
Ferguson Marine: Why has ScotGov kept financing the firm?
It comes as it emerged that the Port Glasgow yard was not certain to get the money it needs to complete a lifeline island vessel at the centre of a "new farce" over soaring delays and costs.
Ferguson Marine has struggled with the long-delayed and wildly over-budget construction of MV Glen Sannox and MV Glen Rosa, the first dual-fuel ferries built in the UK capable of running on liquefied natural gas.
What is Ferguson Marine?
Ferguson Marine is a historic shipyard located in Port Glasgow, on the River Clyde in Scotland. Founded in 1903, it has been a significant part of Scotland's shipbuilding heritage and is one of the last remaining shipyards in the country capable of building large vessels.
Why is Ferguson Marine important to Scotland?
It represents the legacy of Scottish shipbuilding and provides skilled employment in the Inverclyde area, which has suffered from deindustrialisation.
It is seen by many as a national asset in terms of maritime capabilities. Its supporters say the nation needs a domestic shipbuilding base for building and maintaining vessels for ferries, defence, and offshore industries.
Politically, it also stands as a symbol of the Scottish Government's ambition to maintain and revive industrial capacity, especially under public ownership.
What is the current status of Ferguson Marine?
The state-owned shipyard located in Port Glasgow, Scotland, is facing significant challenges. The shipyard has been working on two ferries, the Glen Sannox and the Glen Rosa, which have experienced extensive delays and cost overruns. Originally scheduled for completion in 2018 with a budget of £97 million, the costs are expected to rise to more than five times that figure. The Glen Sannox finally commenced service in January 2025, while the Glen Rosa's arrival has been put back for a further six months and will not see service until between April and June of next year at the earliest - while costs have risen by a further £35m.
What are the main challenges facing Ferguson Marine?
The primary issues relate to financial sustainability because the shipyard is said to lack confirmed contracts beyond the completion of the current ferries, raising concerns about its future viability. It has just lost a key contract to delivery seven loch-class ferries for Scotland to Poland.
There are concerns about its operational efficiency as delays and cost overruns have highlighted issues in project management, And there has been concerns about leadership stability with a series of executive and managerial changes and past difficulties in recruiting a permanent chief executive.
It has been by reputational issues with its most high profile problem - the much- delayed and over-budget delivery of two ferries - Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa - which were meant to be operational in the first half of 2018. Reports highlighted serious problems in project management, including design flaws, poor documentation, and quality control failures.
CalMac (Image: PA) It led to the Scottish Government's nationalisation of Ferguson Marine to prevent its collapse. This move saved jobs but brought the yard's problems into the public sector.
What are the broader implications for Scotland from these issues?
It has damaged confidence in the Scottish Government's and the yard management's ability to manage large infrastructure projects.
Delays to new ferries have exacerbated transport problems for islanders, affecting tourism, supplies, and daily life.
It also raises questions about how and whether governments should intervene in failing industries — and how to do so effectively.
Why does Ferguson Marine require support?
As the last commercial shipyard on the Clyde, it is a significant employer in Port Glasgow, and its closure would adversely affect the local economy. It has strategic importance as it is the only remaining shipyard on the lower Clyde that builds commercial ships.
The success or failure of Ferguson Marine may influence whether Scotland maintains a sovereign shipbuilding capability or becomes entirely reliant on private and international yards.
It is considered by its advocates that maintaining domestic shipbuilding capabilities in Scotland is vital for national infrastructure and maritime needs. But investment is needed to modernise facilities and secure future contracts.
GMB, the main union representing staff at the yard is instrumental in representing the interests of the workforce. It has been actively advocating for job security - to ensure that employees' jobs are protected amid the shipyard's financial uncertainties. It opposes plans for privatisation, arguing that public ownership is crucial for the yard's stability and future. And it has been calling for government investment.
What is the future outlook for Ferguson Marine?
The future of Ferguson Marine remains uncertain. While there are opportunities, such as potential contracts for further small ferry replacements and collaborations with larger shipyards, these are said to be contingent on securing the necessary investment and improving operational efficiency. The Scottish Government's commitment and the shipyard's ability to address its challenges are considered to be critical in determining its long-term viability .
What steps are being considered to secure the shipyard's future?
