Huma Bhabha review – ‘Giacometti is a foil to her flamboyance. She is today's Picasso'
Grey morning light from windows that look across the brutalist ponds at St Giles Cripplegate pours through big holes in her 2019 sculpture Mask of Dimitrios. This roughly assembled human figure has plastic bags for breasts – not inflated but sagging pieces of dirty polythene – a metal chair for a skeleton enhanced by blackened dog bones, plaster arms and legs, a battered tray for a face, all tacked together over an inner emptiness.
It is a troubling patchwork of a person, incomplete, unfinished – like us all. Just as Giacometti created universal images for his time, so Huma Bhabha creates them for ours. And the results are not pretty.
Bhabha was born in Karachi in 1962 and lives in New York state. Giacometti died in Switzerland in 1966 after a life that shaped our very idea of seriousness in modern art. Starting out as a surrealist, creating hybrid forms at once erotic, violent and inexplicable, he became a primeval visionary whose thinned, starkly pointing or walking figures with their tall narrow faces express the reduced yet still-standing state of humanity after the second world war.
The Giacometti Foundation has lent some of his purest, most archaeological figures. Four Women on a Base, cast in bronze in 1950, look like lucky Pompeiians who have walked out of the pyroclastic cloud of Vesuvius. Over by the window, another group of striding emaciated people are framed against concrete and sky – heroically anti-heroic icons of modern existence. 'This is intentional grotesquerie' … Huma Bhabha Encounters: Giacometti.
But Bhabha makes poor Alberto seem museum-bound. You admire miniature figures by Giacometti standing to attention in their cases but are distracted by her rougher, rawer, terracotta-and-concrete shapes on the floor around them: a severed, chewed, gawping head, a bunch of gnarled human bones, a pair of swollen feet.
Bhabha is in subtle dialogue with Giacometti – or is she ever so gently taking the piss? Her traumatised clay-covered heads, feet and other scattered parts mirror his charred ruins of humanity. Yet it is hard to tell if they are homages or parodies. As the exhibition unfolds, Giacometti becomes more and more a foil to her flamboyance, a skinny Polonius to her witty Hamlet, as her existential questions start to feel more urgent, restless and resonant than his.
Giacometti, at least as represented here, is an artist who does one thing with monumental perfection. (His surrealist works would have told another story). Bhabha is an omnivorous eater and vomiter up of traditions and conventions, modern one moment, prehistoric the next, exhilaratingly embracing bad taste. In the gallery's antechamber are four massive statues with bodies that are solid rectangular blocks on which she has incised distorted outlines of body parts and interior organs. These gross, corporeal towers have titles including Mr Stone and, er, Member. This is intentional grotesquerie by an artist who is totally in control of her hideousness.
Bhabha emerges as not a follower of Giacometti at all. With her savage embrace of what can only be called by that 20th-century word 'primitivism', her mixing of beauty and revulsion, her pastiches, her awe at the mystery of human existence, she is today's Picasso. Mask of Dimitrios, with its chaotic human image supported by a chair frame, is highly reminiscent of an Oceanian mask owned by Picasso, now in the Picasso Museum, Paris, which he enhanced by placing on a little wooden chair. Restless and resonant … Bhabha's Magic Carpet (2003). Photograph: Kerry McFate/Courtesy of the artist and David Zwirner Gallery
She is not, however, a European artist, embracing the 'primitive' from elsewhere, but a Pakistani American who sees Europe as the outsider, the incomer, the brutal stranger. Near Giacometti's striding legs she displays her 2003 piece Magic Carpet, in which two booted white legs, bum in the air, stalk over a Mughal-style rug.
Yet she looks for the same kind of universal language that Giacometti and Picasso found in their ransackings of world art and myth. Her powerful statue Scout looks like an ancient Egyptian Ka figure or sarcophagus that's been burned then buried – she created its charred look by applying paint to cork. The cultural cannibalism of her art is as insolent and boldly entitled as the great 20th-century modernists.
