logo
West Virginia prosecutor warned his colleagues could charge women for miscarriages. He didn't say they actually will

West Virginia prosecutor warned his colleagues could charge women for miscarriages. He didn't say they actually will

Yahoo07-06-2025
In late May and early June 2025, a rumor spread online that West Virginia prosecutors planned to start issuing felony charges against women who have miscarriages.
This claim is misleading. It comes from a misunderstanding of comments made by Raleigh County Prosecuting Attorney Tom Truman, who wished to warn people that it may be possible for prosecutors to charge people who miscarry using state laws governing disposal of human remains. However, Truman emphasized that he does not personally want to or plan to prosecute anyone under these conditions.
West Virginia law does not explicitly state that fetal remains are equivalent to human remains. The state treats fetuses as "distinct victims" in "certain crimes of violence," but it does not have a law giving fetuses the same total legal rights as people. Furthermore, prosecutors have broad discretion and authority to decide on bringing charges and how to pursue a case. Thus, it is possible a West Virginia prosecutor could try to charge someone for the disposal of fetal remains after a miscarriage, but it is difficult to determine whether the charge would hold up in court.
In late May and early June 2025, a rumor spread online that West Virginia prosecutors would begin charging women who have miscarriages with crimes.
The claim spread on platforms including X, Facebook, Threads and Reddit. Some posts specified that a miscarriage starting at nine weeks of pregnancy would result in a felony charge; many attributed the information to Raleigh County Prosecuting Attorney Tom Truman.
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1043691187320222
However, this claim is misleading, as it comes from a misunderstanding of Truman's comments to West Virginia news station WVNS, in which he said a prosecutor in the state might, in theory, file criminal charges against people who miscarried using laws governing disposal of human remains. Truman told Snopes he does not personally believe prosecuting people for disposal of fetal remains after a miscarriage is appropriate and he does not know of any prosecutors who have concrete plans to do so.
"I was just trying to send out a warning to people," Truman said in a phone call.
The West Virginia Prosecuting Attorneys Institute said in an email that it does not offer legal advice and thus cannot comment on whether West Virginia law would allow such prosecutions, but its executive director, Jim Samples, said he had not received any inquiries on the subject since he started there in mid-December 2024.
Snopes also reached out to the national Association of Prosecuting Attorneys and the National District Attorneys Association to inquire whether these organizations have reason to believe West Virginia prosecutors may begin charging people who have miscarriages for improper disposal of human remains. We await their responses.
In a May 30, 2025, interview with West Virginia news station WVNS, Truman said he heard a number of prosecuting attorneys discussing their willingness "to file criminal charges against women in pregnancy loss situations by using state law related to the disposal of human remains."
While Truman confirmed the accuracy of the interview, he clarified that the conversation with these attorneys occurred "years ago," before the Supreme Court reversed the federal right to an abortion under Roe v. Wade in 2022.
"Some of the really anti-abortion prosecutors were looking for about anything they could find," Truman said. "Comments were made casually, and at the time it got my attention, but it didn't really mean much before Roe was overturned."
But then Roe fell — and West Virginia began enforcing its near-total ban on abortion. Truman also pointed to language in the West Virginia Code, passed by the state Legislature, defining fetuses and embryos as "separate and distinct" victims from the pregnant person for "certain crimes of violence," as well as a 2016 West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals decision affirming the conviction of a woman for involuntary manslaughter, concealment of a deceased human body and other offenses related to the death of her 26-day-old infant son.
Per pages 16 and 17 of the decision, the woman helped law enforcement find the infant's grave site within 48 hours of his death — and an autopsy could not confirm cause of death. However, the state successfully argued that she still did not meet the requirements of West Virginia law on the "concealment of a deceased human body." The law requires a person to "affirmatively" notify law enforcement not only within 48 hours of concealing the body, but prior to being contacted by law enforcement in connection with the death.
Taken altogether, Truman said, he is concerned that "some of the people hell-bent on prosecuting folks" for miscarriages might do so by getting "creative" with case law and by using the broad powers of prosecutorial discretion, or the authority a prosecutor has to decide whether to file charges and what charges to file.
"All of a sudden, it became — what was pretty far-fetched became a possibility," Truman said.
Truman advised West Virginia residents to protect themselves from possible prosecution by immediately informing the relevant county prosecuting attorney's office or law enforcement when a miscarriage occurs.
