Shameless welfare cuts are a betrayal of Labour voters
Many Labour supporters, including myself, have waited a decade and a half for Labour to return to government and bring about a sea change in the governance of the country. We are now beginning to wonder why we bothered. Labour in opposition promised to ensure that the public would see a significant improvement in essential public services and in their economic wellbeing, but there is a fundamental flaw and inherent dishonesty in this government pretending it can achieve this while adopting an economic policy clothed in a self-imposed straitjacket.
Rachel Reeves's spring statement (Rachel Reeves accused of balancing books on back of UK's poorest, 26 March) further exacerbates the chasm between her party's ambitions in opposition and its achievements in government. A year ago, Frances Ryan asked: What's the point of Starmer's Labour if it won't stand up for poor, sick or disabled people? That is just one of the questions that many of us are beginning to ask.Peter RiddleWirksworth, Derbyshire
'Welfare savings from withdrawing or cutting incapacity benefits'; 'Thousands of public sector jobs to go'; 'Government departments facing major cuts to their budgets'. Sound familiar? Headlines from George Osborne's spending review in 2010. That went really well, didn't it? Good job Labour has learned lessons from that. Still, at least it saved money by copying and pasting from it.Peter Loschi Oldham, Greater Manchester
So all disabled people who want to work will be supported in obtaining secure and well-paid jobs as part of Labour's drive to reduce welfare costs and get Britain working. I recall a previous Labour government targeting disabled people by withdrawing financial support to some Remploy factories under the guise of helping those people affected to secure work in open employment. As feared at the time by disability groups, the reality was that the scheme was really about reducing welfare costs.
The majority of people who lost their job at a Remploy factory faced long-term unemployment and loss of independence and self-worth. History will repeat itself with this Labour government's shameless attack on disabled people.John MaherLiverpool
I am sickened that a Labour chancellor, confronted with an unfavourable financial forecast, thinks the only course of action is to expect the poorest in society to have their income reduced to fill the gap. Our system is awash with tax breaks for the better-off. Rachel Reeves is behaving exactly as I would expect a Tory chancellor to, which is not what I, or the rest of those who voted Labour, wanted out of a new government.John RennieGerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire
Like Jon Burnell (Letters, 25 March), I too am appalled by this Labour government. As a member since 1960, I see a party that is led by a former human rights lawyer who cannot tolerate dissent, that echoes the cruelty of the last Conservative government, and that implements economic policies which seek to penalise the most needy and vulnerable. I have started to ask myself when does loyalty become an endorsement of the unacceptable? I am going to find it very difficult to renew my membership next year.George RedmanNew Eltham, London
Do you think Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves and the rest of this welfare-cutting cabinet can wash the lower halves of their bodies themselves? I just cannot believe that it is a Labour government that is targeting disabled people in such a shameful way. We would have been a better society under another Rishi Sunak government – and I have been a Labour voter all my long life. I can't vote Labour now, not while this lot are in power.Pat StaplesSouthampton
I have been a Labour supporter all my life, but I am appalled by the spring statement. I know that Rachel Reeves loves savings, so I have today resigned my Labour membership and will be donating the money saved to Save the Children instead.Nick RozanskiLondon
If that's not austerity, I'm a spring onion!Jol MiskinSheffield
Do you have a photograph you'd like to share with Guardian readers? If so, please click here to upload it. A selection will be published in our Readers' best photographs galleries and in the print edition on Saturdays.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
5 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Student flats should be open to resident challenge says MSP
Pauline McNeill, Glasgow Labour MSP, raised the issue in the Scottish Parliament with the government. She highlighted the plans for the old 02 ABC site on Sauchiehall Street, approved this month by Glasgow City Council despite objections from the local community. READ NEXT:Get You in Town: New campaign to promote Glasgow city centre as a destination McNeill questioned the number of applications being approved and said the motivation for investors is the ability to collect high rental charges. She said: 'Scotland needs good, affordable student accommodation, but the way that planning consents are being granted in Glasgow makes it seem as if they are being handed out as an easy fix for gap sites. 'We are seeing oversaturation because purpose-built student accommodation is currently favoured by investors due to the ability to charge high rents. 'Last week, a proposed nine-storey student accommodation block was approved on the site of the former O2 ABC iconic music venue, but that is just one of many student developments that have been heavily objected to by local residents and community groups.' McNeill asked Ivan McKee, public finance minister, if there should be a right to challenge overprovision. READ NEXT:Hundreds access emergency homeless help over winter in Glasgow McKee said the council can act if there are concerns about any negative impact. He said: 'Local authorities, including Glasgow City Council, are able to identify areas of concentration where further development would undermine residential amenity. 'That power already exists. There is also a power for local communities to produce local place plans to feed into local development plans. 'We should recognise, as I think Pauline McNeill does, that students who are studying at our colleges and universities are a hugely important part of society. I welcome international students and the making of provision for them, and any PBSA provision obviously takes pressure off the private rented sector, which I think we would all agree is to be welcomed.' The plan 02 ABC site is for a House of Social nine storey block, including student accommodation, a food hall, a public courtyard, a bar, a gym, and more.