Ugliness trumps elegance in this energising show. Instead of another depressing reminder that 21st-century art isn't a patch on 20th-century modernism, it proves the opposite – that artists today are still able to find the new and wild by recooking the many cultures of our ever-shifting world. The Reform chairman recently said Britain needs more patriotic statues and less 'crazy modern art'. Huma Bhabha's art is a punch in the face for such attitudes – and a satisfying punch it is.
At the Barbican, London, 8 May-10 August
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Fox & Friends host sparks red faces and guffaws by making X-rated mistake
Fox & Friends' Brian Kilmeade accidentally said '69' during a segment about James Comey - sending his cohosts into hysterics. The anchor was in the process of slamming the former FBI director when he made the flub. The word '69', in some settings, is slang for a sex act. The numeral he had intended to use was '86', co-host Ainsley Earhardt quickly pointed out. Laughter ensued, as the latter is another slang term largely used in hospitality, when referring to a menu item that is out of stock. It can also mean 'getting rid' of a person or product - a definition that saw many accuse Comey of calling for the assassination of Donald Trump back in May. Comey, back then, uploaded a picture that showed an assortment of shells arranged to spell out: '86 47.' The missive appeared to reference the conservative, who is the 47th president of the United States. Comey insisted he stumbled across the message himself as others continue to use the numerical sequence to also call for the conservative's impeachment. He found himself at the center of the Fox & Friends discussion following a separate post where he outed himself as a fan of Taylor Swift. In it, Comey also panned Trump as an 'elderly, makeup-covered president' - causing Kilmeade to rush to his defense. 'Meanwhile, if you talk about a guy that's absolutely unhinged and lost his mind. He is 6-foot-7. He is James Comey,' the anchor said. 'This guy, who is walking on the beach and sees a mysterious configurations of rocks [and says] "Maybe it's a natural phenomenon - that say 69."' Earhardt immediately interrupted: '86-47,' putting particular emphasis on the first number. 'Eighty-six, rather,' Kilmeade quickly replied, before adding, '86-47.' He went on to own up to the moment by asking aloud: '69? What was I thinking?' His cohosts, Earhardt and cohost Lawrence B. Jones, had been visibly holding in there laughter. Following the admission, the could not contain themselves any longer, each letting out a laugh. Kilmeade cracked as well, but pressed forth with his criticism. He slammed Comey for continuing to speak out against the administration nearly a decade after he ended a federal investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's use of her personal email during the 2016 election. Kilmeade uploaded a picture in May that showed an assortment of shells arranged to spell out: '86 47.' The missive appeared to reference the conservative, the 47th US president. '86' is another slang term largely used in hospitality, when referring to a menu item that is out of stock Comey found that while Clinton's use of a personal email address to send and receive classified messages was 'extremely careless', but not enough to press charges to due a perceived lack of 'criminal intent.' 'Multiple investigations have him going back to 2016 in cahoots with Hillary Clinton and company to cut the knees out of the first Trump administration, he has not stopped posting,' Kilmeade claimed. 'Well, he's a Swifty,' Jones chimed in. 'What guy does that?' he added, referring to Comey's video. 'Nobody,' Kilmeade answered. Onlookers on X couldn't help but poke fun at the exchange, with one taking the time to 'comfort' Kilmeade following his mistake: 'It's ok Kilmeade! Comey '69's himself!' 'Brian @Kilmeade had "69" on his mind,' another joked.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
A new start after 60: I read out my old diaries online – and my youthful secrets went viral
Betsy Lerner doesn't see herself as a TikTok star – though the New York Times described her as one – or an influencer. That means payment and swag – all she's had is a free pen. 'I really do it for myself,' she says, 'and for the people who follow me'. Lerner, 64, has for 20 years worked as a literary agent for writers including Patti Smith and Temple Grandin. She's an author of nonfiction and now of a debut novel, Shred Sisters – 'a love letter to loneliness'. But the 'doing' she's talking about is on TikTok, where she has amassed 1.5m likes for videos in which she reads from the diaries she wrote in her turbulent 20s. 'You don't know who you'll love, who will love you, what you will do for work, what is your purpose,' she says in one post. 