logo
EchoStar soars 50% after report Trump urged EchoStar, FCC chair to reach deal on licenses

EchoStar soars 50% after report Trump urged EchoStar, FCC chair to reach deal on licenses

Reuters6 hours ago

NEW YORK, June 16 (Reuters) - Shares of EchoStar (SATS.O), opens new tab rose as much as 50% on Monday following a late Friday Bloomberg report that U.S. President Donald Trump urged EchoStar Chairman Charlie Ergen and Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr to reach a deal over the fate of the company's wireless spectrum licenses.
The telecommunications services company's stock also surged after the bell on Friday due to the report, which said Trump met on Thursday with Ergen and he telephoned Carr, who came to the White House to join the meeting. EchoStar did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The FCC told EchoStar in May it was investigating the company's compliance obligations to provide 5G service in the U.S.
EchoStar has been trying to protect its wireless spectrum licenses from the threat of revocation by the FCC.
EchoStar has disclosed that it missed roughly $500 million in interest payments and cited uncertainty around the FCC review.
UBS analysts in a Sunday note said they believe the recent developments "suggest the forfeiting of Echostar's airwaves is less likely and brings spectrum valuation back into focus."
They noted they expect interest from wireless carriers in EchoStar's spectrum licenses "given the shortage of near-term spectrum opportunities and the compatibility of Echostar's airwaves with existing network equipment/deployments," such as those with T-Mobile US (TMUS.O), opens new tab and AT&T (T.N), opens new tab.
Still, the analysts wrote that with the current situation unresolved, their "neutral" rating on the stock remains.
The stock hit an intraday high of $25.29 on Monday after closing on Friday at $16.84.
Through Friday's close, EchoStar's stock had shed about 30% of value since the FCC notified, opens new tab the company of its probe.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court to hear appeal from Chevron in landmark Louisiana coastal damage lawsuits
Supreme Court to hear appeal from Chevron in landmark Louisiana coastal damage lawsuits

The Independent

time41 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Supreme Court to hear appeal from Chevron in landmark Louisiana coastal damage lawsuits

The Supreme Court announced Monday it will hear an appeal from Chevron, Exxon and other oil and gas companies that lawsuits seeking compensation for coastal land loss and environmental degradation in Louisiana should be heard in federal court. The companies are appealing a 2024 decision by a federal appeals court that kept the lawsuits in state courts, allowing them to move to trial after more than a decade in limbo. A southeast Louisiana jury then ordered Chevron to pay upwards of $740 million to clean up damage to the state's coastline. The verdict reached in April was the first of dozens of lawsuits filed in 2013 against leading oil and gas companies in Louisiana alleging they violated state environmental laws for decades. While plaintiffs' attorneys say the appeal encompasses at least 10 cases, Chevron disagrees and says the court's ruling could have broader implications for additional lawsuits. Chevron argues that because it and other companies began oil production and refining during World War II as a federal contractor, these cases should be heard in federal court, perceived to be friendlier to businesses. But the plaintiffs' attorneys — representing the Plaquemines and Jefferson Parish governments — say the appeal is the companies' latest stall tactic to avoid accountability. 'It's more delay, they're going to fight till the end and we're going to continue to fight as well,' said John Carmouche, a trial attorney in the Chevron case who is behind the other lawsuits. He noted that the companies' appeal 'doesn't address the merits of the case.' Chevron's counsel, Paul Clement said in a statement that the company was 'pleased' with the decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Exxon did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The court's decision to hear the appeal offers the chance for 'fair and consistent application of the law' and will 'help preserve legal stability for the industry that fuels America's economy,' said Tommy Faucheux, president of the Louisiana Mid-Continent Oil & Gas Association, in an emailed statement. In April, jurors in Plaquemines Parish — a sliver of land straddling the Mississippi River into the Gulf — found that energy giant Texaco, acquired by Chevron in 2001, had for decades violated Louisiana regulations governing coastal resources by failing to restore wetlands impacted by dredging canals, drilling wells and billions of gallons of wastewater dumped into the marsh. 'No company is big enough to ignore the law, no company is big enough to walk away scot-free,' Carmouche told jurors during closing arguments. Louisiana's coastal parishes have lost more than 2,000 square miles (5,180 square kilometers) of land over the past century, according to the U.S. Geological Survey, which has also identified oil and gas infrastructure as a significant cause. The state could lose another 3,000 square miles (7,770 square kilometers) in the coming decades, its coastal protection agency has warned. Chevron's attorneys had argued that land loss in Louisiana was caused by other factors and that the company should not be held liable for its actions prior to the enactment of a 1980 environmental law requiring companies to obtain permits and restore land they had used. The fact that the lawsuits had been delayed for so long due to questions of jurisdiction was 'bordering on absurd,' the late-federal judge Martin Leach-Cross Feldman remarked in 2022 during oral arguments in one of the lawsuits, according to court filings. He added: 'Frankly, I think it's kind of shameful.' Louisiana's Republican Gov. Jeff Landry, a longtime oil and gas industry supporter, nevertheless made the state a party to the lawsuits during his tenure as attorney general. 'Virtually every federal court has rejected Chevron's attempt to avoid liability for knowingly and intentionally violating state law,' Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill said in a statement. 'I'll fight Chevron in state or federal court—either way, they will not win.' ___

