Team Ineos release statement in response to Paul Kimmage article in Sunday Independent
A statement from the team was released on Thursday night.
'Ineos Grenadiers Cycling Team is aware of recent media allegations relating to the 2012 season and a member of its staff,' it read.
'These allegations have not to date been presented to the team by any appropriate authority, however the team has made a formal request to the International Testing Agency (ITA) to request any information it considers relevant. The team reiterates its policy of zero tolerance to any breach of the applicable WADA codes, historic or current.'
The statement failed to address any of the key issues raised in the Sunday Independent story which followed on from an investigative television documentary by German broadcasters ARD that linked a Team Ineos staff member with Dr Schmidt, based on German Court documents, who was sent to prison for five years for his part in the blood-doping investigation, Operation Aderlass.
ARD could not name the Ineos staff member due to legal and privacy laws in Germany but he was identified as Rozman in the Sunday Independent last week. The Slovenia carer, or masseur, has been with the team since 2011, when it was known as Team Sky, and had been working at this year's Tour de France.
The recent reporting has revealed details that were part of Schmidt's 2020 criminal trial, including a number of text message exchanges between Schmidt and Rozman.
Brailsford returned to Team Ineos before this year's Tour de France after stepping back from his role with Manchester United. Brailsford led the team through their most successful period during which they won seven Tours in eight years, starting with Bradley Wiggins in 2012.
Rozman is believed to have worked with four-time Tour de France winner Chris Froome.
No Team Sky/Ineos rider has been sanction or named in the investigation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
10 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump sues Wall Street Journal and Murdoch over reporting on Epstein ties
President Donald Trump filed a lawsuit on Friday against The Wall Street Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch, a day after the newspaper published a story reporting on ties to wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Miami. It seeks at least 10 billion dollars (£7.4 billion) in damages. Mr Trump promised a lawsuit after the newspaper described a sexually suggestive letter that the newspaper says bore Mr Trump's name and was included in a 2003 album for Epstein's 50th birthday. The president denied writing the letter, calling the story 'false, malicious, and defamatory'. Jeffrey Epstein in 2017 (New York State Sex Offender Registry via AP) The letter was reportedly collected by disgraced British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell as part of a birthday album for Epstein years before he was first arrested in 2006 and subsequently had a falling-out with Mr Trump. The letter bearing Mr Trump's name includes text framed by the outline of what appears to be a hand-drawn naked woman and ends with, 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret,' according to the newspaper. The outlet described the contents of the letter but did not publish a photo showing it entirely or provide details on how it came to learn about it. It comes after the US Justice Department asked a federal court to unseal grand jury transcripts in Epstein's case at the direction of Mr Trump amid a firestorm over the administration's handling of records related to the case. Deputy attorney general Todd Blanche filed motions urging the court to unseal the Epstein transcripts as well as those in the case against Maxwell, who was convicted of luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein. Epstein killed himself in 2019 shortly after his arrest while awaiting trial. The Justice Department's announcement that it would not be making public any more Epstein files enraged parts of Mr Trump's base, in part because members of his own administration had hyped the expected release and stoked conspiracies around the well-connected financier. Activists put up a poster showing President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein near the US Embassy in London (AP/Thomas Krych) The Justice Department said in the court filings that it will work with prosecutors in New York to make appropriate redactions of victim-related information and other personally identifying information before transcripts are released. 'Transparency in this process will not be at the expense of our obligation under the law to protect victims,' Mr Blanche wrote. But despite the new push to release the grand jury transcripts, the administration has not announced plans to reverse course and release other evidence in its possession. Attorney general Pam Bondi had hyped the release of additional materials after the initial Epstein files disclosure in February sparked outrage because it contained no new revelations. A judge would have to approve the release of the grand jury transcripts, and it is likely to be a lengthy process to decide what can become public and to make redactions to protect sensitive witness and victim information. The records would show testimony from witnesses and other evidence presented by the prosecution during the secret grand jury proceedings, when a panel decides whether there is enough evidence to bring an indictment, or a formal criminal charge.
