logo
LayerX collaborates with Google Chrome Enterprise to further protect enterprises' extension security

LayerX collaborates with Google Chrome Enterprise to further protect enterprises' extension security

Yahoo31-07-2025
MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif., July 31, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- LayerX Security, the leader in protecting organizations against malicious browser extensions, has integrated its industry-leading extension risk scoring directly into Chrome for Enterprises. This new integration will enable Chrome Enterprise customers to get real-time visibility of the threat profile of every Chrome extension installed in their environment and restrict risky extensions.
For each extension, LayerX's proprietary algorithms analyze a wide range of details, including extensions' access permissions, publisher information, usage, and more. Moreover, LayerX uses innovative techniques to identify malicious code in browser extensions. Enterprises use LayerX's technology to assess the threat posed by each extension and take remediation actions to block risky or malicious ones.
As browsers increasingly serve as the operating system for work, the security posture of browser extensions has never been more important. Extensions play a central role in productivity and workflow customization for most enterprise users. According to the LayerX 2025 Enterprise Browser Extension Security Report, browser extensions are widely used across almost all enterprise users: a full 99% of enterprise users have at least one browser extension installed in their browser, and 53% of enterprise users have more than ten browser extensions.
One of the evolving challenges is that, while extensions deliver tremendous value, their powerful capabilities often require broad permissions to deliver their intended functionality. LayerX's research finds that over half of extensions installed in enterprise environments require 'High' or 'Critical' level access, and more than one in ten can access user cookies. This underscores the need for thoughtful governance and transparency to protect sensitive business data, support compliance, and maintain user trust without restricting the flexibility that makes extensions so useful.
Another factor shaping this landscape is the diversity and reach of the extension developer ecosystem. According to LayerX data, most extension developers have published only a single extension. This diversity drives innovation, but also highlights the need for enterprise-grade visibility and risk assessment tools, helping organizations make informed security decisions.
This is exactly where the new collaboration between Google and LayerX comes in: LayerX's extension risk scoring data helps organizations understand the risks associated with each extension, assess the reputation of its publisher, and decide whether this extension should be allowed or disallowed - all within a single, holistic risk score. As part of the collaboration, LayerX's risk scores will now be integrated into the management dashboard of Chrome Enterprise, providing detailed risk assessment for every extension.
Whenever an organization examines the extensions installed in users' Chrome browsers, the overall risk score of each extension will be displayed directly in the Chrome Enterprise dashboard. Customers can then get a detailed drill-down through the LayerX ExtensionPedia, with full extension technical details, publisher information, and in-depth risk scoring.
"Chrome Enterprise and LayerX are both committed to bringing businesses the most secure browsing experience, without impacting how users get their work done,' says Or Eshed, co-founder and CEO of LayerX. 'For customers, this collaboration offers unmatched 'better together' benefits for browser security, bringing together the industry's best browser with the industry's best browser protection.'
The browser extension risk scores by LayerX are available immediately to all Chrome Enterprise customers. Users can also use the LayerX ExtensionPedia, the Browser Extension Risk Database and Knowledge Center, which is freely available to all users.
About LayerXLayerX is the leading provider of browser security solutions that protect enterprise data in the modern work environment. Purpose-built to secure SaaS access, GenAI usage, and browser-based workflows, LayerX enables enterprises to gain granular visibility and control at the point of risk: the browser.
ContactsBusiness:
press@layerxsecurity.com www.layerxsecurity.com
Media:
dmontner@montner.com Montner Tech PR
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

7 features I want Chrome to steal from its rivals, and why
7 features I want Chrome to steal from its rivals, and why

