Returning James Cleverly hits out at ‘one man band' Reform: 'The British people deserve better'
The former foreign and home secretary, who this week returned to the shadow cabinet, complimented Mr Farage as'funny', 'interesting' and 'a very good communicator'. However, Sir James said Reform UK falls short of credibility.
'The challenge he's got is that he's the only one in his party that you can describe in those terms,' Sir James told The Times.
'If you're going to be taken seriously as a party of government, that's nowhere near enough. As much as he's smart and funny and talented, he's not omnipresent.'
Questioning Reform's ability to govern, the former home secretary said: 'Who are Farage's shadow chancellor, shadow home secretary and shadow defence secretary? The fact is he hasn't got any of them.
'That's nowhere near good enough to be taken seriously as an alternative party of government. The British people deserve better.'
He added that Mr Farage 'crumbles' under scrutiny, particularly when pressed on the cost of his policies.
Sir James's return came as part of Kemi Badenoch 's shake-up of her top team, which she described as reflecting the Conservatives ' 'mission of renewal' after their election defeat.
The former foreign secretary will now shadow Angela Rayner on housing, communities and local government.
Sir James served in senior Cabinet roles when the Conservatives were in power before spending months on the back benches after coming third in last year's Tory leadership contest.
As an influential former minister, he has since warned against pursuing a populist agenda like Mr Farage's Reform UK.
Sir James also reflected on a turbulent personal year, losing a close army friend, his brother-in-law, and his father. He explained why he stepped back after the leadership race.
'I did actually need a bit of time, a bit more time with Susie, a bit of time with the family,' he told The Times.
Now back in the shadow cabinet, he urged the party not to 'throw a leader under the bus' amid speculation over Ms Badenoch's future.
'My strong advice is [that] our effort, our time, our energy, our focus, is much, much better directed at making sure Kemi succeeds as leader. Kemi won fair and square. She's got strong ideas, she is a staunch Conservative,' he said.
Sir James insisted the Tories must 'be hunters, not farmers' to win back voters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
4 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Corbyn's new party and the menace of populism
The upcoming launch of a new party by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana (Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana agree to launch leftwing party, 24 July) will inevitably prompt questions about whether this will divide the progressive vote or offer a genuine alternative to Labour's centrist drift, especially as the Green party continues to grow as a principled voice for environmental and social justice. Although these projects are potential rivals, they need not be. If the disturbing rise of rightwing populism is to be successfully confronted, the left must overcome fragmentation and find ways to coexist and collaborate. The Corbyn-Sultana initiative and the Greens share much common ground: a rejection of austerity, commitment to democratic reform and a belief in economic and ecological justice. Their differences in emphasis, tone and priorities are real but not irreconcilable. There has to be scope for a non-aggression pact at the next general election, with each party standing aside in constituencies where the other has a better chance of success. Joint campaigning on core issues – such as proportional representation, protest rights, wealth taxes and a green new deal – could amplify their impact, and framing climate action as central to economic justice, not separate from it, could provide a unifying narrative for both. This is not about merging or blurring identities. It is about strategic and political maturity. If the left cannot cooperate when so much is at stake, it will surrender the field to those who thrive on division and fear. Unity does not require uniformity; it requires courage and purpose. The worse case, of a public war of words and clashing candidacies between the Greens and Corbynites, would demoralise voters and hand the initiative to the populist CosgroveChapel Lawn, Shropshire Your report quotes Labour party sources who are dismissive of the threat from Jeremy Corbyn and then bluntly states that Corbyn 'lost the 2017 and 2019 elections as party leader'. It would have provided a fairer context if you had pointed out that in 2017, the Corbyn-led Labour party achieved 2.5m more votes (and a 6% higher vote share) than Keir Starmer did in 2024. Even in 2019, 500,000 more people voted for Corbyn's party than Starmer's. Dr Chris MorrisKidderminster, Worcestershire In the winter election of 2019 I spent hours leafleting for Jeremy Corbyn's Labour party. The sensation of cold and wet letterboxes still lingers on my fingertips when I think of what he said in an Observer article just after the election – that Labour had lost the election but won the argument. This is all Mr Corbyn is interested in doing – winning the argument – and indeed I think he will find that is all he ever will ArmstrongChester Thank you to Jeremy Corbyn for still caring enough and having the humanity to rally the 99% to join together and put 40 years of neoliberal theft and exploitation behind us. I support all his domestic policies, but the realpolitik of foreign policy bothers me. How would he deal with Vladimir Putin and Benjamin Netanyahu?Pamela HopeKingston upon Thames, London Oh, Jeremy Corbyn, why splinter the left further by creating a new party when the Greens already actively stand and work for all you want to fight for?Sushila DhallOxford Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Telegraph
