Private Security Personnel Licensing Authority cancels licences for guards accused of turning up to police events
Shaw and his wife Alison both had Certificates of Approval to work as employed security guards but didn't have a licence to run their own business because they couldn't afford the annual fees.
Despite this, Shaw and an employee who didn't hold any kind of security licence would drive around New Plymouth in their signwritten vehicle for their unlicensed security business, House and Farm Security Service.
The business advertised extensively through flyers, social media and business cards but only generated $320 worth of income in that period.
According to a ruling by the authority released this week, the Shaws were found to have been running their business without a licence, and to have hired an employee to work as a security guard without a certificate of approval.
'The fact the business was not successful and earned very little money does mean House and Farm Security Service does not fit within the definition of a crowd controller or property guard …' authority head Trish McConnell said.
'Before spending money on their vehicle, uniforms, flyers and advertising Mr and Mrs Shaw should have applied for a security licence.'
Part of the Shaws' argument in response to the complaint from police was that they hadn't hired an employee because they didn't get any regular work, but had him work a one-off security gig at a local festival.
McConnell said this was a breach of the licensing rules and in addition, they had allowed that worker to wear a uniform for several months and hold himself out as a legitimate security worker.
It's the second time Shaw has fallen foul of the authority after receiving a warning in 2017 for operating a similar business without a licence.
McConnell described the Shaws' conduct as 'intentional and ongoing' and despite being warned about needing a licence, they didn't get one.
McConnell cancelled both Brent and Alison Shaw's personal security licences and fined them $800, which was the cost of the annual licence for their business that they didn't pay when they set it up.
Brian Shaw told NZME he denied having a scanner capable of listening to police communications, and turning up at incidents before actual police to talk to witnesses.
Shaw claimed instead that on one occasion he had witnessed a car accident and taken down the details of a driver who had left the scene, which he passed on to police.
Jeremy Wilkinson is an Open Justice reporter based in Manawatū, covering courts and justice issues with an interest in tribunals. He has been a journalist for nearly a decade and has worked for NZME since 2022.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Uber driver Jomon Perumayan Joseph loses job after stun gun found on his dashboard
By Tara Shaskey, Open Justice reporter of Jomon Perumayan Joseph was caught with a stun gun on the dashboard of his Uber vehicle. Photo: NZME An Uber driver was found with a homemade stun gun on his dashboard, which a judge has alluded to as being a method of protection for the man. Jomon Perumayan Joseph, 39, was stopped by police for an unrelated traffic matter in New Plymouth about 4pm on 13 November last year. At the time, he was operating as an Uber driver, according to a police summary of facts. Police spotted a "cylindrical device with two metal probes" on the dashboard of Joseph's vehicle. "An expert examination of the device determined it was a homemade stun gun of a form and size held in the hand, which had a push switch that latches when pressed to continually operate the device," the summary stated. Testing of the gun showed it would cause a severe electric shock, electrical burning and could render a person wholly or partially incapable of resistance. Joseph was charged with unlawful possession of a restricted weapon and, when speaking with police, said he made it "as an experiment". Jomon Perumayan Joseph appeared in New Plymouth District Court. Photo: NZME / Tara Shaskey On Tuesday, he appeared in New Plymouth District Court where he advanced an application for a discharge without conviction. Judge Ajit Swaran Singh said Joseph had reported making the stun gun was a "hobby" and he had no intention of using it on anyone. However, the judge noted that during his time in the courts he had seen many cases of Uber, taxi and bus drivers being attacked. "Understandably their concern is self-protection in the event of being attacked. "That is quite a common feature in a lot of offending. Be that as it may, you must understand that having weapons is not acceptable ... there are better ways of dealing with situations." In considering Joseph's application, Judge Swaran Singh said as a result of the charge, Joseph had lost his job as an Uber driver and his passenger licence endorsement had been suspended, "suffering a form of punishment already". The judge considered affidavits from Joseph, his wife and an immigration expert, as well as a presentence report which assessed him as a low risk of reoffending, his genuine remorse, and that he had donated $500 to charity. There were no aggravating features, such as the offending being drug or gang-related, and the immigration expert had advised a conviction could impact Joseph's prospects of remaining in New Zealand, and his possible migration to Australia. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
NZ Herald
10 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Uber driver Jomon Perumayan Joseph loses job after stun gun found on his dashboard
Jomon Perumayan Joseph was caught with a stun gun on the dashboard of his Uber vehicle. 'An expert examination of the device determined it was a homemade stun gun of a form and size held in the hand, which had a push switch that latches when pressed to continually operate the device,' the summary stated. Testing of the gun showed it would cause a severe electric shock, electrical burning and could render a person wholly or partially incapable of resistance. Joseph was charged with unlawful possession of a restricted weapon and, when speaking with police, said he made it 'as an experiment'. Jomon Perumayan Joseph appeared in New Plymouth District Court. Photo / Tara Shaskey Yesterday, he appeared in New Plymouth District Court where he advanced an application for a discharge without conviction. Judge Ajit Swaran Singh said Joseph had reported making the stun gun was a 'hobby' and he had no intention of using it on anyone. However, the judge noted that during his time in the courts he had seen many cases of Uber, taxi and bus drivers being attacked. 'Understandably their concern is self-protection in the event of being attacked. 'That is quite a common feature in a lot of offending. Be that as it may, you must understand that having weapons is not acceptable ... there are better ways of dealing with situations.' In considering Joseph's application, Judge Swaran Singh said as a result of the charge, Joseph had lost his job as an Uber driver and his passenger licence endorsement had been suspended, 'suffering a form of punishment already'. The judge considered affidavits from Joseph, his wife and an immigration expert, as well as a presentence report which assessed him as a low risk of reoffending, his genuine remorse, and that he had donated $500 to charity. There were no aggravating features, such as the offending being drug or gang-related, and the immigration expert had advised a conviction could impact Joseph's prospects of remaining in New Zealand, and his possible migration to Australia. The possibility of deportation could also impact his family, the court heard. Judge Swaran Singh accepted that the consequences of a conviction were out of all proportion to the gravity of the offending and granted the discharge without conviction. But Joseph was ordered to pay $661.25 for the independent testing of the stun gun, and the weapon would be destroyed. Tara Shaskey joined NZME in 2022 and is currently an assistant editor and reporter for the Open Justice team. She has been a reporter since 2014 and previously worked at Stuff covering crime and justice, arts and entertainment, and Māori issues.
