How regionalism is shaping South Korea's presidential election
The first day of early voting in South Korea's presidential election saw a record turnout, with more than eight million ballots cast. The election comes after months of political turmoil, following a botched attempt by former leader Yoon Suk Yeol to impose martial law last year. While many voters are focused on candidates' profiles and policies, regionalism remains a powerful force, especially in the south, where political divides are sharpest. Lim Yun Suk heads to the area ahead of the June 3 vote to find out how regionalism is shaping South Korean politics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
an hour ago
- Independent Singapore
America vs China: An avoidable war despite Thucydides' Trap
American soft power extends even to Chinese paramount leader Xi Jinping's family. His daughter, Xi Mingze, his only child, did not study at Tsinghua University like him but graduated from Harvard in 2014. He visited the United States several times, most notably in 1985, when, as a young provincial official, he spent two weeks in Iowa learning about American farming methods and stayed with an American family for three days. Yet, under his leadership, US-China tensions have escalated to the highest level since the early 1950s Korean War, when American soldiers fought the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA). As during the Korean War, America is urging other countries to contain China. Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth appealed to Asian nations to increase defence spending. However, it was not a call to arms. As noted by Singapore's Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing, Hegseth specifically said: 'We do not seek war … we do not seek to dominate or strangle China, to encircle or provoke. We do not seek regime change, nor will we instigate or disrespect a proud and historic culture.' Indeed, what the Americans are trying to do is contain China without confronting it militarily. From strict export controls on advanced technology to attempts to diversify supply chains, Washington is trying to curb Beijing's economic power and reduce dependence on China. Beijing may see it as an act of hostility. But its own actions – from expanding its naval presence to wooing other nations with investments under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) — are challenging the status quo, undermining Pax Americana. See also China's Path Not Taken In Kevin Rudd's view Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd worries the tensions between the two countries may spill into bloody hostilities in what he calls an 'avoidable war'. That is the title of his book: The Avoidable War. The 2020s are 'the decade of living dangerously', he writes, the fallout unimaginable if the two countries go to war. According to him, 'armed conflict between China and the United States, while not yet probable, has become a real possibility'. He urges the two countries to take steps to avert war, like America and the former Soviet Union did after the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. Indeed, as the Cold War demonstrated, superpower rivalry does not inevitably end in war. America and the former Soviet Union waged proxy wars, backing warring nations and rival leaders, but refrained from all-out war. There were military confrontations in Cuba and Berlin, but not gory battles. See also Australia says Xi's caring rhetoric does not match actions Will America and China follow the same course – geopolitical rivals but not warring enemies? Thucydides' Trap The danger that could trip them into full-scale war is called Thucydides' Trap. Named after the ancient Greek historian and Athenian general Thucydides, Thucydides' Trap is a concept popularised by the American political scientist Graham Allison. Discussed by Rudd and the animating idea behind an entire book by Allison, Thucydides' Trap is the hostilities unleashed when a rising power tries to displace a ruling power. Thucydides mentioned the phenomenon In his History of the Peloponnesian War. 'It was the rise of Athens and the fear that this instilled in Sparta that made war inevitable,' he wrote. The fifth-century BC Peloponnesian War was fought between Athens and Sparta and their allies, which included virtually every Greek city-state. It was the result of the then-dominant Sparta's fear of the growing might of Athens. Sparta eventually vanquished Athens after two decades of warfare. Thucydides' Trap is central to Allison's book, Destined for War, about America and China. The Harvard political scientist compares China's growing power to that of Athens before the Peloponnesian War. As Athens grew in importance, Sparta reacted with 'fear, insecurity, and a determination to defend the status quo'. The ensuing Peloponnesian War 'brought ancient Greece to its knees'. War is not inevitable between America and China, says Allison, but only if their leaders alter course. According to Allison, 'If Hollywood were making a movie pitting China against America on the path to war, central casting could not find two better leading actors than Xi Jinping and Donald Trump. Each personifies his country's deep aspirations of national greatness.' But a collision could be averted. 'If Xi and Trump listened to Lee Kuan Yew, they would focus first on what matters most: their domestic problems,' says Allison. Yes, Singapore's founding father, according to the Harvard scholar, could still mentor global leaders from beyond the grave. Featured image is from the Destined For War book cover
Independent Singapore
an hour ago
- Independent Singapore
'He looked frightened and confused' — Singaporean shocked after foreign worker 'jumped up and offered' his seat to her on MRT
