logo
Education experts hail DF Malan ruling as victory for school

Education experts hail DF Malan ruling as victory for school

The Citizen11 hours ago

The SCA dismissed an appeal by four parents who challenged the school governing body's authority to rename DF Malan High School.
Education experts are celebrating the Supreme Court of Appeal's landmark ruling in the DF Malan High School case, describing it as a decisive victory that strengthens school governing bodies' authority to shed apartheid-era symbols and transform their institutional identities.
The judgment, passed down on 4 June, which dismissed an appeal seeking to prevent the school from changing its name to DF Akademie, has been praised by education specialists as a precedent-setting decision that empowers school communities while establishing clear guidelines for institutional transformation.
'The judgement strengthens the school governing bodies to have the autonomy they need to make decisions about renaming schools, as long as they follow a fair and consultative process. This ruling sets a precedent for other schools,' said education expert Hendricks Makatena.
Rautenbach & Others v The Governing Body of die Hoërskool DF Malan & Another (073/2024) [2025] ZASCA 78 (4 June 2025)
Today the Supreme Court of Appeal (the SCA) handed down judgment, dismissing an appeal against an order granted in the Western Cape Division of the High Court. pic.twitter.com/E8nuqkVuBT — Supreme Court of Appeal ZA (@SCA_ZA) June 4, 2025
Experts see broader implications for school governance
Professor Brahm Fleisch, another education expert, emphasised the judgment's significance in reinforcing democratic school governance at a time when there are concerns about legislative changes undermining governing body roles.
'I think that in many respects, it's an important judgement because it says that communities have a very significant say in shaping their own institutions, the values and the vision of the institution,' Fleisch said.
'I think this judgment essentially reminds us that South Africa continues to have a very significant piece of legislation which grants real decision-making power to school governing bodies,' he added.
Makatena noted that the Supreme Court's interpretation reveals greater autonomy than previously understood.
'SCA's interpretation of the Schools Act's provisions on governance suggests that school governing bodies have more autonomy than previously thought. The court's ruling that the governing body has the implied power to change the school's name empowers schools to take ownership of their decisions.'
ALSO READ: Hoërskool DF Malan wants a new, more inclusive name
Fleisch highlighted how the court's reliance on constitutional principles strengthened the foundation of the judgment.
The expert emphasised that the decision aligns with constitutional values of human dignity, equality, and freedom, making it consistent with the principle of 'an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality, and freedom'.
Process creates template for future cases
Education specialists see the ruling as establishing a clear roadmap for other schools considering similar transformations.
Fleisch explained that 'the judgement officially created a process and logic of reasoning should this issue occur in any other school… basically what the judgement does is it provides the rationale, and the overall logic that would need to be followed if another school wanted to change its name.'
Makatena predicted the judgment will influence how institutions approach change: 'The judgement may influence schools to approach renaming or revising symbols with caution, ensuring that they engage in comprehensive consultation processes and consider the impact on their communities. Schools may prioritise contextual understanding and stakeholder engagement when making decisions about their names and symbols.'
ALSO READ: 'Using k-word is illegal': Northern Cape teacher fired for racist outburst loses reinstatement battle
External facilitation model endorsed
The experts praised the use of independent facilitation in the DF Malan case, with Makatena noting that 'usually, external facilitators bring knowledge and skills to manage complex decision-making processes.'
He added that 'bringing in an external facilitator particularly facilitated that trusted by all parties is often away which potential disagreement can get resolved amicably.'
This approach, overseen by experienced mediator Di Jan Frederick Marais, included group discussions focused on the school's identity and core values, leading to the May 2021 decision that the original name conflicted with the school's Christian ethos and inclusivity policy.
Procedural fairness standards clarified
Addressing concerns about consultation processes, Makatena emphasised that 'the court's finding confirms that schools should prioritise transparency and fairness when making decisions that affect their communities.'
The Supreme Court found that minimum requirements under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act were met through detailed stakeholder invitations, unbiased facilitation, and broad community engagement.
The court's acceptance of the 'saturation point' approach, where consultation ended when no new perspectives emerged, provides guidance for future processes while ensuring comprehensive community input.
Message to educational institutions
Education experts believe the ruling sends a powerful message about institutional reflection and transformation.
'This judgement sends a message to schools and educators about the importance of reflecting on their institutional identities and values,' Makatena observed.
Fleisch described the name change as representing a careful balance between preservation and modernisation: 'The decision about the school name is an attempt on the part of the school governing body to preserve the legacy of the school and the memory and the communities reputation of school.
'The school was trying very hard to find a mechanism of preserving the community and belief and commitment to the school, but also to modernise the school name in a way that addresses some of the most egregious parts of the historical name of the school.'
ALSO READ: Education department clears the air on school calendar 'changes'
Impact on decolonisation discourse
The experts see the judgment as contributing positively to broader educational transformation efforts.
'The judgement contributes positively to the discourse about decolonisation,' Makatena concluded, while Fleisch noted that the decision reinforces the importance of schools being 'mindful of the context and changing context within school.'
DF Malan school case background
The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by four parents who challenged the school governing body's authority to rename DF Malan High School, which had borne the name of the apartheid architect since its establishment in 1954.
The court found that governing bodies possess implied power under the South African Schools Act to rename schools, and that the consultative process met all procedural requirements.
The ruling, delivered with costs including expenses for two counsel, establishes that school communities have the democratic authority to transform their institutional identities while following fair and comprehensive consultation processes.
READ NEXT: Department scrambles to fix curriculum chaos at Gauteng school after delayed start

