Trump's Iran gambit: Why Xi Jinping stayed quiet-what it means for Taiwan
President Donald Trump speaks from the East Room of the White House in Washington, as Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth listen. (Carlos Barria/Pool via AP)
On June 22, 2025, when US President
Donald Trump
authorized a series of unprecedented airstrikes against Iranian nuclear sites, it marked America's most significant military escalation in the Middle East since the invasion of Iraq.
While international condemnation was swift and predictable from nations like Russia, Turkey, and Pakistan, the most notable voice was the one largely missing from the chorus: China.
As per an Opinion by Karishma Vaswani in Bloomberg, Trump's decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites dramatically exposed the boundaries of China's influence, leaving Beijing relegated to the diplomatic sidelines.
Despite robust rhetorical condemnation-branding the strikes as a 'serious violation' of international law-Chinese leader
Xi Jinping
has notably refrained from any meaningful diplomatic or military response.
Instead, Trump swiftly transitioned from striking Iranian facilities to mediating a tenuous ceasefire between Israel and Iran, reinforcing Washington's longstanding dominance in global crises.
China, meanwhile, stuck to a cautious script, advocating restraint without putting its geopolitical weight behind concrete diplomatic initiatives.
Why it matters
The cautious Chinese response underscores Beijing's strategic limitations, contradicting Xi's carefully cultivated narrative that China can counterbalance US power globally.
China has steadily positioned itself as a responsible alternative to US leadership, especially under Trump's turbulent America First policies. But this crisis lays bare the stark gap between China's rhetoric of global responsibility and its actual influence in geopolitical flashpoints.
At stake for Beijing is the credibility of its claims of promoting a multipolar world, raising questions among countries in the Global South and the Middle East about China's reliability as a genuine global power beyond economic partnerships.
Zoom in
Beijing's interests in Iran are substantial but complicated, rooted primarily in energy and economic investments.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Investire è più facile che mai
BG SAXO
Scopri di più
Undo
China imports approximately 90% of Iran's oil exports, accounting for nearly 14% of China's total crude imports. Yet despite such dependency, China's direct investments in Iran have been relatively modest compared to its stakes in Saudi Arabia or the UAE, reflecting cautious Chinese corporations wary of crossing US sanctions.
The 25-year, $400 billion strategic partnership agreement inked in 2021 between Beijing and Tehran promised massive infrastructure and energy projects.
Yet actual implementation has lagged due to fears of provoking Washington's ire. Bill Figueroa, a China-Iran expert at the University of Groningen, underlines this point clearly: "Chinese state-owned companies have largely stayed away, mostly out of fear of running afoul of US sanctions.
"
Trump's military strikes have thus sharpened these contradictions. With the US flexing its military might, Beijing's primary response has been passive: evacuating thousands of Chinese citizens from Iran and urging stability to safeguard its oil supplies through the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz.
Between the lines
China's passivity in this crisis aligns with Xi Jinping's innate caution in foreign policy. Xi's strategic focus remains primarily domestic-on economic recovery, social stability, and avoiding confrontations that could disrupt the fragile US-China relationship, recently stabilized through trade negotiations.
China's military presence abroad remains intentionally minimal. Its only overseas military base is a modest naval outpost in Djibouti, positioned alongside other foreign military installations, hardly signaling ambition for aggressive power projection.
As per Vaswani, Jennifer Parker, a defense expert at the ANU National Security College, captured this strategic calculation succinctly: 'China's relationships with other nations are forged out of convenience. Beijing won't intervene significantly unless compelled to protect its own interests.'
Moreover, Xi's caution also reflects deeper strategic thinking among Chinese policymakers who view US involvement in the Middle East as a distraction that ultimately benefits China's long-term objectives. This aligns with historical Chinese views of the region as a geopolitical quagmire capable of draining America's strategic resources, potentially hastening the decline of US global hegemony.
William Figueroa, a China-Iran expert at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, bluntly told the washington Post: "China has little ability to affect the situation directly... it has no ability to militarily influence that conflict."
What they are saying
Chinese officials sharply criticized Trump's actions yet stopped short of decisive action or influence:
China's UN ambassador Fu Cong emphasized, 'Iran was hurt but the United States' credibility was also damaged-both as a country and as a participant in any international negotiations.'
A Global Times editorial condemned the attack, stating that Washington was 'adding fuel to the fire of war and pushing the Iran-Israel conflict to a more uncontrollable situation.'
However, Beijing faced skepticism even from Iran-friendly corners. Gedaliah Afterman, a China expert at Israel's Reichman University, noted that despite close Sino-Iranian ties, 'it's not clear whether or not [China] could convince Iran,' especially given China's lack of meaningful leverage over military affairs or diplomatic outcomes.
