothes.
'We have witnessed signals of a brand in decline and see risks to earnings ahead,' Konik said in a note to clients on Thursday (Jul 16). The analyst, a long-time critic of the company's strategy, has had an underperform rating on Lululemon's stock since 2022.
Lululemon shares had declined 41 per cent this year to Wednesday's close.
A representative for Lululemon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Chief executive officer Calvin McDonald is trying to revive sales at Lululemon as the company faces rising competition from rivals such as Alo Yoga and Vuori. Lululemon has issued disappointing results in two straight quarters and trimmed its outlook for the full year.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The CEO's efforts to double sales from 2021 to 2026 have hit several snags. Executives have said that profitability has been hurt by new US tariffs and warned investors that US consumers are cutting back spending. In June, Lululemon cut 150 corporate employees after a review of its organisational structure.
Lululemon's observed sales in the US fell 4.2 per cent in June, according to Bloomberg Second Measure, which tracks anonymous debit and credit transactions. That's the biggest drop since November.
An adjusted version of Bloomberg Second Measure's observed sales metric shows that the retailer's US sales are on track to decline 2.8 per cent in the quarter that runs to July. Analysts on average expect a gain of 1.9 per cent.
Meanwhile, foot traffic to Lululemon's US stores fell more than 8 per cent in June, according to Placer.ai, which measures visits through mobile device data.
'Designs still look disjointed, inventory growth is accelerating and sales cracks are expanding,' Konik said in his note. BLOOMBERG
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lululemon vs Costco: the fashion copycat fight
Lululemon vs Costco: the fashion copycat fight

Business Times

time3 days ago

  • Business Times

Lululemon vs Costco: the fashion copycat fight

THEY say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but what happens when it veers into outright theft? Costco, the members-only discount store, has long been famous for private label products that compete head to head with national brands in everything from vodka and cranberry juice to mattresses and laundry detergent. Its Kirkland signature products are so popular that it has become something of a national guessing game in the US to determine which manufacturers actually produce them. But rivals contend that the Washington state-based group's recent forays into lookalike clothing have taken emulation a step too far. Last week Lululemon, the luxury athletic clothing brand, sued Costco in federal court in California, alleging that it had illegally copied at least six patented clothing designs, including its popular Scuba hoodie and Define jacket. Lululemon's popular Scuba hoodie PHOTO: LULULEMON That lawsuit comes hard on the heels of one filed in May by Deckers which claimed that Costco had illegally copied its Ugg slippers. Deckers is a repeat litigator: it also sued Costco over lookalike 'mini-boots' in 2023. Fashion copycatting has been a fact of life for decades, from street vendors who illegally purvey faux Chanel bags to haute couture designers who 'borrow' ideas from rivals, sometimes in homage, but often in envy. It is made possible in part by relatively vague US intellectual property rules for fashion designs that grant more protection to technological advances, such as technical fabrics, than innovative design. But the Lululemon versus Costco fight stands out because it involves two large, publicly listed companies and it takes direct aim at a growing cultural phenomenon: the quest for 'dupes'. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 2 pm Lifestyle Our picks of the latest dining, travel and leisure options to treat yourself. Sign Up Sign Up Once seen as embarrassing parsimony, buying knock-offs has become a fashion statement of its own. Egged on by hashtags, TikTok videos and media articles, customers are leaning into the fun of finding cheaper but still good alternatives, turning the search for dupes into a public treasure hunt. Nearly half of US consumers surveyed by analytics firm First Insight said they had tried a product specifically because it was a 'dupe', and 70 per cent of shoppers who make more than $150,000 said they were more likely to try a dupe than other private label goods. Mass market retailers are only too happy to play along. Big box stores and fast fashion chains have a long history of offering clothing and shoes that emulate the vibe of more exclusive stores. But the dupes craze has taken the copying – and the profits – to a new level. 'Everybody does it. The retailers will tell you they are trying to fill a need. Lululemon is not going to sell to Costco, so Costco says, 'People like these leggings, why don't I make some,'' says Joe Feldman, retail analyst at Telsey Advisory Group. Lululemon initially tried to be playful about defending its unique looks from imitators. In 2023, it hosted a 'dupe swap' in Los Angeles, where customers were encouraged to trade in their knock-offs for the real thing. But Costco's latest efforts were more than Lululemon was willing to bear. The warehouse store's US$20 sweatshirt mimics the ornamental stitching and pouch pockets of Lululemon's Scuba offering, which sells for six times the price. And Costco's dupe of the Design jacket mimics an unusual line of curved stitching across the back. Lululemon contends in its lawsuit that those specific details violate the 'trade dress' patents that it has registered over the past two years, as well as a trademark on the colour description 'tidewater teal' that it applied for one day before filing its claim that Costco had 'unlawfully traded upon Plaintiffs' reputation, goodwill and sweat equity'. However Costco, which did not reply to a request for comment, has an arsenal of potential defences upon which to draw. US rules protect makers from infringement claims if the similarities are based on function rather than distinctive design. The warehouse group could also try to turn the dupe craze to its advantage by arguing that consumers are unlikely to be misled into believing that they are buying a Lululemon original. Costco's products are clearly marked with either the Kirkland brand or the manufacturer's name. Despite the publicity, most patent attorneys expect the dispute to settle, as Deckers' first Uggs lawsuit did last year. Each side has too much to lose from a trial. Costco could be on the hook for gigantic monetary damages, while 'if Lululemon were to lose, it would be open season' for other duplicates, says Josh Gerben, a DC patent attorney. If there is a clear line between flattery and forgery, few in fashion want to know exactly where it is. FINANCIAL TIMES

