A newcomer State Police head looks to salvage his agency's reputation
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Noble, who was
Advertisement
'I believe the goal here is to steer a course for the Massachusetts State Police and to do that with transparency, that upholds high standards and deepens our connection to the community we serve,' Noble told the editorial board. 'I'm committed to this role and to being transparent in it. After all, the State Police is a public institution.'
Advertisement
To that end, Noble, who was previously second-in-command of the New Jersey State Police, recently announced a host of goals, policies, and programs aimed at refurbishing the agency's tarnished reputation.
'We have to resolve to operate at the highest standard,' he said, 'And we are going to instill a culture to do that.'
Some of that starts with the training of those who will eventually join its ranks. Noble named a new leader for the agency's training academy in May and at the same time announced that the first class to be admitted after Delgado-Garcia's death would be divided into two smaller units — one with 124 cadets that started training in May and a second with 130 recruits that will start later this summer, according to a State Police spokesperson.
'A smaller student-to-instructor ratio simply works better,' Noble said. 'It allows a more hands-on direct teaching and training experience.'
That kind of experience would likely improve what has been an atrocious attrition rate — one that hit
At the same time, Noble commissioned the International Association of Chiefs of Police to conduct an independent assessment of the academy.
That assessment will focus 'on the relevance, efficacy, and safety of the paramilitary training model currently in use,' according to the department. And the
The boxing ring remains closed, as it has been since Delgado-Garcia's death. But its relevance and the culture it represented within the academy is now all under a microscope as are the physical and mental 'costs and benefits of communal living arrangements' under which cadets are currently trained. Are those arrangements really beneficial for the mental and physical well-being of cadets?
Advertisement
And while the academy awaits the results of that review — expected by the end of the year — academy staff 'have completed an hour-by-hour review of recruits' experiences at the Academy' looking for some kind of balance in a rigorous program.
Following on that, Noble announced a wider ranging reform plan, including an emphasis on what he called 'checks and balances' within the system.
'I think the State Police have the capacity to police ourselves,' he added.
The Excellence Initiative, Noble
Toward that end, the plan includes: an advanced training program for investigators already attended by some 500 members of the force; a still-in-progress 'quality assurance unit' to evaluate those investigations (and perhaps catch the next Proctor before he goes off the rails); and a new body camera audit unit to 'help ensure trooper conduct aligns with departmental standards and public expectations.'
Better community outreach is another pillar of Noble's program, which now includes a Community Affairs office, headed by a civilian appointed earlier this year. Locals and visitors alike will cheer if that office succeeds in getting state troopers to stop barking at travelers at Logan airport for the crimes of heading for the wrong airport check-in line or hugging too long at the curb.
Advertisement
Troopers do, sad to say, have a certain reputation to overcome — aside from the more major sins uncovered by the Read trial.
So Noble has a difficult job ahead of him — supporting his troops, which includes efforts to support their physical and mental well-being while doing what is an increasingly difficult job.
But the colonel's job isn't made any easier by the still unresolved case of Delgado-Garcia, which surely weighs like a stone on the agency and its ability to attract the next generation of troopers.
For all his efforts, Noble's quest to bring transparency to the agency he heads now stalls at the attorney general's door. The people of this state, not to mention the family of Delgado-Garcia, and every would-be trooper who follows him, deserve answers.
Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
House Dems spent more than $7K in campaign funds on El Salvador trips for Kilmar Abrego Garcia — despite some claiming they paid ‘out of their own pocket'
WASHINGTON — House Democrats dropped more than $7,000 in campaign money this spring on air travel to El Salvador — and a reservation at a swanky Hilton hotel — despite some telling the public they were paying for trips to visit alleged foreign gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia 'out of their own pocket.' Reps. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.), Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.) and Maxine Dexter (D-Ore.) arrived in San Salvador April 21 to 'pressure the Trump Administration' for the release of Abrego Garcia, an alleged MS-13 member, according to a joint statement. Garcia's congressional campaign spent $1,981.99 on Taca International Airlines, a Salvadoran carrier, for travel a few days earlier, on April 17 — and another $501.53 for 'event space rental' at the Hilton San Salvador on April 29, Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings show. Frost's campaign shelled out $1,362.49 for travel on Avianca, a Latin American airline that bears El Salvador's flag, and $967.43 for travel on Volaris, a low-cost Mexican airline — both of which were recorded May 8, a week or so after their trip. Ansari's campaign reported the highest total spending on travel with $2,616.45 forked over to Avianca Airlines in four separate tranches between April 17 and 21. Dexter's campaign paid $1,315.44 for travel on Taca Airlines April 18. 6 AFP via Getty Images None of the lawmakers listed any lodging expenses in El Salvador, according to a Post review of the FEC filings, and all except for Garcia claimed they personally footed the bill for the travel costs. 