Libman: Court's rebuke of tuition hikes a wider indictment of divisive CAQ tactics
'The evidence shows that the minister had no data on the matter, beyond tenuous information.'
Two very telling extracts from last week's Quebec Superior Court judgment rendered by Justice Éric Dufour, in overturning the Coalition Avenir Québec government decision to sharply increase university tuition for out‑of‑province students attending McGill and Concordia. The judge criticized Higher Education Minister Pascale Dery's contentions regarding the retention rate of students from outside Quebec and their ability of integrating into Quebec society, posing threats to the survival of French.
This is not just a slap-down of the minister, but a wider indictment exposing how the CAQ often seems to be improvising, particularly on matters of identity and language. Whether by design or incompetence, instead of working from hard data and facts, this government has adopted legislation and implemented important measures — with significant impact on Quebec society — based on anecdotes, hearsay and questionable perceptions.
Bill 94 is another recent example. Prompted by a few alleged incidents in 17 (out of Quebec's 3,000) public schools, Education Minister Bernard Drainville is expanding the ban on wearing religious symbols in schools to now include almost all workers, including janitors.
When it comes to language measures, forget hard data. Everything seems driven by the accepted orthodoxy that French is in serious 'decline' — thus the need to protect the language at all costs. If someone dares question just the means or the methodology, it's invariably seen as an attack on Quebec and unleashes relentless intimidation. When federal Liberal MP Emmanuella Lambropoulos cautiously asked at a language-committee hearing for more information or proof of the supposed decline, she was attacked from all sides, and subsequently quickly retreated.
Measures to promote and protect French and maintaining Quebec's uniqueness are important. But flimsy evidence or fearmongering about the intensity of a decline, to justify measures that unnecessarily go too far, rightfully deserve to be challenged. The court's scolding on tuition is a welcome reminder that governments should be basing major decisions on facts, not exaggeration or phantom menaces.
The French language is deeply rooted throughout Quebec as the dominant language at all levels of government and in public health care institutions and all professional corporations. According to the Office québécois de la langue française, even in neighbourhoods most heavily concentrated with anglophones, customers in businesses can be served in French 94 per cent of the time.
According to Statistics Canada, never in the history of Quebec have so many non-francophones and newcomers been able to speak French.
It's not the French language itself in decline, therefore, but the percentage of native-born mother-tongue francophones. That misleading statistic is often used to justify tougher French language measures, many of which go too far (Allez Canadiens Allez? Really?) Provisions of language Bill 96 — such as search and seizure, snitching and others — do little to protect French, yet clearly violate charter rights. Otherwise, the government wouldn't have used the notwithstanding clause pre-emptively to pass it.
Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet recently called Canada an 'artificial country.' In Monday's federal election, his party was reduced to only about half the number of seats won in Quebec by the Liberals led by Mark Carney. Blanchet, in a display of exaggerated self-importance, offered collaboration but warned it was conditional on Carney not opposing Quebec's use of the notwithstanding clause when Bill 96 reaches the Supreme Court.
Hopefully when the time comes, Carney will show leadership and prove that Canada is a very real country that values rights — and, as judge Dufour did, expose the distinction between laws buttressed by reality as opposed to 'artificial' arguments and tired notions that divide and weaken our society.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
10 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
PQ's Alex Boissonneault projected to win Arthabaska by-election, beating Quebec Conservative leader
The Parti Québécois is projected to win a Quebec by-election in the Arthabaska riding. Former journalist Alex Boissonneault holds a comfortable lead over Quebec Conservative Leader Éric Duhaime, who had been hoping to win a first legislature seat for his party. With over 80 per cent of polls reporting, Boissonneault was leading with over 45 per cent of the vote, compared to about 36 per cent for Duhaime. The by-election was triggered after Coalition Avenir Québec member Éric Lefebvre resigned to run successfully for the Conservative Party of Canada in the last federal election. The governing Coalition Avenir Québec has held the riding since 2012 but was sitting in fourth place just before 10 p.m. It's a third-straight by-election victory for the Parti Québécois, which also won in Jean-Talon in 2023 and Terrebonne earlier this year.
Montreal Gazette
16 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
EMSB joins legal challenge to stop Quebec's school budget cuts
The English Montreal School Board will ask a judge to put a pause on the province's latest round of budget cuts. In a special meeting of the council of commissioners on Monday, the board voted unanimously to join the legal challenge mounted by the Quebec English School Boards Association (QESBA). That challenge will probably be filed in court next week, and would ask a judge for a stay of implementing the 2025-2026 budgetary rules imposed on school boards and school service centres. Announced in June, the province's education ministry imposed $570 million in cuts on schools throughout the province. EMSB chairperson Joe Ortona said that even though the government appeared to correct its course by announcing a new budgetary envelope of $540 million, that is merely a distraction. The new money comes with far too many strings attached, Ortona says, arguing it is impossible for his board to get access to most of that funding. Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Ortona explained the cuts amount to roughly $20 million in the board's $450 million annual budget. Part of the reason the cuts are so dramatic is that they bar schools from using any surplus accumulated from previous years to affect this year's budget. 'It is impossible to balance the budget with these cuts that the government is imposing,' Ortona said. He added that if the board were to enact all the imposed cuts, some extracurricular programs would be cancelled, breakfast programs would be scaled back, and children with special needs would get fewer services. 'Parents are worried,' Ortona said. 'Because they don't know where the cuts will be coming from or what will be affected.' Ortona said the board is reaching out to other English-language boards. Since French-language boards have been abolished, he is urging lobby groups like Uni-es pour l'École and others to support the cause. Nearly 160,000 Quebecers have already signed a National Assembly petition opposing the cuts. 'There is strength in numbers,' Ortona said. 'We're actually fighting for all of the students in both the English and French public system, because they're both suffering from these harmful cuts.' He's called on the province to rescind the June cuts altogether, and said the school board intends to argue that the cuts amount to meddling with the English-speaking community's right to control its educational institutions, a constitutional right that was upheld by a court earlier this year. 'The legal argument is that we have a Court of Appeal decision that says that the government can't micromanage how we spend the money,' Ortona said. 'So they have to stop telling us that they're giving us money to be spent only on certain specific projects. ... They're acting illegally, they're acting unconstitutionally, and it's why we're hopeful that the courts will grant the stay, and ultimately the broader legal challenge.' He added that the board has reached out numerous times over the last few weeks to Education Minister Bernard Drainville, but has yet to receive a response. On Monday, The Gazette's calls to Drainville's office were not returned as of the time of publication. This story was originally published August 11, 2025 at 4:28 PM.
