logo
Albanese ‘confident' US would come to Australia's defence in event of attack

Albanese ‘confident' US would come to Australia's defence in event of attack

The Guardian24-02-2025

Anthony Albanese says he is confident that the US would defend Australia if it were to come under attack, despite the change in leadership in the US, but that Australia needed to look after its own security and would make its own decisions on foreign policy, including on support for Ukraine.
The comments came on a special edition of the ABC's Q&A on Monday night, in which the prime minister took questions from members of the public on foreign affairs, the cost of living crisis, housing and social cohesion, in a bid to win over voters ahead of the election being called.
Albanese was quizzed about the change of leadership in the US and criticisms that he has not been strong enough in denouncing some of Donald Trump's statements.
'I'm not going to give a running commentary on all of what Donald Trump says,' said Albanese. 'That would take up a fair portion of the time.' But he said that Australia had a guarantee that the US would defend it if needed. 'We do, we have an Anzus agreement and an alliance with the United States.'
Asked if he thought the agreement was 'rock solid', the prime minister replied simply 'yes'.
'We, of course, need to ensure that we look after our own security, that's one of the things that we did with the defence force posture review,' he said. 'The US is an important ally of Australia, but we need to make sure that our defence is up to scratch.'
Albanese said that Australia will continue to support Ukraine as it defends against Russian invasion, regardless of the US's changing stance on the war.
'Australia decides what our position on Ukraine is, and the Australian position is very clear, which is: we understand that the struggle of the Ukrainian people is about their national sovereignty, but it's also about the international rule of law,' he said, citing Australia's $1.5bn in financial support for Ukraine to date.
'If a big, powerful country can just go across borders, then the implications of that are global… We stand with the Ukrainian people.'
Albanese refused to be drawn on when the federal election would be held, but he made his pitch to the country, selling his government as one that has restored a struggling economy and restored Australia's position internationally.
'Why do we deserve another term? Because when we came into government, inflation has six in front of it, now it's got a two in front of it,' he said, also citing record creation of jobs, real wage increases, tax cuts, and cutting the debt by $200bn.
'If you don't get the economy right, you don't get other things right,' he said.
Albanese gave a glimpse of what will likely be his stump speech of the campaign, spruiking the government's commitment to universal child care, climate change and women's economic equality.
'We've restored our position with the world as well,' he said. 'We were pariahs, we were in the naughty corner in international forums like the Pacific, we've restored those relationships.'
Albanese addressed Dutton's announcement on Sunday that the Coalition would match Labor's $8.5bn funding boost to Medicare, which will expand the bulk-billing incentive and make access to GPs cheaper.
Albanese disagreed with a comment by host Patricia Karvelas that 'It's being matched by Peter Dutton, though, so you get it either way, right?'
'No,' said Albanese. 'Because [the Coalition] said before 2013, remember they got elected, Tony Abbott, famously [said] 'No cuts to health, no cuts to education'. First budget: $80bn [of budget cuts] – 50 [billion] off hospitals, 30 [billion] off education.'
In a tense moment early in the hour, Albanese received an intense grilling over his response to antisemitic attacks in Australia, with a Jewish audience member accusing him of 'doing nothing' in response to attacks targeting Jewish people across the country.
Albanese condemned anti-semitism as 'abhorrent and completely unacceptable to the Australian ethos, to who we are' in response to the question, which came from a woman called Janet, who described herself as a Jewish mother of four boys and who asked when it would be safe for them to openly identify as Jews in Australia.
The prime minister said he had visited the Adass Israel School school on Monday afternoon and when asked what reception he had received he said 'terrific, very positive, and whenever I've engaged with the community it has been positive, very appreciative'.
Janet shook her head and, misunderstanding which visit he was referring to, said that when the prime minister had visited the Adass Israel synagogue in Melbourne after it was subject to a terrorist arson attack in December, said: 'You didn't get a warm welcome. People heckled you and you left very quickly.'
'I was referring to today,' said a defensive Albanese. 'I had a very warm welcome at the president's home… and with all of the community leaders who were there.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gavin Newsom finally finds a cause: taking on Trump
Gavin Newsom finally finds a cause: taking on Trump

Telegraph

time31 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Gavin Newsom finally finds a cause: taking on Trump

