Brazil braces for Bolsonaro's day in court as ex-president testifies over ‘coup plot'
The 70-year-old paratrooper turned populist, who governed from 2019 until 2023, is scheduled to be interrogated by the supreme court as it seeks to untangle what federal police claim was a sprawling three-year plot to vandalize one of the world's largest democracies.
Seven other alleged co-conspirators will also be questioned, including four former Bolsonaro ministers – three of them army generals; the ex-commander of the navy; and the ex-president's former right-hand man, Lt Col Mauro Cid.
Bolsonaro's day in court, which is expected to come on Tuesday, is a milestone moment for a country that escaped from two decades of military dictatorship in 1985 but appears to have come perilously close to a return to authoritarian rule after the veteran leftist Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva beat Bolsonaro in the 2022 presidential election.
Related: Bombshell police report details alleged Bolsonaro plot to stage rightwing coup
'This is the first time in Brazilian history that there is the prospect of the perpetrators of a coup being brought to justice,' said Bernardo Mello Franco, a political writer for the newspaper O Globo.
'Brazilian history is full of military coups and counter-coups … but throughout history the characters [behind them] have always gone unpunished, either because they succeeded in pulling off the coup and seized control of the judiciary, or because they were granted amnesty, which is what happened after the [1964-85] military dictatorship,' Mello Franco added.
Bolsonaro is accused of trying – but ultimately failing – to overturn Lula's victory through a murderous plot, which allegedly involved assassinating or arresting key political rivals including the president-elect; his vice-president-elect, Geraldo Alckmin; and the supreme court justice Alexandre de Moraes. He has repeatedly denied the charges.
The prospect of watching Bolsonaro go on trial has thrilled his many progressive detractors who, in addition to the alleged coup attempt, blame the ex-president for rampant Amazon devastation; historic attacks on the rights of Indigenous peoples, human rights and Brazilian culture; and a calamitous and anti-scientific response to a Covid pandemic that killed hundreds of thousands of people.
There is broad consensus among experts that Bolsonaro will be found guilty and convicted later this year, meaning the former congressman could face political oblivion and a decades-long prison sentence.
'Bolsonaro himself believes he has already been convicted by the supreme court – he's said it on numerous occasions,' Mello Franco said. 'Those who understand the supreme court also believe he'll be found guilty. There's a great deal of evidence against him.'
Last week the former head of the air force, Brig Carlos de Almeida Baptista Júnior, gave damning evidence, telling the supreme court that at one point in 2022 the former head of the army, Gen Marco Antônio Freire Gomes, threatened to arrest Bolsonaro if he sought any kind of 'institutional rupture'.
But major questions remain over whether, if convicted, Bolsonaro will ever actually serve time.
Already one rightwing presidential hopeful in the 2026 election, Romeu Zema, has pledged to pardon Bolsonaro if he wins power. Polls suggest that if Lula seeks re-election he will face a tough battle against whichever rightwing candidate inherits the votes of the still-popular Bolsonaro, who has already been barred from running because of his attacks on Brazil's electronic voting system.
Potential heirs include one of Bolsonaro's politician sons, Eduardo or Flávio Bolsonaro; his wife, Michelle Bolsonaro; or the conservative governors of the states of São Paulo, Minas Gerais and Paraná: Tarcísio de Freitas, Zema and Ratinho Júnior, respectively.
There are also doubts over how Bolsonaro, a notoriously rambunctious Trump-inspired populist with a huge social media following, will behave when his day in court arrives.
On the eve of his appearance, Bolsonaro promised he would not use the hearing to 'lacrar', a Portuguese word which roughly translates as 'take the piss', 'troll' or 'drop the mic'. But the ex-president said his 'inquisition' would be 'worth watching' and urged followers to tune in to see that 'truth' was on his side.
