Top US court takes case of Rastafarian whose hair was cut in prison
Landor, who had been growing his hair for nearly two decades, was serving the final three weeks of a five-month sentence for drug possession in 2020 when his hair was cut.
Landor presented prison guards with a copy of a 2017 court ruling stating that Rastafarians should be allowed to keep their dreadlocks in line with their religious beliefs.
A prison guard threw the document away and Landor was handcuffed to a chair and had his head shaved, according to court records.
An appeals court condemned Landor's "egregious" treatment but ruled that he is not eligible to sue individual prison officials for damages.
Louisiana Attorney General Elizabeth Murrill, in a brief submitted to the Supreme Court, acknowledged that the treatment of Landor by prison guards was "antithetical to religious freedom."
"The State has amended its prison grooming policy to ensure that nothing like Petitioner's alleged experience can occur," Murrill said.
But federal law does not permit "money damages against a state official sued in his individual capacity," she added.
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case during its next term, which begins in October.
Rastafarians let their hair grow, typically in dreadlocks, as part of their beliefs in the religion which originated in Jamaica and was popularized by the late reggae singer Bob Marley.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
a day ago
- France 24
Australia to recognise Palestinian state
"A two-state solution is humanity's best hope to break the cycle of violence in the Middle East and to bring an end to the conflict, suffering and starvation in Gaza," he told reporters in Canberra. "Until Israeli and Palestinian statehood is permanent, peace can only be temporary. "Australia will recognise the right of the Palestinian people to a state of their own. We will work with the international community to make this right a reality." The decision follows a push from several countries, including France, Britain and Canada, to recognise statehood for the Palestinians after Israel launched a war on Gaza nearly two years ago in response to the Hamas attacks. "There is a moment of opportunity here, and Australia will work with the international community to seize it," Albanese added. He said that Australia's decision was predicated on reassurances from the Palestinian Authority that there would be "no role for the terrorists of Hamas in any future Palestinian state". The PA, however, does not have a presence in Gaza, which has been governed by Hamas for nearly two decades. 'Shameless' Following Australia's announcement, Israel's embassy in Canberra told AFP the ambassador was "unavailable" to comment. Just hours earlier, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu criticised international calls to recognise Palestinian statehood, saying it would "not bring peace, it will bring war". "To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole, just like that, fall right into it and buy this canard is disappointing, and I think it's actually shameful," he said. International concern is growing about the plight of the more than two million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, where the fighting has triggered a dire humanitarian crisis and warnings of mass starvation. Albanese further criticised the Israeli government Monday and said it continued to defy "international law and deny sufficient aid". As the global movement to recognise Palestine grows, New Zealand's Foreign Minister Winston Peters said his country would carefully consider whether to do the same over the next month. He added that New Zealand's recognition of a Palestinian state is a "matter of when, not if". Israel's offensive has killed at least 61,430 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry, figures the United Nations says are reliable. Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel, which triggered the war, resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
Euronews
4 days ago
- Euronews
US federal judge blocks Trump's birthright order nationwide
A federal judge in Maryland ruled that US President Donald Trump cannot withhold citizenship from people born to people in the United States illegally or temporarily, issuing the fourth court decision blocking Trump's birthright citizenship order since a key Supreme Court ruling in June. US District Judge Deborah Boardman's preliminary injunction was expected after she said last month that she would issue such an order if an appeals court returned the case to her. The 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals sent the case back to her late in July. Since June, two other district courts, in addition to an appellate panel of judges, have also blocked Trump's birthright ban nationwide, which he passed on his first day in office through an executive order. Trump's executive order signed on Inauguration Day on 20 January would deny citizenship to children born to parents living in the United States illegally or temporarily. Boardman issued a preliminary injunction blocking the executive order nationwide, but a ruling by the Supreme Court offered the Trump administration some hope of upholding the policy many criticise as a violation of the US Constitution. The 14th Amendment of the Constitution stipulates that all persons born or naturalised in the United States are US citizens. The top US court upended Boardman's decision and other court rulings blocking Trump's order across the nation, saying that federal judges and courts lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions. The justices ruled did not however rule out other court orders which could have nationwide effects, including class-action lawsuits and those brought forward by states. Boardman on her Thursday ruling certified a class of children who have been born or will be born in the United States after 19 February, who would be affected by Trump's order. She argued that the plaintiffs in the lawsuit before her were 'extremely likely' to win their argument that the US president's order is a constitutional violation and are also likely to suffer 'irreparable harm' if the order went into effect.
France 24
5 days ago
- France 24
Trump demands new US census as redistricting war spreads
Trump called for a "new and highly accurate" census that he wanted based on unspecified "modern day facts and figures" gleaned from the 2024 election. "People who are in our Country illegally WILL NOT BE COUNTED IN THE CENSUS," he said in the social media post. The US Constitution since 1790 has required a census every 10 years that counts the "whole number of persons in each state" -- including people in the country illegally. The next one is not due until 2030, although preparations for the enormous task are already underway. Trump did not make clear if he was referring to the regularly scheduled population count or a special survey undertaken earlier. The census is used to determine how many members of Congress are elected from each state, and the Pew Research Center estimates that ignoring unauthorized migrants in 2020 would have deprived California, Florida and Texas of one House seat each. It is also used for apportioning votes in the state-by-state "electoral college" that decides presidential elections and for allocating trillions of dollars in federal funding. Trump attempted similar moves in his first term, including the addition of a citizenship question to the census, but was blocked by the Supreme Court. The court declined to rule on whether the millions of people in the country without legal status should be excluded. Trump's call for a new census comes with state-level lawmakers and officials in Texas locking horns over a new electoral map that would likely net Republicans up to five extra House seats in 2026. Threats to lawmakers More than 50 Texas Democratic lawmakers have fled to multiple Democratic states in an effort to block the passage of the proposed blueprint during a special legislative session. Texas Republicans have threatened to arrest them, and US Senator John Cornyn announced he had successfully petitioned the FBI to help state and local law enforcement locate them. Republican governors in several other states are exploring new maps in a bid to protect the party's razor-thin majority in the House, which would flip next year with three Democratic gains. Vice President JD Vance was scheduled to visit Indiana on Thursday to discuss redistricting with Governor Mike Braun and press local Republicans to eke out another seat for the party. Politico reported that Republicans could draw as many as 10 new seats ahead of the midterms and are targeting Ohio, Missouri, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Florida. But some Republicans have warned that opening a Pandora's box of mid-cycle partisan redistricting -- known as "gerrymandering" -- risks making conservative lawmakers an endangered species in liberal states Republican congressman Kevin Kiley, whose seat would likely disappear under a retaliatory gerrymandering in California, has introduced a bill to block all mid-decade redistricting. In Indiana, Braun said any redistricting conversation would be "exploratory," as the state's maps were drawn fairly in 2021, Indianapolis public broadcaster WFYI reported. "We tried to adhere to township lines and the configurations don't look like an octopus," Braun said, according to the TV and radio network. Democrats have vowed to retaliate with their own proposals, possibly in New York and California, the country's largest states. Texas legislators were evacuated from their suburban Chicago hotel on Wednesday morning following an unspecified threat. State representative John Bucy told NBC News the group had spent two hours outside the building but had not been diverted from pursuing their "fight for voting rights." © 2025 AFP
