East Midlands mayor pledges delivery after 'difficult first year'
10 minutes ago
Share
Save
Georgia Roberts
Political Reporter, BBC Derby
Share
Save
BBC
Claire Ward was elected mayor of the East Midlands in 2024
The mayor of the East Midlands insists the coming year will be of "delivery" for the region after getting off the ground from scratch in her new role.
Labour's Claire Ward also said that a brutal set of local election results for the party, whereby they lost scores of councillors across the East Midlands, underlined the need "to really deliver for people".
"I understand that frustration," said Ward, who was elected as the first for the region last year to oversee the new East Midlands Combined Authority.
The position is supposed to serve as a boon for attracting investment into local areas, with powers transferred from Westminster to take charge of projects.
Claire Ward told the BBC: "This [was] a difficult first year because when I arrived a year ago into that office, they were literally unpacking the computers out of the boxes. There were 20 interim staff.
"So this year has been about building those foundations, building the capacity and capability of the organisation so that I can go and do things.
"And there's nothing worse than trailing around the region promising things that I simply couldn't deliver."
The mayor driving a simulator for trainee drivers at East Midlands Railway's headquarters in Derby
She cited new brownfield sites being cleared for housebuilding and investment in adult skills in colleges across the region as examples of visible upcoming delivery, as well as £5m for a youth scheme.
The mayor said she would be increasing her presence across the region "now that some of those administrative pieces have been done", amid some criticism from opposition parties that she has not done enough to reach out to local people.
She also insisted Derbyshire would benefit from "different funding pots and opportunities" for regeneration funding after Chesterfield was the only Derbyshire-based area in the region to be named as benefitting from £140m of regeneration funding.
Asked whether the government were listening amid criticism from Red Wall MPs that investment in local infrastructure was seen as "too difficult", she said the government "needs to do more".
'Work with me'
"If you look at transport funding, [the East Midlands] are not just at the bottom of the pile...we are way down.
"What we need to see from the government is delivery, delivery, delivery. And they need to understand that in these regions, it's really important that we get that change. And that's why people are angry.
"But the money that we've got from devolution, we're already investing."
Ward pledged to "reinforce" a message of "delivery" to the government.
In anticipation of Reform UK taking the reins in Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire, where they will need to work with the mayor on a number of issues, she said,
"Look at the manifesto that I stood on last year and tell me which bits you don't agree with.
"Work with me. We will work together and we will deliver for this region."
Follow BBC Derby on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@bbc.co.uk or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Shamed Labour councillor who was paid £42k while on bail for sexually abusing girl jailed for 27 months
A shamed Labour councillor has been jailed after grooming and sexually abusing a schoolgirl. David Graham, 43, was yesterday handed a 27-month prison term after being found guilty of having sex with the 15-year-old girl. A crowd gathered outside Kirkcaldy Sheriff Court in Fife as the paedophile, who has earned more than £42,000 while on bail, was led out by guards into a waiting prison van amid tight security. Graham, who was suspended by Labour two years ago, denied the charge against him but was found guilty after a trial. Once a senior local politician, he was Fife Council's spokesman for health and social care and was also a member of the NHS Fife board. But despite his outwardly respectable appearance, over the course of more than six months he was having sexual activity with the girl in his home, office and car. Security camera footage showed Graham kissing the girl in Kirkcaldy town centre after meeting for hot chocolate. The disgraced councillor, who represented Buckhaven, Methil, and Wemyss Villages, would buy the girl gifts and they spent hours phoning and texting each other. Last month he was found guilty of engaging in sexual activity with a child on various occasions between February and August 2023 at locations in Fife and Edinburgh and also in his car. Scores of locals took to the streets outside his home after his conviction to demand he leave the area. It sparked a major police response, with officers equipped with riot shields leading him out of the property to safety. His parents' home has also been targeted. The conviction means Graham will now be disqualified from serving as a councillor. He faced criticism for not resigning earlier after it emerged he had earned more than £42,000 while sitting as an independent since being charged. Graham has not taken part in any full Fife Council meetings since his arrest in August 2023 but is said to have appeared at several area committees. However, it was reported his webcam was switched off and he was not involved in discussions. Graham accepted his full salary in 2023-24 and 2024-25, and with expenses earned £42,410.71. The crime came to light after a witness saw Graham stroking the girl's leg under the table. In a subsequent police search of his office in the Fife Renewables Innovation Centre in August 2023, officers found vital evidence containing Graham's DNA. The girl, now 17, said the first sexual contact was in his car not long after she had turned 15. His victim said she would meet him in St Andrews, Fife, they would go to Greggs for lunch and he stopped his car on country roads where he would assault her. Workers at a Kirkcaldy café saw them holding hands across a table, and security camera footage from various locations showed them walking hand-in-hand, embracing and kissing. Defence lawyer Chris Sneddon said his client still denied the offences but 'understands the impact the type of behaviour can have'. He acknowledged there was a 'potential for community reprisal', but urged the court to impose a non-custodial sentence. But jailing Graham, Sheriff Robert More said the offences showed an 'escalating and brazen course of sexual behaviour' and that he had 'undermined the trust' placed in him by the community. The sheriff, who said Graham's crime was of 'higher culpability', told the offender: 'The conduct took place at a variety of locations including the home you shared with your then partner. 'You were aware of how old the girl was and had been warned by her family to stay away from her. 'Laws are intended to protect children from those who would exploit their vulnerability.' Sheriff More put Graham on the sex offenders register for 10 years. David Ross, leader of Fife Council, said: 'David Graham should have resigned as soon as he was convicted if not before.'