Apple and Cook get a boost – and breather
Apple and Cook get a boost – and breather

Business Times

time3 days ago

  • Business Times

Apple and Cook get a boost – and breather

DID tariffs help Apple to a blowout quarter? That was one theory that emerged as the company disclosed a surprising surge in iPhone sales in the April-June quarter, up 14 per cent compared with the period a year earlier, handily beating estimates. Consumers, it was said, were rushing out to stores in fear that Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' trade levies would drastically increase the cost of an upgrade. It certainly makes some logical sense; though the data shows consumers' fears soon subsided. According to which uses mobile location data to monitor foot traffic, elevated sales in the immediate days after Trump's address rapidly petered out – visitors to US Apple stores were up just 0.93 per cent for the entire fiscal quarter compared to a year earlier. Meanwhile, visits to Apple's website from US consumers were down 3 per cent, according to data from Similarweb. On a call with investors to discuss the results, chief executive officer Tim Cook acknowledged that tariff chatter did create unusual buying patterns in April, mostly around sales in the US of the iPhone and Mac computers. But overall, the boost was limited – Apple said just one percentage point of its 10 per cent overall revenue growth came from these 'pull forward' sales. If Apple's analysis proves correct – and some analysts seemed sceptical, repeatedly asking for more detail – then that would be good news. It means investors would have to worry less that the better-than-expected sales won't mean a significant dip for the rest of this year. That's not to say tariffs won't be a drag – Cook said the company would take a US$1.1 billion tariff-related hit in the current quarter, up from US$900 million in the last. To emphasise the gusto of his most important product, Cook noted that somebody out there has the three billionth iPhone. That's a staying power that will count for a lot as the company moves to this next era of uncertainty. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The quarterly iPhone sales indicate that consumers don't yet care that the bulk of the device's artificial-intelligence features (AI) have yet to materialise – they'll stick with Apple anyway. I found myself agreeing with Cook when he said he felt AI-specific devices – such as glasses from Meta Platforms or whatever it is OpenAI and Jony Ive create – are 'likely to be complementary devices, not substitution' for the smartphone. Still, AI is on the mind of investors, and the blockbuster quarter was not enough to distract from that. The company reiterated its intent to increase spending to fund its AI efforts and to reallocate talent to speed things up. Cook didn't, however, address the fact that some of his top AI talent has reallocated itself to Meta. The Apple boss' apparent disinterest in partaking in the unprecedented talent war – one that would have made his predecessor, Steve Jobs, sick to his stomach – is one facet in Apple's obvious unwillingness to follow its peers and bet the entire house on AI. Its capital expenditures, while growing, are expected to be tens of billions of dollars lower than the other tech giants. The years to come will tell whether Apple was wise to separate itself from the pack. Tellingly, when asked on Thursday (Jul 31) whether he felt AI innovations like large language models might become commoditised, he declined to answer. 'That gives away some things on our strategy,' he said. That could be read as a sign Apple doesn't feel it needs to directly compete in building AI. I think this speaks to a confidence that the iPhone will still be the de facto device of choice for AI, whether or not Apple is successful in making a competent ChatGPT of its own. Another interpretation is that Cook doesn't want to show his hand in any mergers and acquisitions negotiations, but I guess we'll see. Cook said on the call that he was 'very open' to dealmaking – we'll see what exactly he feels he needs to buy rather than build. Frankly, you didn't need to see Apple's numbers to know it had been a great quarter – you could just listen to the tone of Cook's voice. Noticeably upbeat as he ran through his remarks, the tenor of the call was in stark contrast from last quarter, when some (myself included) wondered whether the weight of Apple's numerous challenges were starting to deplete the 64-year-old's energy reserves. Talk of succession will surely now quiet down for the foreseeable future: It's time to let Tim cook. BLOOMBERG

