Is Russia really contesting US sovereignty over Alaska?
The choice of venue is practical. Mainland Alaska and Russia are just 90 kilometres apart, while Alaska's Little Diomede Island lies fewer than 4 kilometres from Russia's Big Diomede Island in the Bering Strait.
It means Putin will be able to travel for talks while avoiding the airspace of Western countries that could attempt to intercept his flight to enforce the arrest warrant of the International Criminal Court (ICC).
But the venue is not only practical, it's also symbolic. Alaska was once a fully-fledged Russian colony.
In 1867, Russia's Tsar Alexander II sold Alaska to the US for $7.2 million, to help pay back high debts accrued during the Crimean war of 1853-1856.
For the Kremlin, Alaska was not considered an economically significant part of its territory.
Alaska was officially proclaimed the 49th US state in 1949, and is now the largest of the US' current 50 states.
Putin will be the first Russian president to visit Anchorage.
Choice of venue re-ignites imperialist narratives
The Anchorage summit has reignited narratives that hail Alaska a 'historical' Russian land, with prominent Kremlin officials and allies quick to highlight the territory's Russian heritage and history.
The theory that Russia will one day re-claim the US state as its own is not new, and has been peddled by several prominent Kremlin officials and allies in the past.
Last year, Russian state TV propagandist Olga Skabeyeva referred to the US territory as 'our Alaska'.
Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chair of the Russian Security Council, has joked on social media about going to war with the US over the territory.
Kirill Dmitriev, a top Kremlin negotiator who also heads the Russian Direct Investment Fund, said last week that Alaska was a 'Russian American' and suggested the summit could trigger closer cooperation between Moscow and Washington in the Arctic.
A 2022 billboard carrying the message 'Alaska is ours', which at that time sparked outrage among some US senators, has also resurfaced.
No publicly available evidence Moscow has nullified 1867 sale of Alaska
Speculation that Moscow is taking steps to regain the territory is also circulating widely.
That speculation has been fuelled by Trump appearing to confuse Alaska for Russia in a press conference on Monday, when he said he would travel to 'Russia' to meet Putin despite having already confirmed Alaska as the venue.
Some social media users have suggested that a 2022 Russian Supreme Court ruling nullified the 1867 sale of Alaska to the US.
But Euroverify couldn't find any official court document to corroborate that claim.
Other users have referenced a 2024 decree that purportedly declared the 1867 sale of Alaska illegal.
That decree does exist. It's dated 18 January 2024 and allocates funds for the search, registration, and legal protection of Russia's historic overseas assets.
We verified its contents and found it makes no reference to Alaska or any of Russia's historical claims to the territory. Analysts however do believe that the Kremlin could use the decree to re-open historical disputes, not only in Alaska but also in former Russian territories.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
35 minutes ago
- LeMonde
Mali junta accuses foreign powers of destabilization plot
The authorities in Mali on Thursday, August 14, said a French national had been arrested on suspicion of working for French intelligence services, and accused "foreign states" of trying to destabilize the country. The ruling junta, which came to power after back-to-back coups in 2020 and 2021, also said that dozens of soldiers had been detained in recent days for allegedly seeking to overthrow the government. Impoverished Mali has been gripped by a security crisis since 2012, fueled notably by violence from groups affiliated with Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State jihadist group, as well as local criminal gangs. In a statement read on national television, the military said "fringe elements of the Malian armed security forces" were held for seeking to "destabilize the institutions of the republic." "These soldiers and civilians" are said to have obtained "the help of foreign states," the government said. The French national was held on suspicion of working "on behalf of the French intelligence service." Security sources told AFP that at least 55 soldiers had been arrested, and the government said it was working to identify "possible accomplices." The junta confirmed the arrest of two generals, including Abbas Dembélé, a highly respected figure in the army and a former governor who was recently dismissed from his position. Security sources told AFP the arrests were made mainly within the national guard – a branch of the army from whose ranks emerged Defence Minister Sadio Camara, a key figure in the junta. Several observers noted that some of those arrested were close to Camara, but he has not been questioned so far. 'Misappropriation' On Tuesday, Mali's civilian former prime minister Choguel Maiga and a number of his former colleagues were taken into custody as part of an investigation into claims of "misappropriation of public funds." Maiga, a former junta heavyweight, was appointed prime minister in 2021 before being dismissed at the end of last year after criticizing the military government. He had criticized being excluded from decisions about the continued leadership of the generals, who had initially promised to hand power back to elected civilians in March 2024. No connection has been made between his arrest and those of the soldiers accused of wanting to overthrow the government. The junta, led by President Assimi Goita, has turned away from Western partners, notably former colonial power France, to align itself politically and militarily with Russia in the name of national sovereignty. The Malian army and its Russian mercenary allies have been tasked with hunting down the jihadists and are regularly accused of committing abuses against civilians.
