
‘It was right to honour that call': Why did Jasprit Bumrah miss The Oval Test between India and England? India's asst. coach explains
India assistant coach Ryan ten Doeschate offered the team management's explanation after the end of Day 1's play. On Friday, the BCCI also confirmed that Bumrah was released from the squad.
'It's quite a complex issue around Bumrah. We obviously want to wheel him in, but we also want to respect where his body's at, and on the basis of that, we just felt that it wasn't worth including him in the squad,' ten Doeschate. said on Thursday. 'He has bowled a large number of overs, I know it doesn't always seem like that because he's only played three Tests and he only bowled in one innings in Manchester. But if you look at the loads, he's bowled a lot of overs, and like he did say coming into the tour, he was going to be available for three games, and we just felt it was right to honour that call.'
The perceived criticism around Bumrah playing three out of the five matches in an important away series has been that he is picking and choosing the matches he wanted to play. Although, coming on the back of a away series in Australia where he toiled right through the summer Down Under before suffering a serious back issue in the final Test, it did seem spurious. Ten Doeschate also confirmed that which three Tests he played was upto the team management as well.
'I don't think picking and choosing is a fair comment to Bumrah,' the former Dutch allrounder said. 'He did say he was going to play three games, he left it up to us which three he played. We've tried to manage the situation, it's not ideal, I guess giving those guys attention, the guys who aren't playing particularly when you're carrying 18 is important.
'… Make them know that you're making all the decisions in good faith, in the best interest of the team, and just on that, all the guys who haven't played, they've been fantastic, they've trained the house down, they're disappointed when they get left out. They don't let it show when they're around the group and that's very important to creating a good culture for the guys who are playing to perform.'
Doeschate added that it made sense to play Bumrah in Manchester than keeping him for the final Test.
'Every time I've answered this question I've spoken about like putting the pieces of the puzzles together and guys were baffled when we didn't play him in the third Test,' he said.
'Our thinking was that the Oval, yes it's got bounce but it's normally a fairly good wicket for batting on, and we thought we'd roll the dice and if we'd won the toss we would have bowled. In hindsight you would have loved to have him here, but you would also have said if we come here 3-1 down that we didn't use him there, so it's trying to not guess but trying to look into the future and then see how we can manage him, and maybe England have got it spot on leaving the best bowling wicket for the last Test after he's played three,' Doeschate said.
The Indian Express had reported earlier on Thursday that India were likely to leave out Bumrah, having decided to go with Karun Nair in place of all-rounder Shardul Thakur. Bumrah and Anshul Kamboj made way for Akash Deep and Prasidh Krishna, with Mohammed Siraj being the pace spearhead. Meanwhile, Dhruv Jurel replaced injured wicket-keeper Rishabh Pant.
On the match eve, there was a point of view that Bumrah might play his fourth Test of the series in Oval despite the team management's workload considerations and the pre-decided plan to play him just three Tests. That was not to be. With the pitch having a layer of grass, left-arm wrist spinner Kuldeep once again failed to make the cut. And that is also the reason India bolstered their batting line-up.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
a few seconds ago
- Hindustan Times
Stuart Broad subs salt on Washington Sundar's wounds as India all-rounder made to eat his words: ‘That made me smile'
Remember the Lord's Test between England and India in the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy? Shoaib Bashir's delivery to Mohammed Siraj comes to mind. The India No.11 played a perfect forward defence only to see the ball rolling back onto the stumps as England registered a famous 22-run win to gain a 2-1 lead in the series. The five-match series hangs in the balance with all results possible on the final day of the fifth Test at the Oval, and ahead of the upcoming crucial day, former England pacer Stuart Broad revealed his favourite moment from the series, and it is from the Lord's Test, where Ben Stokes was adjudged as Player of the Match. Stuart Broad rubs salt on Washington Sundar's wounds. (PTI) Chasing 193, India lost four wickets in the final session on Day 4 with Yashasvi Jaiwal, Karun Nair, Shubman Gill and Akash Deep losing their wickets. However, at stumps, Washington Sundar exuded confidence, saying India would definitely win the contest. However, the next day, India failed to do so and to make matters worse, the all-rounder fell for a duck off the bowling of Jofra Archer. Broad recalled Sundar's words and then the subsequent failure as his favourite moment of the series. 'My favourite moment from the series was when Washington Sundar, in an interview before batting, said that 'India would definitely win this Test',' said Stuart Broad on Sky Sports. Also Read: R Ashwin tears into Gill, Gambhir for 'lack of game awareness': 'You can't commit these mistakes in today's day and age' "Washington Sundar chipped one back to Jofra Archer, beautiful catch, and he went back for zero. It did make me smile," he added. Nasser Hussain's favourite moment The Lord's Test marked the beginning of heightened tensions between India and England. On Day 3, Zak Crawley got under the skin of India captain Shubman Gill as the former employed time-wasting tactics, ensuring the visitors didn't get a second over in before stumps. Seeing Crawley's tactics, Gill went close to the stump mic, asking the England openers to 'grow some f****** b****.' Days later, Gill revealed that England were 90 seconds late to the crease, and this was the main reason behind his frustration. 'Day 3 at Lord's, Crawley and Ben Duckett. Stalling, not only to get out in the middle, but when they got out there, Crawley backing away as Bumrah ran in. Shubman Gill asking Crawley to grow some. Mohammed Siraj, as ever. Whenever there is a round, Siraj pops in and joins the fun,' said Hussain. Speaking of the fifth and final Test at the Oval, England need 35 runs to win the series 3-1. On the other hand, India need four wickets to make it 2-2. There is everything to play for on Day 5 of the Oval Test.