'The congresswoman paid for her own flights and hotel with her own money, and the campaign paid for a campaign volunteer with campaign funds,' noted an Ansari rep, clarifying that no Members' Representational Allowance (MRA) funds were used. Ansari's office previously told a Phoenix-based NBC affiliate that the congresswoman 'paid for the trip out of her own pocket.' A Garcia spokesperson previously confirmed to The Post that the congressman 'paid for the trip through his personal campaign funds.' 6 Getty Images A rep for Dexter had said in April their member self-funded the flight. Frost's reps told Politico no MRA funds, which are provided by US taxpayers, were used. Travel expenses exceeding $1,000 are considered in-kind contributions to campaigns when recorded by a candidate, campaign staffer or volunteer, according to the FEC. 6 REUTERS Rep. Glenn Ivey (D-Md.) made a separate visit to El Salvador to try to meet with Abrego Garcia, a former Maryland resident who resided in his district, but only spent $291.25 in campaign funds for the jaunt. 'Congressman Ivey did not use MRA or taxpayer funds for his trip to El Salvador. In accordance with House Administration and FEC guidelines, his principal campaign committee covered the travel costs associated with fulfilling his official Congressional oversight responsibilities,' said Ivey's communications director Ramón Korionoff in a statement. 'All expenses were properly reported to the FEC in full compliance with federal disclosure requirements. Congressman Ivey believes it's essential to understand the real-world impact of U.S. immigration and security policies firsthand, and he remains committed to conducting his work with transparency, accountability, and fiscal responsibility.' 6 Notably, a review of filings for Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) — the only Democrat to be granted a meeting with Abrego Garcia in what he later claimed was staged by Salvadoran officials for an embarrassing photo-op with margaritas — do not show any campaign spending for similar travel or lodging in mid-April. via REUTERS Notably, a review of filings for Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) — the only Democrat to be granted a meeting with Abrego Garcia in what he later claimed was a staged photo-op by Salvadoran officials for the purpose of embarrassing him — do not show any campaign spending for similar travel or lodging in mid-April. The main campaign arm for Senate Republicans later mocked the political trips by offering 'one-way' tickets for more Dems to visit El Salvador. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) reportedly dissuaded the Dems from taking the trip — despite praising Dexter in a subsequent political livestream as well as Van Hollen, whose 'great leadership' the Brooklynite celebrated for having made the first visit to CECOT. 6 Asked in an April 29 press conference whether he agreed with Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) that it was a 'mistake rallying around' Abrego Garcia, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries deflected the question. via REUTERS Asked in an April 29 press conference whether he agreed with Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) that it was a 'mistake rallying around' Abrego Garcia, Jeffries deflected the question. CECOT, the notorious Salvadoran megaprison, took in 260 suspected gang members that the Trump administration deported on March 15, including Abrego Garcia who had entered the US illegally in 2011. Maryland police arrested him along with some MS-13 members at a Home Depot parking lot in March 2019. Abrego Garcia was sporting a Chicago Bulls hat and hoodie that 'represents they are a member in good standing' of the gang, a confidential informant told authorities. 6 CECOT, the notorious Salvadoran megaprison, took in 260 suspected gang members that the Trump administration deported on March 15, including Abrego Garcia who had entered the US illegally in 2011. @nayibbukele/X The informant, in a report filed with the Prince George's County Police Department, said Abrego Garcia was an 'active member' of MS-13, held the low rank of 'Chequeo' and went by the street name 'Chele.' Later in 2019, an immigration judge granted Abrego Garcia a 'withholding of removal' order preventing his immediate deportation to El Salvador and allowing for removal to other nations — but he was released without the first Trump administration appealing the decision. Garcia was later moved from CECOT to a lower-security facility elsewhere in El Salvador. In June, the Trump administration facilitated the alleged gangbanger's return to the US — where he was hit with human trafficking charges. Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, and defense attorneys have denied Abrego Garcia's purported MS-13 affiliation. Reps for Garcia, Frost and Dexter didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Ketanji Brown Jackson Knows How to Get People's Attention
When Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote her ringing dissent in the case of Trump v. CASA, which severely curtailed the ability of lower courts to serve as a check on unlawful executive orders, she wanted to make abundantly clear the danger of what she regarded as a 'seismic shock' to American legal norms. 'Courts must have the power to order everyone (including the executive) to follow the law — full stop,' she wrote. She continued, in a voice dripping with sarcasm, 'The majority sees a power grab — but not by a presumably lawless executive choosing to act in a manner that flouts the plain text of the Constitution. Instead, to the majority, the power-hungry actors are … (wait for it) … the District Courts.' Social media platforms exploded with outrage. One user asked, in apparent disbelief, 'Did Ketanji Brown Jackson actually pop that stupid little 'wait for it' gag in a SCOTUS opinion?' Another said the dissent 'single-handedly degraded 235 years, four months, and 25 days of SCOTUS precedent.' The worst of them turned the justice's language back on her as a weapon. 'Ketanji Brown Jackson is … (wait for it) …' — well, I won't repeat the insult here, but for good measure, they added, 'full stop.' Her critics were right to note that Jackson was doing something unusual. And it wasn't just those examples. She peppered the whole dissent with expressions like 'Why all the fuss?' 