'It will be broadcast live, which is bonkers,' Mello Franco said of the politically charged session, declining to forecast how Bolsonaro might behave in the dock. 'The only predictable thing about Bolsonaro is that he'll be unpredictable.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's BRICS Warning to India Adds New Twist to Trade Deal
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump's threat to impose new tariffs on India over its participation in the BRICS forum puts New Delhi in a tough position as it races to finalize a favorable trade deal with the US. Singer Akon's Failed Futuristic City in Senegal Ends Up a $1 Billion Resort Are Tourists Ruining Europe? How Locals Are Pushing Back Can Americans Just Stop Building New Highways? Denver City Hall Takes a Page From NASA Philadelphia Trash Piles Up as Garbage Workers' Strike Drags On Trump said Tuesday that India could face an additional 10% tariff alongside other members of BRICS — a bloc of emerging economies he has labeled 'Anti-American.' The remarks came just a day after the US leader said he was close to finalizing a trade deal that New Delhi hopes would give it reprieve from 26% reciprocal tariffs. The US president followed that warning by unveiling a new round of levies, including a 50% rate on Brazil, one of the highest so far announced for the tariffs which are set to hit in August. The letter to Brazil comes just after a two-day BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, in which leaders agreed on a joint statement that criticized trade-distorting tariffs. But while Brazil and South Africa have blasted Trump separately for his comments, India has refrained from responding publicly, a sign that it's treading a fine line in maintaining its relationship with Washington. Officials in New Delhi say they're not overly alarmed by Trump's latest threats for now. The US leader's view is that BRICS is seeking to undermine the dominance of the US dollar, which is not India's goal, the officials said, asking not to be identified because the discussions are private. India doesn't support moves for a single BRICS currency, and any participation in local currency trade arrangements are aimed solely at reducing risks, they said. India's Ministry of Commerce and Industry didn't respond to an email seeking comment. Senior Indian diplomat P Kumaran said at a press briefing on Tuesday that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Brazilian counterpart Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva had 'no discussion' on Trump's tariff threats during the Indian leader's state visit there. 'We didn't have an opportunity to discuss that.' With India set to assume the BRICS chairmanship in 2026, it will need to differentiate itself from members like China and Russia, who are seeking to build the bloc as a stronger opposition voice to the US. India would be banking on its strategic value and neutral currency stance to be treated differently by Washington. 'Trump is unhappy with some BRICS members who have been talking about an alternate reserve currency,' said Mohan Kumar, a former Indian envoy and lead negotiator at the World Trade Organization, who now teaches at OP Jindal Global University. 'India has time and again differentiated between local currency trade and de-dollarization and therefore doesn't fall in that category.' India has been cultivated by several US administrations over the years as a strategic partner and key regional counterweight to an increasingly assertive China. As recently as April, US Vice President JD Vance remarked that the fate of the 21st century 'is going to be determined by the strength of the United States and India partnership.' Those ties have recently come under strain, though, after Trump took credit for brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan in May. Modi has pushed back at Trump's claims he used trade as a bargaining tool to secure a truce. The Trump administration has also made overtures to Islamabad, including its powerful army chief, in the aftermath of the conflict, a source of concern in New Delhi. Much is riding on the success of the India-US trade deal, which both countries have pledged to finalize by the fall of this year. Shashi Tharoor, an opposition lawmaker who has led India's diplomatic outreach since the Pakistan conflict, said a trade deal would signify the strong ties between the two countries. 'The relationship with the US is in a good shape,' he said in an interview in London on Tuesday. If the terms of the trade deal are agreed, 'that will be a very, very healthy sign.' After months of talks, Indian trade negotiators have put forward their best offer to the Trump administration and are now awaiting a response. The latest tariff threats from Trump may also be a bargaining tool to secure more concessions from New Delhi. Trump has previously threatened to slap 100% levies on BRICS if they ditch the dollar in bilateral trade. 'We need to distinguish between President Trump's narrative and his action,' Kumar said. Follow Bloomberg India on WhatsApp for exclusive content and analysis on what billionaires, businesses and markets are doing. Sign up here. --With assistance from Prateek Mazumdar and Unni Krishnan. (Updates with details of US slapping 50% tariff on Brazil) Will Trade War Make South India the Next Manufacturing Hub? 'Our Goal Is to Get Their Money': Inside a Firm Charged With Scamming Writers for Millions Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate 'Telecom Is the New Tequila': Behind the Celebrity Wireless Boom SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Charges for man accused of sexually assaulting teen followed flawed investigation: Manitoba judge
