HC: Court can't take cognisance of PMLA case without hearing accused
KOLKATA: A court cannot take cognisance of a case under Prevention of Money Laundering Act without hearing the accused, as required under the BNSS, Calcutta HC on Friday held, quashing proceedings under PMLA against three accused.
Tutu Ghosh, Bipin Kumar Kedia, and Anil Kumar Jain were accused of offences under sections 3 and 4 (money laundering), read with section 70 of PMLA (offences by companies and their officials).
They approached the HC, contending the PMLA judge took cognisance of the offences in violation of the first proviso to BNSS section 223, as no opportunity of hearing was given to any of them before such cognisance was taken.
Senior counsel appearing for the accused argued that BNSS has introduced a provision requiring an opportunity of hearing for the accused prior to the taking of cognisance, and that denial of such an opportunity amounts to a violation of fundamental rights.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC pulls up CBI over Abhijit Sarkar case
1 2 3 Kolkata: Calcutta High Court on Friday reprimanded CBI sleuths working on the 2021 Abhijit Sarkar murder case, saying: "Your investigating officer is not investigating properly. " The court, which was hearing the bail plea of three accused, questioned whether the agency had confirmed whether TMC MLA Paresh Paul's cellphone tower location put him at the scene of the crime. Justice Jay Sengupta said if proper evidence was not placed before the court, the bench would have to consider granting bail. The judge also asked CBI whether a video, purportedly showing Paul making a threatening speech, was converted from Bengali to English, and asked the agency to gather other information on the MLA. Abhijit's mother Madhabi Sarkar had filed a complaint alleging that her son, a BJP worker, was assaulted by unknown miscreants on May 2, 2021, leading to his death. HC transferred the case to CBI on Aug 19, 2021. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata CBI named Beliaghata MLA Paul, ward number 56 councillor Swapan Samaddar and ward number 30 councillor Papiya Ghosh in a supplementary charge sheet. The agency said during the assembly election campaign, Paul delivered a provocative speech in which he named Abhijit as a troublemaker. The BJP worker was attacked 12 days later. Paul, Samaddar and Ghosh approached HC, claiming to be "victims" of CBI's atrocities. "The central agency is using their unethical force, violating the fundamental human rights, including the right to life, liberty, security, and freedom of the petitioners herein. The brutality of the central agency led to serious mental injuries and psychological trauma of the petitioners. Such excessive and unwarranted use of force by the central agency causes severe human rights violations of the petitioners," the bail application stated.
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Disrupting normalcy during ‘Nabanna Abhijan' will attract legal action: HC
1 2 Kolkata: Calcutta High Court on Friday said that anyone trying to disrupt trade or day-to-day activities during the 'Nabanna Abhijan' called by Sangrami Joutha Mancha on July 28 can face legal action. Traders, fearing disruptions, particularly around Howrah station, had moved HC against the protest rally. Justice Tirthankar Ghosh said in his order, "Since the police authorities have refused permission to the organisation on July 28, in case there is any assembly of persons which disturbs the business of the present petitioner and/or other affected persons who intend to carry out their trade/profession or day-to-day work, police authorities would take steps against the violators in accordance with law." The Bengal govt had told the HC that police had refused permission to this rally on "cogent grounds." You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata The 'Nabanna Abhiijan' was called with a host of demands, including the non-payment of additional DA by the Bengal govt despite an order by the Supreme Court.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
HC stays slum rehabilitation on Mumbai University land
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has stayed a Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) scheme on over 3.5 acres of land, which Bombay University said was acquired for the university between 1967 and 1974 for academic purposes by the Collector of Mumbai. Although acquired, the lands were not mutated in the name of the university, and taking advantage of non-updated revenue records, third-party rights were created in favour of the developer, said a petition filed by Mumbai University (MU). The university said that by 2024, the land was even notified as a slum since it was encroached upon, and this was done with no notice to the university. Justices GS Kulkarni and Arif Doctor on July 21, said they found this case to be one of the most unfortunate cases where land acquired by the state for MU to set up the university campus for its future needs is now facing proceedings over the redevelopment of slum dwellers who encroached on the land. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai The HC heard advocates Yuvraj Narvankar for the university, senior advocates Anil Singh for SRA, Pravin Samdani for the developer, and Milind Sathe for the slum society before saying, "The land was certainly not acquired for the rehabilitation of slum dwellers or encroachers. At least save the university land from encroachers and the bonanza of a slum scheme of free housing to encroachers and large benefit to private developers, is the cry of the petitioners. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo " The slum society and builders said not all land was to be utilised as claimed. The HC said the state has a "vital role" to show all documents pertaining to the acquisition of the land for the university and whether SRA can approve any slum scheme on university land is another vital issue. The HC adjourned the matter to August 11 and sought replies and rejoinders by then. The HC said, "Prima facie, we are of the opinion that once land was subjected to acquisition for the public purpose to be vested with MU, merely because effective steps were not taken by the state govt for handing over some part of the said land and/or for removal of encroachments, would not bring about a situation that such lands be utilised for the encroachers and for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. This is the primary issue. "