The Hindu
a few seconds ago
- The Hindu
National Sports Governance Bill: Federations split over new law, concerns raised over sports autonomy
The story so far: 'Preparing for 2036 Summer Olympics, it is imperative that the sports governance landscape undergoes a positive transformation to bring better outcomes,' reads the aims of the National Sports Governance Bill, 2025. The Bill, which has been tabled in the Lok Sabha by Union Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya is likely to be taken for debate next week. The Bill has been heralded by some sports federations as 'visionary, transformative and furthering sports in India', but several others remain skeptic. BCCI remains non-committal India's top cricketing body — Board of Cricket Control in India (BCCI), has opposed any efforts to be dragged under the ambit of Right to Information (RTI), citing it does not depend on government funding for its functioning. When asked about its stance on the Bill, BCCI General Secretary Devajit Saikia told The Hindu, 'Currently, it is too premature to comment on the Bill as it is going to be debated by MPs in Parliament. The BCCI will take a call once a final draft is passed by the Parliament'. Federations differ on government interference In October last year, Indian Olympic Association (IOA) President P.T. Usha had first raised concerns over the Bill citing government infringing on the IOA's independence. She had stated that the National Sports Board – which will have powers to recognise federations, may 'lead to a conflict between the government and international sports governance bodies, particularly the IOC, which has previously suspended many National Olympic committees for excessive governmental interference'. Ms. Usha found herself in a dilemma recently after the IOA's executive committee members had refused to ratify Mr. Raghuram Iyer's appointment as Chief Executive Officer, seeking to bring of motion of no confidence against Ms. Usha. Upon prodding from the Sports Ministry, the members ceded and Mr. Iyer's appointment was ratified. Disagreeing with IOA's stance, Hockey India Secretary-General Bhola Nath Singh, while speaking to The Hindu, says, 'If there were any such provisions which enhance government interference into sports, the international Olympic Committee would not approve this Bill. This legislation follows international norms.' Terming the Bill as helpful for promoting sports, he asserts, 'All federations were consulted thrice while the Bill was being drafted.' He also downplays any concerns over former poll officials conducting sports bodies' elections. 'If my federation is run properly and you seek welfare of your sportspersons, it would not matter if EC is involved in federation's elections,' he opines. 'The bill is anti-sports, anti-India': Rahul Mehra The biggest pushback from the Bill is from sports Activist and senior advocate Rahul Mehra. His public interest litigation filed in 2010 against the IOA for non-compliance to the National Sports Development Code of India, 2011 (Sports Code), resulted in the landmark verdict by the Delhi High Court in 2022. The HC had made compliance with the sports code non-negotiable and failure will result in derecognition of the sports body. 'This Bill gives Centre de facto and maybe direct control of all federations and the entire sports domain of India. Apart from the Chairman, members of the National Sports Board are going to be senior bureaucrats, people from the ministry and Sports Authority of India. This is like how the Election Commissioner is appointed by the Prime Minister and his nominee, leaving the Leader of Opposition powerless,' Mr. Mehra tells to The Hindu. The Delhi HC verdict had mandated appointment of 25% sportspersons in such federations, paving way for Dilip Tirkey to become the first international player to head a national body — Hockey India. However, Mr. Bhola Nath Singh's tenure as Vice-President Hockey India was cut down as the court did not allow a former President to have voting rights in the executive committee. 'Earlier, the government used to appoint an MLA or a sportsperson via the 25% quota in these federations to exercise indirect control. This Bill stamps that idea of control, legally,' explains Mr. Mehra. When asked if the Bill infringes on sports autonomy, Mr. Mehra says, 'If a court appoints an administrator when a federation is deep-rooted in corruption, conflicts and nepotism, these federations file affidavits saying they will be suspended and derecognized by the international bodies. We saw the Sports Ministry citing these in cases of Football and Wrestling federations recently. However, this same government has now made infringement a law. He also decries the relaxation of age barrier for members by the Bill. 'As per the Sports Code, age of every elected member in all these bodies across the board, whether be President, Secretary, Treasurer, any elected office bearer, be the executive Committee member cannot exceed 70 years. This Bill imposes this age limit only for the top three — President, Secretary and Treasurer and also relaxes this to 75 years, but in actual it is perpetuity. In one section, it says that if the member happens to be in the office of an international body, he can apply for exemption and that will be granted to him.' He adds, 'The Sports Code mandated members to retire after 12 years of tenure. He cannot transfer to another sports body. But this Bill gives 12 years maximum and then a four-year cooling off then another 12 years and so on. Why do you want the same people to keep, stay put in power? Once these politicians and bureaucrats man these bodies, they want those to be there for perpetuity. Whether BJP is in power or not.' He also points out that while the Sports Code only allowed a government servant to serve one four-year term, this Bill is silent on it. 