An attempt to put a group home worker's name on Manitoba's child abuse registry was based on charges stemming from a "seriously flawed investigation," a Manitoba judge says. Court of King's Bench Justice Kaye Dunlop said in a June ruling it's "overwhelmingly clear" the man could not have abused a girl at the group home he worked at in 2015. The man, who was in his 50s at the time and is identified in the ruling only as "M.G.," was arrested in October 2017 and charged with sexual assault and sexual interference, after the girl told investigators she'd been touched at the group home when she was 13. The man maintained his innocence. A trial was held at Court of King's Bench in February 2020, and during the direct examination of the girl, the Crown stayed the charges against the man, Dunlop's decision said. However, the Child and Family All Nations Coordinated Response Network — a non-profit agency that provides intake and emergency child and family services in Winnipeg and surrounding areas — still moved to have the man's name put on the child abuse registry. He was given notice in August 2021 that the agency intended to have his name added to the registry. He challenged the ANCR's move, with Dunlop ruling in his favour. The judge said in her reasoning the agency acknowledged the investigation into the allegation was lacking. She said the burden of proof rested entirely on the organization, which didn't prove the man abused the child. "This case is an example of the great responsibility held by players tasked not only with protecting children but also protecting society from unfounded claims," Dunlop wrote in her decision. "This case is also an example of the profound effect that improper, incomplete and single focused investigations can have on an individual's life." As much as the investigators owed a duty to the child, they did so just as much to M. - Justice Kaye Dunlop The man was fired from his position at the group home after he was criminally charged. He had spent more than 20 years working with Child and Family Services at various homes before that, and had also worked with the Headingley Correctional Service. The girl, who was from northern Manitoba, tried to harm herself in July 2015, when she was 13 years old, and was flown to Winnipeg. She eventually ended up in the group home where the man worked. In the following years, she was placed in several other group homes around Winnipeg, and when she was 15, told her favourite worker at the Marymound group home she had been sexually assaulted. The worker reported the incident to the girl's social worker, after which the ANCR agency got involved. She was interviewed by a provincial investigator in February 2017. The decision said the girl told the investigator she had been sexually touched by a group home worker, whom she identified as a white, bald man who rode a bike to work, and referred to him using a shortened version of M.G.'s first name. Investigators failed in 'very basics' A forensic investigator from Snowflake Place, now known as Toba Centre — a non-profit that works with children affected by abuse — also interviewed the child. A Winnipeg police officer was present, and gave her a photo lineup. At one point, the officer took two photos out of the lineup and showed them to the girl side by side, which is against best practices, according to Dunlop's decision. The girl "said that the one photo looked like the staff [member], but gestured that he had facial hair," the decision said. But the man had provided court with two photos of himself around the time of the alleged assault that showed he did not have facial hair then. "Even if I accept the flawed procedure used for the lineup, the photographs of M. that he tendered as exhibits explicitly show him a few days before the date of the alleged offence with no facial hair," Dunlop's decision said. The judge pointed to other inconsistencies in the girl's testimony that she said investigators should have looked into, but didn't, displaying "a single-minded focus from the very beginning by essentially accepting at face value the allegations." She said among other things, investigators could have seen the room at the group home where the alleged assault occurred was "wide open for all to see," with large windows and video cameras placed all around the area, and that the girl's description of the room did not match it. The police officer who was ANCR's witness in the proceedings "believed that the assault took place in the management office," Dunlop said. "In fairness to her, no other investigator knew or seemed to care where the alleged assault could have occurred because they did not go to the group home, or they simply did not ask the question." The judge said investigators also failed to establish when the assault could have occurred, failing to do "very basics" like review the group home's logbooks. The investigators admitted they failed to follow best practices, Dunlop's decision said. She said she believed the child may have been sexually assaulted before the allegations and doesn't believe she fabricated the evidence, but that it was clear the child "had been influenced about what to say." The judge said the girl's description of events may have also been affected by a mental health crisis she was going through at the time. "As much as the investigators owed a duty to the child, they did so just as much to M. As a result of their failures, the consequences on M.'s life were significant," she said. "They also impacted another child, M.'s daughter, who was without her father for several years while this matter unfolded. We, as a society, owe both the child and M. more."
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump to Impose 50% Tariff on Goods From Brazil
President Donald Trump threatened to impose 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods, sharply escalating a dispute with Latin America's largest nation. Vinicius Andrade has more on "Bloomberg The Close."
