
Outrage In China After Men Share Non-Consensual Intimate Pics Of Partners On Telegram
Pornography in China is illegal, and conservative social attitudes towards women remain the norm, often reinforced by state media and popular culture.
It comes after a Chinese university expelled a woman this month for "damaging national dignity" over videos posted by a Ukrainian esports player on Telegram suggesting they had been intimate.
The Chinese state-owned Southern Daily reported this week that a woman discovered photos of her taken unknowingly had been shared in a Telegram forum with over 100,000 users, mostly Chinese men.
Members of the forum also shared photos of their girlfriends, ex-girlfriends and wives, according to a commentary in the Guangming Daily, an outlet backed by China's ruling communist party.
Revelations of the group have sparked widespread outcry online.
"We are not... 'content' that can be randomly uploaded, viewed and fantasised about," read one comment on Instagram-like Red Note.
"We can no longer remain silent. Because next could be me, or it could be you."
A related hashtag has been viewed more than 230 million times on social media platform Weibo since Thursday.
The largest group, called "Mask Park", has since been taken down, but smaller spinoffs remain active, according to women contacted by Southern Daily.
Telegram encrypts its users' messages and is banned in China, but it is accessible using a virtual private network.
"The sharing of nonconsensual pornography is explicitly forbidden by Telegram's terms of service and is removed whenever discovered," Telegram said in a statement sent to AFP.
"Moderators proactively monitor public parts of the platform and accept reports in order to remove millions of pieces of harmful content each day, including nonconsensual pornography."
'Nightmares for life'
The incident has drawn comparisons to a case in South Korea dubbed "Nth Room", in which a man blackmailed dozens of women into taking sexually explicit videos and sold them on Telegram.
Online, Chinese women have detailed their own experiences of being filmed and photographed by men in public.
"What criminals consider 'regular' for them may be nightmares that countless women can't escape for the rest of their lives," one woman said, sharing an encounter on Douyin.
Chinese police have cracked down on illegal filming, arresting hundreds of people in 2022 over clandestine surveillance.
But women's rights are sensitive territory in China -- over the last decade, authorities have suppressed almost every form of independent feminist activism.
#MeToo activist Sophia Huang Xueqin was sentenced to five years in prison on charges of "inciting subversion of state power" after she became a symbol of the country's stalled feminist movement.
Chinese authorities have yet to publicly announce any action against the Telegram group.
But the Guangming Daily commentary urged "accountability" for the organisers of the Telegram group, and empathy for the people filmed.
Improving law enforcement would "enhance the overall sense of security, free women from the fear of being spied on and make privacy boundaries a truly untouchable red line", it said.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
14 minutes ago
- India.com
India Shuts Doors On Chinese Money – What Message Is Modi Sending To Beijing?
New Delhi: The handshake may have warmed, but the heart remains guarded. Even as New Delhi and Beijing slowly return to the negotiating table after years of chill, the Indian government has made no move to relax its grip on Chinese investment. Officials with direct knowledge of the matter say there is no plan to review or revoke Press Note 3, the regulatory gate that keeps Chinese money out of India's strategic sectors. Introduced in April 2020, the note was born in a moment of national anxiety (COVID 19 pandemic) before the deadly clash in Galwan. It mandates that any investment from countries sharing a land border with India must pass through layers of government scrutiny. The policy does not name China. But it does not need to. The signal is India wants trade and growth, but not at the cost of its sovereignty. Not when questions of trust still linger across the Himalayas. 'There has not even been internal discussion so far about easing Press Note 3. This is not the time for that. The security environment has not changed enough,' said an official. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has acknowledged the potential for economic engagement. Speaking at a forum, she recently said India and China should talk and share more.' But she added a caveat: 'With caution.' That word caution hangs heavy over every boardroom pitch that originates in Beijing or Shenzhen. It is not paranoia. It is memory. The Galwan Valley changed the mood in New Delhi. It made national security a defence as well as economic issue. The government does not want Indian companies to quietly pass into Chinese hands. It does not want Trojan horses built out of equity deals. Press Note 3 now functions as a firewall. It was initially drafted to prevent opportunistic takeovers during COVID-19. Today, it stands as a symbol of India's geopolitical posture. Still, India is not closing the door entirely. There is interest in joint ventures. Electronics manufacturing remains a hopeful space. But even here, the guardrails stay up. Beijing's ambitions, officials say, stretch beyond balance sheets. And until India is sure it will not get blindsided, that door will not open fully. Any decision to dilute the restrictions will carry strategic weight. It would ripple across sectors like telecom, fintech and critical infrastructure. The consequences, economic and political, would be irreversible. For now, visas may be easier. Meetings may happen. The tone may soften. But when it comes to money, especially Chinese money, India is still watching and not welcoming. The message to Beijing is show restraint, sincerity and maybe someday, the locks will click open. But not now.


