
Church of England priest led cult and sexually abused a ‘staggering number of women', jury told
Christopher Brain, who led the progressive Nine O-Clock Service (NOS) in Sheffield in the 80s and 90s, surrounded himself with women who wore lingerie or revealing clothes as part of his 'homebase team', jurors at Inner London Crown Court were told.
The court heard the women – sometimes referred to as the 'the Lycra Lovelies' or 'the Lycra Nuns' – were on a rota to help then-Reverend Brain get to bed and this included performing sexual favours, a Bishop was told by a whistleblower in 1995.
When Mr Brian was confronted at the time over claims he had abused up to 40 women, he replied: 'I thought it was more', the court heard. He resigned from holy orders in November that year.
Appearing in the dock wearing purple shirt on Tuesday, Mr Brain is accused of one count of rape and 36 counts of indecent assault relating to 13 women between 1981 and 1995.
Opening the prosecution's case, Tim Clark KC said that zthe Church of England initially viewed NOS as a success story and Mr Brain was fast-tracked for ordination.
'In truth NOS became a closed and controlled group which the defendant dominated and abused his position first as a leader and then as an ordained priest to sexually assault a staggering number of women from his congregation,' he told the jury.
Mr Clark said NOS became a cult in which members, who were vetted and organised into 'discipleship' groups, were isolated from their friends and families.
'Members of NOS became utterly dependent on NOS and desperate for the attention and praise of the defendant,' he added. 'They were encouraged to give up their time, finances and, eventually, their sense of self to this organisation and its leader.'
Mr Brain first became involved with St Thomas' Church in Sheffield through his Christian rock band Present Tense. The 9pm NOS multimedia church services were described as 'visually stunning' and featured live music aimed at a younger congregation.
By the time he took Holy Orders in December 1991 'signs of grandiose self-regard were already present' and large sums of money were spent finding the robes worn by the actor Robert De Niro in the movie 'The Mission' for him to wear at his ordination, Mr Clark said.
One female congregant, who believes she was 'brainwashed' by the priest, alleges he invited her to his home while his wife was away in 1983 or 1984, where he pinned her down and raped her.
'She recalls moving her head from side to side and saying 'no',' Mr Clark told the jury. 'She said his weight was too great for her to be able to move him off her. She felt that she froze.'
Another woman claims she 'had to be available' to 'put him to bed'. On those occasions, he would undress and rub himself against her as she massaged him while wearing only her underwear, the court heard.
Mr Clark said: 'She described going into a 'robotic' state doing this, she dreaded receiving his phone calls.'
Mr Brain told his alleged victim he was helping her 'heal from her sexual repression', the jury heard.
A third woman alleges she would be called to the defendant's address to 'help him relax'. She said she had no friends outside NOS and feared being removed from his team if she disobeyed.
She described him as 'Jekyll and Hyde' character, Mr Clark said, adding: 'She feared his anger if she didn't comply, isolation if she didn't submit and he had installed in her a belief (as a apparent man of God) that she was doing the right thing.'
A further complainant described him as a 'predator hiding in plain sight' who would 'pick off women who he viewed as vulnerable'.
She told police the homebase team was made up of church member who were 'young, female and beautiful', the jury were told.
On one occasion he pinned her down on the floor, pressed himself against her and said she 'needed to accept that she was the sort of woman who wanted to be raped and that she couldn't be spiritual person unless she admitted this', Mr Clark said.
'He continued to pin her down until she made this admission,' the prosecutor added. 'She didn't hold such views but she was scared of him. His violent conduct was sudden and without warning.'
Mr Brain, 68, who denies all charges, insists NOS was not a cult and, where sexual contact did occur, it was consensual.
