China helped Pakistan with 'live inputs' in conflict with India, Indian Army deputy chief says
FILE PHOTO: An Indian security personnel stands guard on a street, following clashes between India and Pakistan, in Srinagar, Kashmir May 9, 2025. REUTERS/Sharafat Ali/File Photo
NEW DELHI - China gave Islamabad "live inputs" on key Indian positions during Pakistan's deadly conflict with its neighbour in May, the deputy chief of India's army said on Friday, calling for urgent upgrades to the country's air defence systems.
The nuclear-armed rivals used missiles, drones and artillery fire during the four-day fighting - their worst in decades - triggered by an April attack on Hindu tourists in Indian Kashmir that New Delhi blamed on Islamabad, before agreeing to a ceasefire.
Pakistan has denied involvement in the April attack.
India fought two adversaries during the conflict, with Pakistan being the "front face" while China provided "all possible support", Lieutenant General Rahul Singh said at a defence industry event in New Delhi.
"When the DGMO (director general of military operations) level talks were going on, Pakistan ... said that we know that your such and such important vector is primed and it is ready for action ... he was getting live inputs from China," he said.
Singh did not elaborate on how India knew about the live inputs from China.
The Chinese foreign and defence ministries, and Pakistan army's public relations wing did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment.
India's relationship with China was strained after a 2020 border clash that sparked a four-year military standoff, but tensions began to ease after the countries reached a pact to step back in October.
India had earlier said that although Pakistan is closely allied with China, there was no sign of any actual help from Beijing during the conflict.
Regarding the possibility of China providing satellite imagery or other real-time intelligence, India's chief of defence staff had said such imagery was commercially available and could have been procured from China or elsewhere.
Pakistani officials have previously dismissed allegations of receiving active support from China in the conflict, but have not commented specifically on whether Beijing gave any satellite and radar help during the fighting.
Beijing, which welcomed the ceasefire in May, has helped Pakistan's struggling economy with investments and financial support since 2013.
The Chinese foreign minister also vowed support to Pakistan in safeguarding its national sovereignty and territorial integrity when he met his Pakistani counterpart days after the ceasefire.
Singh said that Turkey also provided key support to Pakistan during the fighting, equipping it with Bayraktar and "numerous other" drones, and "trained individuals".
Ankara has strong ties with Islamabad, and had expressed solidarity with it during the clash, prompting Indians to boycott everything from Turkish coffee to holidays in the country.
Turkey's defence ministry did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
10 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Singapore supports calls for immediate end to Gaza war, full and unimpeded flow of aid: Faishal
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Acting Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim said he was "deeply saddened" by the continuing loss of innocent lives in Gaza. SINGAPORE - Several countries have jointly called for an immediate end to the war in Gaza, and to lift restrictions on humanitarian aid there, a stance Singapore supports, said Acting Minister for Muslim Affairs Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim. 'I fully share their urgency for the sake of humanity,' said Assoc Prof Faishal in a Facebook post early on July 23. He added that the Republic has consistently called for the full and unimpeded flow of humanitarian assistance into Gaza, and has been supporting efforts to alleviate the suffering of people in Gaza. 'At the same time, we also continue to call for the immediate release of all remaining hostages. Every life matters. I hope the relevant parties will come to an agreement quickly, because every day this war continues, more lives are lost and more families are broken,' Assoc Prof Faishal said in his post. 'The violence cannot go on. It's time to stop the suffering and work towards peace and dignity for everyone.' Assoc Prof Faishal's post comes after a group of largely European nations issued a statement on July 21 calling for Israel to immediately end its war in Gaza. The group of nations, including Japan, Britain and France, condemned the 'inhumane killing' of Palestinians there and what they called the 'drip feeding of aid' to these people. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore S'pore's domestic recycling rate drops to all time low of 11% Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kick in Business Singapore's digital banks finding their niche in areas like SMEs as they narrow losses in 2024 Asia Japan Prime Minister Ishiba to resign by August, Mainichi newspaper reports World Trump says US will charge 19% tariff on goods from Philippines, down from 20% Singapore Two found dead after fire in Toa Payoh flat Singapore 2 foreigners arrested for shop theft at Changi Airport Singapore Ports and planes: The 2 Singapore firms helping to keep the world moving More than 800 civilians have been killed while seeking aid, the majority near Gaza Humanitarian Foundation sites backed by the United States and Israel. The foundation largely bypasses the UN-led system that Israel says has let Hamas-affiliated militants to loot aid shipments. The countries behind the July 21 joint statement said Israel was denying essential humanitarian aid and called on the country to fulfil its obligations under international humanitarian law. Israel's Foreign Ministry said the statement was 'disconnected from reality' and it would send the wrong message to Hamas. Separately, MP Zhulkarnain Abdul Rahim said in a Facebook post on July 23 that 'such atrocities' need to be investigated, sharing screengrabs on a media article on the joint statement, as well as Assoc Prof Faishal's Facebook post. The lawyer reiterated that Singapore supports an investigation into breaches of international law, in the conflict between Israel and Hamas since Hamas' Oct 7, 2023 attack on Israel, referencing a reply by Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan to his parliamentary question in November 2023. Then, Dr Balakrishnan said: 'Any alleged violation of international humanitarian law in this conflict should therefore be investigated in accordance with international law... Yes, we would support that investigation into all allegations, in accordance with international law. 'We hope that all parties will cooperate in the investigations.'
Straits Times
10 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Malaysia PM announces new measures to address rising living costs
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim delivers his speech during the 58th Association of Southeast Asian Nations Foreign Ministers' Meeting at Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, July 9, 2025. REUTERS/Hasnoor Hussain/File Photo KUALA LUMPUR - Malaysia's Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim on Wednesday announced new measures to address growing public disquiet about the rising cost of living, including a cash handout for all adult citizens and a promise to lower fuel prices. The announcement came ahead of a planned protest to be held in Malaysia's capital Kuala Lumpur on Saturday, calling for Anwar to step down over escalating prices and a failure to deliver on promised reforms, among other concerns. Anwar's administration has carried out a number of measures to boost revenue and productivity this year, including a minimum wage hike, increased electricity tariffs on heavy power users, and new sales taxes on some imported fruits and luxury goods. Anwar has said the moves were mainly targeted at large businesses and the wealthy, but critics have voiced fears that higher costs would eventually be passed down to consumers, including lower and middle income earners. On Wednesday, Anwar said all adult Malaysians above 18 years old will receive a 100 ringgit ($23.67) one-off cash aid to be disbursed from August 31. The government will spend a total 15 billion ringgit ($3.55 billion) in cash aid in 2025, up from 13 billion ringgit originally allocated for the year, he said. Police have said they expect between 10,000 and 15,000 people to attend the Saturday protest, which has been organised by opposition parties. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore S'pore's domestic recycling rate drops to all time low of 11% Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kick in Business Singapore's digital banks finding their niche in areas like SMEs as they narrow losses in 2024 Asia Japan Prime Minister Ishiba to resign by August, Mainichi newspaper reports World Trump says US will charge 19% tariff on goods from Philippines, down from 20% Singapore Two found dead after fire in Toa Payoh flat Singapore 2 foreigners arrested for shop theft at Changi Airport Singapore Ports and planes: The 2 Singapore firms helping to keep the world moving "I acknowledge the complaints and accept that the cost of living remains a challenge that must be addressed, even though we have announced various measures thus far," Anwar said. He added that further initiatives to aid those in poverty will be launched on Thursday. Anwar said the government will also announce details on a long-awaited plan to remove blanket subsidies on the widely used RON95 transport fuel before the end of September. Once the subsidy changes are implemented, Malaysians will see fuel prices at the pump drop to 1.99 ringgit per litre, compared to the current price of 2.05 ringgit, Anwar said. Foreign nationals however will have to pay unsubsidised market prices for the fuel, he added. Anwar also announced additional allocations for a government programme aimed at increasing access to affordable goods and necessities, and vowed to improve other existing aid measures. Malaysia has seen inflation fall this year, but worries persist over increasing prices of basic necessities like food. Data released this week showed consumer prices rising 1.1% from a year earlier last month, but the costs of food and beverages were up at a faster pace of 2.1%. REUTERS