Android Authority

timean hour ago

  • Android Authority

7 features I want Chrome to steal from its rivals, and why

Ryan Haines / Android Authority I've been on the Chrome bandwagon for years now and it remains my go-to browser even today. But let's just say, I haven't been entirely faithful to Chrome. Over the years, I've dabbled in a wide variety of browsers ranging from Edge to modern AI-infused alternatives to see what I might be missing out on. And while I keep coming back to Chrome, it's clear to me that Google has been playing it safe. I haven't been entirely faithful to Chrome, and that's exactly why I know it can do better. Google's been so focused on stability, performance, and ecosystem integration that it's lost some of the ambition that made Chrome exciting in the first place. Meanwhile, competitors like Edge, Vivaldi, Samsung Internet, and even Opera have been quietly adding genuinely useful features that make you question why Chrome doesn't have them yet. Don't get me wrong. For as much as we criticize Chrome, it still nails the basics like syncing across devices, a smart address bar, and unmatched integration with Google services. But that is exactly why it should be better. With the basics nailed down tight and mass acceptance by millions of users, now is the time for Chrome to raise the bar with a modern feature set. So here's a list of features I wish Chrome would just borrow already. In 2025, I wouldn't call any of these features game changers. But most of them are table stakes that would make Chrome a better browser without compromising on what makes it great today. While most of these features are available across the desktop and mobile versions of the browsers, some are available only on the desktop version to account for available screen space. Have you considered switching from Chrome to another browser? 0 votes I've already switched to Opera / Vivaldi / Edge / other. NaN % Not yet, but I'm considering it. NaN % Chrome has all the features I need. NaN % Vertical tabs Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority If you, like me, are a sucker for widescreen displays, you'll know what I'm talking about. Once you've used a browser with vertical tabs, it's hard to go back. Edge and Vivaldi get this right with implementations that let you stack dozens of tabs neatly along the side. It saves horizontal space, keeps tab titles or icons visible, and just makes sense for widescreen monitors. Once you've used vertical tabs on a widescreen monitor, there's no going back. Chrome still forces you to deal with overflowing tabs that shrink to favicon-sized blobs. With my kind of use, even those favicons aren't a very viable solution. Sure, there are a few extensions that claim to offer vertical tabs, but nothing beats a native, polished solution with full keyboard shortcut support and drag-and-drop management. For power users like me who are constantly juggling dozens of tabs at once, vertical tabs aren't a nice-to-have anymore. They're essential. Split-screen tabs Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority As a writer on the internet, I spend a lot of time researching and, all too often, referencing interesting research in my articles, comparing spec sheets, or looking up a Google Doc while drafting an email. One of my favorite features in the Vivaldi browser is its native ability to toss up split-screen tabs that let you view two tabs side by side. It might seem like a minor step up over just snapping two windows side by side in Chrome, but the added convenience makes a big difference in everyday usability. More so because once you have a couple of these windows open, believe me, it can be a chore to sift through the mess to locate the right one. A simple tab tiling feature that lets you open two or more tabs in a split screen inside a single window would instantly boost productivity, especially for users who live in their browser all day. Built-in screenshot and markup tools Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority It boggles my mind that in 2025, Chrome still doesn't offer a native screenshot tool with full-fledged, or even rudimentary, annotation capabilities. Yes, I can use the tools built into my Mac, but that's more steps for something as basic as taking a screenshot and sharing a section of the display. It's 2025 and Chrome still doesn't have a proper screenshot and annotation tool. That's just embarrassing. Meanwhile, Edge lets you capture a section of a page, mark it up, and share it instantly. Opera goes one step further with text recognition and meme templates. Chrome users are stuck with clunky third-party extensions or system-level tools that lack web-specific context. Whether you're grabbing a quote, pointing out a bug, or saving a receipt, built-in screenshot tools save time. If Google really wants to push its AI-first strategy, imagine combining a screenshot tool