The eight-week trial continues.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Muslim soldiers are dismissed from the Army after sharing graphic helmet-cam videos of murdered victims after Hamas October 7 attacks
Two Muslim British Army soldiers shared graphic helmet-cam videos of murdered and desecrated dead bodies after the Hamas October 7 attacks, a court martial heard. Signaller Zakariya Munir and Signaller Mohammed Salah sent on 'grossly offensive' videos capturing the horrific aftermath of the atrocities the day after they took place. The servicemen claimed 'you won't see this in the media' as they shared clips of corpses being kicked and montages of 'dead civilians lying in pools of blood'. The clips were believed to have been filmed from Hamas terrorists after they carried out the attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. The pair also shared another 'exceptionally violent piece of footage' showing an execution carried out by ISIS extremists. The court martial was told Sig Munir found the videos of the ' war crimes ' and mutilated bodies in the Middle East and sent them to colleague Sig Salah. The soldiers exchanged messages about the content, with Sig Munir telling Sig Salah that they would not be shown in the media. Young father Sig Salah then sent them on to other service personnel. Now, the pair of soldiers have both been dismissed from the Army. Bulford Military Court, in Wiltshire, was told Sig Salah's phone was investigated and they were both charged. Sig Munir was charged with four counts of sending offensive messages on a public network. Sig Salah was charged with three counts. Both soldiers, from the 10th Signal Regiment, denied the offences but were convicted by court martial. Sig Munir and Sig Salah had served in the armed forces since 2021 and 2019 respectively. Sig Salah has a three-month old son with his wife. October 7, 2023, saw Hamas and several other Palestinian militant groups launch coordinated attacks from the Gaza Strip into Israel. It was the first invasion into Israel since the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. Around 2,800 people were killed. Lieutenant Colonel Felicity Bryson, prosecuting at Bulford Military Court, said: 'The case concerns messages sent by Sig Munir to Sig Salah and then sent to other personnel. 'They depicted real scenes of brutality during the October Hamas attacks. 'On October 8 Sig Munir said he had a video of the attack and that they won't be shown in the media. 'The video was taken from a head cam from the perspective of an irregular fighter. 'They show faces and bodies of corpses being searched and being kicked by the cameraman. 'Sig Munir asked whether he wanted to see another one, saying it was a bit graphic though. 'He asked whether he was on Telegram, saying it was all on there. 'Sig Munir sent a video showing montages of soldiers in barracks interspersed with dead civilians lying in pools of blood. 'He later sent a video of a group of young men shoving and urinating on elderly men who had their heads bagged and hands tied.' One of the videos was an ISIS execution, it was heard. Lt Col Bryson said: 'On October 31 Sig Munir sent a video of a group of men with a group of detainees kneeling behind them. 'Each stepped forward and executed them with a single gun shot. It was an exceptionally violent piece of footage. Sig Salah did not send this footage on. 'Sig Salah's phone was later explored and an investigation was launched.' Fiona Edington, defending for Sig Munir, said: 'He is a young and naive soldier who has become susceptible to peer pressure. 'His Colonel said he is a developing soldier who made a mistake and is showing clear signs of learning. He has a lot to offer to the British Army.' James Hay, defending for Sig Salah, said: 'Sig Salah suffers from extreme anxiety. His arrest led to instances of vomiting and hyperventilating. 'His priority is now the welfare of his wife and young son.' Judge Advocate General Alan Large dismissed both soldiers. Judge Large said: 'You sent messages to each other about the October 7 attacks. There is nothing sinister about that. 'However you then contacted him with videos saying 'You won't see this in the media'. 'This all happened in the context of events that were globally important. You sent these grossly offensive videos in the immediate aftermath of these events. 'The videos showed bodies that had been violated and it is highly likely that they were taken by those who had committed murder and war crimes. 'The last video actually showed people being murdered. 'You were both serving members of the British Army and when you sign up for that there are certain values that you must adhere to. 'There were plenty of opportunities for you to seek advice but you decided to distribute the videos. You must have realised that these videos could have been distributed further.'