BBC News
12 minutes ago
- BBC News
County sees first Reform UK councillor in by-election win
A town council has its first Reform UK councillor after the party's candidate won a by-election by 24 Bellhouse will sit on Bracknell Town Council as the new representative for Harmans Water following Thursday's election, which was triggered by former councillor Cherise Welch's Bellhouse won 302 votes, edging out Labour's Chloe McDougall, who won 278 votes. Chris Turrell, a Conservative and former executive member on Bracknell Forest Council, won 234 votes and Jason Reardon, the Heritage Party's candidate, came fourth with 20 UK Bracknell said on its Facebook page that it was "absolutely delighted" with Mr Bellhouse's victory. It said it was "delighted " with the result and the "first elected Reform UK councillor in the whole of Berkshire".It described it as a "significant milestone, not just for Reform UK Bracknell but for the residents, who have placed their trust in someone genuinely committed to listening, challenging and delivering real change".Mr Bellhouse is the sole councillor on the 28-person authority who is not a Labour representative. You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Daily Record
17 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Tory calls for flags to be put up and taken down every day at East Ayrshire HQ
He described it as 'a very British way of expressing joy and pride'. A call to fly the Union Flag, Saltire and East Ayrshire flags daily at East Ayrshire Council's headquarters was roundly rejected following concerns over cost, resources, and political motivations. Conservative Councillor Neill Watts had proposed flying the three flags every day at the London Road HQ in Kilmarnock, describing it as 'a very British way of expressing joy and pride' and 'a symbol of unity.' His motion suggested that these flags be flown daily except when a different flag is more appropriate for special occasions. However, the proposal was met with strong opposition, particularly from Labour group leader Councillor Barry Douglas, who questioned both the practicality and its similarity to moves at Reform UK run councils in England. He challenged the resource implications, asking whether flags would be installed at all council buildings, how much that would cost, and who would be tasked with raising and lowering the flags. 'There's a cost involved in all of that,' Cllr Douglas said. 'Raising and lowering flags takes staff. Are council officers to stop their duties to do this every day?' He also took issue with Cllr Watts' description of the Conservatives as 'Scotland's strongest unionist party,' suggesting the recent general election results told a different story. 'Are we really talking about community cohesion,' he asked, 'or making a political point around the flag?' Labour councillor Peter Mabon also opposed the move, stating that while flags were appropriate on special days, raising them daily would eat into officer time. He said: 'We're talking about 200-plus hours every year in all weathers to raise and lower flags. Our officers have enough to do.' SNP Council leader Douglas Reid also opposed the motion, expressing support for the current approach. 'We've got a policy that's lasted before my time as leader. Raising flags for special occasions, like Ukraine or Rainbow Flag (for Pride), makes it meaningful. Changing that sends the wrong message.' Conservative councillor John McFadzean argued the proposal was modest in scale. 'For all the time it would take to hook on one flag and wind it up, there's not a huge implication. Civic pride helps lift morale.' Cllr Douglas responded by drawing parallels with Reform UK-run councils in England, where flag-related motions have gained traction. He acknowledged Cllr Watts' claim that he had been approached by Reform but had declined. 'Maybe he wants to tell the chamber something today. It is a big issue for Reform, but why is it such a big issue for him?' Chief Governance Officer David Mitchell then intervened to clarify that there is no East Ayrshire Council flag. 'There has never been a council flag and we certainly don't have one at the moment.' Cllr Watts denied any political motive, explaining his motion was based on personal observation. 'I would be more than happy just to have a flag – it doesn't matter whether it's the Saltire, it doesn't matter whether it's the flag of the United Kingdom, 'I just think that we should have at least a flag at this building as a mark of respect to our communities.' He also reiterated his Conservative affiliation and rejected any association with Reform. 'I certainly am a Conservative and I am nowhere near Reform in that respect.' In the end, councillors voted overwhelmingly to maintain the current flag policy, with 24 voting in favour of an amendment to retain existing arrangements and just four supporting the motion.
