logo
10 Worst Cities for Renters Who Need Child Care

10 Worst Cities for Renters Who Need Child Care

Yahoo2 days ago

Rent prices in the U.S. have been going up since the COVID-19 pandemic started in 2020. Low inventory is the chief factor driving high rents, and with interest rates still steep, fewer people can afford to buy. The cost of child care has also been going up in the U.S. Limited supply and overwhelming demand plays a similar role here. But what choice do we have? Working parents need to maintain an income. And even if you have the luxury of working from home, the 'working' part doesn't go away. Child care, however much of a privilege it's become, is a need.
Learn More:
Read Next:
Combine rising rents with rising costs for child care and you get, quite possibly, a financial nightmare. And it's worse in some major cities than in others. A recent analysis by Redfin looked at the combined monthly cost of rent and child care to find the 10 cities that are the most unaffordable for middle-class parents. All data cited is from Redfin, while U.S. Census Bureau data was used to source the median household incomes.
Median monthly household income: $11,787
Average monthly child care + rent costs: $4,692 ($1,997 for child care + $2,695 for rent)
Share of income spent on child care + rent: 34.5%
Find Out:
Median monthly household income: $6,419
Average monthly child care + rent costs: $2,393 ($918 for child care + $1,475 for rent)
Share of income spent on child care + rent: 38.3%
Median monthly household income: $5,941
Average monthly child care + rent costs: $2,658 ($865 for child care + $1,793 for rent)
Share of income spent on child care + rent: 40.6%
Median monthly household income: $8,077
Average monthly child care + rent costs: $4,396 ($1,609 for child care + $2,787 for rent)
Share of income spent on child care + rent: 42.1%
Median monthly household income: $8,693
Average monthly child care + rent costs: $3,995 ($1,318 for child care + $2,677 for rent)
Share of income spent on child care + rent: 42.6%
Median monthly household income: $7,473
Average monthly child care + rent costs: $3,516 ($1,183 for child care + $2,333 for rent)
Share of income spent on child care + rent: 44.5%
Median monthly household income: $5,058
Average monthly child care + rent costs: $2,846 ($961 for child care + $1,855 for rent)
Share of income spent on child care + rent: 45.6%
Median monthly household income: $7,313
Average monthly child care + rent costs: $3,892 ($1,145 for child care + $2,747 for rent)
Share of income spent on child care + rent: 48.4%
Median monthly household income: $6,643
Average monthly child care + rent costs: $4,051 ($1,208 for child care + $2,843 for rent)
Share of income spent on child care + rent: 49.2%
Median monthly household income: $4,949
Average monthly child care + rent costs: $3,179 ($764 for child care + $2,415 for rent)
Share of income spent on child care + rent: 50.5%
More From GOBankingRates
7 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: 10 Worst Cities for Renters Who Need Child Care
擷取數據時發生錯誤
登入存取你的投資組合
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump pushes 'Big, Beautiful Bill' as solution to four years of Biden failures: 'Largest tax cut, EVER'
Trump pushes 'Big, Beautiful Bill' as solution to four years of Biden failures: 'Largest tax cut, EVER'

Fox News

time12 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Trump pushes 'Big, Beautiful Bill' as solution to four years of Biden failures: 'Largest tax cut, EVER'