'This morning I found one line in my diary that just sums [your 20s] up: 'I feel as if I don't know who I am, today.'' Lerner posts in her dressing gown, without makeup. Initially she explored BookTok to support her authors. But with her own novel forthcoming, she started posting, camera off, and got no followers. 'A friend told me, you need to be on camera and think of it as your own TV channel … I thought, 'Well, maybe I will read from my old diaries.'' She'd kept one from the age of 11, after reading Anne Frank's The Diary of a Young Girl. 'I wrote my first poems in there. I vented. I tried to analyse myself …' Her journals from the ages of 12 to 18 were lost when her car was stolen, but those from her 20s – about 30 volumes – were stowed in a crawl space in her attic. 'My diaries are very sad. They're all about being lonely, looking for love, looking for friendship, trying to figure out who I was,' she says. Lerner describes herself as 'a late bloomer'. She was accepted on to Columbia's MFA poetry programme at 26, entering publishing in her late 20s when most editorial assistants were fresh from college. 'I didn't fall in love till I was 30. I'd never had any significant relationships … I lost a lot of my teenage years and most of my 20s struggling with depression.' When she was 15, her parents had taken her to a psychiatrist, and she had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder. 'I didn't want to accept that I had this illness. I fought it a lot,' she says. Her 2003 memoir, Food and Loathing, documents her relationship with her weight, food, depression and more, and at one point in her late 20s describes her straddling a ledge on a bridge above the Hudson River. The turning point came at 30. She found a psychopharmacologist – who 'figured out' the right lithium dosage (they've worked together for 35 years) – and she got married. Her diaries stopped. She had written them alone in bed at night. But now, 'I just didn't feel that sad and lonely any more', she says. For years, Lerner says, 'I gravitated toward a lot of intensity.' Now, 'I prioritise stability over everything.' She had never thought she'd write a novel. But in 2019 she came through 'four very tragic deaths'. She lost her mother, then her teenage niece and nephew, Ruby and Hart Campbell, who were killed by a drunk driver, and her best friend, the writer George Hodgman, who died by suicide. 'I still don't know who I'm grieving for at any given time,' she says. In the aftermath of these deaths she started to write Shred Sisters, partly inspired by the online workouts – shredding – she and her two sisters did during Covid to take care of each other, and as 'a way of working through all of that grief'. She is already writing another novel, and for as long as there is material in the diaries, and there is TikTok, she will continue to share them. 'It's all about trying to connect and communicate,' she says. 'There's a constant stream of comments from kids in their 20s who identify with my struggles. That's really what keeps me going. I feel this connection to these kids … I try to say, I felt the same. Hang in. Some heart emojis. Just a little something to say, 'You're recognised.'' Shred Sisters is out now, published by Verve Books. To support the Guardian, order a copy from the Guardian bookshop. Delivery fees may apply. Tell us: has your life taken a new direction after the age of 60? In the UK and Ireland, Samaritans can be contacted on freephone 116 123, or email jo@ or jo@ In the US, you can call or text the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline on 988, chat on or text HOME to 741741 to connect with a crisis counselor. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found at
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Star power, big money and simmering anger – this is tennis' new mixed doubles
To start with a dad joke, the US Open is definitely 'mixing it up' this year. The often overlooked mixed-doubles event has been repurposed as a show-stopping glitzfest, featuring grand slam winners like Carlos Alcaraz, veteran champions like Venus Williams, and social-media phenoms like Emma Raducanu. Four rounds of knockouts will be staged across Tuesday and Wednesday, and both days have sold out, with fans paying between $25 and $135 (£18 and £100) for seats on Arthur Ashe Stadium. So, won't those poorly treated doubles players – who so often find themselves at the bottom of tennis's pecking order – be delighted by their newfound prominence? Especially when the winning team will pocket $1m (£740,000) in prize money? Er, no. Because only two doubles specialists – defending US Open champions Sara Errani and Andrea Vavassori of Italy – were originally invited to participate in a field of 16 teams. There have been a few personnel changes since, but Kristina Mladenovic, the Frenchwoman who won the Wimbledon mixed title in 2013, expressed her reservations as soon as the announcement was made in June. 