France 24
35 minutes ago
- France 24
All 800 National Guard troops officially deployed in DC amid Trump's federal takeover
All 800 National Guard troops who were ordered to the US capital Washington to aid law enforcement personnel by President Donald Trump have now been mobilized, the Pentagon said Thursday. Trump ordered the deployment -- which follows a similar move during protests in Los Angeles in June -- as part of what he billed as a crackdown on crime in Washington, where violent offenses are in fact down. "As of today, all 800 Army and Air National Guardsmen are mobilized... as part of Joint Task Force DC, and they are now here in our capital," Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson told journalists. They "will assist the DC Metropolitan Police Department and federal law enforcement partners with monument security, community safety patrols, protecting federal facilities and officers" and traffic control posts, Wilson said. The troops "will remain until law and order has been restored in the District, as determined by the president," she added. The US Army later said the National Guard's initial mission "is to provide a visible presence in key public areas, serving as a visible crime deterrent." "They will not arrest, search, or direct law enforcement," but they "have the authority to temporarily detain individuals to prevent imminent harm," the Army said in a statement. The troops will be equipped with protective gear, it added, saying that weapons would be available if needed but would remain in the armory. Trump announced the National Guard deployment -- along with a federal takeover of the city's police department -- on Monday, vowing "to take our capital back." The overwhelmingly Democratic US capital faces allegations from Republican politicians that it is overrun by crime, plagued by homelessness and financially mismanaged. 01:40 However, data from Washington police shows significant drops in violent crime between 2023 and 2024, although that was coming off the back of a post-pandemic surge. The deployment of troops in Washington comes after Trump dispatched the National Guard and Marines to quell unrest in Los Angeles, California, that was spurred by immigration enforcement raids. It was the first time since 1965 that a US president deployed the National Guard against the wishes of a state governor. Most National Guard forces answer to state governors and have to be "federalized" to be brought under presidential control, but in Washington these troops already report only to the US president.
France 24
5 hours ago
- France 24
Dueling interests for Trump and Putin at Alaska summit
What does Trump want? The Nobel Peace Prize. Trump has openly and repeatedly sought the world's most prestigious award, however unlikely many observers think it is that the Norwegian committee would bestow the honor on the divisive president. Trump has boasted of his deal-making skills and had vowed to end the Ukraine war within 24 hours, but his calls to Putin went unheeded even after Trump put heavy pressure on Zelensky to compromise, including by cutting US aid. The billionaire has also said that he sees business opportunities in Russia, which remains under Western sanctions over the war. Many European leaders fear that in a one-on-one meeting, Trump could fall under the sway of Putin, for whom he has voiced admiration in the past. At a 2018 summit, Trump stunned viewers by siding with Putin over US intelligence in denying that Russia intervened in the 2016 US election to support Trump. What does Putin want? To retain as much Ukrainian territory as possible. Russia failed in its goal of quickly seizing Ukraine in its February 2022 invasion but in recent months has made steady gains on the battlefield, leading Putin to believe he has an upper hand militarily. John Herbst, the former US ambassador to Ukraine, said that Putin already knows what a deal could look like -- a ceasefire, plus some form of security guarantees for Ukraine. "That doesn't give Putin what he wants, which is control over all of Ukraine. But it doesn't matter what Putin wants. If he can't get anything more, he may settle for what's available," said Herbst, now senior director of the Atlantic Council's Eurasia Center. Putin suggested the meeting with Trump after the US president threatened new sanctions on Russia unless it moves toward a ceasefire. "The best-case scenario for Russia is… if they are able to put a deal on the table that creates some kind of a ceasefire, but that leaves Russia in control of those escalatory dynamics, [and] does not create any kind of genuine deterrence on the ground or in the skies over Ukraine," said Sam Greene, director for democratic resilience at the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA). What does Zelensky want? A seat at the negotiating table, and Russia out of Ukraine. Zelensky will not participate in Trump's summit with Putin -- a sharp shift from previous US president Joe Biden's insistence on "nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine." Trump has promised to involve Zelensky, possibly with a three-way summit -- if Putin agrees. But Trump has also again insisted that Ukraine needs to make territorial concessions, which Zelensky has refused. For Ukrainians, "It looks like it's two big powers that are just deciding the fate of Ukraine without any Ukrainians at the table," said Olga Tokariuk, also at CEPA. For Ukraine, the best-case scenario would be no agreement between Putin and Trump and the imposition of new sanctions on Russia, she said. But Herbst said Zelensky could accept a deal in which Russia controls what it has -- without formal recognition of its conquest. Putin in turn would accept "that his notion of taking more of Ukraine and restoring the Russian Empire is kaput," Herbst said. Why Alaska? Putin will be stepping foot on western soil for the first time since the war began. He faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court in The Hague, to which the United States is not a party. Alaska carries historic significance as the United States bought it from tsarist Russia in 1867. Russia has pointed to Alaska as it makes the case that it is normal to transfer land. Ukraine's borders date from the breakup of the Soviet Union, although Russia in 2014 seized the Crimean peninsula in an annexation unrecognized by nearly all countries.