There is some precedent to Truman's concerns, at least in other states. Snopes confirmed in April that police arrested a Georgia woman on charges of improper disposal and notification of a dead body after she miscarried and put the fetal remains in a dumpster. (The prosecutor's office later dropped the charges, according to reports.)
Furthermore, an organization called Pregnancy Justice found in a September 2024 report — see Page 2 — that at least 210 people have faced criminal charges related to pregnancy, pregnancy loss and birth, and that 22 of those cases involved "a fetal or infant demise and allegations regarding conduct concerning pregnancy, pregnancy loss, or birth."
However, West Virginia, unlike Georgia and similar states with anti-abortion laws, does not have a broad fetal-personhood law as of this writing — a legislative attempt to pass one in 2024 stalled. Fetal personhood is the idea that a fetus has the same legal rights as a person; not having a fetal-personhood law makes it less likely that West Virginia law on human remains is considered applicable to fetal remains.
Furthermore, West Virginia law does not penalize patients who receive abortions, only the people who perform the operation — and another state law explicitly states that a miscarriage is not an abortion. An attorney with Pregnancy Justice, Kulsoom Ijaz, told WVNS, the same outlet Truman spoke to, that while she believes West Virginia law bars prosecutors from charging a woman in relation to her own abortion or miscarriage, "there are countless unjust and unfounded prosecutions every day in this country."
Some claims said that West Virginia prosecutors would begin charging people whose miscarriages happened just nine weeks into a pregnancy. That rumor appeared to be based off a line in the WVNS story: "Truman added that women who miscarry at nine weeks or later could potentially face charges."
This timeline, Truman said in an email to Snopes, came from the state law, which recognizes an embryo or fetus as a "distinct unborn victim." Under that law, a fetus is, by definition, a developing human "eight weeks after fertilization or ten weeks after the onset of the last menstrual period" — in other words, around nine weeks. He also pointed to a state law that provides definitions for "fetal death."
But none of the laws Truman referenced explicitly states that fetal remains are equal to human remains under state law, meaning it is difficult to determine whether a prosecutor could successfully bring a case applying laws about the disposal and notification of human remains to fetal remains.
To summarize, while at least one prosecuting attorney in West Virginia said he believes other prosecutors in the state could find a way to charge a person who had a miscarriage in relation to the disposal of fetal remains, the law did not, at the time of this writing, explicitly endorse this belief — nor was there any indication that prosecutors in West Virginia had active plans to pursue such cases.
Bach, Wendy, and Madalyn Wasilczuk. Pregnancy as a Crime: A Preliminary Report on the First Year after Dobbs. Sept. 2024, www.pregnancyjusticeus.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Pregnancy-as-a-Crime.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2025.
Deng, Grace. "Yes, Georgia Woman Was Arrested after Having Miscarriage. Here Are the Facts." Snopes, Snopes Media Group, 1 Apr. 2025, www.snopes.com/news/2025/04/01/georgia-woman-miscarriage/. Accessed 5 June 2025.
Farrish, Jessica. "Attorney for Pregnancy Rights Group Says West Virginia Law Protects Women Who Miscarry." WVNS, 4 June 2025, www.wvnstv.com/news/attorney-for-pregnancy-rights-group-says-west-virginia-law-protects-women-who-miscarry/. Accessed 5 June 2025.
---. "Prosecutor Warns of Potential Charges against Women Who Miscarry in West Virginia." WVNS, 31 May 2025, www.wvnstv.com/news/local-news/prosecutor-warns-of-potential-charges-against-women-who-miscarry-in-west-virginia/. Accessed 5 June 2025.
Frye, Jr, Andrew N. "State v. McDaniel ." Justia Law, 12 Oct. 2016, law.justia.com/cases/west-virginia/supreme-court/2016/15-0641.html. Accessed 5 June 2025.
González-Ramírez, Andrea. "Prosecutor Drops Charges over Georgia Woman's Miscarriage." The Cut, 4 Apr. 2025, www.thecut.com/article/prosecutor-drops-charges-over-georgia-womans-miscarriage.html. Accessed 5 June 2025.
"House Bill 5041." Wvlegislature.gov, www.wvlegislature.gov/bill_status/bills_history.cfm?INPUT=5041&year=2024&sessiontype=RS. Accessed 5 June 2025.
"West Virginia Code Section 16-2R-3." West Virginia Code, code.wvlegislature.gov/16-2R-3/. Accessed 5 June 2025.
"West Virginia Code Section 16-2R-4." West Virginia Code, code.wvlegislature.gov/16-2R-4/. Accessed 5 June 2025.
"West Virginia Code Section 16-5-1." West Virginia Code, code.wvlegislature.gov/16-5-1/. Accessed 5 June 2025.
"West Virginia Code Section 61-2-5A." West Virginia Code, code.wvlegislature.gov/61-2-5A/. Accessed 5 June 2025.
"West Virginia Code Section 61-2-30." West Virginia Code, code.wvlegislature.gov/61-2-30/. Accessed 5 June 2025.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Paintings Multiply on White House Walls as Other Presidents' Portraits Get Moved. See What's Been Added
Trump Paintings Multiply on White House Walls as Other Presidents' Portraits Get Moved. See What's Been Added