with contextual smart suggestions or one-tap copy-paste. Smart Sidebar Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority There's so much untapped potential in a browser sidebar. Microsoft saw that first and turned the Edge sidebar into a productivity hub. You can take notes, use the AI-based Copilot to interact with the web page, manage tasks, or control media playback directly from the side of your browser offers a customizable panel for social media, email, and RSS. Opera, too, offers a plethora of features like social connections and key bookmarks. Chrome's side panel, in comparison, feels like an afterthought. It's not really a sidebar to begin with, nor is it available to all users, but even when accessible, it lacks the breadth of features that other browsers include. Why not let users pin tools like Keep, Gemini, Calendar, or Gmail into the sidebar? Add support for custom widgets and suddenly Chrome transforms into a full blown workspace for users. Efficiency mode Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority Chrome and bad RAM management go hand-in-hand. In fact, the browser is the punchline for jokes about being a memory hog and for contributing to poor battery efficiency. While Google has been working on fixing that reputation, Microsoft Edge's efficiency mode proves that a browser can actively manage background tabs and power consumption without slowing things down. A high-efficiency toggle puts the control in users' hands. Giving users direct access to an energy-efficient mode leads to better battery life on laptops, fewer fan whirrs, smoother performance on lower-end hardware, and fewer user complaints. Who'd have thought? Chrome has started making progress here with features like Memory Saver and Energy Saver, but they're tucked away in settings and not as effective as Edge's approach. A dedicated mode with clear toggles and real-time feedback could go a long way. Privacy controls Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority With privacy ranking up there as one of the top things users look out for on the internet these days, it is no surprise that it is the modern day battleground for browsers as well. And let's just say Chrome still feels like it's playing catch-up. That somewhat understandable given Google's skewed ad-driven business interests. Browsers like Brave block trackers by default, Safari shows exactly which trackers were stopped, and Firefox gives you a privacy scorecard. Chrome's privacy controls feel like they were designed for engineers and power users, not everyday users. Chrome's privacy tools, on the other hand, feel more like a developer experiment than a user-facing feature. Basic things like clearing site data, managing permissions, or turning off third-party cookies should be easier and more transparent instead of being buried deep within menus and submenus. An easy to view dashboard with smarter defaults and explanations that don't require an engineering degree is what we need. But it's far from what we get with Chrome. More customization Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority I think we can all agree that Chrome is far from the most customizable browser — on desktop or mobile. It's something that Samsung Internet does brilliantly. You can pick which buttons show up in the toolbar and rearrange them to suit your flow. Want a shortcut for downloads, share, dark mode, or desktop site toggle? You can add that. Chrome, meanwhile, sticks to a rigid layout that hasn't changed much in years. Sure, there are a few more settings to add deeper settings to the menu bar, but offering a browser experience that's truly your own isn't what Chrome specializes in. Even basic stuff like customizing the new tab page or moving the address bar is limited. Chrome could significantly benefit from letting users tweak the interface to fit their habits and devices. For example, mobile users might prefer one-handed controls while desktop users might want more shortcuts. Being the default browser isn't enough anymore For a browser as bloated as Chrome, you might be thinking I'm wrong in asking for more features. But adding quality of life enhancements goes hand-in-hand with removing legacy cruft. The best browsers today strike a balance between performance and functionality. Edge, Vivaldi, and even Arc browser show that it's possible to be fast, clean, and powerful at the same time. And many of these browsers are built on the same Chromium base as Chrome. Most of these features aren't game changers anymore. They're just table stakes in 2025. Google's Chrome browser has the foundation and the reach to pull ahead with modern features that it's still missing out on once it decides to stop playing it safe. If even a few of these ideas made their way into Chrome in a meaningful way, it could feel fresh again instead of being the default by virtue of being the most common option. Follow