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Post Office scandal victims place hope in public inquiry report
Scottish victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal say they hope the first part of the public inquiry's final report will bring justice a step one, which will focus on the human impact and compensation, will be published at midday on than 70 people in Scotland have had their convictions overturned after they were wrongly accused of crimes like theft because of the faulty Post Office IT the scandal runs deeper than those prosecuted, with many more people losing livelihoods and relationships as a result of false accusations. Thousands of people across the UK have been affected by what has been described as the most widespread miscarriage of justice of recent times. A statutory public inquiry into the UK-wide scandal was established in 2021 and has heard from hundreds of witnesses from across the lawyers and journalists will be among those gathering in central London when the chair of the inquiry - Sir Wyn Williams - delivers the first part of his Macaldowie gave evidence to the inquiry when it came to Glasgow in ran a post office in Greenock and was forced to resign in 2011 after an alleged shortfall of £10,000 was was not convicted but lost his livelihood and told the inquiry he came close to finally reached a financial settlement with the company in March this ahead of the publication of the findings, he said: "What I hope from the first part of the inquiry report is for the redress scheme to speed up and get everyone paid what they are due."I also hope that it helps with the police investigation that is ongoing." Ravinder Naga falsely confessed to stealing money from his mother's post office in Greenock in 2009 to protect her from going to prison. Appeal judges overturned his conviction last told BBC Scotland News he wants accountability."The people who died, they don't know their names have been cleared. They died before all this came out," he the focus of Tuesday's report will be on the victims and compensation, Mr Naga said he ultimately wants those responsible for the scandal to go to prison."I want justice," he Advocate Stuart Munro is head of specialist litigation at Livingstone Brown and has been representing one of the first Scottish victims to have her conviction said the Post Office Horizon scandal was one of the most far-reaching miscarriages of justice in British history."Countless lives were ruined. Its victims will now be looking to Sir Wyn Williams to lay bare the truth of what happened and to recommend measures to ensure nothing like this can ever happen again."That process begins on Tuesday with the publication of the first part of this final report."


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Black superintendent drops ‘racist witch-hunt' claims against Met
A black former superintendent who was suing the Metropolitan Police over an alleged racist witch-hunt has withdrawn her claim after further negotiations with the force. The agreement came as a close supporter of Robyn Williams, 60, was due to give what was likely to be damaging evidence against her former employer at a tribunal. It is understood that Williams withdrew after the Met agreed not to pursue her for legal costs. It had repeatedly tried to sack Williams, a highly decorated officer, after she was convicted of possessing a video of child abuse that she was sent on WhatsApp but did not watch. Williams said that she was forced to resign after a protracted legal battle and accused the force of orchestrating a 'campaign of attack' against senior black and minority ethnic officers. She had previously told the Central London employment tribunal that the Met's leadership consisted of a 'white female clique' and 'white male pitbulls'. The force denied her allegations. The tribunal was about to enter its second week and ended just before a key witness Victor Marshall, a retired police superintendent, was due to give evidence in Williams's favour. His testimony was expected to be damaging to the Met because it was thought he was likely to contradict accounts given by detectives who had investigated Williams. Equal Justice, the law firm that represents Williams, said she had withdrawn her claim but there were still unresolved financial matters. Williams had said she is owed £73,000 in back pay. The case ended after the Met decided not to seek to recover its legal costs from her, which were estimated to be as much as £250,000. The force said that Williams 'approached the Metropolitan Police and confirmed that she wanted to withdraw all her claims'. It added: 'She has now done so and the matter has concluded. We have not settled the claims.' Williams and Sir Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, in 2016 GETTY IMAGES Williams was placed under investigation in February 2018 after a 54-second video of a young girl being sexually abused was found on her smartphone. Williams said that she did not report the video, sent by her sister, because she did not see it. She was the only one of 17 recipients of the footage to be charged. After she was found guilty at the Old Bailey, Williams was ordered to complete 200 hours of unpaid work and register as a sex offender for five years, even though the trial judge accepted that there was no sexual element to the crime. The Met sacked her in March 2020 but she was reinstated after the decision was overturned by the police appeals tribunal. She sued her employer for discrimination, harassment and victimisation, claiming that its pursuit of her had destroyed her life. She had been signed off work for months with depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder. Williams, who won the Queen's Police Medal during a 39-year career, eventually resigned last year. The tribunal confirmed that the claims were withdrawn and the case had ended but provided no other details. Williams said: 'I would like to thank my legal team at Equal Justice solicitors and the many supporters who stood by me. I have no other comment to make at this time.'