logo
Tougher laws on unlicensed drivers to be considered after Sky News report

Tougher laws on unlicensed drivers to be considered after Sky News report

Sky News04-02-2025

Why you can trust Sky News
The government will look to introduce tougher laws on unlicensed drivers as part of its forthcoming road safety strategy, Sky News understands.
It comes after Sky News reported on the story of Harry Parker, who was just 14-years-old when he was hit and killed by a car on his way to his Swindon school in November 2022.
The driver of the car did not have a licence, insurance, or stop at the scene.
But two years after Harry's death, the Crown Prosecution Service told his parents it was dropping the charges.
It said: "We examined this case in great detail - including obtaining the advice of a forensic collision expert - and it has become clear that there is not enough evidence to demonstrate that this collision could reasonably have been avoided, and therefore that the driving was careless."
His parents' local MP, Will Stone, received permission from the Commons on Tuesday to introduce the Road Traffic (unlicensed drivers) Bill, that he referred to in his speech in the chamber as the "Harry Parker Bill".
The bill would make causing death while driving without a licence or insurance a specific criminal offence after previous legislation became effectively redundant.
Labour MP Mr Stone made a speech setting out the case for changing the law in parliament on Tuesday as part of a Ten Minute Rule Bill - a motion to seek MPs' permission to introduce a bill to make the case for a new law.
"The law in its current form is failing," he said. "A person who does not hold a valid license has no business being behind the wheel of a car. And when they do so, they put lives at risk.
"I cannot bring back Harry, nor can I give Adam and Kelly the justice that they deserve. No legislation, no speech, no court ruling will ever be able to ease their pain. What we must do is ensure that no other family has to endure what they have been through.
"The Harry Parker Bill seeks to close the dangerous gaps in our legal system and impose real world consequences on those who choose to drive without a license. Those who choose to drive without a valid license will be deemed careless."
MPs voted to progress the bill to be debated as part of the next stage of the parliamentary process.
It is rare for a backbench Ten Minute Rule Bill to become legislation. But Sky News now understands the government is going to adopt the Harry Parker Bill as part of its forthcoming new Road Safety Strategy.
Harry's parents, Adam and Kelly Parker, travelled to Westminster to watch the Ten Minute Rule Bill from the public gallery.
"It was a bit surreal," said Mr Parker. "When he actually read it out I just started crying, I welled up. It made it very, very real, how far we're actually taking this, and it showed that people are actually really listening. It's comforting."
There is no current national data on the number of unlicensed drivers, though past research by the Department for Transport estimated they commit 9.3% - or nearly 1 in 10 - of all motoring offences. It was thought there could be as many as 470,000 on the roads.
In 2006, the Labour government introduced a new offence of causing death while driving without a licence or insurance, punishable by up to two years in prison.
But in 2013 the Supreme Court ruled that, due to the way the legislation was worded, prosecutors still had to prove the driving was at fault - thus rendering the new law fairly redundant, as a driver could then be charged by careless or dangerous driving.
The judges were concerned about otherwise faultless unlicensed drivers being charged if a drunk pedestrian fell into the road in front of them, or if someone attempted suicide by jumping out into the road.
The Department of Transport said: "Every death on our roads is a tragedy and our thoughts remain with the family and friends of Harry Parker.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Owner of 'pocket bully' which mauled boy, five, blames child for attack
Owner of 'pocket bully' which mauled boy, five, blames child for attack

Metro

time4 hours ago

  • Metro

Owner of 'pocket bully' which mauled boy, five, blames child for attack

A five-year-old boy who was left in hospital after being attacked by a 'pocket bully' has been told it was his fault. Four-year-old Antonio Quinn needed a three-hour operation to have his face stitched back together after the vicious attack left him covered in blood. But the dog's owner has now blamed the child for the incident, while insisting his 'teddy bear' pet, named Harry, was just defending his home. Antonio's mother Amanda Holmes, 34, said her son was lucky to be alive, but dog owner Aaron Eccles said the child shouldn't have come into his home and that the attack was a 'genuine mistake'. Mr Eccles said that dogs don't differentiate between an adult and child when responding to who they think is a burglar, adding that Harry had even given Antonio a 'warning bite'. Harry was later seized along with a Staffordshire bull terrier by 20 officers who arrived at the property in Oswaldthwistle, Lancashire. Mr Eccles accused police of antagonising his dog by using pepper spray on him, MailOnline reports. The dog owner said he declined an offer from officers to have his pets euthanised and was now awaiting the results of an assessment which will determine whether they are safe to be returned home. Antonio was reportedly playing outside with Mr Eccles' partner's son and was going in to get a drink when he was attacked by the dog. He was wounded on the chin, cheeks and thigh before a neighbour's intervention stopped the incident from further escalating. The child was then hurried to Royal Manchester Children's Hospital for treatment. Ms Holmes said the scene was 'like something out of a horror film', but that, despite enduring a lot of pain, Antonio was doing well. A spokesperson for Lancashire Police said: 'We were called at shortly after 1.30pm on May 26 following reports that a child had been bitten by a dog on Thwaites Road, Oswaldtwistle. 'The child, a four-year-old boy, was taken to hospital with injuries to his leg and face. Thankfully, those injuries are not life threatening. 'Two dogs have been seized by police – a Staffordshire Bull Terrier type and a Pocket Bully Type and the dog owner has been identified and will be spoken to in due course. More Trending 'We know this may be concerning to hear about, but we want to reassure you that enquiries are ongoing into the incident, and we are asking for your help to assist those enquiries. 'We are particularly interested in viewing any CCTV footage of the area that may have captured the incident.' Anyone with footage or information should call 101 quoting log 0603 of May 26. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Mum pleads for missing schoolgirl, 13, to 'come home safe' MORE: Urgent search for two girls, 13 and 14, last seen at leisure centre MORE: The 'eclectic' suburb with homes £63,000 cheaper than the UK average