SINGAPORE: A local Reddit user had questions after an encounter on the MRT with a foreign worker left her puzzled. She wrote that the man had exhibited 'weird behaviour.' In a post on r/ askSingapore on Sunday (Jun 1), u/a_nonny_mooze wrote that while she is a 'young-looking' 48-year-old without any injuries or disabilities, when she and a foreign worker made eye contact on the train, he 'immediately jumped up and offered me his seat.' The worker's good manners could explain this, but it was clear from the post that it was about more than that. ' I did not make a fuss or in any way indicate I wanted the seat. The poor guy looked frightened and confused when I told him to sit back down, as I was getting off in a few stops. He was looking round for someone to take the seat, and only reluctantly sat back down when there were no takers,' she wrote. She asked whether this is 'common behaviour for foreign workers,' adding that she's taken public transport for a number of years now, which is why she was surprised that the man felt the 'need to surrender his seat' to her. See also Wake Up, Singapore: Ban and probe racist social media accounts 'We all paid the same fare, so why?' the post author added. Some commenters on her post surmised that the foreign worker may have had a prior negative experience with locals, adding that her experience is not that unusual. 'My guess is that the poor guy may have been treated badly and told to give up seats for locals before. Too many people think they don't deserve to sit smh,' wrote one. Another agreed, writing, 'Yeah, have seen that happen quite often. That's why they usually give up the seat.' They added that it is usually older Singaporeans who do this, and at times, middle-aged locals as well. 'Probably some self-righteous auntie/uncle spoiled his public transport experience before,' one wrote. 'I live in a building full of foreign workers. Most of them would insist I enter the lift first, even though they might be there earlier than I. Sometimes I feel like they feel secondary to us,' a commenter observed. See also Malaysian Airlines got its geography wrong and they fly planes? This prompted the post author to answer, 'That is a very sad indictment of our society. We need to do better for these people who come here to make our lives better.' 'This reminded me of a similar incident I witnessed yesterday. A foreign worker was seated at the reserved seat with an empty seat next to him. An uncle walked towards the empty seat, and the foreign worker immediately jumped out of his seat (in fear?), and the uncle had to reassure him to sit back down,' another Reddit user wrote. /TISG Read also: Jamus Lim proposes CPF-equivalent scheme for foreign workers to level workforce playing field for Singaporeans
Independent Singapore
an hour ago
- Independent Singapore
U.S. Defence Secretary compares Donald Trump to Lee Kuan Yew, but Singaporeans say 'ah gong confirm flip in his grave'
SINGAPORE: In comments over the weekend, Pete Hegseth, the United States' Secretary of Defense, made the headlines for a comparison he made between U.S. President Donald Trump and Singapore's much-revered founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew. He characterized Mr Trump and Prime Minister Lee as 'historic men.' 'Across three decades, he built this country into one of the world's most important hubs of finance and innovation. Like the late prime minister, President Trump's approach is grounded in common sense and national interests,' Mr Hegseth said. He noted that Mr Lee's 'sage leadership, strategic vision' and 'common sense policies' had done so much for Singapore, adding that 'that's precisely what President Trump's vision is all about.' Many Singaporeans commenting online took these remarks with a huge grain of salt. A Reddit user agreed that both men are historic figures, but added, it's 'just that one brought an eastern country from third world to first. The other is bringing a Western country from the first world to the third.' Another took it a step further, replying to the comment above with, 'More like from a third world 'developed' country to a 4th Reich if you asked me.' A commenter also agreed with the 'historic' label, but added, 'But for different reasons.' 'No billionaire could control LKY,' one noted, while another argued that U.S. Presidents Bill Clinton and George Bush are more like the late Mr Lee than the current U.S. President. A commenter noted that one of the leaders united their nation while the other is succeeding in dividing theirs. Others suggested that Prime Minister Lawrence Wong might have had strong reactions to the comparison in private. 'Lmao ah gong confirm flip in his grave,' another quipped, while one added, 'I wish LKY was still around to have a witty response to this.' Some Facebook users aimed at the Defence Secretary and other U.S. officials, writing, 'The extent of how the current U.S. officers polish their supreme leader's boots at every opportunity is like replaying the last few breaths of past falling empires.' 'He has single-handedly turned the Shangri-la dialogue into a joke with this comment,' another noted. Mr Hegseth, a former Army National Guard officer, is best known as a Fox News contributor and co-host on Fox & Friends Weekend . Many Americans were surprised when he was named Mr Trump's nominee for Defence Secretary last year, even though Mr Hegseth had served as his advisor in 2016. He barely squeaked by in the confirmation hearing for the position, after U.S. Vice President JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote, largely due to allegations of misconduct, financial mismanagement, and alcohol issues against Mr Hegseth. /TISG Read also: U.S. urges Asian allies to prepare for China's 'imminent' threat head-on