4 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Tech Secretary under fire as Online Safety Act faces mounting backlash
Meanwhile, Preston Byrne, a US lawyer, said on X he was preparing to sue Ofcom in the US over the act on the instruction of unnamed tech companies. The rules may also to reignite anger over grooming gangs and child abuse. Sammy Woodhouse, a campaigner who helped reveal the Rotherham abuse scandal, said last night on X that the 'Online Safety Act – put in place by our government – has done nothing but silence the victims' after a post from a grooming victim was subject to an age restriction. The Online Safety Act requires tech giants to enforce their terms of service and introduce measures to stop children seeing extreme or explicit content. Most visibly, this has led to new ID or age estimation checks for porn websites. But other websites that allow explicit posts, such as X, have also had to introduce the new checks. Failure to abide by the rules can lead to fines of up to 10pc of a company's turnover. The legislation is broad enough that some fairly innocuous content, such as a Reddit forum dedicated to beer, has now been placed behind a digital age verification wall. Critics, including Mr Farage, claim this will just drive internet users towards the dark web or to readily available VPN apps, which are used to hide an internet-user's identity and location. Petition hits 450,000 signatures Even some of Mr Kyle's Labour colleagues are not happy with the byzantine digital laws, which were originally passed under the Conservatives, though critics on the Left tend to fear the act does not go far enough when it comes to tackling misinformation or protecting children. Chi Onwurah, the Labour chair of Parliament's science committee, says: 'The Labour Government inherited the Online Safety Act, which everyone acknowledged is a bit of a mess.' She says the act has proved 'woefully incapable' of tackling disinformation. Mr Kyle has said 'he wants the Government to go further but we have yet to see any real evidence of that', she said. However, she also criticised Farage's insistence that Reform would repeal the law. 'Given the strength of Reform's calls for action on real world grooming and child sexual abuse, it seems strange that they are seeking to roll back online protection for children,' she said. So far, Mr Kyle is not budging. A petition to scrap the law, signed by 450,000 people, received a response from the Government that insisted there were 'no plans to repeal the Online Safety Act'. And on Thursday, Ofcom announced 34 new investigations into pornography websites over their compliance with its age-check rules. 'This enforcement goes to the very heart of what the Online Safety Act is here to do – protecting children from pornographic material,' Mr Kyle said on Thursday. 'These laws have nothing to do with censorship or policing adults seeking to access legal content. Those who suggest otherwise are playing politics with child safety and have no practical alternatives for protecting our children from content they should never see – content that can cause lasting, even fatal, damage.'
The Guardian
4 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Is this a dagger which I see before me, King Charles?
I note that in the photo of King Charles visiting Scotland in your print edition (Monarch north of the glens, 29 July), he has a dagger tucked into his sock. How does this fit with the man arrested recently by armed police for carrying garden tools home from his allotment ? No doubt the king had armed police with him who took a different view of someone carrying a weapon in LowcockSandbach, Cheshire Nigel Farage is surely right that lawlessness on the streets is being compounded by the arrival of 'droves of unvetted men into our towns and cities' (Editorial, 29 July). Perhaps he could simply ask his supporters to stay at PaffordBowerhill, Wiltshire It might help to improve the status of oracy in schools (Editorial, 27 July) if teachers could rephrase the often-heard classroom instruction: 'Stop talking and get on with your work.'Pat Jones Author of Lipservice: The Story of Talk in Schools Rather than a green burial (Letters, 30 July), I hope that when my time comes, resomation (a process that uses water and a weak alkaline solution to break down human remains) will be widely available in this MarchingtonWhaley Bridge, Derbyshire Thank you to Martin Parr for his wonderful photo essay on 'voyaging', as cruising is now apparently called (Decks appeal, 28 July). I have never been a fan, but now I'm sure that 'voyaging' is not for VandecasteeleCupar, Fife Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
