South Africa secures massive cash boost from World Bank
South Africa said on Monday it had won a new $1.5 billion (R26 billion) World Bank loan to revive its sluggish growth rate through reforms targeting rundown transport and energy infrastructure.
Africa's most industrialised economy has struggled to build momentum since the 2008 global financial crisis, hampered by chronic power cuts and bottlenecks at the ports and on the freight rail network.
The loan 'marks a significant step towards addressing South Africa's pressing economic challenges of low growth and high unemployment', the country's Treasury said in a statement.
It forms part of the government's agenda to improve basic service delivery, and comes as the mineral-rich nation prepares to host the G20 summit in November.
The Treasury did not specify which projects the loan would fund, but said the 16-year financing plan included a three-year interest grace period.
Despite its industrial base, South Africa's economy remains weighed down by an unemployment rate that tops 32%, one of the highest in the world. Young people are the most severely affected.
Growth reached just 0.6% in 2024, with the South African Reserve Bank projecting a modest 1.2% for this year.
The International Monetary Fund, meanwhile, revised down its growth forecast for the country to 1%.
The country's frequent power cuts are driven by breakdowns at the grid's coal-fired plants.
At times of crisis the cuts have left South Africans without power for up to 12 hours a day.
Debt-laden state logistics firm Transnet has also long been hobbled by maintenance troubles, graft scandals and theft.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) last month urged South Africa to invest more in public infrastructure to tackle those challenges.
But the Paris-based forum also warned against the country's rising debt, which it estimated had soared from 31.5% of gross domestic product in 2010 to a projected 77% in 2025.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news
© Agence France-Presse
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
FSCA's Deepfake Admission Sparks Industry Outrage: Why is Banxso facing the brunt?
The FSCA has issued a stark warning about deepfake investment scams targeting South Africans, implicating high-profile figures. Yet, why is Banxso facing severe penalties while others evade scrutiny? Image: IOL / Ron AI The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) has issued a damning public warning over a sophisticated network of deepfake investment scams exploiting high-profile South African figures, including President Cyril Ramaphosa, Dr Patrice Motsepe, Ms Leanne Manas, and Deputy President Paul Mashatile. But industry insiders are asking a pointed question: why is Banxso being crucified when others are quietly cautioned? This month's FSCA release formally acknowledges what many in the financial services industry have long suspected — that the problem of unauthorised third-party affiliates deploying AI-generated deepfake advertisements is industry-wide, not confined to one firm. Yet, in what critics describe as a deeply unbalanced enforcement approach, Banxso has seemingly become the regulator's scapegoat whilst other implicated platforms escape scrutiny. The Scale of Deception The FSCA's June 10, 2025, warning reveals the alarming sophistication of these fraud networks. Scammers are promising investors "unrealistic returns of between R13,000 and R17,000 per day, on an investment of R4,500" using fabricated endorsements from South Africa's most trusted public figures. In one particularly brazen deepfake video, Dr Motsepe appears to promote the investments, whilst Deputy President Mashatile is shown "confirming that the platform is authorised and that investors will receive returns". Another synthetic video features President Ramaphosa endorsing "guaranteed returns" — content so convincing it has fooled hundreds of potential investors. The FSCA explicitly states that "the individuals behind the platforms are not authorised in terms of any financial sector law to provide financial services to the public" and that these operators "failed to respond to FSCA queries." This represents a clear acknowledgement that multiple unauthorised entities are operating these schemes across various platforms and seemingly the FSCA has no way of combatting this. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Selective Enforcement Under Fire "Banxso acted swiftly when made aware of the deepfakes — refunding over R14 million of their own capital to affected consumers and laying criminal charges against the entity identified as operating the scam," an anonymous compliance expert said. "Other firms stayed silent or claimed ignorance. Why is only one company facing the full weight of enforcement?" Indeed, whilst the FSCA's press release highlights "platforms" plural using synthetic media to promote fraudulent investments, there is no specific mention of Banxso, nor any indication that Banxso continues to operate in connection with these ongoing scams. The regulatory warning appears to confirm that the deepfake problem extends far beyond any single financial services provider. Still, Banxso — a firm currently locked in multiple legal battles and awaiting judgment in a liquidation application that allegedly stems from the FSCA enforcement action — remains the only market participant to face such intense regulatory scrutiny and enforcement action. The company has not only ceased operations but has also proactively worked to trace the perpetrators of the fraudulent advertisements. Industry-Wide Problem, Singular Punishment "The FSCA is finally admitting that this isn't about one rogue actor. The deepfake threat is pervasive and sophisticated," said a fintech policy analyst. "These scammers are using unauthorised platforms, fake documentation, and AI-generated content to deceive consumers on a massive scale. But the regulator's response has been wildly