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: All set for a mesmerising 48 hours of sport
Anyone suffering from bloat after watching soccer's Club World Cup and its mind-boggling closing ceremony can return to reality this weekend with today and tomorrow competing to become, in the words of that old Andy Williams/Johnny Mathis standard, 'the most wonderful time of the year'. This morning the British & Irish Lions — with more than half the players from Ireland — will line up against the Wallabies at Brisbane's Suncorp Stadium in Queensland. While the Lions as a sporting concept is not to everyone's taste — one commentator in this newspaper, iconoclastic tongue firmly in cheek perhaps, recently described it as 'utterly idiotic' — there are more reasons to enjoy than dislike them. Certainly, they have a cachet, a French word, which is perhaps why la belle France, a shrewd judge of the oval ball game, is keen to secure regular British and Irish Lions tours. There cannot, given the current unpredictability of political circumstances and the future of the island of Ireland, be anything harmful in witnessing five nations pursuing a common purpose with the emphasis on unity rather than division. While we take an understandable pride in providing the playing and coaching backbone of this current tour party, we must beware hubris. Another nation was once more powerful than our own. But Wales have fallen so far from the days of Barry John, Gareth Edwards, and JPR Williams that it has not a single representative in today's Lions selection, the first time this has happened in 129 years. As serendipity would have it, there is another fabled Irish rugby name at one of this weekend's great sporting occasions — the 153rd Open golf championship at Royal Portrush — where Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry are among those competing for the Claret Jug (almost), confident that Donald Trump won't pitch up tomorrow to take it out of their hands. Among the marshals at the Co Antrim course is 82-year-old Mike Gibson, for many discerning judges one of the greatest rugby players of all time. The Tour de France, meanwhile, rolls on through the weekend until July 27. Ben Healy thrilled us by taking the yellow jersey on stage 11 of the iconic race, the first Irishman to wear the maillot jaune since Stephen Roche in 1987. Healy's parents hail originally from Cork and Waterford and moved to London more than 60 years ago. For many though, all these events will form but an amuse-bouche to Sunday's All-Ireland senior hurling championship final when Cork face Tipperary for the supreme honour for the first time in history. The Rebels will be seeking their first All-Ireland for 20 years while Tipp were last victorious in 2019 when they roundly defeated Kilkenny. While we are blessed with a mesmerising 48 hours of sport in which Irish interests are to the fore, it is correct to say the main attraction will be at Croke Park for an occasion which is truly unique. Let us hope for a fast and robust game which will provide enough talking points to distract us, and keep us entertained, for months to come. An act that may change the law In Ireland, we like to think we know a thing or two about 21st century acting, an opinion buttressed by our candidates for the 2025 Emmy awards to be presented in Los Angeles in September. But well merited as our shortlisted hopefuls are — Colin Farrell, Sharon Horgan, and Ruth Negga for their roles in The Penguin, Bad Sisters, and Presumed Innocent, respectively, — none of them is as eye-catching as the nomination of a young man who was unknown before March. Even more remarkable, the character of Jamie Miller, who provided hundreds of millions of viewers across the world with a powerful insight into the dangerously insidious effect that internet-driven 'incel' culture can have on young boys, was performed by someone who had never acted previously. Owen Cooper, a Liverpool-supporting 14-year-old from Warrington in Lancashire, was chosen to play a schoolboy arrested for murder in the Netflix series Adolescence despite no previous experience on stage and possessing none of the 'nepo baby' advantages which are now commonplace in many showbiz breakthroughs. His mother is a carer; his father works in IT, and he is the youngest of three brothers. His performance was remarkable in that it utilised two difficult skills of stagecraft — shooting episodes in one continuous take and improvisation. It accelerated a worldwide debate about social media and how parents manage that issue in their families. The series writer, Jack Thorne, said smartphones should be considered as dangerous as cigarettes, and banned until the age of 16. Restrictions in their use of varying degrees of severity are being considered across Irish schools. Cooper faces stiff competition for his award. He's up against Javier Bardem and Ashley Walters in his category. But his future seems secure. He's set to play young Heathcliff in a Wuthering Heights prequel. Rather less certainty attaches to whether society has yet formulated the correct responses to corrosive technology foreshortening the timeline of childhood. That will be an even more important act. What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Data calamity will stoke conspiracy theories It may be tempting to regard what is taking place next door in the UK, with its calamitous