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Education experts hail DF Malan ruling as victory for school
Education experts hail DF Malan ruling as victory for school

The Citizen

time11 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Education experts hail DF Malan ruling as victory for school

The SCA dismissed an appeal by four parents who challenged the school governing body's authority to rename DF Malan High School. Education experts are celebrating the Supreme Court of Appeal's landmark ruling in the DF Malan High School case, describing it as a decisive victory that strengthens school governing bodies' authority to shed apartheid-era symbols and transform their institutional identities. The judgment, passed down on 4 June, which dismissed an appeal seeking to prevent the school from changing its name to DF Akademie, has been praised by education specialists as a precedent-setting decision that empowers school communities while establishing clear guidelines for institutional transformation. 'The judgement strengthens the school governing bodies to have the autonomy they need to make decisions about renaming schools, as long as they follow a fair and consultative process. This ruling sets a precedent for other schools,' said education expert Hendricks Makatena. Rautenbach & Others v The Governing Body of die Hoërskool DF Malan & Another (073/2024) [2025] ZASCA 78 (4 June 2025) Today the Supreme Court of Appeal (the SCA) handed down judgment, dismissing an appeal against an order granted in the Western Cape Division of the High Court. — Supreme Court of Appeal ZA (@SCA_ZA) June 4, 2025 Experts see broader implications for school governance Professor Brahm Fleisch, another education expert, emphasised the judgment's significance in reinforcing democratic school governance at a time when there are concerns about legislative changes undermining governing body roles. 'I think that in many respects, it's an important judgement because it says that communities have a very significant say in shaping their own institutions, the values and the vision of the institution,' Fleisch said. 'I think this judgment essentially reminds us that South Africa continues to have a very significant piece of legislation which grants real decision-making power to school governing bodies,' he added. Makatena noted that the Supreme Court's interpretation reveals greater autonomy than previously understood. 'SCA's interpretation of the Schools Act's provisions on governance suggests that school governing bodies have more autonomy than previously thought. The court's ruling that the governing body has the implied power to change the school's name empowers schools to take ownership of their decisions.' ALSO READ: Hoërskool DF Malan wants a new, more inclusive name Fleisch highlighted how the court's reliance on constitutional principles strengthened the foundation of the judgment. The expert emphasised that the decision aligns with constitutional values of human dignity, equality, and freedom, making it consistent with the principle of 'an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality, and freedom'. Process creates template for future cases Education specialists see the ruling as establishing a clear roadmap for other schools considering similar transformations. Fleisch explained that 'the judgement officially created a process and logic of reasoning should this issue occur in any other school… basically what the judgement does is it provides the rationale, and the overall logic that would need to be followed if another school wanted to change its name.' Makatena predicted the judgment will influence how institutions approach change: 'The judgement may influence schools to approach renaming or revising symbols with caution, ensuring that they engage in comprehensive consultation processes and consider the impact on their communities. Schools may prioritise contextual understanding and stakeholder engagement when making decisions about their names and symbols.' ALSO READ: 'Using k-word is illegal': Northern Cape teacher fired for racist outburst loses reinstatement battle External facilitation model endorsed The experts praised the use of independent facilitation in the DF Malan case, with Makatena noting that 'usually, external facilitators bring knowledge and skills to manage complex decision-making processes.' He added that 'bringing in an external facilitator particularly facilitated that trusted by all parties is often away which potential disagreement can get resolved amicably.' This approach, overseen by experienced mediator Di Jan Frederick Marais, included group discussions focused on the school's identity and core values, leading to the May 2021 decision that the original name conflicted with the school's Christian ethos and inclusivity policy. Procedural fairness standards clarified Addressing concerns about consultation processes, Makatena emphasised that 'the court's finding confirms that schools should prioritise transparency and fairness when making decisions that affect their communities.' The Supreme Court found that minimum requirements under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act were met through detailed stakeholder invitations, unbiased facilitation, and broad community engagement. The court's acceptance of the 'saturation point' approach, where consultation ended when no new perspectives emerged, provides guidance for future processes while ensuring comprehensive community input. Message to educational institutions Education experts believe the ruling sends a powerful message about institutional reflection and transformation. 'This judgement sends a message to schools and educators about the importance of reflecting on their institutional identities and values,' Makatena observed. Fleisch described the name change as representing a careful balance between preservation and modernisation: 'The decision about the school name is an attempt on the part of the school governing body to preserve the legacy of the school and the memory and the communities reputation of school. 'The school was trying very hard to find a mechanism of preserving the community and belief and commitment to the school, but also to modernise the school name in a way that addresses some of the most egregious parts of the historical name of the school.' ALSO READ: Education department clears the air on school calendar 'changes' Impact on decolonisation discourse The experts see the judgment as contributing positively to broader educational transformation efforts. 'The judgement contributes positively to the discourse about decolonisation,' Makatena concluded, while Fleisch noted that the decision reinforces the importance of schools being 'mindful of the context and changing context within school.' DF Malan school case background The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by four parents who challenged the school governing body's authority to rename DF Malan High School, which had borne the name of the apartheid architect since its establishment in 1954. The court found that governing bodies possess implied power under the South African Schools Act to rename schools, and that the consultative process met all procedural requirements. The ruling, delivered with costs including expenses for two counsel, establishes that school communities have the democratic authority to transform their institutional identities while following fair and comprehensive consultation processes. READ NEXT: Department scrambles to fix curriculum chaos at Gauteng school after delayed start