Ferguson Marine has been exploring collaborations with larger shipyards to enhance competitiveness for new contracts and has been proposing investments to upgrade shipyard infrastructure.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Rangers to officially change name after takeover by US consortium completed
After the club were taken over by a US led consortium, Rangers are set to undergo a name-change, in a move which is provoking a lot of curiosity The parent company of Rangers FC is looking to rebrand following their acquisition of the club. The takeover of the Scottish giants by the US led consortium was officially completed on May 30. The takeover group, that is led by healthcare tycoon Andrew Cavenagh, purchased a 51 per cent controlling stake at the Glasgow giants, after the Scottish FA approved the move. The new owners are overseeing a transition from a public to a private company, pending shareholder approval later this month. Since November 2012, the Ibrox team has been known as 'The Rangers International Football Club PLC', but will now trade under the name 'Rangers International Football Club Limited'. This change ushers in a new era under chairman Cavenagh and 49ers enterprises, led by vice-chairman Paraag Marathe. The proposed shift will be put to a vote at the club's forthcoming Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM), set for June 23 at Glasgow's Doubletree Hilton. To pass, the name change requires a 75 per cent approval rate. Despite their PLC status, Rangers were not publicly listed on the stock exchange. The transition to an LTD ensures shares cannot be offered to the public, providing an additional level of control for the new leadership, reports the Daily Record. The EGM will cover the move to the LTD company, informing shareholders about what they are voting on. Friday's big announcement covered the ordinary resolutions. This includes the allotment of nominal shares, a price that has been set in recent years for directors investing in Ibrox. The club is entering a new era with nine appointments to the revamped board, spearheaded by Cavenagh and Marathe. Patrick Stewart, Eugene Schneur, Andrew Clayton, Mark Taber, Fraser Thornton, John Halsted and George Taylor are the other seven who will play pivotal roles. In an open letter to the Rangers supporters, Cavenagh and Marathe said: "We are proud to be entering a new chapter for this extraordinary club. This moment is the result of months of thoughtful discussions with club leadership and our shared confidence in Rangers' success going forward. "To that end we'd like to tell you a bit about our thinking. Simply put - our goal is to win trophies in Scotland and be able to compete at a high level in Europe, while laying a foundation of financial sustainability for the future. "As our first step, we are investing fresh capital into Rangers, which will be strategically deployed on and off the pitch. While we recognise the importance of resources, we believe that thoughtful, disciplined investment, guided by a clear strategy, is the path to enduring success. "Every decision, whether sporting or business, will be made with the club's long-term success and sustainability in mind." Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.


The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
How PSG got rid of the GOAT and became Champions League contenders
When Rothen claimed the presence of Messi, Neymar and Kylian Mbappe at the Parc des Princes was preventing the Ligue 1 champions from fulfilling their vast potential in Europe, many fans asked if he had drunk one too many glasses of Chateauneuf-du-Pape. However, somebody at Qatar Sports Investments, who had turned PSG into one of the wealthiest clubs in the world game when they had bought a majority shareholding in them in 2011, was clearly paying attention to the one-time Scottish title winner. Read more: There has been a definite shift away from the superstar-centric strategy since. Messi, Neymar and Mbappe, who had cost in excess of €400m, have all been allowed to depart. There has been a move towards a more collective mindset. The change has worked wonders. Paris Saint-Germain are, having swatted aside Manchester City, Liverpool, Aston Villa and Arsenal in Europe this year, favourites to beat Inter Milan in the Champions League final in the Allianz Arena in Munich tonight and win the competition for the first time. Rothen, who has covered Les Parisiens' exploits on the continent for RMC Sport in France this term and who will be cheering on his boyhood heroes this evening along with millions of others around the globe, has been proved emphatically correct in his assessment. 'Managing Messi, Neymar and Mbappe was complicated,' he said ahead of the eagerly anticipated encounter between Luis Enrique's team and Simone Inzaghi's side. 'They also had to pay huge sums to cover their salaries, which were very high. I thought it was a bad idea to renew their deals. 'Messi in particular made no attempt to engage with the club or with the fans when he was here. It looked like he was only interested in his image rights. He never waved to the fans or acknowledged their backing. I thought it was best for him to go. The money they have saved since he has gone has allowed them to improve the squad.' (Image: Nick Potts) Enrique, the former Barcelona, Real Madrid and Spain midfielder and Roma, Celta Vigo, Barcelona and Spain manager who took over from Christophe Galtier in the summer of 2023, has transformed PSG from show ponies into work horses during his two year tenure. His charges have run for 117.94 kilometres on average in every game in the Champions League this season, far more than any other side in the competition. In addition, they have completed more passes, created more scoring chances and had more shots on goal than any other team. They have been nothing short of relentless in the past five months. John McGinn, the Scotland midfielder and Villa captain, was helpless to prevent his Premier League outfit from slumping to a 5-4 aggregate defeat against them in their last eight double header last month. However, he claimed that he and his team mates could be satisfied of how they acquitted themselves against opponents he rated highly following the final whistle. 