leak of the names of Afghan allies and collaborators to the hard-eyed and flint-hearted Taliban, as a matter of academic interest, one more example of the 2025 truism that you can't trust people nor technology. Unfortunately, because we are the nearest neighbour with shared borders and an unresolved debate to be pursued on the judicial implications of eventual reunification, this is a serious matter for Ireland and it behoves us to take an acute interest in the dubious legal practices of two successive British governments. For more than 600 days under the stewardship of two prime ministers — Rishi Sunak of the Conservatives and Keir Starmer of Labour — Whitehall has maintained a 'super-injunction', one of the most draconian legal instruments available to the courts, preventing the discussion of any information relating to what is arguably the worst data breach in the history of any government. A spreadsheet containing the names of some 25,000 Afghan soldiers, government workers and their family member,s and the identities of British special forces personnel and spies was circulated on email, with excerpts posted on social media platforms between February 2022 and August 2023. In September 2023 the ministry of defence gained an injunction to prevent dissemination of this fact. And not any old common or garden injunction of the kind normally sought by feckless footballers and bullying corporations attempting to avoid embarrassment. It was far more sinister. It was, said a judge, the 'first contra mundum super-injunction ever granted'. That Latin phrase meaning 'against the whole world' indicates its scope. Instead of being applied to a named individual or news organisation, anyone with knowledge of the leak was banned from talking about it under threat of imprisonment. Even reference to the court case itself was verboten. This constraint covered up the fact Britain was relocating thousands of Afghans in a programme, estimated by its current defence secretary John Healey to cost €8.2bn, without recourse to parliament or to media scrutiny. That sum goes some way to explain what Labour described as a €25bn 'black hole' in public finances when it assumed power. Many might agree with the views of the high court judge, Justice Chamberlain, who asked 'am I going bonkers' when he discovered the extent of the cover-up and it is impossible to underestimate the political consequences when a population which is already hugely disappointed with migration policy assimilates the levels of misdirection from government ministers supported by their senior law officers. This is the nearest jurisdiction to us, and many of its legal processes overlap with ours. We must be cognisant of the way super-injunctions are used. Last year the Unionist MP and barrister Jim Allister was told, in answer to an Assembly question, that seven such super-injunctions were 'live' in the North. Calculated lack of transparency adds fuel to conspiracy theories which will ultimately undermine democracy. It is already doing so. Read More Irish Examiner view: CAP remains key to the entire rural economy
The Irish Sun
3 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
What are Daniel Dubois' career earnings and what is his boxing record before Usyk rematch?
DANIEL Dubois is a former heavyweight champion from London with a punch so hard his nickname is 'Dynamite'. He's facing Oleksandr Usyk on July 19 — here we take a look at his boxing record and career earnings. Advertisement 2 Dubois (right) is set to take on Oleksandr Usyk (left) at Wembley Credit: Getty What is Daniel Dubois' net worth? According to multiple outlets, He began earning six-figure sums Dubois earned £1.75 million when After facing Joyce, Dubois pulled in a further £1.8m across his next four fights. Advertisement Read more on Daniel Dubois Although he How much he received for his knockout victory over He earned around £3.5 million from his clash with Anthony Joshua. What is Daniel Dubois' boxing record? Dubois' boxing record stands as 22–2–0. Advertisement Most read in Boxing Exclusive Exclusive This means he's won 22 of his 24 professional bouts, losing two and drawing none. Dynamite has won 19 of his fights via knockout, giving him an impressive KO percentage of 86%. Dubois has seen some major success during his career — he held the World Boxing Association (WBA) heavyweight title from June 2022 to August 2023. He also held the British and Commonwealth titles between 2019 and 2020. Advertisement His He most recently picked up a win over Anthony Joshua, with his last fight a loss against Usyk in Poland. 2 Dubois is a former WBA Heavyweight Champion Credit: Jamie McPhilimey What TV channel is Oleksandr Usyk vs Daniel Dubois 2 on and can it be live streamed? Advertisement There are three options for a DAZN subscription, Annual - either paying a one-off fee or monthly - and a monthly option. An annual pass can be purchased for £119.99 in the United Kingdom. That's just £2.30 per week or 65p per fight (based on 185 fight nights per year). A monthly flexible pass is priced at £24.99 per month, which can be cancelled at any time. A subscription allows you to watch every live event and all on-demand programming on DAZN Advertisement A DAZN subscription costs: Annual Super Saver: £119.99 annually Monthly Saver (12-month deal): £14.99 per month Monthly Flexible pass (cancel any time): £24.99 per month