Faction of Zulu royal family optimistic SCA will uphold ruling setting aside Ramaphosa's recognition of Misuzulu as king
Faction of Zulu royal family optimistic SCA will uphold ruling setting aside Ramaphosa's recognition of Misuzulu as king

Eyewitness News

time16 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Faction of Zulu royal family optimistic SCA will uphold ruling setting aside Ramaphosa's recognition of Misuzulu as king

JOHANNESBURG - A faction of the AmaZulu royal family supporting Prince Simakade says it's optimistic that the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) will uphold a ruling that could set into motion the dethroning of King Misuzulu kaZwelithini. Tensions in the royal house reached breaking point after King Misuzulu was crowned as the Zulu monarch following the passing of his father, King Zwelithini and his mother, Queen Regent Mantfombi, in 2021. Prince Simakade, who is King Misuzulu's half-brother, believes he is the rightful heir to the throne, claiming customary protocols were ignored. In December 2023, the High Court in Pretoria set aside President Cyril Ramaphosa's recognition of King Misuzulu as king of the Zulu nation. Less than two weeks ago, the SCA reserved judgment in the appeal over the legitimacy of the kingship. Speaking on the matter on 702's Nguni programme, Siyaxoxa ku-702 , Prince Thokozani Zulu weighed in on what he believes needs to follow. 'We cannot take this matter back to the family for a resolution because there's a court ruling which says the Zulu family would not be able to mediate on the matter without intervention. That way, the President must step in and do what the law requires, by appointing a committee to probe and report back on the allegations that the identification process of Misuzulu was not done in terms of customary laws and customs.' ALSO READ:

‘Shielded from arrest': What Supreme Court of Appeal ruling means for 180,000 Zimbabweans in South Africa
‘Shielded from arrest': What Supreme Court of Appeal ruling means for 180,000 Zimbabweans in South Africa

IOL News

time16 hours ago

  • IOL News

‘Shielded from arrest': What Supreme Court of Appeal ruling means for 180,000 Zimbabweans in South Africa

Scores of Zimbabweans during a picket at the Union Buildings in Pretoria. Image: Jonisayi Maromo/IOL The Supreme Court of Appeal has dismissed with costs the Department of Home Affairs' attempt to overturn an interim interdict, previously granted in favour of the Zimbabwe Immigration Federation, protecting nearly 200,000 Zimbabwean Exemption Permit (ZEP) holders against arrest and deportation. After winning Part A of the court wrangle, the federation will be heading back to the court, for Part B, to argue before court that the Department of Home Affairs overreached in 2021, when the then home affairs minister Aaron Motsoaledi announced the termination of the ZEP. The special permit dispensation has allowed 180,000 Zimbabwean nationals to live and work in South Africa since 2009. In the federation's view, the jurisdiction to terminate the ZEP lies with Parliament, not the minister. IOL had an interview with Vindren Magadzire, director of the Zimbabwe Immigration Federation who said his organisation's case revolves around the termination of the ZEP programme by the minister of home affairs. Vindren Magadzire, director of the Zimbabwe Immigration Federation Image: Supplied Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. 'The programme allowed approximately 180,000 Zimbabweans to live and work in South Africa. In 2021, the minister of home affairs announced plans to terminate the ZEP permits, sparking legal actions from the Zimbabwe Immigration Federation,' Magadzire told IOL. 'The Zimbabwe Immigration Federation was inspired to go through courts due to the South African minister of home affairs' decision to terminate the permits. The decision would have significant implications for approximately 180,000 Zimbabweans living and working in South Africa under the ZEP permit program.' Magadzire said his organisation is requesting the superior court to declare the termination of the ZEP permits unlawful, setting aside the termination decision, and protecting permit holders rights. In Magadzire's view, a lasting solution would be granting the ZEP holders permanent residence status in South Africa. 'The latest development in the court case is that the Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed the minister of home affairs appeal. This decision upholds a Johannesburg High Court interdict that shields approximately 180,000 ZEP holders from arrest and deportation,' said Magadzire. Last year, IOL reported that the High Court in Pretoria heard arguments from the Helen Suzman Foundation to enforce the court's order that the ZEP remains valid, while the minister of home affairs conducts a fair and rational inquiry into the impact of its termination. The foundation turned to court in a bid to give ZEP holders a lifeline.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store