Former KY rep Cherlynn Stevenson to run as Democrat to replace Barr in Congress
Stevenson said that she believes the seat is within reach for Democrats despite GOP Rep. Andy Barr's recent landslide victories.
'I know how to win in a red seat,' Stevenson said in an interview with the Herald-Leader about the race.
So, how is it done? Stevenson said she'll focus on aggressive in-person campaigning and hammering home the 'meat and potatoes' issues of prices, education and health care.
A predicted backlash to the policies of President Donald Trump, whose undulating tariff strategy has stirred uncertainty and even discontent on Wall Street, is central to her argument. The available polling on Trump's approval rating has been declining steadily.
'I think people are really scared by the chaos that they're seeing in Washington right now,' she said.
'You know, we see tariffs that are hurting our local economies and threatening a lot of jobs. We see people that are worried that the Social Security benefits aren't going to be there, that Medicaid and Medicare are in danger. You know, a carton of eggs cost more, and people's nest eggs have gone down.'
Stevenson added: 'I think that the environment is going to be right for somebody who's out there not trying to talk about the things that divide us, but about the real issues that Kentucky families and working families are facing right now.'
But while Stevenson, 48, won her seat three times, she lost on the fourth effort to Rep. Vanessa Grossl, R-Georgetown, last year.
Grossl flipped the seat — which stretches across much of suburban and rural Fayette County as well a slice of Scott County — winning by about half a percentage point two years after Stevenson won reelection by an even slimmer margin.
Republican Party of Kentucky Communications Director Andy Westberry pointed the loss out in a statement on Stevenson's candidacy.
'Cherlynn Stevenson must be a glutton for punishment. After getting rejected by voters in her own backyard, she's now aiming higher—only to fall harder. Her entry into this race isn't a serious campaign; it's a one-way ticket to political career-ending humiliation.
'Let's be clear: the 6th District is Trump Country —rock-solid Republican ground where liberal pipe dreams go to die,' Westberry wrote.
Indeed, Trump won the district by about 15 percentage points. Ever since a close three-point victory over Democrat Amy McGrath in 2018, Barr has won his last three elections by an average of 24 percentage points.
But Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear, albeit with a different off-year electorate, won the district by about 20.
And Stevenson's pledge to focus on the 'real issues' over the divisive ones sounds a lot like Beshear's classic pitch to voters, both in Kentucky and more recently on the national stage.
So where does Beshear stand on Stevenson's run? She said she spoke to the governor before making her announcement, and he was 'encouraging,'
'He was encouraging. We talked about the fact that I have been able to win in difficult districts. You know, he has endorsed me in every other race that I've ever been in, and I look forward to earning his endorsement this time,' Stevenson said.
She did not say whether she believed his endorsement would come during the primary for the seat.
A handful of other Kentucky Democrats have been mentioned as possibilities for the seat, especially since the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee listed the Central Kentucky-based district as one of their 35 Republican-held 'Districts in Play' for the 2026 cycle.
Federal prosecutor Zach Dembo and former Lexington councilman David Kloiber are two names to watch; former secretary of state Allison Lundergan Grimes is also mentioned as a potential candidate.
Fayette County makes up about 44% of the district.
The other counties in the 6th Congressional District, in order of population, are Madison, Scott, Jessamine, Montgomery, Woodford, Mercer, Bourbon, Garrard, Fleming, Estill, Powell and Nicholas. Aside from Fayette, the other counties in the district generally lean Republican.
When asked about her elevator pitch to voters, Stevenson gave a glimpse of how she feels her background – moving to the Lexington area from Eastern Kentucky, as many residents have – might help her.
'I was raised in Eastern Kentucky by a mom who was a teacher and a daddy who worked in coal and I know the values of hard work, and I know you know the struggles that everyday Kentuckians face, that I am not someone who Is there to represent a political party, but I am there to represent the people and take their hopes, their dreams and their worst fears to Washington and to fight for them,' Stevenson said.
Stevenson was raised in Knott County but has lived in Lexington for several years. She first ran for office and flipped the 88th House District in 2018. She won a close race in 2020, then won again by just 37 votes in a tight race to Republican Jim Coleman.
In Frankfort, Stevenson rose the ranks quickly to become House Democratic caucus chair four years into her time there. She was widely seen as a strong candidate for floor leader, the highest position in the caucus, before her loss.
Stevenson was the subject of a short-lived controversy last year due to an ethics complaint filed against her. The complaint centered around her co-purchasing a Frankfort condo with a lobbyist. It was swiftly dismissed by the Legislative Ethics Commission.