Vancouver Sun
19 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Why the French are outraged that Perrier filtered its water: 'This really is our Water-gate'
An iconic French brand dating back more than 160 years, Perrier's reputation has been rocked by a scandal. Last year, a joint investigation by Le Monde and Radio France revealed that at least a third of the country's mineral water brands — including Perrier, Contrex, Vittel and Hépar, owned by Nestlé Waters — had been illegally treated. According to the investigation, French President Emmanuel Macron's government knew about the practices and responded by 'quietly' easing the regulations. Here's what you need to know about the Perrier scandal, and why some are calling it France's 'Water-gate.' Discover the best of B.C.'s recipes, restaurants and wine. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of West Coast Table will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. At the heart of the controversy is whether brands such as Perrier can continue to market themselves as 'natural mineral water.' The 2024 Le Monde and Radio France investigation found that bottlers had been using illegal purification techniques for 'spring' and 'natural mineral' water for years, including carbon filters, micro-meshes and ultraviolet light. 'This really is our Water-gate,' Stéphane Mandard, a Le Monde journalist who worked on the investigations, told the BBC . 'It's a combination of industrial fraud and state collusion.' After a six-month inquiry, a French Senate report released in May supported Le Monde and Radio France's findings. 'Despite the fact that this method of disinfection is a fraud against consumers, authorities chose not to pursue legal action following these revelations. They decided not to inform the public of this fraud, not to inform European authorities, and not to inform local authorities who would have had direct oversight,' Alexandre Ouizille, a senator who led the committee on mineral water, said in a press conference. Natural mineral water costs 100 to 400 times more than tap water, and France is one of the world's largest producers, The Guardian reports. Unlike tap water, which is filtered and treated, mineral water can't be altered, according to European regulations. To be labelled 'natural mineral water,' rules prohibit it from being treated in any way that changes its characteristics. Ouizille said that France's agency in charge of fraud control estimated the total amount of the deception to be over 3 billion euros ($4.8 billion). Originating from protected, underground sources, mineral water traditionally didn't require treatment to make it safe to drink. This is no longer the case, experts say. Human activity and extreme weather, such as flooding, are resulting in increased groundwater contamination. In April 2024, Nestlé destroyed two million bottles of Perrier 'as a precautionary measure' because of bacterial contamination in one of its wells in Vergèze, southern France. 'The commercial model of the big producers has worked very well. But it is absolutely not sustainable at a time of global climate change,' hydrologist Emma Haziza told the BBC. 'When you have big brands that feel they have no choice but to treat their water, that means they know there is a problem with the quality.' Following the Le Monde and Radio France investigation, Nestlé Waters admitted using prohibited filters and ultraviolet treatment on mineral waters and paid a fine of 2 million euros ($3.2 million) to avoid legal action. The French Senate inquiry put the issue back in the spotlight. In February, Macron said , 'I am not aware of these things.' Adding that there hadn't been an 'agreement' with Nestlé and that 'there is no collusion with anyone.' However, the Senate report found that the government was involved in concealing Nestlé's prohibited water treatment methods. 'The presidency of the republic had known, at least since 2022, that Nestlé had been cheating for years,' the commission concluded . The findings have further rocked consumer confidence. 'I trust tap water more now,' one French grocery shopper told France 24 . Another said, 'I feel like we've been cheated.' The commission interviewed 120 people in its inquiry, including CEO Laurent Freixe and senior managers at Nestlé, the Swiss food and beverage giant. At a Senate hearing earlier this year, Freixe admitted that Perrier had used prohibited water treatments and that an official hydrologists' report recommended against renewing 'natural mineral water' status at the company's groundwater aquifer between Nîmes and Montpellier in southern France. On July 3, Nestlé said it had removed prohibited filtration devices but has yet to prove that Perrier springs can meet the legal 'natural mineral water' criteria, Le Monde reports. Perrier wells are located in a heavily populated, hot agricultural area that felt the effects of five years of successive droughts, Haziza told the BBC. Though Perrier may be the most prominent bottler to face issues, she expects more to follow. 'We can foresee that what has happened first at Perrier's site will happen to other producers in the years to come. That's why we need to move away from our current model of consumption.' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our cookbook and recipe newsletter, Cook This, here .