'Do not take my word for it,' 'Here is what I mean,' and the assessment — again with unmistakable sarcasm — 'That is some solicitation.' You won't find anything like that in Marbury v. Madison. What's striking about Jackson's turns of phrase is that they employ what we typically regard as oral language — spontaneous, spoken words — in an extremely serious written text. That choice, and the blowback it encountered, are a chance to consider the arbitrariness and narrowness of the conventions dictating how legal opinions should be written. The expectation that their language be timeless, faceless and Latinate is a matter of custom, not necessity. 'Why all the fuss?' indeed. Jackson is, at 54, the youngest justice on the court. She was raised in the 1980s, a time when America's writing culture was getting markedly less hidebound. Waving aside the hats and girdles and stuffy dance steps of old, the counterculture had shown America how to let its language hang out, too. A new, looser style of writing allowed a play between the oral and the written, and the result enriched the culture rather than impoverishing it. I can't speak for Jackson, but that shift had a big impact on a great many people who grew up in that era's wake. It definitely had a big impact on me. I write in what I hope is a conversational style. Like Jackson, I have sometimes been scolded for it by people who would prefer that I write 'with a tie on,' as it were. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Boston Globe
13 hours ago
- Boston Globe
One big disaster for Massachusetts health care
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up One major impact of the bill they'll need to contend with is the new administrative barriers, like work requirements, it created for enrollees in MassHealth, the state Medicaid program for low-income residents. Advertisement While the vast majority of Medicaid recipients are already working or would qualify for an exemption, states with work requirements typically State officials should work with community organizations, health care providers, and consumer advocates like Health Care for All on a public education and assistance campaign that informs MassHealth enrollees of the new requirements and helps them fill out paperwork. Advertisement The bill will also require states to redetermine enrollees' eligibility for MassHealth twice a year instead of annually. To satisfy that requirement, the state should also work on establishing automated systems that let information be verified through data-matching, so the state uses information it collects through other state agencies (like unemployment insurance filings) to confirm eligibility for MassHealth. The good news is state officials While the goal should be keeping people insured, some residents will lose insurance for paperwork reasons, or because they can no longer afford it, or because they lose eligibility. For example, many immigrants who have legal status in the US but not permanent residency (like refugees or asylum seekers) will no longer be eligible for Medicaid or for subsidies from Massachusetts' Health Connector. It's also still unknown whether Congress will extend Of course, people without insurance will still get sick, and they are likely to land in hospital emergency rooms. Massachusetts' Health Safety Net fund, which helps hospitals pay for uncompensated care, is The financial hits to Medicaid will come from several policy changes included in the bill. The biggest ones are restrictions on the extent to which the state can rely on provider taxes and state-directed payments, which are complicated methods by which the state uses state money (including fees collected from hospitals and providers) to draw federal Medicaid matching money, then distributes that money back to health care providers (hospitals, nursing homes, and community health centers). Advertisement There are no easy answers as the Legislature and governor decide how to respond. Lawmakers will likely face pressure to raise new revenues through taxes or dip into the state's $8.1 billion rainy day fund to avoid major cuts to MassHealth benefits or eligibility. But the magnitude of the cuts will make it impossible for the state to backfill the entire amount. At the same time, ripples from the Medicaid cuts will affect the entire health care system. The organization There will likely be targeted areas where the state will want to replace federal with state money — for example, if money is need to avoid the shuttering of essential services, like a rural hospital's emergency room or the sole regional facility for labor and delivery. There may need to be cuts to MassHealth benefits, and enrollees will be forced to pay new federally required copays for many services. Some rates paid to providers may be cut. Advertisement Massachusetts also needs to negotiate a new waiver with federal Medicaid officials by the end of 2027, which sets the parameters around how MassHealth is structured and what services the federal government will cover. Massachusetts Congressman Jake Auchincloss suggested, in an interview with the editorial board, that the state could seek to negotiate more state flexibility and autonomy in running its own program — for example, to make enrollment easier, to experiment with pilot programs, do more with alternative payment systems, or get paid for investments that save Medicare money, like community-based care for seniors. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the state convened state policy experts and stakeholders to respond to the crisis. The Healey administration should consider reviving that model today. In a time of scarcity, it's tempting for each segment of the industry to protect its turf. It would be far better to put state policy makers in a room with representatives of hospitals, community health centers, insurers, nursing homes, drug companies, patient advocates, and other health system stakeholders so they can collaborate and chart a path forward that's in the best interest of the Commonwealth's residents. Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
