Supreme Court restores FBI 'wrong house' raid lawsuit
The Supreme Court brought back a lawsuit against the FBI over a mishandled home raid from 2017 in Atlanta. Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI. | License Photo
June 12 (UPI) -- The Supreme Court brought back a lawsuit against the FBI over a mishandled home raid from 2017 in Atlanta on Thursday.
A unanimous decision moved the case over an incident in which federal agents broke through the door of Trina Martin's home with a search warrant at the wrong address, back to a lower court to look at it again to see if the lawsuit can move forward.
Martin sued the government for assault and battery, false arrest and other violations, after the FBI entered her home, where she lived with her then-boyfriend Toi Cliatt and 7-year-old son Gabe Watson, believing it was the home of an alleged violent gang member.
The suit alleged that agents entered the home with their guns drawn and set of a flash bang that startled the family and caused Gabe to scream.
The Supreme Court ruled that a federal judge in Atlanta and the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals were wrong to dismiss the suit, ordering them to determine whether the discretionary-function exception of the Federal Tort Claims Act in 2019, under which the suit was filed, would allow the case to go forward.
The justices did not answer the question, but allowed the plaintiffs to argue it in the lower courts.
"It is work enough for the day to answer the questions we took this case to resolve, clear away the two faulty assumptions on which that court has relied in the past and redirect it to the proper inquiry," Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote.
"We readily acknowledge that different lower courts have taken different views of the discretionary function exception," Gorsuch continued."We acknowledge, too, that important questions surround whether and under what circumstances that exception may ever foreclose a suit like this one."
During the raid Martin's former boyfriend was handcuffed and she wanted to go to her son. She wasn't allowed to move and the 7-year-old woke up to see agents with guns in his room.
After the agents realized their mistake they left the house and their supervisor came back to apologize.
The FBI had an arrest warrant out for Joseph Riley. After they left Martin's house, FBI raided Riley's house and arrested him.
Pattrick Jaicomo, Martin's lawyer in a statement said the court was right to revive the Martin family's case
"The Court's decision today acknowledged how far the circuit courts have strayed from the purpose of the Federal Tort Claims Act, which is to ensure remedies to the victims of federal harms-intentional and negligent alike," he said. "We look forward to continuing this fight with the Martins in the Eleventh Circuit and making it easier for everyday people to hold the government accountable for its mistaken and intentional violations of individual rights."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Spanberger slams FBI relocation, pushes affordability agenda, weighs in on Trump-Newsom
The Brief Spanberger opposes FBI relocation, calling it politically motivated and harmful to national security. She prioritizes affordability, focusing on housing, energy, and healthcare costs in Virginia. She warns against politicizing security, criticizing Trump's handling of National Guard deployments. WASHINGTON - Democratic nominee for Virginia governor Abigail Spanberger is speaking out strongly against the Trump administration's proposal to move the FBI National Academy from Quantico to Alabama—calling the plan "outrageous" and "politically motivated." "This is an issue where politics shouldn't be in play," Spanberger told Jim Lokay on "The Final 5." "Any person who cares about the security of our nation should be concerned." The former CIA officer and congresswoman, who clinched the Democratic nomination earlier this spring and therefore won't be on the ballot in next week's primary, said the decades of training infrastructure and expertise at Quantico can't be easily uprooted. "The FBI needs to have the strength of the training facility and the program that has taken decades to develop and build out," she said. "To up and move it on a whim—it's a terrible idea." Spanberger accused former President Trump of using federal institutions as pawns. "We need the FBI Academy to not be a political pawn, and something that President Trump is just choosing to upend," she said. "To play games with the FBI like this—especially the training of new agents—is just outrageous." The move, she warned, would not only harm Virginia but undermine national security. "When there are terrorist attacks at home, it is the FBI that comes out to investigate—and often thwarts threats before they happen," she added. READ MORE: Virginia governor candidates eye end to Virginia car tax Shifting to her platform, Spanberger outlined a comprehensive affordability agenda for Virginians, including housing, energy, and health care. "In every corner of the Commonwealth, housing costs are pricing people out of the market," she said. "It's impacting where people work, the jobs they can take, and the communities they can afford to live in." Her recently unveiled housing plan seeks to address rising costs statewide, particularly in Northern Virginia. "We need a governor who understands the breadth and scope of the problem and lays out a plan to build more housing and address affordability head-on," she said. When asked about Virginia's No. 1 ranking from CNBC as a state for business under Governor Glenn Youngkin, Spanberger credited both parties. "It's a bipartisan priority," she said. "Governor Youngkin carried on some of the policies of Governor Northam, and I'd continue to build on them too." On the campaign trail, one issue keeps coming up: the car tax. Efforts to repeal it have failed in the past, but both candidates have made proclamations about their intent to carry through with the effort. Spanberger called it "the most hated tax in all of Virginia" and said she's committed to working with lawmakers to eliminate it. She acknowledged that doing so would be complicated. "The devil's in the details," she said, pointing to the need for a constitutional amendment and its role in funding local governments. Spanberger also weighed in on the escalating fight between California and the Trump administration over National Guard deployments. If faced with a similar situation in Virginia, she said she would prioritize working with local officials rather than being dictated to by Washington. "When local and state law enforcement say they don't need additional resources, it calls into question the state's autonomy," she said. "It should not be the case that the president is dictating or mandating deployments." What they're saying Spanberger warned against the politicization of security responses. "What we're seeing in California is violence being used as a political tool," she said. "The president's efforts to politicize it are fanning the flames—and that's not what law enforcement is asking for." We have placed several requests to speak with Republican nominee Lieutenant Governor Winsome Earle-Sears, and we hope to speak with her during the campaign. The Source Information in this article comes from Democratic nominee for Virginia governor Abigail Spanberger.