Straits Times
10 minutes ago
- Straits Times
ICJ climate ruling: Five things to watch for
Find out what's new on ST website and app. The advisory opinion will be read out from 1300 GMT (9pm Singapore time). THE HAGUE - The International Court of Justice is preparing to hand down its first-ever opinion on climate change on July 23, seen by many as a historic moment in international law. The advisory opinion will be read out from 1300 GMT (9pm Singapore time). Judges have waded through tens of thousands of pages of written submissions and heard two weeks of oral arguments during the ICJ's biggest-ever case. Its own 'advisory opinion' is expected to run to several hundred pages, as it clarifies nations' obligations to prevent climate change and the consequences for polluters that have failed to do so. Here are some of the key things to watch for: What legal framework? This is the crux of the matter and speaks to the first question put to the court on countries' responsibilities to tackle climate change. ICJ judges will seek to pull together different strands of environmental law into one definitive international standard. Top polluters say this is unnecessary, and that the legal provisions under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) are sufficient. But opponents argue the ICJ should adopt a broader yardstick, including human rights law and the laws of the sea. Vanuatu urged judges to consider 'the entire corpus of international law' in its opinion, arguing the ICJ was uniquely placed to do so. The ICJ is 'the only international jurisdiction with a general competence over all areas of international law, which allows it to provide such an answer,' said Vanuatu. And the consequences? This is the more controversial second question the judges will consider: what are the legal repercussions – if any – for countries who significantly contribute to the climate crisis? The United States, the world's biggest historical emitter of greenhouse gases, and other top polluters referred the court to the landmark 2015 Paris Agreement, which does not explicitly provide for direct compensation for past damage. Issues around liability are highly sensitive in climate negotiations, but at UN talks in 2022 wealthy nations did agree to create a fund to help vulnerable countries deal with current impacts caused by past pollution. Many top polluters also say it is impossible to assign blame to individual countries for a global phenomenon with unequal effects. Those on the other side of the debate point to a basic principle of international law – 'ubi jus, ubi remedium' – roughly speaking, where there's blame, there's a claim. In legal jargon, this should result in cessation, non-repetition and reparations, argue the climate-vulnerable nations. They want the ICJ to propose a stop to fossil fuel subsidies, a drastic reduction in emissions, and a formal commitment and timeline for decarbonisation. They also demand monetary reparations, as well as increased support for adapting to the devastating future effects of climate change. Harm or no harm? Another key point is the issue of 'transboundary' law, often known as the 'no-harm' rule. Put simply, this key tenet of international law means one state should not permit activities on its territory that could cause damage to another. The question ICJ judges will have to consider is: does this apply to greenhouse gas emissions that have contributed to climate change? Major polluters argue this law does not apply to climate change as there is no single, specific source that can be identified as damaging another state. Others say that climate change should not be an exception. Other major international judicial decisions in recent months have looked to increasing scientific precision in the link between human-caused climate change and severe impacts like extreme weather, nature loss and sea level rise. When did they know? A fundamental debating point in the oral hearings was: when did governments become aware greenhouse gas emissions were harming the planet? The late 1980s, according to the United States. Switzerland said no one could have linked emissions to rising temperatures before scientific studies in that decade. Rubbish, say climate-vulnerable countries, who point to research in developed nations as early as the 1960s. This could have an impact on when potential reparations kick in. 'Future generations' The concept of 'intergenerational equity' is another fundamental demand of the young climate justice campaigners who helped bring this case to the world's highest court. 'The impact of climate change is not bounded by time,' argued Namibia, with the worst effects hitting people decades or maybe centuries later. But developed countries counter that the rights of as-yet-unborn people have no force in international law. 'Human beings alive now cannot claim rights on behalf of future generations,' argued Germany. AFP