'We should be proud that we turned the game around against one of the best teams in the world and fought to the very end,' he said. 'PSG are the best team I've ever played against. I definitely wouldn't want to face them every week.' Enrique, whose team recorded just one win during their first five Champions League league phase games and at one stage looked set to miss out on qualification for the knockout rounds, has made important tactical changes as well as an inspired signing. He moved Ousmane Dembele from the right wing to striker, deployed Vitinha as a holding midfielder and gave right-back Achraf Hakimi the freedom to move upfield and infield. Read more: On top of that, he landed Khvicha Kvaratskhelia from Napoli for €60m in January. The wide man has established himself as a regular starter alongside Dembele, Desire Doue and Bradley Barcola in his front three. Enrique's insistence that PSG attack together and defend together – something which did not happen when Messi, Mbappe and Neymar formed the forward line – has impressed Rothen. 'Everything has gone well this year,' he said. 'There are no problems with the team, no problems behind the scenes, no problems in the media. That is unheard of at PSG. They have won a lot in previous years, but there was never the same atmosphere. 'It hasn't been perfect. They switched off against Aston Villa after scoring two early goals and allowed their opponents to come back into the game. They fell asleep. But they have been a blessing in disguise because they will know now they can't afford that sort of slackness. But everything has gone well for the club. All of the planets are aligned.' Inter, who beat Barcelona 4-3 after extra-time in the second leg of the semi-final in the San Siro last month to complete a remarkable 7-6 aggregate triumph, can certainly be crowned European champions for a fourth time in Germany this evening. They, too, have an abundance of talent in every area of the pitch. But if Paris Saint-Germain scale the heights they are capable of they should prevail and make history.

The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Labour say Britain will spend £10 billion extra on defence
The UK Government's 10-year defence plan, which is due to be announced on Monday, is said to be 'unaffordable' without the increased spending, The Times has reported. Prime Minister Keir Starmer had previously outlined the 3% target by 2034 as an 'ambition', but Healey has now said it is a certainty. Healey's comments mean the Labour Government would be committed to spending more than £10 billion extra on defence every year despite criticism over proposed cuts to public services. READ MORE: Labour has 'given up' on by-election amid SNP-Reform contest, says John Swinney In February, Starmer announced that the UK would spend 2.5% of GDP on defence by April 2027, raiding the international development budget, which was a decision branded by the Scottish Government as 'deeply disappointing'. At the same time, Starmer also outlined an 'ambition' to reach 3% by 2034, a target which was reportedly described by government sources as still an 'ambition' this week. However, Healey (below) told The Times on Saturday: 'In the next parliament, this country will spend 3 per cent of our GDP on defence.' When pressed whether this was a firm commitment, he said he had 'no doubt' Britain would be spending 3% 'in the next parliament'. He said there was a 'certain decade of rising defence spending', adding: 'It allows us to plan for the long term. It allows us to deal with the pressures.' It is unclear whether Healey's comments were an attempt to pressure the Treasury into approving the spending or if it was a commitment that has been agreed across Whitehall. It was also reported that the review, which was due to be published during VE Day week this month, into Britain's defence spending had been delayed because of rows with the Treasury. One source told The Times there had been 'discontent that the Ministry of Defence is using it to push for more defence spending'. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has estimated that reaching 3% of GDP by the next parliament would cost the UK an additional £17.3bn in 2029-30. The 130-page review reportedly will warn of the 'immediate and pressing' danger posed by Russia and will also describe Iran and North Korea as 'regional disruptors'. The review comes as other government departments are still negotiating how much they will have to spend over the next three years. A Ministry of Defence spokesperson said: 'This government has announced the largest sustained increase to defence spending since the end of the Cold War — 2.5 per cent by 2027 and 3 per cent in the next parliament when fiscal and economic conditions allow, including an extra £5 billion this financial year. 'The review will rightly set the vision for how that uplift will be spent, including new capabilities to put us at the leading edge of innovation in Nato, investment in our people and making defence an engine for growth across the UK — making Britain more secure at home and strong abroad.' NATO member states are expected to agree to a defence spending target during a summit in June with the target reportedly possibly being as high as 3.5% of GDP.