logo
Apple stock has severely lagged the rest of the Mag 7. BofA says a rumored AI deal could turn it around.

Apple stock has severely lagged the rest of the Mag 7. BofA says a rumored AI deal could turn it around.

Business Insider6 hours ago

It's been a rough year for Apple stock, but there might be hope for a rebound with a rumored AI acquisition.
Apple has been the worst-performing Magnificent Seven stock in 2025, with shares down 20% year-to-date. On top of weak iPhone sales and tariff concerns, the company has lagged in the AI race among its mega-cap tech peers.
At Apple's WWDC earlier this month, the company failed to ease Wall Street's concerns about its Apple Intelligence product, with investors bemoaning the company's lack of a new killer app.
However, Apple executives could be eyeing a purchase of AI startup Perplexity, Bloomberg reported last week. While Perplexity has denied any M&A discussions and Apple has declined to comment,
Wall Street didn't ignore the buzz. Bank of America believes a deal could throw a lifeline to Apple's thus-lacking AI strategy and turn the stock around.
A potential stock rebound
If you can't make your own special AI sauce, buying it might be the next best option, according to BofA.
The bank said that, in the near-term, "we think any positive developments around AI initiatives would be positive for the stock that has largely been seen as an AI laggard."
Perplexity is an AI-powered search engine that responds to queries with cited responses, as opposed to a Google search that returns links. If completed, the acquisition would provide Apple with a more comprehensive AI offering instead of building one out in-house over years.
A strategic partnership, as opposed to an outright acquisition, could also help Apple to a lesser degree.
"Any such deal (we do not have any direct knowledge of the probability of such a deal) would likely be positive for shares that are currently in the penalty box given Apple is largely viewed as an AI laggard (deep Siri integration delayed and no cutting edge models)," Wamsi Mohan, technology research analyst at Bank of America, wrote.
An acquisition would give Apple access to Perplexity's search and answering capabilities, fresh AI talent, product synergies with Siri and other Apple offering, and exposure to non-Google search, Mohan highlighted.
Specifically, Perplexity could revitalize Siri's capabilities, which have struggled to keep up with developments in chatbots. Perplexity could also be integrated with not just Safari but also system-wide, helping Apple build AI into its services and hardware. All of these factors could fetch a higher valuation for Apple stock.
Most importantly, an acquisition would provide Apple with a clear AI strategy and prevent Perplexity from being acquired by a competitor.
Acquisition risks
Competition in the AI space is fierce, and Apple certainly isn't alone in pursuing a potential M&A or acquihire strategy. As Big Tech companies scramble to grab market share in the rapidly developing AI industry, growing through inorganic means is becoming more common.
Before Meta invested $14.3 billion into data annotation startup Scale AI, it also tried to acquire Perplexity and another AI startup called Safe Superintelligence.
But that's not to say that locking down a hot AI startup like Perplexity would solve all of Apple's problems.
Integrating a young startup into a larger, more-established company comes with its fair share of organizational challenges, and Mohan pointed to some of Apple's previous M&A ventures, such as Siri or Laserlike, as examples of acquisitions that experienced delays or roadblocks.
Apple will need to customize parts of Perplexity's platform to fit into its existing ecosystem and scale up to Apple's much larger user base. There are also legal risks: Perplexity is facing a copyright infringement case, which Apple would need to take on in the case of an acquisition.
Buying Perplexity could also jeopardize Apple's existing partnership with Google, creating a potential headwind to earnings.
Even with these concerns, Mohan is cautiously optimistic on the payoff of a potential acquisition: "From an investor's vantage point, a deal would offer a high-reward but high-risk proposition," he wrote.
"However, execution, in our view, is paramount: Apple would need to break from some of its old habits (siloed development, extreme secrecy, slow rollout) to fully capitalize on Perplexity's fast-paced innovation," Mohan added.
If completed, the acquisition would be Apple's biggest ever, as Perplexity is currently valued at $14 billion. It would also be a marked departure from the company's traditional free cash flow strategy of conducting stock buybacks and paying dividends.
Bank of America believes Apple could certainly afford to shell out for a deal of this size, as the company posted profits of $24.8 billion in Q1 2025. A Perplexity deal would signal to investors that Apple is willing to shift its capital allocation strategy to compete in the AI race.
"Given the transformative potential of AI, many analysts believe that not investing aggressively in AI is the bigger risk, even for a company as successful as Apple," Mohan wrote.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Investors Should Reconsider Buying the Dip on Apple Stock (AAPL)
Why Investors Should Reconsider Buying the Dip on Apple Stock (AAPL)

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why Investors Should Reconsider Buying the Dip on Apple Stock (AAPL)