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Paintings Multiply on White House Walls as Other Presidents' Portraits Get Moved. See What's Been Added

A White House official said there are more Trump portraits to come amid controversy over the president's decision to move Barack Obama's official portrait to a hidden stairwell President Donald Trump is hanging even more portraits of himself around the White House. This week, a new painting of the president was revealed on social media. Longtime Trump ally Sebastian Gorka, who is currently serving as deputy assistant to the president and senior director for counterterrorism, shared a photo on X of the artwork, which shows Trump walking forward, his hands tucked into a long dark coat, flanked by rows of American flags. "One of the new @WhiteHouse paintings of President @realDonaldTrump," Gorka captioned the post. "More to come." Another new addition to the White House art collection was shared in May by New York Times White House correspondent Shawn McCreesh. McCreesh posted a photo to X of a portrait depicting Trump with late Republican Presidents Ronald Reagan and Abraham Lincoln looking over his shoulder, which he said was spotted "on the walls of the West Wing." Trump showed off another recent painting of himself, the one pictured above, while posing for a photo with European leaders during a Ukraine summit at the White House on Monday, Aug. 18. White House communications adviser Margo Martin shared a video on X of Trump pointing out the artistic depiction of his July 2024 assassination attempt, which she called his "Butler 'Fight, Fight, Fight' painting." The painting, which has hung in the White House since April, shows him raising his fist while surrounded by Secret Service agents after a bullet grazed his ear at a rally in Butler, Pa.. "That was not a great day!" Trump joked to the group. Other additions to the White House walls during Trump's second term have included an unorthodox painting of Trump's face overlaid with an American flag — which was crammed in between portraits of two former first ladies — as well as a new presidential portrait that bears a striking resemblance to his August 2023 mug shot. A framed New York Post cover showing his actual mug shot was also spotted on a wall just outside the Oval Office. The latest Trump artwork revealed by Gorka comes just a week after a White House official confirmed to PEOPLE that the president had broken precedent to move Barack Obama's official portrait out of public view. White House tradition says that the two most recent presidential portraits should hang prominently on either side of the Grand Foyer for members of the public to appreciate during tours and events. Since President Joe Biden's White House portrait has not yet been completed, the two most recent portraits are of Obama and George W. Bush. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Back in April, the president swapped Obama's portrait with the "Fight, Fight, Fight" assassination attempt painting. Now, Obama's portrait has been moved even further from public view, to the top of the Grand Staircase. The stairwell, which leads up to the president's private living area, is off-limits to visitors and partially obstructed from public view. CNN reported that Obama's portrait in particular is "firmly out of view" for visitors. Insiders also told the outlet that Trump signs off on nearly all aesthetic changes to the White House, no matter how small. A spokesperson for Obama declined to comment on the recent change. The portraits aren't the only major change that Trump has made since taking office for a second time. He's also come under fire from critics for his gaudy makeover of the Oval Office. An April report in The Wall Street Journal revealed that the president had enlisted his "gold guy," cabinetmaker John Icart, to create golden borders for his political portraits, gilded carvings for the fireplace mantel and a gold Trump crest in a doorway. Musician Jack White slammed the Oval Office's new look in an Instagram rant following Trump's Aug. 18 meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. "Look at how disgusting Trump has transformed the historic White House," White wrote. "It's now a vulgar, gold-leafed and gaudy, professional wrestler's dressing room. Can't wait for the UFC match on the front lawn too, he's almost fully achieved the movie 'Idiocracy.' " "Look at his disgusting taste, would you even buy a used car from this conman, let alone give him the nuclear codes?" he continued. "A gold-plated Trump bible would look perfect up on that mantle with a pair of Trump shoes on either side, wouldn't it? What an embarrassment to American history." Read the original article on People

Trump: ‘Mail-in ballots are corrupt.' Changes may be coming for the mail-in process
Trump: ‘Mail-in ballots are corrupt.' Changes may be coming for the mail-in process

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump: ‘Mail-in ballots are corrupt.' Changes may be coming for the mail-in process