Times
16 minutes ago
- Times
Rachel Reeves plans to tax high-value homes to plug fiscal black hole
Rachel Reeves is drawing up plans to hit the owners of high-value properties with capital gains tax when they sell their homes as she attempts to fill a £40 billion hole in the public finances. The chancellor is considering using the autumn budget to end the current exemption from capital gains tax that people enjoy when they sell their 'primary' residence under plans that will be seen as a 'mansion tax'. Higher-rate taxpayers would have to pay 24 per cent of the value of any 'gain' they make from the increase in the value of their property while basic rate taxpayers would have to pay 18 per cent. Under the plans the current exemption from capital gains tax, known as private residence relief, would come to an end for properties above a certain threshold. While the threshold is the subject of live discussion in the Treasury, officials believe it could raise significant sums of money. A threshold of £1.5 million would hit around 120,000 homeowners who are higher-rate taxpayers with capital gains tax bills of £199,973. However, property experts warned that the owners of more expensive properties could choose to simply stay put instead of selling up and this could stymie the housing market and limit revenues for the government. There are also concerns that it could hit pensioners who want to downsize particularly hard. Aneisha Beveridge, head of research at the estate agent Hamptons, said: 'It's a big change that would hit long-term owners hardest and create a cliff-edge at £1.5 million, distorting behaviour around that point. 'While the headline gains look substantial, they're often the result of decades of ownership and, in some cases, house prices haven't even kept pace with inflation. 'For households who don't need to move, this could act as a strong disincentive to sell, dampening transactions and potentially weighing on house price growth and Treasury revenues alike.' The Treasury is also looking at the idea of imposing an entirely new tax on the sale of more expensive homes, as first reported by The Guardian. However, government sources rejected suggestions that the threshold for a potential annual levy would be £500,000, suggesting it would have to be far higher to avoid slowing the market. No decisions have been taken given the budget is months out. Reeves is said to be concerned that Britain's property taxes are outdated and in need of reform and she also has limited room for manoeuvre given Labour's manifesto commitments. The chancellor will put the principle of 'fairness' at the heart of her budget. She is looking at property taxes after ruling out increasing income tax, national insurance or VAT in Labour's manifesto. The manifesto also included an explicit pledge by the government not to raise taxes on working people. There are concerns that the current council tax system is deeply unfair because it is based on property values from 1991. Critics say that this has led to a 'regressive' system under which a house valued at £1 million pays only twice as much council tax as a house worth £80,000. The Treasury has considered adding additional bands in the past but any changes are likely to be highly complex and would carry significant political risk. Removing the capital gains tax exemption for higher-value properties is viewed as a more realistic revenue-raiser. • Most millionaires think they'd be better off outside the UK Isaac Delestre, senior research economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said: 'Short of reinventing council tax entirely, the current system could be made more proportional by increasing council tax multipliers for properties in the highest bands or even adding additional bands. Another option would be for central government to levy a new, separate tax on high-value properties, in addition to council tax.' Tom Bill, from the estate agency Knight Frank, said that if only gains over the past few years were factored in, any tax could raise little money. He said: 'I'd be surprised if there are any gains to tax at the top end of the property market, given that prices in prime central London are down 20 per cent over the last decade. If there was anything that reduced demand further, then the prospect of gains in the short-term would pretty much vanish.' Simon Brown, the chief executive of the property data company Landmark Information Group, said: 'Any tax that rises with property value risks slowing the housing market even further. If downsizing becomes less attractive, larger family homes stay off the market and transaction volumes fall. This reduces overall movement in the market upwards and downwards, and not only reduces choice for families and first-time buyers, but also hits the Treasury by shrinking the tax base.' Kirstie Allsopp, the property expert and TV presenter, warned that discussions about potential mansion taxes risked 'destabalising the property market'. By Stephen