The year 2025, so far, hasn't been kind to Apple (AAPL) shareholders. The stock is trading below the $200 mark—about 25% off its all-time highs—making it the worst performer among the top seven tech stocks right now. This is a sharp contrast to the 22% total annualized returns Apple has delivered to shareholders over the past decade. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter While the recent bearishness isn't entirely unjustified — higher import fees are putting pressure on Apple's product margins, and sticky interest rates continue to weigh on consumer spending — I don't believe the stock is doomed for an extended correction. Historically, Apple has proven to be a great stock to own during periods of relative weakness like this, especially when valuations reset to more reasonable levels. That said, when it comes to high-quality stocks like AAPL, buying just because momentum looks weak isn't always the best strategy. For now, until the trends start to improve, I remain Neutral on AAPL stock. Among the Magnificent 7 stocks, Apple's recent performance clearly reflects that markets view the company's thesis as one of the most fragile, mainly due to growing concerns around the ongoing trade war. The possibility of new tariffs on imported products resurfaced after the U.S. president threatened to impose a 25% tariff on iPhones manufactured outside the U.S. No doubt, this would be a blow to Apple's bullish case. Growth estimates are likely to be revised downward for the coming quarters—and possibly even years. However, if we step back and look at the bigger picture, these fears might actually be somewhat exaggerated, as TipRanks' risk analysis shows. For one, history shows that tariff threats are often more a political negotiation tool than something that is actually enforced. Additionally, under the highly efficient leadership of CEO Tim Cook, Apple has consistently demonstrated its ability to navigate supply chain challenges. We saw this play out back in 2018-2019, during Trump's first administration, when the U.S.-China trade war intensified. Apple responded quickly by expanding its production outside of China, significantly reducing its reliance on the country. Approximately 75% of Apple's revenue still comes from hardware, which is more susceptible to tariff risks. But here's the other side of the coin: Apple's services segment has grown massively and now accounts for around 40% of operating profit. This part of the business—driven by recurring revenue streams like the App Store and licensing deals (think Google) — is far less exposed to trade war impacts. In fact, I believe the services business is still underrated by the market and remains one of Apple's most powerful growth engines today. Naturally, when tariffs threaten to impact Apple's core business, combined with a broader 'crash correction' where markets rush for cash and liquidity, and the stock is trading at elevated valuation multiples, the outcome tends to be a bearish reaction. Currently, Apple trades at 27.3x forward earnings, which is significantly below the 36x peak reached in January and also below its 12-month average of 31x. While long-term EPS growth expectations aren't particularly exciting at around 10% CAGR, a PEG ratio of 2.5 honestly doesn't seem outrageous for a company with fundamentals as strong as Apple's. But the key point in this case may be that Apple shouldn't be trading at cheap multiples and probably never will, simply because it's a company with a historically low risk of underperformance. While tariffs might seem like a threat, as I've highlighted before, Apple has faced similar headwinds not long ago and managed to navigate them successfully. After all, we're talking about a business with one of the strongest brands and the highest customer loyalty in the world. And when the numbers are crunched, Apple's services segment alone is arguably worth $1.7 trillion—that's more than half of the company's current market cap. Although it may seem counterintuitive, I tend to believe that when it comes to high-quality stocks, the old saying 'buy low, sell high' is somewhat of a misnomer, mainly because no one actually knows where 'low' and 'high' truly are. If you think about it, 'sell high' would've meant selling AAPL (or any other high-quality tech name like MSFT, AMZN, and NVDA) multiple times over the past decade, expecting some massive correction that, honestly, either never came or only briefly happened. Meanwhile, you would have missed out on a ton of upside. That said, it's pretty well known that great stocks—the kind that isn't super cyclical and has rock-solid fundamentals (like Apple)—tend to perform better on a risk-adjusted basis when they're trending higher, not when they're at some mythical 'bottom' or during ugly corrections. And honestly, that pretty much describes where AAPL is right now: stuck in a weak momentum phase. The reality is that when high-quality stocks are in a clear uptrend—meaning trading above long-term moving averages like the 200-day—they deliver lower drawdowns, better Sharpe ratios, and just generally smoother, more consistent returns. In Apple's case, sitting at $198 per share, it's well below its 200-day moving average of $223.50, which is a clear signal of bearish momentum. My take is that I would be comfortable going heavy on the stock only if it starts showing a steady recovery. Otherwise, simply stepping aside when the chart is falling apart may be the wisest course of action. While there's certainly room for skepticism, the consensus among AAPL analysts remains mostly bullish. Out of 29 experts covering the stock, 16 rate it a Buy, nine rate it a Hold, and only four recommend Sell. AAPL's average price target stands at $226.94, suggesting about 15% upside from the current share price. Apple is in bear territory—and in my view, for somewhat justified reasons. As a high-quality stock with pristine business fundamentals (both subjectively and quantitatively), many Apple bulls may be tempted to jump in on the 'buy the dip' opportunity as valuations fall from their peaks. And while that approach makes sense, the reality is that no one ever truly knows how low Apple's valuation can go. Historically, high-quality stocks tend to behave better when they're near a peak rather than stuck in the middle of corrections. That's why, personally, I would prefer to wait for more apparent signs of a reversal. Even if that means giving up part of the upside, the trade-off is entering with a better risk-adjusted setup backed by stronger technical confirmation. Bottom line, I believe Apple is a Hold for now. Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Apple's AI Gambit Under the Microscope
Apple's AI Gambit Under the Microscope

