Brooklyn Car Accident Lawyer Samantha Kucher Explains New York Car Accident Settlements
As a Brooklyn car accident lawyer, Samantha Kucher highlights the importance of following legal requirements immediately after a crash. Victims are urged to report the incident to law enforcement, file Form MV-104 with the Department of Motor Vehicles if the damages exceed $1,000, and begin gathering evidence from the scene. These initial actions set the stage for a smoother settlement process and help protect the individual's legal rights.
Samantha Kucher emphasizes that a Brooklyn car accident lawyer can help claimants understand the state's no-fault system. Under New York law, Personal Injury Protection (PIP) covers up to $50,000 for medical expenses and lost wages, regardless of who caused the accident. However, if injuries go beyond this coverage or involve non-economic damages like pain and suffering, claimants must meet the 'serious injury' threshold to pursue additional compensation through the at-fault driver's insurer. This includes injuries such as fractures, disfigurement, or extended disability that prevents daily activities for 90 out of 180 days.
Once the initial treatment phase concludes and a claimant reaches Maximum Medical Improvement, Samantha Kucher explains that the next step is the demand letter. The demand letter outlines the accident, medical history, lost income, and a specific settlement amount. It also includes supporting documentation and gives the insurer a deadline to respond. 'A skilled attorney can help draft your letter and ensure that all the necessary details are included for the insurance company's consideration,' the article states.
Insurance companies may accept the demand, reject it, or more commonly, counter with a lower offer. Samantha Kucher points out that settlement negotiations can take weeks or months depending on the injury's severity, the strength of evidence, and whether liability is disputed. While many cases resolve during negotiations, some require a lawsuit to proceed further, especially when the insurer refuses to pay what the claimant is owed.
The Brooklyn car accident lawyer also outlines what happens when a lawsuit becomes necessary. The process begins with filing a formal complaint, followed by an exchange of information during discovery, and possibly going to trial. Although trials are rare, the threat of litigation often motivates insurers to offer better settlements. As noted in the article, 'Filing a lawsuit doesn't just preserve your claim, it can also change the insurer's posture.'
Timing is another essential factor. New York law requires lawsuits to be filed within three years of the accident, or within 90 days if a government entity is involved. Missing these deadlines can result in losing the right to seek compensation entirely. Samantha Kucher advises that legal action can be both a strategic move and a safeguard for one's legal rights, especially when faced with insurance delays or denials.
The settlement amount itself is based on several key factors. According to the article, damages are categorized into economic (medical bills, lost income, property damage), non-economic (pain and suffering, emotional distress), and in rare cases, punitive damages. The claim's size, liability disputes, comparative negligence, insurance policy limits, and even the court venue all influence how much compensation a claimant may receive.
For example, Samantha Kucher explains that if a claimant is found partially at fault for the accident, their compensation is reduced proportionally. A person who is 20% responsible for the accident would receive 80% of the total settlement amount. She also notes that venues such as Manhattan or the Bronx tend to award higher settlements compared to other counties, making local legal insight an important consideration.
Once a settlement is reached, New York law mandates that insurance companies issue payment within 21 days. Government entities have up to 90 days. The funds are usually routed through the attorney's trust account, with disbursements made after resolving any liens or legal fees. Most claimants receive their payment within two to three weeks after finalizing the agreement.
The article from Samantha Kucher concludes by reiterating the importance of knowing how the system works. From documentation and filing deadlines to insurer tactics and negotiation strategies, each step affects the final outcome. Legal guidance can help ensure that claimants are not shortchanged during any phase of the settlement.
For those facing the aftermath of a car accident in Brooklyn, understanding each step in the settlement process is a critical part of recovery. Samantha Kucher's breakdown provides a reliable guide to navigating New York's car accident claims and reaching a fair resolution.
Kucher Law Group continues to advocate for injured individuals across New York City. With a deep understanding of the local legal landscape, Samantha Kucher offers clarity and support to those who may be overwhelmed by the settlement process.
About Kucher Law Group:
Kucher Law Group is a New York-based law firm focused on helping injury victims pursue the compensation they need after accidents. Led by attorney Samantha Kucher, the firm is committed to providing personalized legal guidance to clients across Brooklyn and the greater NYC area.