LINE NEWS: Did Lineage, Inc. Mislead Investors? Contact BFA Law by September 30 Class Action Deadline (NASDAQ:LINE)
LINE NEWS: Did Lineage, Inc. Mislead Investors? Contact BFA Law by September 30 Class Action Deadline (NASDAQ:LINE)

Business Upturn

time3 hours ago

  • Business Upturn

LINE NEWS: Did Lineage, Inc. Mislead Investors? Contact BFA Law by September 30 Class Action Deadline (NASDAQ:LINE)

NEW YORK, Aug. 09, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a lawsuit has been filed against Lineage, Inc. (NASDAQ: LINE) and certain of the Company's senior executives and directors for potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Lineage, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: Investors have until September 30, 2025, to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 on behalf of investors who purchased stock pursuant and/or traceable to Lineage's registration statement for its initial public offering held on or about July 25, 2024. The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan and is captioned City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System v. Lineage, Inc., et al. , No. 2:25-cv-12383. Why Was Lineage Sued Under the Federal Securities Laws? Lineage is a cold storage focused real estate investment trust ('REIT'). Through its Global Warehousing Segment, Lineage owns and operates hundreds of temperature-controlled storage facilities used by companies to store food and other perishable products. As alleged, Lineage's IPO documents touted its 'consistent cold chain demand,' which purportedly provided Lineage 'with strong cash flows even during periods of broader economic stress.' The IPO documents also represented that the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic had 'accelerated trends that . . . have the potential to be growth engines for the industry in coming years.' In truth, Lineage was allegedly in the midst of a sustained downturn, as its customers destocked excess inventory built up during the COVID-19 pandemic, and also shifted to leaner inventories on a go-forward basis and as more cold-storage supply came on line. Events Following the IPO On February 26, 2025, Lineage announced its fiscal Q4 2024 financial results, revealing that customers had been 'unwinding' previously 'overbuil[t]' levels of inventory, returning to a 'more normal seasonal pattern' that was expected to 'continue moving forward.' Lineage conducted its IPO at $78 per share. Since the IPO, the price of Lineage stock has fallen dramatically, to lows near $40 per share—approximately half the IPO price. Click here for more information: What Can You Do? If you invested in Lineage you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis, there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: Or contact:Ross Shikowitz [email protected] 212.789.3619

RXST NEWS: Did RxSight, Inc. Mislead Investors? Contact BFA Law by September 22 Class Action Deadline (NASDAQ:RXST)
RXST NEWS: Did RxSight, Inc. Mislead Investors? Contact BFA Law by September 22 Class Action Deadline (NASDAQ:RXST)

Business Upturn

time3 hours ago

  • Business Upturn

RXST NEWS: Did RxSight, Inc. Mislead Investors? Contact BFA Law by September 22 Class Action Deadline (NASDAQ:RXST)

By GlobeNewswire Published on August 9, 2025, 16:36 IST NEW YORK, Aug. 09, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a lawsuit has been filed against RxSight, Inc. (NASDAQ: RXST) and certain of the Company's senior executives for potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in RxSight, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: Investors have until September 22, 2025, to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors who purchased RxSight securities. The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California and is captioned Makaveev v. RxSight, Inc., et al. , No. 25-cv- 01596. Why Was RxSight Sued for Securities Fraud? RxSight is engaged in the manufacture and sale of light adjustable intraocular lenses used in cataract surgery along with capital equipment used with the lenses. The Company's main product is its Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) that can be customized after cataract surgery through a series of non-invasive light treatments. These treatments, using a Light Delivery Device (LDD), adjust the lens's shape and power to optimize vision based on the patient's individual needs and preferences. During the relevant period, the Company touted its strong LAL and LDD sales and failed to disclose 'adoption challenges' in its products. In reality, RxSight was experiencing a slowdown in LAL utilization that was first noted in 2024. The Stock Declines as the Truth Is Revealed On April 3, 2025, before the market opened, RxSight cut its 2025 full-year revenue forecast citing a 'softening' of the market that purportedly occurred 'in the second half of 2024.' On this news, the price of RxSight stock declined roughly 38%, from $26.12 per share on April 2, 2025, to $16.21 per share on April 3, 2025. Then on July 8, 2025, the Company further cut its 2025 full-year revenue forecast. RxSight attributed the adjustment to 'the slower ramp in LAL utilization that was first noted in 2024' and '[a]doption challenges over the last few quarters.' On this news, the price of RxSight stock declined roughly 38%, from $12.79 per share on July 8, 2025, to $7.95 per share on July 9, 2025. Click here for more information: What Can You Do? If you invested in RxSight you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis, there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: Or contact:Ross Shikowitz [email protected] 212.789.3619 Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP? BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA , The Legal 500 , and ISS SCAS , and its attorneys have been named 'Elite Trial Lawyers' by the National Law Journal , among the top '500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers' by Lawdragon , 'Titans of the Plaintiffs' Bar' by Law360 and 'SuperLawyers' by Thomson Reuters. Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.'s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd. For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash GlobeNewswire provides press release distribution services globally, with substantial operations in North America and Europe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store