President Trump is proposing changes to mail-in ballot guidelines to increase voting integrity, prompting election officials at the county and state levels to prepare for adjustments in verification standards. The proposal aims to enhance the security of mail-in voting, a method that has been under scrutiny for its potential vulnerabilities. Election officials are ready to implement changes to ensure the integrity of the voting process, with Montgomery County Board of Elections emphasizing its commitment to security measures. 'Mail-in ballots are corrupt,' President Trump stated, highlighting his concerns about the current system. [DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]the TRENDING STORIES: Over 200 tons of debris cleared after historic catholic church fire Son of NFL Hall of Famer removed from UC men's basketball team, coach says Scratch-off worth $1 million sold in Miami Valley Bob Warnock, a truck driver from New Lebanon, expressed distrust in absentee ballots, saying, 'People voting and it wasn't them. A lot of that. I saw it on TV and they still deny it!' Jeff Rezabek from the Montgomery County Board of Elections explained, 'There are security documents and things on the ballot itself that we check. So you can't just go out and make a photocopy of the ballot.' Amber Jenkins from News Center 7 visited Montgomery County to gather public opinion on the proposed changes and the efforts to verify mail-in ballots. Residents like Bob Warnock voiced concerns over the integrity of absentee voting, citing instances of alleged fraud. Rezabek assured that the Montgomery County Board of Elections is proactive in maintaining voting integrity, working closely with the Secretary of State to follow rules and guidelines. He stated that any changes proposed would be implemented and communicated to voters. The Ohio Secretary of State released a statement indicating that they are reviewing the President's proposal and will discuss potential changes with the General Assembly, as modifications to Ohio's voting process require legislative approval. As discussions continue regarding the proposed changes to mail-in ballot guidelines, election officials remain committed to ensuring the security and integrity of the voting process. Voters in Montgomery County and across Ohio can expect updates as the situation develops. [SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter] Solve the daily Crossword

A mother of three was randomly shot and killed outside her California home. A decade later, the murder suspect has finally been arrested
A mother of three was randomly shot and killed outside her California home. A decade later, the murder suspect has finally been arrested

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A mother of three was randomly shot and killed outside her California home. A decade later, the murder suspect has finally been arrested

Authorities have arrested a California man suspected of murdering two people, over a decade after their deaths — including an innocent bystander killed in front of her children. Maria Soza, 32, was standing outside her San Francisco home with her three children when she was struck and killed by a stray bullet during a drive-by shooting in 2015. The other victim killed in the shooting was 38-year-old Donte Glenn of San Francisco. On Tuesday, the San Francisco District Attorney's Office announced they had finally arrested a suspect in the cold cases. Anthony James Tyree, 34, also known as 'Dot Diggla,' has been charged with two counts of murder, attempted murder, and possession of a firearm by a felon. District Attorney Brooke Jenkins said Tyree was arrested Monday at his home in Pittsburg, California, after homicide cold case investigators linked him to the shooting. He was scheduled to be arraigned Tuesday afternoon at the San Francisco Hall of Justice. The shootings unfolded on January 27, 2015, when two vehicles sped through the Bayview District neighborhood near Revere Avenue and Ingalls Street. According to prosecutors, Tyree was a passenger in the Dodge pickup when he and another passenger opened fire on a black Infinity SUV. 'Mr. Tyree and another passenger opened fire at the Infinity and its occupants,' the District Attorney's Office wrote. 'The barrage of bullets hit and wounded the driver of the Infinity, and hit and killed the passenger. A stray bullet from the shooting hit and killed a woman standing outside her residence with her family.' That woman was Soza, who family members said in a GoFundMe campaign had just returned from picking her children, aged 13, 8, and 3, from school, when the shooting occured. She collapsed in front of her children, before being rushed to a hospital where she died. Minutes after Soza was shot, the other victim, Glenn, was found with multiple gunshot wounds after trying to get help at The Old Clam House restaurant on Bayshore Boulevard, CBS News reported. He died before reaching a hospital. The case remained unsolved for years, until last summer, when San Francisco police homicide cold case detectives reopened the investigation. By August 2024, investigators developed probable cause linking Tyree to the two murders. On Monday, officers executed a search warrant at Tyree's Pittsburg home, where they said they located an AR-15-style ghost gun hidden in his bedroom. He was taken into custody and is being held at San Francisco County Jail. Prosecutors said they will seek to keep him detained without bail, citing the danger he poses to the public. 'This arrest is the result of tireless work by our homicide cold case unit,' Jenkins said. 'We will now fight to secure justice for Maria Soza, Donte Glenn, and their families.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store