'A grand slam is a competition steeped in history, in singles and doubles,' said Mladenovic. 'And now, all of a sudden, the doubles becomes a super exhibition without anyone or anything having a say. There's no problem putting on such an event, but above all, don't call it a grand slam!' Mladenovic's position has since gathered substantial support within tennis's hardcore fandom. Traditionalists argue that the US Open's mixed-doubles trophy becomes worthless when it is contested by scratch teams who have never played together before, especially when they are using an accelerated scoring system in which only four games are required to win a set. The counter-argument is that mixed doubles has always been a bit of a joke in any case. So why not 'reimagine' it – to use the phrase preferred by the US Open – as a light-hearted knockabout with dazzling star power? A world of specialists Mixed doubles is not played at any tournament outside the majors. The winning teams, with occasional exceptions, tend to be completely unknown to the general public. Perhaps you were aware that Katerina Siniakova and Sem Verbeek lifted the Wimbledon title five weeks ago, but I certainly had to look it up. The more awkward issue involves the gradual decline of doubles – especially men's doubles – within the professional game. It sometimes feels like a slow death spiral, in which the obscurity of doubles specialists leaves them tucked away in the far corners of tournaments. This reduces their visibility still further, whereupon the whole cycle begins again. Work is afoot to reverse this trend. Ross Hutchins, the former doubles player who is now chief sporting officer for the ATP Tour, has spent the last couple of years overseeing a review of doubles and its place within the sport's ecosystem. 'Most active tennis fans play doubles themselves, and it's been part of the sport for decades,' Hutchins told Telegraph Sport. 'The key now is shaping the schedule in a way that makes doubles, and the overall event, more appealing. A big part of that is delivering the right mix within the draw. When singles players compete against doubles specialists, it creates a fresh dynamic that fans really enjoy.' This is a tough job, though, because doubles has one fundamental problem. It is not a great format for creating stars. Think of the sprint relays at the Olympic Games. They are great fun to watch, arguably more so than the 100m or 400m individual events. But nobody can remember who won – unless Usain Bolt happened to be part of the roster. The bottom line of individual sports like tennis and athletics is that you build your brand by proving yourself the best in the world. As soon as we add a team element, that simple and powerful concept is diluted. Rich history Back in the 1980s, none of this mattered. In those days, singles grandees such as John McEnroe and Martina Navratilova had enough bandwidth to stack up doubles titles at every level. Let us not forget their regular partners, Peter Fleming and Pam Shriver respectively, who provided stalwart support. But as tennis has become more physical, fewer players have been prepared, or able, to combine both formats at the same events. It is out of the question for male singles players – who contest best-of-five-set matches – to enter more than one event at the slams, even if versatile women like Coco Gauff and Jasmine Paolini occasionally sweep the board at lesser tournaments. The upshot, at least on the ATP Tour, is the development of two largely parallel workforces. Which creates extra expense for tournaments that have to feed and house twice as many players. What's more, there can be a certain froideur between the two camps. The former British No1 Dan Evans is one of several men who have scoffed at doubles specialists in the past, transmitting the general impression that he considers them to be failed singles players who are stealing a living. In response, doubles guys will remind you that they usually beat the singles stars in a team format, thanks to their greater familiarity with net play. New territory This week will thus provide a fascinating case study. Tennis technicians will be fascinated to see whether Vavassori and Errani can strike a blow for doubles experts by outperforming their first-round opponents Taylor Fritz (last year's US Open singles runner-up) and Elena Rybakina (the 2022 Wimbledon champion). The US Open Mixed Doubles Championship draw is set! — US Open Tennis (@usopen) August 17, 2025 Beyond the locker room, tennis's army of administrators are sure to be checking out the broadcasting figures and the tone of the coverage. Fans will be intrigued by the players' demeanour on court: can we expect a hit-and-giggle with lots of clowning and interplay, or will there be a hard competitive edge? This is all new territory for the game. Call me a sucker for a cheap gimmick, but I'm looking forward to it enormously.