President Donald Trump turned to social media on Monday evening to sell Americans on his vision for the "Big, Beautiful Bill," calling it an opportunity to turn the U.S. around after what he called "four disastrous years" under former President Joe Biden. The House passed the spending bill in late May and it is now in the Senate's hands. "We will take a massive step to balancing our Budget by enacting the largest mandatory Spending Cut, EVER, and Americans will get to keep more of their money with the largest Tax Cut, EVER, and no longer taxing Tips, Overtime, or Social Security for Seniors — Something 80 Million Voters supported in November," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "It will unleash American Energy by expediting permitting for Energy, and refilling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. It will make American Air Travel GREAT AGAIN by purchasing the final Air Traffic Control System." The president said the bill includes the construction of The Gold Dome, which he says will secure American skies from adversaries. The bill will also secure the border by building more of the wall and "supercharging the deportation of millions of Criminal Illegals" that he said Biden allowed into the U.S. "It will kick millions of Illegals off Medicaid, and make sure SNAP is focused on Americans ONLY! It will also restore Choice and Affordability for Car purchases by REPEALING Biden's EV Mandate, and all of the GREEN NEW SCAM Tax Credits and Spending," Trump wrote. "THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL also protects our beautiful children by stopping funding for sick sex changes for minors." The Senate returned to Washington on Monday, and in his post, Trump called on his Republican allies in Congress to work quickly to get the bill on his desk before July 4. In a separate post, Trump addressed what he referred to as false statements about the bill, reiterating that it is the "single biggest Spending Cut in History." He noted that there will not be any cuts to Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid, adding they will be saved from "the incompetence of the Democrats." "The Democrats, who have totally lost their confidence and their way, are saying whatever comes to mind — Anything to win!" Trump said. "They suffered the Greatest Humiliation in the History of Politics, and they're desperate to get back on their game, but they won't be able to do that because their Policies are so bad, in fact, they would lead to the Destruction of our Country and almost did. "The only 'cutting' we will do is for Waste, Fraud, and Abuse, something that should have been done by the Incompetent, Radical Left Democrats for the last four years, but wasn't," he concluded. Senate Republicans will get their turn to parse through the colossal package and are eying changes that could be a hard sell for House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., who can only afford to lose three votes. Congressional Republicans are in a dead sprint to get the megabill — filled with Trump's policy desires on taxes, immigration, energy, defense and the national debt — onto the president's desk by early July. If passed in its current state, the bill is expected to add roughly $3 trillion to the national debt, including interest, according to the Committee for Responsible Federal Budget.

A Doctor vs. the Hospital Lobby on Medicaid
A Doctor vs. the Hospital Lobby on Medicaid

Wall Street Journal

time15 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

A Doctor vs. the Hospital Lobby on Medicaid

Regarding your editorial 'The Medicaid Scare Campaign' (May 27): I've dealt with this issue after having practiced emergency medicine for more than 30 years in the once Golden State of California. I work in a less affluent urban area of a generally affluent county. In my last two shifts, I saw five new immigrants, all covered by 'Emergency Medi-Cal'—the state's version of Medicaid—for nonemergent conditions. Four arrived by ambulance for drug- or alcohol-related problems, and another had dental issues, having never been seen by a dentist in her home country. One of them asked for a 'general checkup' at midnight once he sobered up. California started by offering prenatal care to immigrant mothers many years ago, in the hope this would improve maternal and pediatric outcomes. The Democratic Legislature rapidly expanded that coverage to all for emergencies, while ignoring the high cost of care in the emergency departments vs. that of clinics. The general public doesn't comprehend the concept of true emergencies, and my state has become a magnet for people seeking all the free stuff.

'Superman': DC's $225M Gamble To Save The DCU
'Superman': DC's $225M Gamble To Save The DCU