Embeds:
GMB: https://www.google.com/maps?cid=5716384493669715397
Email and website
Email: contact@rrklawgroup.com
Website: https://www.rrklawgroup.com/
Media Contact
Company Name: Kucher Law Group
Contact Person: Samantha Kucher
Email: Send Email
Phone: (929) 563-6780
Address: 463 Pulaski St #1c
City: Brooklyn
State: New York 11221
Country: United States
Website:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Sun
2 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
Hot dog spill shuts down highway in Pennsylvania commuters' wurst nightmare
Published Aug 01, 2025 • 1 minute read Rescue crews clean up a truckload of hot dogs that spilled out of a tractor-trailer on Friday, Aug. 1, 2025, along Interstate 83 in Shrewsbury, Pa. Photo by Shrewsbury Volunteer Fire Company via AP / AP SHREWSBURY, Pa. — A truckload of hot dogs spilled across a Pennsylvania interstate Friday after a crash that briefly clogged the heavily traveled artery in both directions. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Crews were stuck with a job they did not relish — rolling up the scattered tube steaks for disposal. 'Once those leave the truck and hit the road, that's all garbage, and it's still pretty warm,' Shrewsbury Fire Company Chief Brad Dauberman said. State police said the tractor trailer had an unspecified mechanical problem on Interstate 83 a few miles north of the Maryland line as morning rush hour was wrapping up, causing it to push into a passenger vehicle. When the truck scraped along a concrete divider, its trailer was ripped open and the contents scattered. Four people required medical attention, Dauberman said, for injuries that police said were not life-threatening. A front-end loader was used to scoop up the hot dogs and drop them into a dump truck. Dauberman said emergency crews couldn't help but see the humor in the situation, and his daughter texted him a photo of a hot dog-themed T-shirt. 'I can tell you personally, hot dogs are very slippery,' the fire chief said. 'I did not know that.' Canada Toronto Blue Jays Toronto & GTA World Celebrity
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Jury orders Tesla to pay more than $240 million in Autopilot crash case
MIAMI (AP) — A Miami jury decided that Elon Musk's car company Tesla was partly responsible for a deadly crash in Florida involving its Autopilot driver assist technology and must pay the victims more than $200 million in damages. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. 'This will open the floodgates,' said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.' The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. 'Today's verdict is wrong," Tesla said in a statement, 'and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology,' They said the plaintiffs concocted a story 'blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility.' In addition to a punitive award of $200 million, the jury said Tesla must also pay $43 million in compensatory damages, bringing the total borne by the company to $243 million. 'It's a big number that will send shockwaves to others in the industry,' said financial analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities. 'It's not a good day for Tesla.' Tesla said it will appeal. It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019. But the issue of trust generally in the company came up several times in the case, including in closing arguments Thursday. The plaintiffs' lead lawyer, Brett Schreiber, said Tesla's decision to even use the term Autopilot showed it was willing to mislead people and take big risks with their lives because the system only helps drivers with lane changes, slowing a car and other tasks, falling far short of driving the car itself. Schreiber said other automakers use terms like 'driver assist' and 'copilot' to make sure drivers don't rely too much on the technology. 'Words matter,' Schreiber said. 'And if someone is playing fast and lose with words, they're playing fast and lose with information and facts.' Schreiber acknowledged that the driver, George McGee, was negligent when he blew through flashing lights, a stop sign and a T-intersection at 62 miles an hour before slamming into a Chevrolet Tahoe that the couple had parked to get a look at the stars. The Tahoe spun around so hard it was able to launch Benavides 75 feet through the air into nearby woods where her body was later found. It also left Angulo, who walked into the courtroom Friday with a limp and cushion to sit on, with broken bones and a traumatic brain injury. But Schreiber said Tesla was at fault nonetheless. He said Tesla allowed drivers to act recklessly by not disengaging the Autopilot as soon as they begin to show signs of distraction and by allowing them to use the system on smaller roads that it was not designed for, like the one McGee was driving on. 'I trusted the technology too much,' said McGee at one point in his testimony. 'I believed that if the car saw something in front of it, it would provide a warning and apply the brakes.' The lead defense lawyer in the Miami case, Joel Smith, countered that Tesla warns drivers that they must keep their eyes on the road and hands on the wheel yet McGee chose not to do that while he looked for a dropped cell phone, adding to the danger by speeding. Noting that McGee had gone through the same intersection 30 or 40 times previously and hadn't crashed during any of those trips, Smith said that isolated the cause to one thing alone: 'The cause is that he dropped his cell phone.' The auto industry has been watching the case closely because a finding of Tesla liability despite a driver's admission of reckless behavior would pose significant legal risks for every company as they develop cars that increasingly drive themselves.
Globe and Mail
3 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Jury orders Tesla to pay more than $200 million in Autopilot crash case
MIAMI (AP) — A Miami jury decided that Elon Musk's car company Tesla was partly responsible for a deadly crash in Florida involving its Autopilot driver assist technology and must pay the victims more than $200 million in punitive damages. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. 'This will open the floodgates,' said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.' The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019. __
