logo
Unshakable: How Iconic Leaders Forge Their Own Path

Unshakable: How Iconic Leaders Forge Their Own Path

Forbes9 hours ago

Dr. Adil Dalal, DBA - CEO, keynote speaker, leadership and AI pioneer. Author of 7 books and 10 global awards, inspiring leaders worldwide.
In the arena of leadership, voices of doubt and criticism are inevitable. The difference between those who falter and those who forge their own legacy often comes down to self-awareness, resilience, clarity of purpose and a refusal to let others define them.
The Hidden Cost Of Chasing Approval
When leaders prioritize external opinions over their vision, two critical aspects suffer: decisive action and innovation.
Leaders who internalize external opinions often experience decision paralysis, caught between pleasing stakeholders and following their vision. This constant tension drains mental energy and can lead to burnout. As McKinsey notes, burnout stems from a lack of impact or autonomy at work, leading to feelings of depletion and emotional distance.
Overreliance on consensus can suppress bold ideas. Steve Jobs famously stated, "People don't know what they want until you show it to them." Had he listened to critics, the iPhone might never have existed. His ousting from Apple in 1985 could have marked the end of his career, but instead, it ignited his most creative era. Jobs later reflected that "getting fired from Apple was the best thing that could have ever happened to me," noting that it was one of the most creative periods of his life. Jobs didn't let others define his story. He rewrote it—and changed the world.
Outside Noise Versus Inside Voice
Take this example: Ten runners stood at the base of a mountain. As the race began, the crowd shouted warnings: 'It's too hard!' 'You'll never make it!' One by one, the runners gave up—except for one. She kept climbing, steady and focused. At the summit, she stood alone, victorious. A reporter asked about her secret, but she couldn't hear —she had been wearing noise-canceling earbuds all along. She never heard the naysayers; silence was her true strength. There's a powerful moral here: Resilience comes from listening to your inner voice and refusing to be shaped by voices that were never meant to define you.
History and modern times alike offer vivid examples of leaders who rose above the noise—remaining practically deaf to petty criticism—and stayed true to their vision. These individuals, from business innovators to warriors, share a common mindset: They shape their own narrative rather than let outside opinions script their story.
As one of the first Indian-born women to lead a Fortune 50 company, Indra Nooyi faced a chorus of doubt. Early in her role as PepsiCo's CEO, critics pushed for more profits through sugary drinks and snacks. Instead, she chose a harder path—'Performance with Purpose.'
Nooyi redirected PepsiCo toward healthier products and sustainability, drawing fire from investors and insiders. But she held her ground. Her focus wasn't just a quarterly return; it was long-term value, rooted in ethics. Over time, the results spoke louder than the critics. PepsiCo's portfolio evolved, profits endured and global impact deepened.
Nooyi didn't follow the noise. She followed her vision—and proved that true leadership means doing what's right, not what's easy.
Imprisoned for 27 years, Nelson Mandela refused to let his captors define him. Though branded a criminal, he clung to his vision of equality—and never surrendered to hatred. When released, he chose reconciliation over the popular path of revenge. Critics expected fury; he offered forgiveness.
His moral clarity transformed enemies into allies and ushered the nation into a democracy. Mandela's strength wasn't in retaliation—it was in restraint. He taught us that to gain true inner freedom, one must first escape the prison of conventional norms and opinions.
Techniques To Rewire The Brain For True Freedom
Human survival once depended on pleasing the tribe. Today, that same wiring—fueled by the amygdala—makes us hypersensitive to criticism. Fear hijacks identity. But resilience begins when fear ends. Visualization is not fantasy. It's neurotraining. Each time we imagine ourselves thriving—delivering a bold keynote, leading through chaos or calmly deflecting criticism—we reshape neural pathways. Repetition builds familiarity. Familiarity builds confidence. To be self-reliant is to choose the inner vision over outer noise. To be resilient is to rehearse success until fear no longer leads. Visualize to realize: That is the true power of visualization.
Mark Manson said it best: 'You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.' This isn't a license for arrogance; it's a mandate for integrity. In a culture obsessed with likes and applause, leadership requires the strength to stand alone, to lead with vision, choose values over validation and legacy over likability. True leaders aren't shaped by approval—they're defined by conviction.
Leaders are not meant to echo the crowd—they are meant to guide it. But guidance requires freedom, and freedom begins with the courage to be misunderstood. To lead with conviction, one must first silence the noise of judgment.
That silence comes not from arrogance or narcissism, but from high EQ, inner clarity, a noble purpose, knowing who you are, what you stand for and why it matters, even when no one else sees it yet. From the boardroom to the battlefield, real progress is sparked by those willing to be disliked. Being disliked isn't a flaw—it's freedom.
Your Narrative, Your Legacy
'Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.' This fact underscores Einstein's wisdom that average individuals are incapable of understanding why great leaders always choose freedom of honesty over the prison of others' opinions.
Leadership is not just about the world you change—it's about the self you refuse to betray. Jobs, Mandela, Nooyi and other leaders did not follow approval; they followed their inner truth. And in doing so, they became the authors of their legacy—not characters in someone else's script.
My Leadership Mantra:
Unshaken by what others say,
I stand like a mountain in the fray,
Turning doubts into purposeful might,
I use my inner voice as my guiding light.
Forbes Coaches Council is an invitation-only community for leading business and career coaches. Do I qualify?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple stock has severely lagged the rest of the Mag 7. BofA says a rumored AI deal could turn it around.
Apple stock has severely lagged the rest of the Mag 7. BofA says a rumored AI deal could turn it around.