inconsistent. Where is the fairness in targeting the one company that did the right thing?" The FSCA's own guidance emphasises that consumers should "verify that an entity or individual is authorised by the FSCA to provide financial products and services" and warns against "investment or trading offers on social media platforms or any unsolicited offers." This advice tacitly acknowledges that the deepfake threat spans multiple channels and operators — yet enforcement action remains concentrated on a single entity. Legal documents reviewed by IOL confirm that Banxso has initiated criminal proceedings against those behind what they believe to be the third party affiliate marketing scam, a fraudulent offshore entity believed to be at the centre of these AI-powered scams. The company has cooperated fully with authorities, and voluntarily compensated affected consumers — actions that stand in stark contrast to the unnamed platforms that continue operating without consequence. Questions of Proportionality "There is no question that regulation is necessary to protect consumers from these sophisticated fraud networks," added the regulatory source. "But we must ask who it truly protects when it turns a blind eye to some actors whilst hanging others out to dry. The FSCA's own warning confirms this is an industry-wide crisis, yet only one firm faces consequences for crimes it neither initiated nor condoned." The regulator's approach becomes more questionable when considering that the FSCA provides multiple verification methods for consumers to check authorisation status, including a toll-free number (0800 110 443) and online databases. These resources exist precisely because unauthorised operators are a systemic problem across the financial services landscape, not an isolated incident. Regulatory Inconsistency Under Spotlight The FSCA has advised the public to exercise "caution when considering investment or trading offers on social media platforms" and to verify that "the FSP number utilised by the entity or individual offering financial services matches the name of the FSP on the FSCA database." This guidance implicitly acknowledges that multiple unauthorised entities are exploiting regulatory gaps and consumer trust. Yet despite this industry-wide acknowledgement, enforcement actions remain conspicuously one-sided. Whilst unnamed platforms continue operating with apparent impunity, Banxso remains embroiled in costly legal proceedings despite its proactive response to the fraud network. "The selective enforcement sends a dangerous message to the industry," observed a former FSCA official. "Companies that cooperate, self-report, and take corrective action face harsher treatment than those who remain silent or deny responsibility. This approach will inevitably discourage transparency and cooperation in future incidents." The Broader Implications The FSCA's deepfake warning represents more than just consumer protection — it's an admission that South Africa's financial regulatory framework is struggling to keep pace with sophisticated AI-powered fraud networks. These criminals exploit the trust South Africans place in respected public figures whilst operating through unauthorised offshore entities that deliberately evade regulatory oversight. The scams described in the FSCA warning, promising guaranteed daily returns through fabricated celebrity endorsements, represent a clear and present danger to consumer confidence in legitimate financial services. Yet the regulator's response suggests a troubling pattern of selective enforcement that may ultimately undermine its stated objectives. Call for Balanced Response As artificial intelligence continues blurring the line between authentic and fabricated content, and as scammers become increasingly sophisticated in their tactics, the need for a coherent and even-handed regulatory response has never been more urgent. The FSCA's own warning confirms that deepfake investment fraud is a systemic threat requiring industry-wide vigilance and proportionate enforcement. But for now, Banxso remains the public face of a crime it neither initiated nor condoned whilst other implicated platforms escape meaningful scrutiny. The company paid dearly to correct a fraud perpetrated against it and its clients yet continues facing disproportionate regulatory consequences whilst the actual perpetrators operate with apparent impunity. The FSCA has not commented directly on the perceived imbalance in its enforcement actions, despite mounting questions from the financial services community about the consistency and fairness of its regulatory approach. With consumer protection hanging in the balance, South Africa's financial sector deserves regulatory oversight that targets actual wrongdoers. For verification of authorised financial service providers: Toll-free: 0800-110-443 Online: Click here. FSP Search: Click here. IOL
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
More South Africans are turning to crowdfunding to survive
South Africans arer turning to crowdfunding as a solution to their financial struggles, This growing trend is raising millions for medical expenses, education, and more. Image: IOL / RonAI More and more South Africans are turning to crowdfunding to pay for medical expenses, cover school fees, support startups, and lend a hand to charities – raising hundreds of millions of rands in the process. These solutions are increasingly pertinent, given that Statistics South Africa's Tuesday Labour Force Survey showed that, as of March, 95 000 people lost their jobs. At the same time, the release showed that gross earnings dropped by 4.6% between December last year and March. Data from Horizon indicates that the crowdfunding market in the Middle East and Africa is expected to reach a projected revenue of $478.4 million (R8.5 billion) by 2030 from R183.8m (R3.3bn) now. I've personally used BackaBuddy: I have a small Jack Russell x Dachshund x Whippet who developed a chronic illness. However, it