Stevenson's political calling card has been education. She pushed back strongly against 2024's pro-school choice amendment, which would have allowed the state legislature to fund charter and non-public K-12 schooling.
Stevenson represented the 'anti' side on the amendment question at Fancy Farm, the state's biggest political speaking event, in 2024.
The amendment ended up losing by a whopping 30 percentage points.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
a few seconds ago
- Indianapolis Star
Gov. Mike Braun on Trump's redistricting pitch: 'I'm listening to the legislators'
Gov. Mike Braun says he will lean on the will of the legislature when it comes to President Donald Trump's push for mid-decade redistricting in Indiana. Already some of those legislators are making their ill feelings known. Vice President JD Vance made the pitch to Braun, House Speaker Todd Huston and Senate President Pro Tempore Rodric Bray in a closed-door meeting at the Statehouse last week. The latter two said nothing after the meeting, only releasing vague statements that didn't mention redistricting. Braun said the meeting went "pretty good." It would be up to Braun to call a special session in order to redraw the congressional maps. He said Aug. 12 that Huston and Bray are consulting with their caucuses, and he is waiting to see what the legislature wants to do. "I think it's going to be a methodical process, and I think each leader is going to take his time on getting to that point where they say what they want to do," he said. He acknowledged that even if he called a special session, the legislature, if they are at odds with the idea, could very well just gavel in and gavel right out. "I'm listening to the legislators," he said. The political conundrum is this: Indiana leaders are facing the ultimate loyalty test to Trump while balancing the reality that carving up their very few Democratic congressional districts could make some incumbent Republicans' races tighter. Plus, redistricting for an overtly partisan purpose of giving Trump a more favorable midterm election in 2026 isn't a very popular idea with voters, some lawmakers are saying. More: Top Indiana Republicans met with VP on redistricting. Only Democrats are talking about it There's also the risk of diluting votes if new maps are drawn based on five-year-old Census data that won't account for any more recent population shifts. This is one point new state Rep. Danny Lopez, R-Carmel, made in a post on X Aug. 12. "We should stand by that work," he wrote, while also saying he is a "hard no" on mid-decade redistricting. Another "hard no" comes from Republican Rep. Jim Lucas of Seymour, who on Facebook called the idea "highly unusual and politically optically horrible." He also said Republicans shouldn't "stoop to the level of Democrats on this issue," which could be a reference to the criticism that Illinois Democrats' map is gerrymandered. "If there are seats that need targeted, we should do it the old fashioned way and campaign harder in those districts," Lucas wrote. Mooresville Rep. Craig Haggard, a Republican running for the 4th Congressional District, could very well be drawn out of that district. He told the Indiana Capital Chronicle that he's not hearing any "appetite" for redistricting right now. Sen. Jim Tomes, R-Wadesville, has also said he doesn't think redistricting is needed, WEHT reported. Rep. Becky Cash, R-Zionsville, responded to a voter's question on her Facebook page about redistricting and said that she does not support nor "know of any reason why Indiana should redistrict." The prospect of mid-decade redistricting drew at least 100 protestors to the Statehouse and to the governor's mansion last week, with those gathered characterizing the concept as "cheating."
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Benny Johnson rails against DC crime at White House, floats presidential medal for ‘Big Balls'
Conservative pundit and social media personality Benny Johnson used an appearance in the White House Press Briefing Room's 'new media' seat to rail against crime in Washington, D.C. and suggest a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer, who was recently assaulted in the district, be awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom. 'As a DC resident of 15 years … I have witnessed so much mugging and so much theft I lost track. I was carjacked. I have murderers on my Ring camera and masked shootings,' Johnson said at the top of Tuesday's briefing. 'I witnessed a woman on my block get held up at gun point for $20. And my house was set ablaze with my infant child inside.' The right-wing pundit then turned his gaze to other reporters seating in the White House. 'So to any reporter that says, and lies, that DC is a safe place to live and work,' Johnson said turning back to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. 'Thank you for making the city safe.' Johnson is one in a growing number of D.C.-based supporters of President Trump who have shared stories of feeling unsafe in the district, praising the president's decision on Monday to mobilize the national guard in the district and take control of its police department. Trump's announcement came on the heels of a number of high-profile crimes involving people with ties to government, including an incident earlier this month in which Edward 'Big Balls' Coristine, a 19-year-old former DOGE staffer, was attacked. Johnson on Tuesday suggested the White House honor Coristine as part of its pledge to crack down on D.C. crime. 'Will the president consider giving the presidential medal of freedom to Big Balls?' he asked Leavitt. 'I haven't spoken to him about that,' the press secretary chuckled in response. 'But perhaps its something he would consider.' Johnson is the latest in a slew of right-leaning podcasters, social media influencers and content creators on the right the White House has sought to elevate in the briefing room as a means to promote the president's agenda and push back on mainstream media coverage of his administration. During Monday's wide-ranging press conference announcing the D.C. crime crack down, conservative commentator Brain Glenn told Trump he was 'robbed last year, on the street by these teenage thugs who had a gun and got away with it,' and suggested 'adult crimes deserve adult penalties.' Trump's crime crackdown has angered Democrats and some local leaders in D.C., many of whom have pointed to statistics showing decreases in crime in the district in recent years and warned the president is overstepping his authority.