Lululemon doubles down on physical expansion in Singapore and across South-east Asia
Lululemon doubles down on physical expansion in Singapore and across South-east Asia

Business Times

time3 days ago

  • Business Times

Lululemon doubles down on physical expansion in Singapore and across South-east Asia

RUNNING is more than just a form of exercise for Tim Campbell-Scott. He often takes part in half-marathons and 10-kilometre runs as a way to help him focus on what he needs to do for the rest of the day. 'I see running as my kind of meditation. I try and run in the morning because what I find is it gives me this clarity of mind, which is what I need to be able to do my job effectively,' he says. It has certainly been a busy few weeks for Campbell-Scott, who is the market director for South-east Asia at Lululemon. The Vancouver-based athletic apparel brand, which is listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange in New York, recently opened a new flagship store at Takashimaya Shopping Centre along Orchard Road. This nearly 6,000 square-foot store – the brand's ninth in Singapore and the largest – is also the first in the region to open in collaboration with a partner studio called within, which offers yoga and reformer pilates classes. BT Weekend met Campbell-Scott for a chat and he explains why, even in this age of online commerce, there is nothing quite like having a fully decked-out brick-and-mortar store to reach out and connect with customers. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 2 pm Lifestyle Our picks of the latest dining, travel and leisure options to treat yourself. Sign Up Sign Up What do you do as the market director? I joined the company in 2017 and I am responsible for the strategic vision, driving growth and developing the brand across different markets in South-east Asia. I was previously based in Hong Kong and I moved to Singapore three years ago. What are the considerations when the company decides to enter a new market? First we ask ourselves, is there a pull? Do we feel as if we would be able to bring an added benefit to a particular market? It may sound very simple, but we are always looking at different places and trying to find out if that market is ready for a brand like Lululemon. We have more than 700 stores all over the world, and we are present in many markets across Asia today. Our first store in the region was right here in Singapore 11 years ago. Not too long ago, we opened our first store in the west of the country at Jem, and we just completed a relocation of our store at Marina Bay Sands. We expanded into Malaysia in 2019 and we will soon open another store at Mega Bangna, which is one of the biggest malls in Bangkok. The goal is to continue to expand further in other parts of South-east Asia. These days, many shoppers tend to just go online to get what they want. With high rental and labour costs, what is the thinking behind opening a big physical store? We have been present in Takashimaya for a while (at a smaller space a few floors above our new store), and we decided some time ago to expand our footprint in this mall. This really came out of a conversation some of us had about how we can continue to deepen the relationship with our customers, and what it would be like to have a concept where retail meets wellness. While many brands have moved fully online over the years, our decision to invest in brick-and-mortar growth is both intentional and strategic. We see ourselves as more than just an apparel company. We are a community built around movement, mindfulness and well-being. A physical space allows us to bring the brand to life so that people can feel and touch the products and get a better sense of who we are and what we do. Nothing can replicate that sort of energy when you are in a store like this. The interior of Lululemon's new flagship store at Takashimaya features an extensive menswear selection. PHOTO: LULULEMON How has the customer base or profile evolved over the years? Ask people to describe Lululemon and a common answer might be that it is a women's yoga brand. But as you can see, it is so much more than that. A very large percentage of our guests are men, and they are coming in for the high-performance gear for their workouts, or the smart casual attire that they can wear to the office. At all our stores, you will see a large proportion of the floor dedicated to menswear. We have really continued to invest in our men's range, and that is definitely one of the growth engines for us in the years to come. Are you quite an active person yourself? I enjoy running, doing half-marathons and other long distances. I recently took part in my first two Hyrox races – one in Singapore, and the other in Hong Kong. I try and do a lot of different things to stay well, and I see running as my kind of meditation. I try and run in the morning because what I find is it gives me this clarity of mind, which is what I need to be able to do my job effectively. So yes, I do think I am quite active.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store