cost more than R20 000 to finally get to a diagnosis because the vet and I agreed that we would follow a process of elimination. Because this was a lot of cash to fork out that I simply didn't have at the time, I turned to BackaBuddy. Ordinary South Africans generously donated so much more than the vet bill – I was able to pay off the bill as well as get doggo (Ginger is her name) the very expensive food that she needed for a few months. The causes people turn to crowdfunding for range from heart-wrenching to hopeful. An AI summary indicates that the most successful campaign to date is for Gift of the Givers, which has pulled in more than R19 million. Others include funding life-saving surgeries, such as Willem le Roux's R1.6m medical campaign, and social justice movements like the Uyinene Mrwetyana Fund, which raised over R1.2m in the wake of the UCT student's murder. Among some of the more interesting campaigns is one run by rock band Fokofpolisiekar, which – in 2017 – turned to Thundafund to ask people to give them more than R500 000 to record and independently release their third studio album, Selfmedikasie. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ On its website, Thundafund said 'this album caused a lot of excitement as it was their first album to be released in 11 years, since their sophomore album was released back in 2006'. Fokofpolisiekar set its target at R500 000, which they hit in just a week. 'This campaign was the first of the year to break South African rewards-based crowdfunding records, raising R1 081 010 through the campaign,' said BackaBuddy of the 2017 campaigns. While BackaBuddy is the most popular site people turn to when they want to crowdfund, having raised more than R550m in donations since launch in 2015, there are others that have raised funds for all sorts of things, such as – which provides shares in a company if you contribute. That platform offered shares in Beerhouse, a bar that offered more than 99 types of beer, at R1 000 a pop. Beerhouse closed its doors after 11 years, reportedly because of 'issues related to extortion and the murder of a doorman'. I've tried investing in upcoming companies through similar crowdfunding platforms and, well, lost my money. Others have had bad experiences, with one people on Reddit stating: 'A person I know created a BackaBuddy page to raise money to cover medical costs for her newly born. However, her WhatsApp stories painted a different picture, showcasing outings and was my one and only experience. 0/10 I'm not funding someone else's financial problems if they aren't willing to try fund it themselves.' BackaBuddy's website says it verifies campaigns by requiring organisers of the campaign to register with their true identities and providing supporting information to validate the cause. It also looks at the nature of the campaign, and won't support gambling, for example.
TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Nissan shareholders assail management over deepening crisis
Nissan Motor shareholders vented their frustrations over the carmaker's poor performance at its AGM on Tuesday, with some demanding greater management accountability for the deepening crisis at Japan's third-largest car company. The meeting was the first for new boss Ivan Espinosa since he replaced Makoto Uchida as CEO in April. It remains to be seen whether Espinosa, a company veteran, will be able to halt the sharp decline at Nissan. Shares have fallen some 36% over the past year and dividend payments have been suspended. Nissan reported a $4.5bn (R80.2bn) net loss in the last financial year and there is no guarantee it will return to profit this year — so far, it has declined to give a full-year earnings forecast, and has estimated a first-quarter loss of ¥200bn (R24.4bn). All the same, shareholders voted down a number of proposals that the company had opposed, including an activist-shareholder proposal that would have forced Nissan to take action on listed subsidiary Nissan Shatai. Espinosa has laid out plans for big cuts, including closing seven plants and shedding a total of 20,000 jobs, or about 15% of Nissan's workforce. One shareholder accused the board of trying to 'shift its responsibility to front-line workers' by cutting jobs while retaining their own positions. The board should likewise face a shake-up or risk losing the trust of shareholders and company employees, the shareholder said. Another shareholder complained about the cut to the dividend. Tokyo-based activist shareholder Strategic Capital had pressed Nissan to take action on its listed subsidiary as part of its overhaul. While that proposal was defeated, the breakdown of the vote won't be known until later. Japanese companies are under increasing pressure from the Tokyo Stock Exchange and regulators to clear up so-called 'parent-child listings', which are seen as unfair to minority shareholders and a drag on governance. In one prominent example, Toyota Motor this month unveiled plans to take private its listed subsidiary, Toyota Industries, in a complex, $33bn (R584.25bn) transaction that some shareholders have said undervalues the forklift operator. Toyota likely took action because 'it felt pressure from shareholders and thought it had to change,' said Tsuyoshi Maruki, the CEO of Strategic Capital, in an interview with Reuters on Monday. He said he hoped Nissan's management could also give the issue similar consideration. Nissan owns 50% of Nissan Shatai, which manufactures cars for the carmaker. Strategic Capital owns 3.5% of Nissan Shatai. It has also acquired a small stake in Nissan, allowing it to submit proposals to the general meeting. It has proposed that Nissan change its articles of incorporation so that it would be required to annually examine its relationship with listed subsidiaries and disclose what action, if any, it planned to take. Nissan's board has opposed that and said changing its articles of incorporation would hinder its flexibility.