Poll shows voters have huge housing demand amid 'charter for greed' warning
Poll shows voters have huge housing demand amid 'charter for greed' warning

Daily Mirror

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Poll shows voters have huge housing demand amid 'charter for greed' warning

Polling by YouGov found people are three times more likely to want the Government to build more social housing than encouraging developers to build more private homes Voters are three times more likely to want the Government to build more social housing than encouraging developers to build private homes, new polling shows. Figures show 58% want ministers to set a target for the amount of social housing included in plans to build 1.5million homes by 2029. According to polling by YouGov data, 48% of the public say that the government should focus on building more social homes. Just 14% said the government should encourage developers to build more private homes. ‌ It comes as the government's Planning and Infrastructure Bill returns to Parliament for its third reading this week. Green MP Ellie Chowns told The Mirror that without an explicit social housing commitment, the Bill is a "charter for developers' greed". ‌ She said: 'A place to call home is the foundation of a good life. But right now a secure home is out of reach for too many people – rents are spiralling, families are struggling to afford a place to live, and over a million people are stuck on housing waiting lists. "But instead of tackling the crisis head-on by building the social housing we need, this government is writing a charter for developers' greed, giving them carte blanche to bulldoze over communities and nature in order to build luxury homes only the richest can afford. "As a result, big developers will be able to line their pockets even further while ordinary people are locked out of affording a decent home." The landmark bill, put forward in March, will set out how the delivery process for critical infrastructure will be streamlined. Deputy PM Angela Rayner said at the time: "We need to reform the system to ensure it is sensible and balanced, and does not create unintended delays - putting a hold on people's lives and harming our efforts to build the homes people desperately need.' A spokesman from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) said: 'The government inherited an unprecedented housing crisis, but we will get Britain building again and deliver the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation. ‌ 'Through our Plan for Change, we are providing an £800 million top up to the Affordable Homes Programme and a £2 billion down payment on further funding, while our landmark Planning and Infrastructure Bill will drive housebuilding to meet our stretching target of 1.5 million homes.' :: YouGov polled 2,241 adults between 2 and 3 :: 'This isn't how we should be fixing the housing crisis' By Ellie Chowns, Green MP for North Herefordshire ‌ A place to call home is the foundation of a good life. But across the country, for too many people, just keeping a roof over their heads is a struggle. This Labour government came into power promising to fix this and finally tackle the housing crisis. But instead, they're writing legislation that would give big developers a blank cheque to build pretty much whatever they want, wherever they want – no matter the cost to nature, and with no guarantee that new homes will be affordable. We know what the result will be: more luxury housing in out-of-town developments that only the richest can afford, while everyone else is still priced out of home ownership, falling behind on rent, or stuck on housing waiting lists. ‌ This isn't what the public want. On the contrary: Brits are three times more likely to want the government to focus on building social housing, than on encouraging developers to build private homes. And it's not what this country deserves. Everyone has the right to a warm, safe, affordable home - and it's the government's duty to deliver it. That's why I'm demanding that the government use the Planning and Infrastructure Bill to restore Britain's social housing - by setting targets for building homes for social rent, and ensuring these homes are zero carbon and fit for the future. It's time to ask Ministers: will you build the homes we need, or sell us out to developers' greed?

UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle
UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle

North Wales Chronicle

time8 hours ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle

Technology Secretary Peter Kyle indicated the UK would offer a 'fulsome response' to any concerns raised by allies amid suggestions that US opposition could undermine transatlantic trade negotiations. Mr Kyle sought to reassure the public that the Government deals with similar 'infrastructure issues' relating to embassies 'all the time'. 'These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process,' he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme. He added: 'These are the issues that we talk about as two countries all the time… we're in the Five Eyes agreement, America and Britain share intelligence… If people raise security issues even though it relates to planning, then I'm sure we will have a fulsome response for them. 'But look, the key thing is these are issues which are quite routinised in the way that we deal with the security of our country.' A senior US official had told the Sunday Times: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' The matter is believed to have been discussed during US-UK trade talks, with diplomats saying the Trump administration would have reservations about intelligence sharing with the UK if the building went ahead. More than a thousand demonstrators gathered earlier this year for a rally against the proposed Chinese 'super-embassy' because of concerns about its potential proximity to Canary Wharf and the City of London. The redevelopment plans at the former site of the Royal Mint were 'called in' last year, which means the Government will make the final decision following a report from the Planning Inspectorate. The plan was initially refused by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store