China urges caution, speed on assisted-driving technology
BEIJING : China's automakers are outpacing foreign rivals in their push for assisted-driving technology, eager to woo motorists hungry for rapid innovation.
Yet, Beijing has a nuanced message for its rising stars: move fast – but be careful.
Regulators this week have been finalising new safety rules for driver-assistance systems as Beijing sharpens scrutiny of the technology following an accident involving a Xiaomi SU7 sedan in March.
That incident killed three occupants when their car crashed seconds after the driver took control from the assisted-driving system.
While Chinese officials want to prevent carmakers from overselling the capabilities of such systems, they are also threading the needle between innovation and safety to ensure their automakers don't lose out to US and European rivals.
Setting clear regulations for assisted-driving tech without slowing its advancement could give China's industry an edge over global competitors, analysts say.
This approach is in stark contrast to the US market, where companies pursuing autonomous cars have expressed frustration that the government has not implemented a regulatory system to validate and test the technology.
Markus Muessig, auto industry lead at Accenture Greater China, said China's regulators and industries have long followed former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping's 'feel the stones to cross the river' philosophy.
The expression means to steadily explore new, uncertain technologies, which 'has proven very successful for this market,' he said.
Current Chinese regulations allow systems that automatically steer, brake and accelerate under certain conditions while requiring the driver to stay engaged.
For that reason, marketing terms such as 'smart' and 'autonomous' are banned.
The new rules will focus on hardware and software designs that monitor a driver's state of awareness and their capacity to take control in time.
To do this, regulators enlisted Chinese automaker Dongfeng and tech giant Huawei to help draft new rules and have sought public input over a month-long period, ending Friday.
At the same time, government officials are pressing Chinese automakers to rapidly deploy even more-advanced systems, known as Level 3 assisted-driving, which allow drivers to take their eyes off the road in certain situations.
Level 3 is the midway point on the industry's autonomous-driving scale, from basic features like cruise control at Level 1, to self-driving capability under all conditions at Level 5.
The Chinese government had tapped state-owned Changan to be the first automaker to begin Level 3 validation tests in April, but the plan was paused after the Xiaomi crash, said a source familiar with the regulatory planning process.
'Beijing still hopes to resume such tests this year and approve the country's first Level 3 car in 2026,' the source said.
China's industry of information technology ministry and Changan did not respond to requests for comment.
Xiaomi has said it is cooperating with a police investigation into the accident.
Driver-assistance systems are seen by industry analysts as the next big battleground in China's hyper-competitive car market.
Over the past decade, Level 2 systems have proliferated in China, including Tesla's full self driving system, as well as the Xiaomi feature involved in the March crash.
The capability ranges from basic vehicle following on highways to handling most tasks on busy urban roads, under driver supervision.
Automakers have pushed down hardware costs to levels that allow them to offer Level 2 features at little or no extra cost.
China's No 1 automaker BYD has rolled out its 'God's Eye' assisted-driving software for free across its entire product line-up.
More than 60% of new cars sold in China this year will have Level 2 features, according to an estimate from research firm Canalys.
Global race
In its push for assisted-driving technology, and ultimately fully self-driving cars, Beijing is seeking to help homegrown carmakers just as it supported China's rapid rise to become the world's electric-car juggernaut.
Last year, China's government lined up nine automakers for public tests to advance the adoption of self-driving cars.
In their Level 3 push, Chinese regulators also are upping the regulatory ante by holding automakers and parts suppliers liable if their systems fail and cause an accident.
Legislation passed in Britain last year adopted a similar approach to liability.
At the Shanghai auto show in April, several companies touted progress toward rolling out vehicles with Level 3 capability.
Tech giant Huawei said it is ready to introduce a Level 3 system for highways after simulated testing of more than 600 million km.
It showed a video of drivers and passengers singing karaoke as the car drove itself.
Geely's Zeekr brand debuted the luxury SUV 9X, featuring Level 3 software the automaker said is ready for mass production in the third quarter if regulations allow. Zeekr is also applying to be part of a second batch of automakers to undergo government Level 3 validation tests.
Meanwhile, traditional automakers at the Shanghai auto show such as Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen said they were pushing their most advanced assisted-driving features but stopped short of crossing the Level 3 liability line.
Getting there is a challenge as they are already at a cost disadvantage against their Chinese rivals, analysts say.