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Republicans are making boogeymen of their own voters on Medicaid
Republicans love their boogeymen; the grotesquely exaggerated villains they use to justify their worst policy ideas. President Trump loves to parade his favorite boogeymen: the ' criminal aliens,' the dishonest media, the Democrats, and so on. These dehumanizing caricatures help him rile up his base and lead them to back his cruelest initiatives. As the GOP-controlled Congress argues the merits of the cuts included in Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' act — which is deeply unpopular with voters — they're discovering new boogeymen to deflect criticism. Republicans are very defensive about their $1 trillion cut in Medicaid, which will deprive almost 12 million, mostly low-income and working-class Americans, of their health care coverage. So with the aid of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Oz, they've conjured up a new boogeyman: ' able-bodied working-age Americans without dependents.' The emblematic figure here is a ' 25-year-old living in the basement.' There's just one problem: In 2024, able-bodied adults who qualified for Medicaid (i.e., adults between the ages of 18-64 who make approximately $21,597/year or less) mostly voted for Donald Trump. In 2024, Trump won the majority of voters who made less than $50,000 and was up 14 points with men between the ages of 19 and 29, and even expanded his margin with men under 50 compared to 2020. To add to this, Trump also won over two-thirds of voters in rural areas where 1 in 4 people are Medicaid recipients. In other words, Republicans are making boogeymen of their own voters. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) seems to be one of the few congressional Republicans to grasp this point. He says that 'slashing health insurance for the working poor… is both morally wrong and politically suicidal,' while noting that MAGA voters never signed up for Medicaid cuts. In fact, in Hawley's home state of Missouri, voters elected Trump as president and expanded eligibility for Medicaid on the very same ballot. President Trump has repeatedly promised his voters, 'We're not cutting Medicaid,' and he would veto a bill that would do that. The White House website repeats the claim that there will be no cuts to Medicaid, just the surgical elimination of waste, fraud and abuse. However, many nonpartisan groups, including the Congressional Budget Office, the National Patient Advocate Foundation and groups that focus on specific diseases, say the GOP Medicare cuts will do collateral damage to recipients who are eligible and already working, as well as all Americans, when rural hospitals close and health care costs increase. Almost two-thirds of Americans view the law unfavorably, including many Republicans. When informed that the bill would increase the uninsured rate and decrease hospital funding, half of self-identified MAGA voters didn't support the bill. When the public is informed that most people on Medicaid already meet the work requirement, but the paperwork connected to it would cause people to lose their insurance, only about one-third of people support work requirements in Medicaid. In addition, as Republicans attempt to hobble Medicaid, public support continues to grow for the program, increasing by six percentage points since January to 83 percent. Congressional Republicans don't seem to care that Medicaid covers our most vulnerable citizens, who can't just tap their bank accounts when they get sick or have an accident. Americans deserve to have a backup as they recover from job loss, as they care for their loved ones, and while they educate themselves. Medicaid is there because having fewer people uninsured helps stabilize other parts of the health care system, like rural facilities and the cost for all health care users. This was also once the belief of Vice President JD Vance, too. As for what congressional Republicans believe, it is unclear. It took less than a year for them to forget who voted them into power and go back to their usual 'tax breaks for the rich, shame on the working poor' stance. Their law, which manages to be spendthrift and stingy at the same time, is most assuredly cutting Medicaid, no matter how much Trump tries to gaslight us into thinking otherwise. These cuts are cruel and, as Hawley predicts, will likely prove hazardous to the Republicans' political health in the midterm elections.