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A new wave of candidates is putting motherhood front and center
Democrats see turning to a new type of candidate to give them an edge in the 2026 midterms: mothers of young children. JoAnna Mendoza, a single mother of a 9-year-old son, launched a bid to run in Arizona's Sixth Congressional District in February. Christina Hines, a mother of three, threw her hat in the ring for an open seat in Michigan's 10th Congressional District in April. And in Iowa, state Sen. Sarah Trone Garriott, a mom of two, is vying for the state's 3rd Congressional District in May. Motherhood — once seen as a political liability — is becoming a key plank of campaign messaging for a new crop of Democratic candidates. Candidates are not just listing their credentials as former Marines or special victims prosecutors, but are also leaning into their experience raising a family in their pitch to voters. "Women candidates work so much harder than anyone else, and especially mothers, because they know how to really juggle and manage a lot of things, but they also know what's at stake,' said Trone Garriott, who said she raised $230,000 within the first 24 hours of launching her congressional campaign that leans into her 'public school mom' persona. And they have support from Vote Mama, a PAC dedicated to helping mothers of minor children get elected to public office. The group currently has 70 endorsed candidates and expects that number to grow. 'Moms have had enough,' said Liuba Grechen Shirley, who founded Vote Mama after her own unsuccessful run in 2018. 'Our policies fail moms.' The recent rush of political involvement from mothers follows past waves. Most famously, the sexual harassment allegations that dominated Clarence Thomas' Supreme Court nomination in the 1990s inspired a fresh crop of women running in 1992. But more recently, President Donald Trump's first presidential win inspired candidates in the 2018 midterms, and the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in 2022 pushed new grassroots groups to organize. Despite some high-profile examples — former Speaker Nancy Pelosi famously raised five children before running for Congress — mothers of young children remain rare in elected office. Only 6.8 percent of the members of the 118th Congress were mothers of children under 18, compared to 24.2 percent being fathers of minor children, according to data released by Vote Mama. At the state level, only 7.9 percent of all legislators are women with minor children. Ahead of the 2026 midterms, groups like Vote Mama say they are seeing renewed energy from mothers frustrated by Republican-led efforts to slash funding to programs that support families, like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Medicaid. But as more women enter public office, tensions arise with business as usual. Earlier this year, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna and a bipartisan group of lawmakers thrust motherhood into the spotlight with a push to allow proxy voting in the House — a move that drew aggressive criticism from conservatives and ultimately failed. 'Show up for work, or don't run for Congress,' Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) said in a post on X. But Luna's campaign shows that there are signs of growing support for mothers serving in Congress. 'What is noticeable is that it started as a bipartisan effort, and because of that, I think that just helps show that this is not tied to your political party,' said Gayle Goldin, a senior fellow at The Century Foundation. 'This is something that needs to be in effect for women, regardless of their political party.' Internal grapples with parental responsibilities has been one thing moms said they considered carefully. Hines, whose campaign was motivated by Trump's push to dismantle the Education Department, said she weighed the potential toll her candidacy could have on her family before making the decision to run. 'My biggest hesitation is the fact that I do have three kids — they're nine, seven and four — and they are my biggest passion and love of my life," Hines said. "The idea, not just of the campaign, but of winning and then being away from them, was something that was holding me back.' And motherhood is front and center for many candidates' messaging strategy. Dr. Annie Andrews, a pediatrician who recently announced a long-shot bid against Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) in May, said in her candidate announcement video: "I'm literally a busy mom," highlighting taking her kids to tae kwon do, dance and football. But Andrews' pitch to voters also aims to emphasize her blend of experience, highlighting her concerns as a doctor over Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s contested agenda. 'Like so many of you, I am worried about what the future holds for our kids,' she said. And some of these moms are already seeing early enthusiasm for their candidacies. Mendoza, who is running in Arizona, raised over $816,000 for her first-quarter FEC filing, an impressive figure for a candidate seeking federal office for the first time. She's also locked down endorsements from BOLD PAC, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus' political arm, and VoteVets, a progressive group that backs veterans running for office. "We're already in the political arena ready to go," Mendoza said. "Some of these other candidates are outside the stadium trying to figure out how to get in.'