Indian Express
44 minutes ago
- Indian Express
New normal in fight against terror, world support: Jaishankar lists wins
Operation Sindoor against Pakistan in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, which killed 26 civilians, marked a 'new normal' in how India responds to terror and showed 'we will never bow down to nuclear blackmail,' External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said in the Lok Sabha Monday. Calling for a united approach within the country in dealing with terror, Jaishankar said, 'The challenge of cross-border terrorism continues, but Operation Sindoor marks a new phase. There is now a new normal.' The new normal has five points, he said. 'One: terrorists will not be treated as proxies, two: cross-border terrorism will get an appropriate response, three: terror and talks are not possible together and there will only be talks on terror, four: not yielding to nuclear blackmail and finally, terror and good neighbourliness cannot coexist, blood and water cannot flow together. This is our position.' On the foreign policy dimension of Operation Sindoor, Jaishankar said that thanks to India's diplomacy, The Resistance Front (TRF) — a proxy of Lashkar-e-Taiba that claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam attack — was designated as a global terrorist organisation by the US on July 18. He said the focus of India's diplomacy (in the wake of Pahalgam attack) was directed at creating a global understanding of Pakistan's involvement, especially at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), of which Pakistan is presently a (non-permanent) member and India is not. 'Our goals in the Security Council were two: to get an endorsement from the Security Council on the need for accountability, and to bring to justice those who perpetrated this attack,' he said. Jaishankar also said that a result of India's diplomacy post-Pahalgam attack was that only three of the countries that are part of the UN opposed Operation Sindoor. Underlining that India's response to Pahalgam was 'focused, measured and non-escalatory', he said it was important to send a 'clear, strong and resolute' message that 'our red lines had been crossed'. In response to the Opposition's question on why India chose to stop the military action (on May 10), he accused the then Congress-led government of 'inaction' after the 2008 Mumbai attacks. 'People who did nothing have the temerity to ask a government which did so much, which brought down Bahawalpur and Muridke, to say why didn't you do more – it's extraordinary,' he said. He also took on the Opposition for warning the government on a two-front challenge coming from Pakistan and China, saying it was their doing over the last six decades. 'We are getting warnings about Pakistan-China collaboration, when this has been going on for 60 years,' he said. Jaishankar also slammed the Opposition leaders' visits to China 'when the Chinese were issuing stapled visas to people from Arunachal Pradesh and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi's meeting the Chinese Ambassador in the days of the Doklam standoff eight years ago. 'I did not go to China for Olympics, secret agreements; I went to make India's stand clear on terrorism, trade restrictions and de-escalation,' he said. 'The very people who are cautioning us on China are the people who allowed 3G and 4G to come from China. It was this government which ensured Made in India 5G.'


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Trump cuts ceasefire deadline for Russia, slams Israel's Gaza claims during UK visit
US President Donald Trump's visit to Scotland turned into a whirlwind of diplomatic headlines. From rebuking Vladimir Putin to criticizing Israeli leadership over Gaza's starvation crisis, the president made waves during talks with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, while also defending himself over Epstein rumors and touting a new trade deal. While meeting UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland, Donald Trump cut his deadline for Russia to negotiate a Ukraine ceasefire and criticized Israel's denial of Gaza starvation. During his high-profile meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer at a golf resort in Scotland, President Donald Trump made it clear he's tightening the pressure on Moscow. Trump revealed Monday that he is no longer willing to wait 50 days for Vladimir Putin to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine, he now wants results within 10 to 12 days. ALSO READ: Rare Derecho threat looms over South Dakota as historic windstorms return 'I'm disappointed in Putin,' Trump said bluntly, signaling a tougher stance than previously expected. The president, who has long teased his ability to broker peace swiftly in Ukraine, appears to be ramping up the urgency in what he calls 'peace through strength.' Ukrainian officials, including President Zelensky's chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, have praised Trump's firm approach, as per a report by CNN. Trump also took a surprising turn when the topic shifted to the war in Gaza. Rejecting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's claim that 'there is no starvation in Gaza,' Trump said the U.S. would be opening food centers in the region. 'That's real starvation stuff,' he said, acknowledging the widespread reports of humanitarian suffering. It marks one of his most pointed critiques of Israeli leadership to READ: Pentagon in chaos: Pete Hegseth's last-minute flip sparks showdown with Donald Trump's top general The visit wasn't without controversy. Trump, still facing questions about a 2003 letter reportedly sent to Jeffrey Epstein, used the trip to distance himself from the disgraced financier. He denied any involvement with the letter and continued to label it as fake, pushing back against renewed media attention on the Trump also praised a recently announced U.S.–EU trade framework, calling it 'the biggest deal ever made.' While light on specifics, the agreement has been positioned as a relief measure for both American and European economies, signaling renewed alignment across the pressuring Putin to criticizing Israel and brushing off Epstein-related scandals, Trump's time in Scotland proved he's still commanding headlines across continents, and still shaping international discourse on war, diplomacy, and justice. How long did Donald Trump give Russia to reach a ceasefire?Trump reduced his initial 50-day ceasefire deadline to 10-12 days. What has Donald Trump said about Gaza's starvation crisis? He disputed Israel's claims and stated that the United States will establish food centers in Gaza.