RNZ News
21 hours ago
- RNZ News
Bay of Plenty Snapchat predator Raveen Saily admits further offending
By Hannah Bartlett of Snapchat predator Raveen Saily has pleaded guilty to new charges related to grooming and indecent communication with an 11-year-old girl. Photo: NZME Warning: This story deals with details of sexual assault against young people, and may be distressing. Snapchat predator Raveen Saily was on bail, awaiting a rape trial , when he filmed a 13-year-old Rotorua girl performing a sexual act on him. Now it's been revealed the 23-year-old sent that video to an 11-year-old Auckland girl he'd met through Snapchat, whom he'd asked to be his girlfriend, and was also grooming. On Tuesday in the Tauranga District Court, Saily pleaded guilty to grooming for sexual conduct with a young person, indecent communication with a young person and distributing objectionable material. The charges all relate to the Auckland victim. He will be sentenced in December, along with charges related to the sexual violation of the 13-year-old victim from Rotorua. A police summary of facts reveals Saily met the 11-year-old through Snapchat in May 2024. At the time, he was awaiting trial on charges of indecent assault, rape and sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection, for an attack on a 16-year-old girl at the Arataki Community Centre in Mount Maunganui. He had also met that teen on Snapchat, where he used the alias "John", and was found guilty by a jury, on all six charges, in August last year. While awaiting trial, Saily continued to contact girls on Snapchat. This was despite bail conditions banning him from accessing the internet, having contact with anyone under 16, or leaving his Pyes Pā home at night. When spoken to by police about his contact with the 11-year-old, he told them he "probably did do these things, but he cannot remember specifics due to the volume of girls he was in communication with, and the time that has passed since his incarceration". Saily never met the 11-year-old victim in person; they lived in different cities and communicated on Snapchat. Their relationship was discovered when the girl's mother looked at her phone, saw the messaging and reported it to police. The police summary of facts stated that during a video call, Saily asked the girl to be his girlfriend. She told him she was only 11, and too young to have a boyfriend. However, Saily continued to pressure her until she agreed, and their conversations continued over text and Snapchat, and audio and video calls. She became "increasingly emotionally dependent" on Saily, believing she was in a relationship with him. Saily told the 11-year-old he loved her, while encouraging her to send him sexually explicit images. He would ask her to "get naked", and tell her about his sexual preferences, describing himself as "freaky". He told her she would be a "good SCAT girl", which describes sexual arousal from faecal matter. He would direct her to places in the house away from her caregiver, while on video calls, and instruct her to perform sexual acts while he watched. He told her he wanted to drive from Tauranga to have sex with her. In June 2024, he filmed the 13-year-old victim from Rotorua performing a sexual act on himself, and sent it to the 11-year-old. The video of the 13-year-old was sent between June 27 and August 27, 2024, with the video found by police when they examined Saily's phone, after arresting him. Last month, Saily pleaded guilty to charges related to the 13-year-old, including grooming, sexual connection with a young person, sexual violation, and possessing objectionable material. He had added that girl on Snapchat in May 2024, claiming he was only 16. He groomed her over a month and encouraged her to send him sexually explicit photographs. They met at night in June 2024, and he drove her to several private locations where he sexually violated her, at times as she cried in pain. She repeatedly told him to stop, but he told her to shut up. It was her first experience of sexual intercourse. This offending was only detected after police pulled the pair over during a routine police stop and became suspicious about their age gap. When being dealt with by police at the traffic stop, the defendant indicated he was not aware of the girl's age and tried to stop her from speaking to the attending officers. Because of the significant age difference between the complainant and the defendant, she was taken to her home and spoken to alongside her mother. That traffic stop happened on Saturday, August 24, just before Saily's Tauranga trial began on August 26. During the Tauranga trial, the court heard how the girl didn't know Saily's proper name, and he didn't use it on any of his social media profiles. They'd met up at Mount Maunganui's Bayfair mall, and then went for a walk to the nearby Arataki Community Centre. There, the girl said she had been forced to perform sexual acts after Saily threatened her with a knife. He then went on to rape and violate her. Saily claimed it had been consensual, but the Crown said this was "utterly fanciful", particularly given the "naive" girl had no sexual experience and it was the first time she'd met up with a boy alone. Saily is currently serving a sentence of nine years and two months' imprisonment for the Tauranga attack, and will be sentenced for the offending against the 13-year-old and 11-year-old in December. If it is an emergency and you feel like you or someone else is at risk, call 111. This story first appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