Business Insider

time18 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Apple stock has severely lagged the rest of the Mag 7. BofA says a rumored AI deal could turn it around.

It's been a rough year for Apple stock, but there might be hope for a rebound with a rumored AI acquisition. Apple has been the worst-performing Magnificent Seven stock in 2025, with shares down 20% year-to-date. On top of weak iPhone sales and tariff concerns, the company has lagged in the AI race among its mega-cap tech peers. At Apple's WWDC earlier this month, the company failed to ease Wall Street's concerns about its Apple Intelligence product, with investors bemoaning the company's lack of a new killer app. However, Apple executives could be eyeing a purchase of AI startup Perplexity, Bloomberg reported last week. While Perplexity has denied any M&A discussions and Apple has declined to comment, Wall Street didn't ignore the buzz. Bank of America believes a deal could throw a lifeline to Apple's thus-lacking AI strategy and turn the stock around. A potential stock rebound If you can't make your own special AI sauce, buying it might be the next best option, according to BofA. The bank said that, in the near-term, "we think any positive developments around AI initiatives would be positive for the stock that has largely been seen as an AI laggard." Perplexity is an AI-powered search engine that responds to queries with cited responses, as opposed to a Google search that returns links. If completed, the acquisition would provide Apple with a more comprehensive AI offering instead of building one out in-house over years. A strategic partnership, as opposed to an outright acquisition, could also help Apple to a lesser degree. "Any such deal (we do not have any direct knowledge of the probability of such a deal) would likely be positive for shares that are currently in the penalty box given Apple is largely viewed as an AI laggard (deep Siri integration delayed and no cutting edge models)," Wamsi Mohan, technology research analyst at Bank of America, wrote. An acquisition would give Apple access to Perplexity's search and answering capabilities, fresh AI talent, product synergies with Siri and other Apple offering, and exposure to non-Google search, Mohan highlighted. Specifically, Perplexity could revitalize Siri's capabilities, which have struggled to keep up with developments in chatbots. Perplexity could also be integrated with not just Safari but also system-wide, helping Apple build AI into its services and hardware. All of these factors could fetch a higher valuation for Apple stock. Most importantly, an acquisition would provide Apple with a clear AI strategy and prevent Perplexity from being acquired by a competitor. Acquisition risks Competition in the AI space is fierce, and Apple certainly isn't alone in pursuing a potential M&A or acquihire strategy. As Big Tech companies scramble to grab market share in the rapidly developing AI industry, growing through inorganic means is becoming more common. Before Meta invested $14.3 billion into data annotation startup Scale AI, it also tried to acquire Perplexity and another AI startup called Safe Superintelligence. But that's not to say that locking down a hot AI startup like Perplexity would solve all of Apple's problems. Integrating a young startup into a larger, more-established company comes with its fair share of organizational challenges, and Mohan pointed to some of Apple's previous M&A ventures, such as Siri or Laserlike, as examples of acquisitions that experienced delays or roadblocks. Apple will need to customize parts of Perplexity's platform to fit into its existing ecosystem and scale up to Apple's much larger user base. There are also legal risks: Perplexity is facing a copyright infringement case, which Apple would need to take on in the case of an acquisition. Buying Perplexity could also jeopardize Apple's existing partnership with Google, creating a potential headwind to earnings. Even with these concerns, Mohan is cautiously optimistic on the payoff of a potential acquisition: "From an investor's vantage point, a deal would offer a high-reward but high-risk proposition," he wrote. "However, execution, in our view, is paramount: Apple would need to break from some of its old habits (siloed development, extreme secrecy, slow rollout) to fully capitalize on Perplexity's fast-paced innovation," Mohan added. If completed, the acquisition would be Apple's biggest ever, as Perplexity is currently valued at $14 billion. It would also be a marked departure from the company's traditional free cash flow strategy of conducting stock buybacks and paying dividends. Bank of America believes Apple could certainly afford to shell out for a deal of this size, as the company posted profits of $24.8 billion in Q1 2025. A Perplexity deal would signal to investors that Apple is willing to shift its capital allocation strategy to compete in the AI race. "Given the transformative potential of AI, many analysts believe that not investing aggressively in AI is the bigger risk, even for a company as successful as Apple," Mohan wrote.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store