Swinford, Political Editor The concept of a 'mansion tax' is far from new. Over the past 12 years both the Liberal Democrats under Nick Clegg and then Labour under Ed Miliband have toyed with the idea, only for it to fail to survive. However, the dire fiscal circumstances facing Reeves now mean it is very much back on the table. The chancellor is said to be looking at two broad options: the first is a capital gains tax raid on the sale of high-value property; the second an annual levy. Both will be contentious, as recent political history suggests. Vince Cable first proposed the idea on behalf of the Liberal Democrats in 2009. He suggested the new tax would hit anyone owning a home worth more than £1 million. He then proposed a £2 million threshold after the Liberal Democrats entered a coalition with the Tories. The plans were dropped in favour of a 7 per cent stamp duty charge on houses worth more than £2 million after negotiations with George Osborne, then the chancellor. The Liberal Democrats tried to revive the idea but were met with outright opposition from their coalition partners. In 2013 Ed Miliband, then the Labour leader, revived the proposals. In the run-up to the 2015 election he claimed that the policy would raise £1.2 billion a year which could be used to fund the NHS. Osborne once again used his budget in 2014 to announce increases in stamp duty, which he suggested were an alternative to a mansion tax. Reeves, however, has little room for manoeuvre given Labour's pledge not to increase the main rates of income tax, VAT or national insurance. With a black hole in the public finances of as much as £41 billion the mansion tax could be about to make a return.
Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Red tape ‘will cripple museums and galleries', Starmer warned
Sir Keir Starmer has been warned that red tape will cripple Britain's museums and galleries. A loophole in new legislation will allow visitors free access to any paid exhibition by giving them the right to take out memberships, use them and get them refunded. The heads of the National Trust, Tate and Victoria and Albert Museum, among others, have warned that the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 'creates onerous new burdens'. The new law, which received royal assent under the Conservatives last year, will give consumers a 'two-week cooling-off period' in which they can cancel any subscription and receive a full refund. But museums and galleries have told the Prime Minister that the change will leave them 'crippled'. Among the exhibitions that could be affected are the V&A's Cartier show, on until Nov 16, and the Tate's display of work by Australian artist Emily Kam Kngwarray, on until Jan 11. In the July 31 letter, first reported by The Times, the figures asked to be made exempt so that visitors would not be able to access their attractions for free. Under the law, members of the public would be able to buy an annual membership, use it to enter an attraction and then receive a full refund – so long as they claimed it within two weeks of taking out the membership. 'Not only has it put at risk our ability to claim gift aid on memberships, but it creates onerous new burdens,' the signatories, led by Hilary McGrady, the National Trust's director-general, said. 'The proposed cooling-off period would create a loophole that could allow people to join charities as members and enjoy benefits, such as free entry to sites, for a two-week period before claiming substantial refunds for the rest of the year. 'This threatens to cripple the very future value of membership itself as a functional model of income generation for charities with visitor models – currently worth hundreds of millions [of pounds] to charities across the UK every year.' Other signatories included the Woodland Trust, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, the Royal Horticultural Society, the Royal British Legion and the Wildlife Trusts. The letter added: 'The public benefit we deliver as a result of the relationship between us as charities and our members has long been reflected in law and by HMRC, differentiating between charitable memberships and subscriptions for commercial services such as gym memberships, and acknowledging their status as charitable donations, not subscriptions to goods or services.' The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act was introduced by the former government and is being implemented by Labour. The cooling-off period is designed to stop consumers being 'misled' by free or discounted trials that automatically turn into full-price subscriptions. A government spokesman said: 'We are engaging with charities on this issue. The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act does not change the definition of what constitutes a consumer contract. 'Our plans to protect consumers from rip-off subscriptions will not unfairly affect charities, and we continue to engage closely with them to understand their concerns.'