Mercedes-Benz CTO Markus Schaefer told Reuters that while chip and computing power prices have fallen, the additional safety required for Level 3 will cost much more.
'It's a moving target,' Schaefer said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
China urged to issue 30 trillion yuan in bonds to tackle local debt crisis
China should issue 30 trillion yuan (US$4.2 trillion) in treasury bonds to swap local governments' hidden liabilities to re-energise growth momentum and cut off financial risks at their root, a Beijing-based think tank has proposed. Such a move, combined with a few trillion yuan worth of additional bonds to shore up the property market, boost consumption and remove excessive industrial capacity, would be a strong step toward resolving China's local-level debt and real estate crises once and for all, according to a report released by Tsinghua University's Academic Centre for Chinese Economic Practice and Thinking (Accept). 'The economy is beginning to show signs of stabilisation, but significant risks still remain beneath the surface,' Liu Peilin, the centre's chief research fellow, said while discussing the report at a macroeconomic forum hosted by the institute on Wednesday. 'At the root of the problem is high local government debt, which has disrupted economic and financial operations. 'What's needed is a comprehensive policy package – more specifically, a package of more proactive fiscal measures.' China rolled out a 12 trillion yuan (US$1.67 trillion) debt swap in late 2024 – a move that significantly eased the repayment pressure on local authorities, as the Ministry of Finance had identified a total of 14.3 trillion yuan in local government hidden debts by the end of 2023. However, there are still tens of trillions of yuan worth of local-level debt unidentified by the ministry as government liabilities, but they remain a ticking debt bomb because they are owed by state-owned enterprises, local financing vehicles or exist in other forms. According to Liu, the large-scale debt-swap plan would not raise China's overall leverage ratio, as the debt is already on the books. It would simply involve the central government issuing bonds to assume the liabilities from local governments, effectively shifting the debt burden to a different entity. Meanwhile, the move would also allow high-cost debt to be replaced with lower-interest bonds, which could help revive economic activity. Specifically, the report proposed issuing 4 trillion yuan in treasury bonds to clear unsold housing inventory by converting it into affordable housing, as well as trillion-yuan bonds to help absorb industrial overcapacity and to boost domestic consumption. 'If the 4 trillion yuan treasury bonds are issued to buy half of the real estate inventory and convert it into affordable housing for migrant workers, it would effectively revitalise the property market,' Li Daokui, director of Accept and a former adviser to China's central bank, said at the same forum. China's economy has maintained an upwards momentum in 2025, with GDP growing by 5.4 per cent in the first quarter. Despite US tariff hikes, China's export growth stood at 7.2 per cent during the January-May period. However, with a weak job market, particularly for the youngest workers, as well as a staggering real estate sector, deflationary pressures and declining manufacturing profits due to intense competition, economists at the forum warned that the economy still faces significant long-term risks. The fiscal capabilities of provincial and municipal governments, in the face of falling land-sale revenue and rising expenditure responsibilities, remain a concern, and the Tsinghua centre called for a change in the financing model. Since local governments typically borrow funds for long-term infrastructure projects and then face shorter repayment terms, this is especially challenging for them, because land-sale income and tax revenue have sharply declined amid the prolonged property woes. As a result, they have to collect extra fees and increase non-tax revenues to maintain operations and pay off the debt. Such a pattern – in which local governments face short-term pressure to repay public debt – should shift to a 'public finance' model, where safe and liquid instruments such as treasury bonds are used to fund infrastructure projects, Accept director Li said. 'Treasury bonds are even safer than holding cash, and this is exactly what China's financial system needs most,' Li added. 'Yet, the volume of government bonds is far from sufficient, accounting for just over 25 per cent of GDP.' He said China should embrace the concept of 'public finance' and move away from the mindset of managing the national accounts like a cash register: i.e. treating each transaction in isolation, trying to cover debts in the short term, and rushing to repay as soon as funds are needed. 'Issuing ultra-long-term treasury bonds allows us to roll over the debt when it matures,' Li said. 'This is how the state should manage its accounts and long-term investments, especially in infrastructure – through financial instruments.' - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
Free Malaysia Today
4 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
BRICS nations to denounce Trump tariffs