Geek Vibes Nation

time19 minutes ago

  • Geek Vibes Nation

'Superman': DC's $225M Gamble To Save The DCU

Come July 11, 2025, James Gunn's Superman will soar into theaters, carrying the weight of DC Studios' rebooted DC Universe (DCU) on its caped shoulders. A recent report from The Wrap lays bare the stakes: with a hefty $225 million budget, this film isn't just a movie—it's a proving ground for Warner Bros. Discovery's future. Can Gunn and co-CEO Peter Safran make the Man of Steel fly again, or will the DCU crash before it even takes off? The Numbers Game: $500M to Survive, $700M to Thrive According to industry insiders cited by The Wrap, Superman needs to hit $500 million globally to break even, factoring in marketing and distribution costs. That's the bare minimum to turn a modest profit. But for Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) CEO David Zaslav, modest isn't enough. The studio is banking on DC—alongside Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings—to pull it out of a financial slump, with $37 billion in debt from the 2022 Discovery-WarnerMedia merger still looming. To be a true win, Superman needs to rake in closer to $700 million worldwide, signaling that audiences are buying into Gunn's vision. A talent agent told The Wrap, 'The simple brand recognition of Superman will probably take them to or close to $500 million worldwide, but anything above that will be because the audience identifies with the title character.' The real challenge? Making an 'Eisenhower-era' hero like Superman resonate with Gen Z in 2025. It's not about competing with summer heavyweights like Jurassic World: Rebirth (July 2) or Marvel's The Fantastic Four: First Steps (July 25)—it's about whether Clark Kent, played by David Corenswet, feels fresh and relatable. Why Superman Matters Superman isn't just another superhero flick; it's the cornerstone of the DCU's 'Gods and Monsters' chapter, setting the tone for projects like Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow , Lanterns , and Peacemaker Season 2. The film follows Clark Kent as he balances his Kryptonian roots with his human upbringing, with Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane and Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luthor. Gunn's track record with Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy gives him cred, and the first trailer racked up over 250 million views in 24 hours, a record for Warner Bros. But after the DC Extended Universe (DCEU) fizzled out with flops like Joker: Folie à Deux and The Flash , the pressure is on. Zaslav's all-in on DC, hyping Superman with a marketing blitz akin to Barbie , which grossed $1.44 billion. Insiders say he's 'rallied the entire company' behind the film, with tie-ins across Food Network and HGTV. Box office projections are optimistic—Box Office Theory predicts a $154–175 million opening weekend, potentially topping Batman v Superman 's $166 million DC record. But if it falls short, the fallout could be brutal. What Happens if Superman Stumbles? A flop could spell trouble for WBD's leadership. Zaslav's already facing heat after high-budget misfires like Joker: Folie à Deux , which lost nine figures, and Mickey17 . Rumors swirl that studio heads Mike De Luca and Pam Abdy are on thin ice, with some speculating Safran could replace them if Superman succeeds. But pulling Safran from DC Studios might disrupt Gunn's plans, creating a Catch-22. DC's strategy is already shifting. Projects like Sgt. Rock have been scrapped for now. An insider noted, 'Supergirl is a much safer bet than, say, Sgt. Rock, which despite a good package, is a property with zero awareness.' DC seems to be playing it safe, greenlighting Supergirl to extend the Superman mythos ( filming has already wrapped ) while holding off on riskier bets like Booster Gold or Swamp Thing until Superman 's performance is clear. Batman Can't Do It Alone Batman remains DC's golden goose, with The Batman: Part II in development and The Brave and the Bold inching along. Whispers of a World's Finest team-up movie pairing Superman and Batman could be a slam dunk, echoing the DCEU's Batman v Superman pivot. But as one studio insider put it, 'Outside of anything Batman-related, DC will most likely wait to react to how Superman performs before deciding on which superhero from their library to tackle next.' Batman can't carry the DCU solo—Superman needs to prove there's room for other heroes. The Road Ahead Gunn and Safran are unlikely to face the axe after one misstep, but the next few years will be a tightrope walk. They're balancing bold swings with lesser-known characters against the need for crowd-pleasers. Early buzz is promising—SuperHeroHype cites strong tracking polls—but superhero fatigue is real, with 2023's DCEU films and Marvel's The Marvels underperforming. Gunn's focus on standalone stories, where viewers don't need to watch Creature Commandos to enjoy Superman , could help. July 11 will tell us if audiences are ready to believe a man can fly again. If Superman hits that $700 million mark, it'll cement the DCU's foundation. If it stalls at $500 million or below, WBD might face leadership shake-ups, project cancellations, or even talk of being acquired, as some fear it could 'go the way of Fox.' Whatever happens, this is DC's moment to shine—or rebuild in real-time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store