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Apple's AI Gambit Under the Microscope

You know how Siri's always been a step behind the curve? Well, Bank of America's Wamsi Mohan floated the idea that Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) could team up withor even buyPerplexity AI to give its voice assistant some real smarts. Perplexity's got cutting-edge generative search tech, so imagine asking Siri a tricky question and actually getting a satisfying answer instead of a shrug and a web link. On the plus side, bringing Perplexity's crew and models in would let Apple jump-start Siri improvements, tap into search advertising revenue. Currently, Google's (NASDAQ:GOOG) still the default, and lock down some top AI talent before someone else snaps them up. Plus, tighter integration between on-device smarts and cloud AI could unlock new ways to bundle hardware and servicesthink of it as Siri finally earning its keep. But don't get too excited just yet. Merging two companies is always messy: there's integration risk, you've got to keep the Perplexity team happy, and regulators might squint hard at any deal that edges Apple further into search. And even if everything goes smoothly, users still have to actually switch over to the new, souped-up Siri. Worst case, Apple pays up but sees only a trickle of new ad revenue if default-search deals with Google stay intact. At the end of the day, Mohan thinks any sign that Apple's shedding its AI laggard rep would be a mood booster for the stock. A full buyout might give more of a valuation bump than a simple partnership, but either move would signal that Cupertino's serious about catching up in the voice-assistant and search wars. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

蘋果傳考慮收購Perplexity AI!為剝離與Google的合作做準備?
蘋果傳考慮收購Perplexity AI!為剝離與Google的合作做準備?

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

蘋果傳考慮收購Perplexity AI!為剝離與Google的合作做準備?

知情人士透露,蘋果 (AAPL-US) 公司近期內部已展開初步討論,評估是否收購人工智慧(AI)搜尋新創公司 Perplexity。雖尚未與 Perplexity 展開正式洽談,但此舉凸顯蘋果正積極擴展其 AI 搜尋領域的布局。 根據《路透》報導,蘋果併購主管 Adrian Perica 曾與服務部門負責人 Eddy Cue 及 AI 團隊高層討論,計劃將 Perplexity 的 AI 搜尋功能整合進 Safari 瀏覽器,代表蘋果正試圖逐步擺脫對 Google(GOOGL-US) 搜尋引擎的長期依賴。 對於併購傳聞,Perplexity 向《路透》回應表示:「我們目前或未來均未獲悉任何涉及 Perplexity 的併購談判。」截至目前,蘋果尚未就此做出公開說明。 蘋果此舉可能與美國司法部近期對 Google 提出的反壟斷措施有關。該部門建議禁止其向第三方公司支付費用以取得預設搜尋引擎地位。 儘管 Google 目前仍是全球搜尋引擎的主導者,但包括 Perplexity、ChatGPT 等 AI 搜尋平台,正在快速獲得年輕用戶支持。AI 驅動的搜尋體驗,成為未來趨勢的熱門焦點。 根據《彭博》,Perplexity 最新一輪融資已使其估值達到 140 億美元。若收購落實,將成為蘋果歷來最大規模的併購交易之一。 由輝達 (NVDA-US) 投資支持的 Perplexity,主打 AI 搜尋摘要技術,提供類似 Google Gemini 與 OpenAI ChatGPT 的即時資訊整理服務,為使用者帶來無需點擊的搜尋新體驗。 值得一提的是,Meta 平台 (META-US) 也曾於今年稍早試圖收購 Perplexity,但最終未能成功。Meta 近期也積極投資 AI 領域,宣布對 Scale AI 投資 148 億美元,並由其執行長汪滔(Alexandr Wang)領導新的超級智慧部門。 更多鉅亨報導•Meta網羅Scale AI天才汪滔主導「超級智慧」AI戰略!砸148億美元投資•Google欲終止與Scale AI合作!Meta入股引質疑資料洩漏風險

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store