'So that means the government servant can ask multiple can stand for election multiple times,' he says. A new National Sports Tribunal which will adjudicate disputes between federations and players is also not well-intentioned, says Mr. Mehra. 'Earlier, citizens like me could go to court and challenge the government and the federation. Under new provisions of the Bill, barring anybody other than an aggrieved person cannot challenge its decisions. They have taken away the jurisdiction of the High Court by transfering all pending cases to the Tribunal. With this they have decided to undo these contempts of court and petitions where they have absolutely no answers in the court,' says Mr. Mehra. However, he adds that he is not against the Tribunal as such. 'However, the intention behind bringing the tribunal is not quick, speedy, efficacious remedy to sportspersons and to people involved in sports. Disputes are usually between a sportsperson and a sports adminstrator with deep pockets. It's a mismatched fight. The longer you prolong, the more the fatigue and disenchantment amongst the players and they give up. Now in order to improve the system, you're bringing your tribunal. But you have no time limit to the tribunal deciding a particular time,' he notes. 'Every single step should have a specific time bound period. So a case when it comes should be decided within 30 days. Appeals should be decided within another 30 days. Then if someone wants, they can take it to the Supreme Court. In 60-90 days, your entire litigation is over,' Mr. Mehra says. The only two aspects of the Bill he agrees with is the constitution of a National Sports Election panel and the government taking a final call on participation of sportspersons in international events where matters of national security, public order and safety are involved. He cedes, 'As a purist, I would say sports and politics should never be mixed. But you can't divorce it from the will of the people. However, by putting something like this in writing, you are inviting trouble. Certain things you just leave unsaid.' In contrast, Mr. Singh says, 'For any citizen, the government is responsible for safety. What is wrong if it decides on stopping players from travelling to such [dangerous] locations? We have seen how well security preparations are in Pakistan. India is prepared to welcome all Pakistani players with VISA because government is responsible for their safety.'


India Today
3 minutes ago
- India Today
ENG vs IND, 5th Test Day 5 Live weather updates: Will rain continue to spoil Oval finale?
Well, the Indian cricket team fans were right behind their side towards the end of Day 4 as there was more energy on the field. The Indian team coped criticism for their body language from the fans as many felt the team gave up way too easily. However, in the final few overs, the fielding was sharp, the bowling on point and the crowd buzzing. This has to be the tone from the get-go. Former pacer Varun Aaron feels that India will hold the advantage and can go on to win the Oval Test after a well-needed rest before play on Monday. 'Even a 10–15 minute extra break can do wonders for a team. It gave the players time to regroup in the dressing room, talk strategy, and recover physically. I'm sure the message in the room was clear—'We've worked too hard over the past 60 days to let this game slip.' This team has travelled all the way from India and dominated large parts of the series. A series draw is the least they deserve. A loss from this position would really hurt. But after that spirited bowling spell post-tea, I genuinely believe India are now in a position to win this match,' said Aaron. (READ) One of the intriguing things to see is the heavy roller being used ahead of the start of play on Monday. Ollie Pope will have the choice to use it on Day 5 and both Joe Root and Morne Morkel have weighed in on it. (READ) Just when we thought the England vs India series couldn't get wilder, Day 4 at the Oval cranked the tension up to 11. India had 9 wickets to grab, England needed 374 runs—and it looked like the finale was loading. Early blows from India had Duckett and Pope walking back, but then came the Brook-Root rescue act. Harry Brook (111 off 98) punished India for a dropped catch, while Joe Root's 39th Test ton set England on course for another epic chase. But just as the hosts looked to wrap it up, Prasidh Krishna crashed the party, removing Bethell and Root to keep the thriller alive. Then came the plot twist—bad light and rain halted the drama and sparked frustration all around. With 35 runs needed by England, 4 wickets by India - the Oval Finale thriller can go either way. The final day of the Oval Test is here—and so is the tension. With all four results still possible, India and England are eyeing that crucial morning session before rain starts knocking. BBC Weather says the rain might arrive around 1 PM local time, just as lunch begins. That means the morning is dry, cloudy, and tailor-made for India's pacers with the new ball. But after lunch? Things could get soggy. Accuweather predicts a 60% chance of rain post 2 PM, which means both teams have a narrow window to decide the fate of this thriller. If England want to chase or India hope to steal it, they'll need to act before the skies do. Umbrellas ready—but keep your eyes on the pitch. The Oval Test is set for a blockbuster finale—but only if the skies behave! As England eye a historic series win and India look to pull off a dramatic heist, Day 5 is walking a tightrope between cricketing glory and rain-curtailed heartbreak. With just 35 runs needed and four wickets in hand, England have the edge, but don't count out Team India just yet. Shubman Gill's men have fought tooth and nail throughout this series, and a few early wickets could flip this game on its head.