Miami Herald
21 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Iran strikes: Israel downs scores of drones as escalation fears mount
June 13 (UPI) -- Israel said Friday morning its air defenses had successfully repelled an Iranian airborne assault in retaliation for overnight Israeli airstrikes targeting Iran's nuclear development program. Israel Defense Forces said Iran had launched more than 100 drones toward Israel, prompting the Home Front Command to order the public to remain close to air-raid shelters, but the warnings were later scaled back after Air Force interceptor fighter jets and anti-missile systems downed or disabled the majority. The IDF said it was unable to confirm the threat had been completely eliminated as more UAVs could have been launched since and en route toward Israel, but that sufficient numbers had been downed to allow the Home Front Command to temporarily ease the emergency measures. Schools, government offices and most offices were shut for the weekend, but Israeli airspace was closed and all flights grounded until further notice, with flights already en route diverted. Jordan and Iraq also closed their airspace. However, there were fears the missiles could follow and that the drones were just the beginning of a much more significant retaliation in line with Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warning Israel "should anticipate a severe punishment" in response to its deadly strikes overnight. The Jerusalem Post reported that airstrikes by the Israeli Air Force targeting Iran's radar systems and air defenses were still ongoing late Friday morning. "This operation will continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement posted on X. He said the "Operation Rising Lion" he had ordered was a "targeted military operation to roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival" from Iran's advancing nuclear program, which he said was close to being able to manufacture a nuclear bomb unless it was stopped. The Iranian foreign ministry vowed Friday to hit back saying the Israeli strikes on Iran were "a blatant act of aggression in violation of the U.N. Charter. "In accordance with Article 51 of the U.N. Charter, Iran reserves the legitimate and legal right to respond to this aggression. The Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran will not hesitate to defend Iran's sovereignty with full strength and in the manner they deem appropriate," the ministry said in a statement. It also threatened the United States, alleging the attacks could not have taken place without its backing and that as Israel's "primary patron," the U.S. government would "also bear responsibility for the dangerous repercussions of the Zionist regime's reckless actions." Internationally, leaders have appealed for calm. U.S. President Trump, who confirmed he was notified of the strikes in advance but that the United States was not involved, said he hoped that U.S.-Iran negotiations on Tehran's nuclear program could continue. "Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb, and we are hoping to get back to the negotiating table. We will see. There are several people in leadership in Iran that will not be coming back," Trump told Fox News. The independent London-based Iran International news outlet reported on X that Aladdin Boroujerdi, a member of the Iranian parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, saying a sixth round of nuclear talks in Oman scheduled for Sunday would now not go ahead. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expressed "deep alarm" and called for restraint, de-escalation and for military forces on all sides to stand down. "A diplomatic resolution is now more urgent than ever, for the sake of the region's stability and global security,' she wrote on social media. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, speaking in Stockholm, told reporters it was critical that Israel's allies stepped in to de-escalate the crisis. "I think that is now the first order of the day," he said. International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Grossi told the U.N nuclear watchdog's board which is meeting in Vienna, that nuclear facilities must never be attacked under any circumstances due to the risk to people and the environment. "Such attacks have serious implications for nuclear safety, security and safeguards, as well as regional and international peace and security," Grossi warned, noting that the IAEA has repeatedly stated that military strikes on nuclear facilities could result in radioactive releases that would not be contained within international borders. "I call on all parties to exercise maximum restraint to avoid further escalation. I reiterate that any military action that jeopardizes the safety and security of nuclear facilities risks grave consequences for the people of Iran, the region, and beyond," he said. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