US and UK announce a trade deal, but steel imports are still being negotiated
US and UK announce a trade deal, but steel imports are still being negotiated

The Independent

time41 minutes ago

  • The Independent

US and UK announce a trade deal, but steel imports are still being negotiated

U.S. President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Monday that they had signed a trade deal that will slash tariffs on U.K. auto and aerospace industry imports, but they are still discussing how to handle steel production. The pair spoke to reporters at the Group of Seven summit in the Canadian Rockies, with Trump brandishing the pages of what he said was a long-awaited agreement. The rollout was anything but smooth, however, as Trump dropped the papers and at first said his administration had reached an agreement with the European Union when he meant the United Kingdom. The president nonetheless insisted the pact is 'a fair deal for both' and would 'produce a lot of jobs, a lot of income.' 'We just signed it,' Trump said, 'and it's done.' Starmer said it meant 'a very good day for both our countries, a real sign of strength.' Reaching an agreement is significant as Trump has threatened much of the world with steep import tariffs that have unsettled markets and raised the possibility of a global trade war. He has since backed off on many of his proposed levies but also continued to suggest that administration officials were furiously negotiating new trade pacts with dozens of countries — even as few have actually materialized. Trump said 'the U.K. is very well protected,' from tariffs. 'You know why? Because I like them.' The signing of the deal at the G7 followed Trump and Starmer's announcement in May that they'd reached a framework for a trade pact that would slash U.S. import taxes on British cars, steel and aluminum in return for greater access to the British market for U.S. products, including beef and ethanol. But Monday's agreement fully covers only British cars and aerospace materials, with more work to come on steel. Trump said more details on that would be available soon. After the two leaders spoke, the White House released a statement seeking to clarify matters, saying that with respect to steel and aluminum, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick will 'determine a quota of products that can enter the United States without being subject' to previous tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. The British government said the new agreement removes U.S. tariffs on U.K. aerospace products, exempting Britain from a 10% levy the Trump White House has sought to impose on all other countries — a boost to British firms, including engine-maker Rolls-Royce. It also sets the tax on British autos at 10% from the end of the month, down from the current 27.5%. U.K. Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the deal protects 'jobs and livelihoods in some of our most vital sectors.' But there was no final agreement to cut the tax on British steel to zero as originally foreseen. Britain has been spared the 50% tariff imposed on global steel, instead getting a 25% rate. It will stay at that level while talks continue on lowering it. There also was no final deal on pharmaceuticals, where 'work will continue,' the U.K. said. The deal signed Monday also confirms that American farmers can export 13,000 metric tons (29 million pounds) of beef to the U.K. each year, and vice versa — though a British ban on hormone-treated beef remains in place. That's more detail than both countries offered in May when they announced a framework deal. That framework didn't immediately take effect, leaving British businesses uncertain about whether the U.K. could be exposed to any surprise hikes from Trump. British businesses, and the U.K. government, were then blindsided earlier this month when Trump doubled metals tariffs on countries around the world to 50%. He later clarified the level would remain at 25% for the U.K. The British government said Monday that the plan was still for '0% tariffs on core steel products as agreed.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store