The Democratic governor of liberal California has welcomed Donald Trump to his state, cosied up to Conservative podcasters, and slashed healthcare provisions for illegal immigrants this year. But the reinvention of Gavin Newsom as the sort of Democrat who might be able to win back Republican voters came to a shuddering halt during a weekend of riots. With Mr Trump ordering troops onto his streets, Mr Newsom hit back, accusing the president of intentionally inflaming a difficult situation. It leaves Mr Newsom with no choice but to halt his drift Right-ward, said Hank Sheinkopf, a Democratic strategist. 'If not, he loses his entire constituency,' he said. 'In other words, there's a toleration level for moving to the centre, but not when it comes to massive chaos in Los Angeles.' Mr Newsom has put himself at the front of Democrat efforts to examine how they lost the 2024 election so badly. He launched a podcast in March in which he picks the brains of leading figures in Trump world. And Mr Newsom angered liberals with the very first episode, in which he interviewed Charlie Kirk, the controversial Conservative, when he said it was unfair that transgender athletes could compete in women's sport. He also said Democrats simply could not compete with the likes of Mr Trump and Elon Musk when it came to online reach. 'We're toast,' he said. Last month, facing a budget crunch, the telegenic governor back-pedalled on a promise of healthcare for all. He announced a freeze in enrolment for undocumented adults in the state's public health insurance programme. He has also urged cities to ban encampments for homeless people, cracking down on the tent cities that have blighted so much of California. And in January, he thanked Mr Trump for federal help in rebuilding after devastating wildfires that swept through Los Angeles. 'I've been always a hard-headed pragmatist,' he told reporters recently when quizzed about his shifting positions. 'I'm not an ideologue.' Trump a 'stone cold liar' That all seems a long time ago after immigration raids around Los Angeles on Friday sparked three days of riots, and an order by Mr Trump to send in 2,000 National Guard troops. Tom Homan, the president's border tsar, threatened to arrest the California governor if he got in the way. 'Come and get me, tough guy,' was Mr Newsom's pithy response on X. After Mr Trump agreed the governor should be arrested, the governor shot back saying it was 'a line we cannot cross as a nation'. He threatened to sue the federal government for its illegal act and called the president a 'stone cold liar' for failing to bring up his plan to send the National Guard when they spoke by telephone. 'There is currently no need for the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles and to do so in this unlawful manner and for such lengthy period is a serious breach of state sovereignty that seems intentionally designed to inflame the situation while simultaneously depriving the state from deploying these personnel and resources where they are truly required,' he wrote in a letter. That puts him at the centre of the news headlines, said James Carville, the veteran Democratic strategist and former adviser to Bill Clinton, even if it was too early to say that the party had finally found a national figurehead to oppose Mr Trump. But he said Mr Newsom's full-blooded reaction to Mr Trump and his tsar did not mark a reversal of his shift to the Right, but were compatible with his rejection of progressive totems such as identity politics. 'I don't think we should say we can render a verdict after 48 hours, but his actions have been totally what he would expect,' he said after Mr Trump had 'invaded' his state with troops. At the same time, he added, the crackdown on illegal immigrants remained a popular part of the platform that helped Republicans reclaim the White House last year. That leaves the governor and Democrats with a fine line to straddle: taking on Mr Trump over his decision to send in troops but without being painted as soft on illegal immigration or unrest in the streets. 'I think Trump sees all kinds of trouble on the horizon,' Mr Carville said. 'What he's very good at is just doing something to dominate the news.'

Trump says meeting on Iran planned for Thursday
Trump says meeting on Iran planned for Thursday

Reuters

time33 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump says meeting on Iran planned for Thursday

WASHINGTON, June 9 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday said the U.S. and Iran would continue talks on Thursday for a nuclear deal, adding that Tehran was a tough negotiator and that the main impediment to an agreement was over enrichment. "We're doing a lot of work on Iran right now," Trump told reporters at an economic event at the White House. "It's tough. ... They're great negotiators." "They're just asking for things that you can't do. They don't want to give up what they have to give up," he added. "They seek enrichment. We can't have enrichment. We want just the opposite. And so far, they're not there." "They have given us their thoughts on the deal. And I said, you know, it's just not acceptable," Trump said as Tehran plans to hand Washington a counter-proposal. Trump also said he discussed Iran among other topics with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday, adding that the call went well.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store