For countries in the Global South and the Gulf, China's championing of a multipolar world may now ring hollow. Governments are looking for reliable crisis partners, not just trade and development. Beijing's hands-off approach is raising doubts about how much weight it's really willing to carry.
Karishma Vaswani in Bloomberg
The big picture
China's limited influence in the Iran crisis has deeper global implications. Despite diplomatic breakthroughs in the Middle East, such as the Saudi-Iranian normalization deal brokered by Beijing in 2023, China remains fundamentally constrained in leveraging its economic power into geopolitical clout during major crises.
Trump's proactive yet aggressive approach in Iran contrasts sharply with China's cautious diplomacy, reinforcing global perceptions of US military dominance and diplomatic reach.
This diminishes China's ability to effectively position itself as a credible alternative to US global leadership.
Furthermore, Trump's assertiveness could reshape calculations in Beijing, particularly regarding potential US responses in other hotspots closer to China, such as Taiwan. Gedaliah Afterman noted: 'Trump's willingness to intervene with force in Iran might make Beijing think the US is more likely to respond militarily to a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan.'
Conversely, other analysts suggest US military entanglement in the Middle East could reduce strategic pressure on China elsewhere, including on economic fronts. Mohammed Alsudairi, a China-Middle East expert at the Australian National University, said: 'US political and strategic bandwidth is limited. The US could be dragged into a quagmire, indirectly benefiting China.'
What's next
Looking forward, Beijing will likely continue its cautious approach in the Middle East. Its primary focus will remain on protecting economic interests, particularly securing oil supplies and safeguarding trade routes, without provoking further confrontation with the US.
There is a possibility, however, that China might gradually seek to strengthen its diplomatic role in less contentious regional issues-continuing infrastructure investments and quiet diplomacy through the Belt and Road Initiative, rather than direct confrontation or military involvement.
Yet the lingering question remains whether China will ever translate economic clout into genuine geopolitical power or if Beijing will consistently prefer caution, leaving the global stage largely dominated by more assertive powers like the United States.
In this Iran crisis, China's restrained response revealed more clearly than ever the true extent-and the significant limitations-of its global ambitions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
33 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India tightens security for nuclear installations amid ongoing conflicts
This decision follows Operation Sindoor and rising tensions between Israel and Iran, which are raising concerns over potential nuclear threats Puja Das New Delhi Listen to This Article India is tightening security at its nuclear installations, including power plants, fuel fabrication facilities, civilian research reactors, and military bases. This decision follows Operation Sindoor and the Israel-Iran conflict, which have raised concerns of potential nuclear threats, according to two senior officials. Operation Sindoor was launched by India against Pakistan on May 7 after a terrorist attack killed 26 civilians and tourists in Pahalgam on April 22. On the other hand, the conflict between Israel and Iran escalated on June 13. Last week, a high-level meeting took place in Delhi that included the department of atomic energy, and security agencies
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
33 minutes ago
- Business Standard
An uneasy truce between Iran-Israel may be best-case scenario: Vandana Hari
True rapprochement between Israel and Iran remains elusive, complicated further by the Gaza conflict that has pitted Israel against Iran-backed groups like the Houthis, Hamas, and Hezbollah, says Hari S Dinakar Amritsar Listen to This Article The conflict in West Asia has roiled Asian economies, especially India, and added fresh strain to domestic refiners. Against this backdrop, Singapore-based energy expert Vandana Hari, founder of Vanda Insights, speaks with S Dinakar via email, shedding light on India's oil and gas options amid a tentative ceasefire in the ongoing Iran-Israel-US war. Edited excerpts: How do you see the West Asian situation evolving with a delicate ceasefire in place? It's likely to be an uneasy calm, at least for the next few days — ceasefires are often fragile. Yet this one offers a sliver of cautious optimism, especially as
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
33 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump says US, Iranian officials will talk next week as ceasefire holds
Iran has not acknowledged any talks taking place next week, though US Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff has said there has been direct and indirect communication between the countries AP Dubai The fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran appeared to be holding on Wednesday while US President Donald Trump asserted that US and Iranian officials will talk next week, giving rise to cautious hope for longer-term peace even as Tehran insisted it will not give up its nuclear programme. Trump, who helped negotiate the ceasefire that took hold Tuesday on the 12th day of the war, told reporters at a NATO summit that he wasn't particularly interested in restarting negotiations with Iran, insisting that US strikes had destroyed its nuclear programme. Earlier in the day, an Iranian official questioned whether the United States could be trusted after its weekend attack. We may sign an agreement, I don't know, Trump said. The way I look at it, they fought, the war is done." Iran has not acknowledged any talks taking place next week, though US Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff has said there has been direct and indirect communication between the countries. A sixth round of negotiations between the US and Iran had been scheduled for earlier this month in Oman but was cancelled when Israel attacked Iran. Earlier, Trump said the ceasefire was