Diplomats from key emerging countries are finalising a joint statement criticising global economic uncertainty. (AFP pic) RIO DE JANEIRO : BRICS leaders meeting in Rio de Janeiro from Sunday are expected to decry Donald Trump's hardline trade policies but are struggling to bridge divides over crises roiling the Middle East. Emerging nations representing about half the world's population and 40% of global economic output are set to unite over what they see as unfair US import tariffs, according to sources familiar with summit negotiations. Since coming to office in January, Trump has threatened allies and rivals alike with a slew of punitive tariffs. His latest salvo comes in the form of letters due to be sent starting Friday informing trading partners of new tariff rates expected next week on July 9. Diplomats from 11 emerging nations, including Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, have been busy drafting a statement condemning the economic uncertainty. Any final summit declaration is not expected to mention the US or its president by name. But it is expected to be a clear political shot directed at Washington. 'We're anticipating a summit with a cautious tone: it will be difficult to mention the US by name in the final declaration,' Marta Fernandez, director of the BRICS Policy Center at Rio's Pontifical Catholic University said. This is particularly the case for China, which has only recently negotiated with the US to lower steep tit-for-tat levies. 'This doesn't seem to be the right time to provoke further friction' between the world's two leading economies, Fernandez said. Xi no show Conceived two decades ago as a forum for fast-growing economies, the BRICS have come to be seen as a Chinese-driven counterbalance to Western power. But the summit's political punch will be depleted by the absence of China's Xi Jinping, who is skipping the annual meeting for the first time in his 12 years as president. 'I expect there will be speculation about the reasons for Xi's absence,' said Ryan Hass, a former China director at the US National Security Council who is now with the Brookings Institution think tank. 'The simplest explanation may hold the most explanatory power. Xi recently hosted Lula in Beijing,' said Hass. The Chinese leader will not be the only notable absentee. War crime-indicted Russian President Vladimir Putin is also opting to stay aaway but will participate via video link, according to the Kremlin. Hass said Putin's non-attendance and the fact that India's prime minister will be a guest of hhonourin Brazil could also be factors in Xi's absence. 'Xi does not want to appear upstaged by Modi,' who will receive a state lunch, he said. 'I expect Xi's decision to delegate attendance to Premier Li (Qiang) rests amidst these factors.' Still, the Xi no-show is a blow to host President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who wants Brazil to play a bigger role on the world stage. In the year to November 2025, Brazil will have hosted a G20 summit, a BRICS summit and COP30 international climate talks, all before heading into fiercely contested presidential elections next year, in which he is expected to run. Middle path Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, whose nation is still reeling from a 12-day conflict with Israel, is also skipping the meeting. A source familiar with the negotiations said the BRICS countries were still in disagreement over how to respond to the wars in Gaza and between Iran and Israel. Iranian negotiators are pushing for a tougher collective stance that goes beyond referencing the need for the creation of a Palestinian state and for disputes to be resolved peacefully. Artificial intelligence and health will also be on the agenda at the summit. Original members of the bloc Brazil, Russia, India, and China have been joined by South Africa and, more recently, by Saudi Arabia, Iran, the UAE, Egypt, Ethiopia and Indonesia. Analysts say that it has given the grouping more potential international punch. But it has also opened many new fault lines. Brazil hopes that countries can take a common stand at the summit, including on the most sensitive issues. 'BRICS (countries), throughout their history, have managed to speak with one voice on major international issues, and there's no reason why that shouldn't be the case this time on the subject of the Middle East,' Brazil's Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira told AFP.
Free Malaysia Today
4 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump says US will start talks with China on TikTok deal this week
The deadline for ByteDance to divest TikTok's US assets was pushed to September 17 by Donald Trump last month. (AP pic) WASHINGTON : US President Donald Trump said on Friday he will start talking to China on Monday or Tuesday about a possible TikTok deal. He said the US 'pretty much' has a deal on the sale of the TikTok short-video app. 'I think we're gonna start Monday or Tuesday…talking to China, perhaps President Xi or one of his representatives, but we would we pretty much have a deal,' Trump told reporters on Air Force One. Last month, Trump extended to September 17 a deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest the US assets of TikTok. A deal had been in the works this spring to spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and -operated by US investors, but it was put on hold after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese goods. Trump said the US will probably have to get a deal approved by China. When asked how confident he was that China would agree to a deal, he said, 'I'm not confident, but I think so. President Xi and I have a great relationship, and I think it's good for them. I think the deal is good for China and it's good for us.'