going very well, and added that Iran was not going to have a bomb and they're not going to enrich. Iran has insisted, however, that it will not give up its nuclear programme. In a vote underscoring the tough path ahead, its parliament agreed to fast-track a proposal that would effectively stop the country's cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN watchdog that has monitored the programme for years. Ahead of the vote, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf criticised the IAEA for having refused to even pretend to condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities that the US carried out on Sunday. For this reason, the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran will suspend cooperation with the IAEA until security of nuclear facilities is ensured, and Iran's peaceful nuclear programme will move forward at a faster pace," Qalibaf told lawmakers. IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said he had written to Iran to discuss resuming inspections of their nuclear facilities. Among other things, Iran claims to have moved its highly enriched uranium ahead of the US strikes, and Grossi said his inspectors need to re-assess the country's stockpiles. We need to return, he said. We need to engage. French President Emmanuel Macron, whose country was part of the 2015 deal with Iran that restricted its nuclear programme but began unravelling after Trump pulled the US out in his first term, said he hoped Tehran would come back to the table. Iran has long maintained that its nuclear programme was peaceful, and US intelligence agencies have assessed that Tehran is not actively pursuing a bomb. However, Israeli leaders have argued that Iran could quickly assemble a nuclear weapon. Israel is widely believed to be the only Middle Eastern country with nuclear weapons, which it has never acknowledged. Questions over effectiveness of the US strikes The Israel Atomic Energy Commission said its assessment was that the US and Israeli strikes have set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years. It did not give evidence to back up its claim. The US strikes hit three Iranian nuclear sites, which Trump said completely and fully obliterated the country's nuclear programme. When asked about a US intelligence report that found Iran's nuclear programme has been set back only a few months, Trump scoffed and said it would at least take years to rebuild. Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, confirmed that the strikes by US B-2 bombers using bunker-buster bombs had caused significant damage. Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure, he told Al Jazeera on Wednesday, while refusing to go into detail. He seemed to suggest Iran might not shut out IAEA inspectors for good, noting that the bill before parliament only talks of suspending work with the agency, not ending it. He also insisted Iran has the right to pursue a nuclear energy programme. Iran is determined to preserve that right under any circumstances, he said. Witkoff said on Fox News late on Tuesday that Israel and the US had achieved their objective of the total destruction of the enrichment capacity in Iran, and Iran's prerequisite for talks that Israel end its campaign had been fulfilled. The proof is in the pudding, he said. No one's shooting at each other. It's over. Grossi said he could not speculate on how bad the damage was but that Iran's nuclear capabilities were well known. The technical knowledge is there, and the industrial capacity is there, he said. That no one can deny, so we need to work together with them. Hopes for a long-term peace agreement An Israeli official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said the ceasefire agreement with Iran amounted to quiet for quiet, with no further understandings about Iran's nuclear programme going ahead. Witkoff told Fox News that Trump is now looking to land a comprehensive peace agreement that goes beyond even the ceasefire. We're already talking to each other, not just directly, but also through interlocutors, Witkoff said, adding that the conversations were promising and we're hopeful that we can have a long-term peace agreement. However, Baghaei, the Iranian spokesman, said Washington had torpedoed diplomacy with its attacks on nuclear sites, and that while Iran in principle was always open to talks, national security was the priority. We have to make sure whether the other parties are really serious when they're talking about diplomacy, or is it again part of their tactics to make more problems for the region and for my country, he said. China and Russia, Iran's strongest allies, welcomed the ceasefire and said they hoped it would hold. Grossi said Iran and the international community should seize the opportunity of the ceasefire for a long-term diplomatic solution. Out of the ... bad things that military conflict brings, there's also now a possibility, an opening, he said. We shouldn't miss that opportunity. A rare video by Mossad In a rare video released by Mossad, Israel's spy agency, chief David Barnea thanked the CIA for being a key partner, and his own agents for work over months and years to achieve what was unimaginable at first. Thanks to accurate intelligence, advanced technologies and operational capabilities beyond imagination, we helped the Air Force strike the Iranian nuclear project, establish aerial superiority in Iranian skies and reduce the missile threat, the agency said in a Facebook post alongside the video. During the war, Israeli airstrikes also targeted Iran's top military leadership and other sites associated with its ruling theocracy. Tehran on Tuesday put the death toll in Iran at 606, with 5,332 people wounded. The Washington-based Human Rights Activists group released figures Wednesday suggesting Israeli strikes on Iran had killed at least 1,054 and wounded 4,476. The group, which has provided detailed casualty figures from multiple rounds of unrest in Iran, said 417 of those killed were civilians and 318 were security forces. At least 28 people were killed in Israel and more than 1,000 wounded, according to officials. In the past two weeks, Iran has executed six prisoners accused of spying for Israel, including three on Wednesday. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
