Northamptonshire council says it backs Pride despite flag stance
A council that will no longer fly an LGBTQ+ rainbow flag from any of its buildings has insisted it remained "committed to supporting community-led events and activities" including Pride.The newly-elected Reform UK administration on West Northamptonshire Council made changes to its flag protocol after coming to power last month.The protocol dictates that only the union jack, St George's flag and council flag will be flown outside its buildings.Mark Arnull, council leader, said the new protocol "prioritises the flying of flags on council buildings that foremostly reflect our local and national identity as a place that represents everyone living in West Northamptonshire".
It comes after Mike Reader, the Labour MP for Northampton South, had shared an open letter to Arnull and the Reform UK administration at the council calling for "clarity and reassurance" for LGBTQ+ people following the policy change.Under the new flag protocol, the council said additional flags would be flown on specified dates for royal or national occasions.These include plans for an Armed Forces Day flag for a week from 23 June, but no flag would be flown to reflect this month's international Pride month, as has been the case in previous years.
The Reform-controlled local authority said it "continued to give its backing to a busy and varied local community events calendar for the year ahead".It said it would provide resource and support to community organisers for events including Pride, Windrush, Diwali and others.Arnull said: "We acknowledge the role that local community forums play in promoting an inclusive environment for everyone who lives and works in West Northants and continue to support this work."
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
13 minutes ago
- Sky News
Ballymena protests: It is hard to see where the violence will end - and it could go on for weeks
The ugly, violent side of this Northern Ireland town was on full display once again last night. Angry mobs went on a rampage through the streets of Ballymena for a second evening as riot police from across this country were drafted in to push back against an escalating ambush. Hours of blaring sirens were punctured by the relentless sound of bricks and petrol bombs landing on police vehicles. The main roads became a war zone with fires in the middle of the carriageway, cars ablaze and the crunch of broken glass at our feet as we walked the streets. Masked and hooded young men were blasted with the water cannon as tensions boiled over in a strained, fragile community. This has been rumbling for days and began when a vigil, held for a girl who was the victim of an alleged sex attack was, according to police, hijacked by anti-immigration mobs. Authorities say "racist thugs" used the incident to plot their attacks on foreign people living locally. One family with three children were said to have hidden in their attic on Monday night as yobs ransacked their home. Another man told me how he had to drag his 84-year-old mum from her home of 40 years "kicking and screaming" as it was simply not safe anymore. "I've never seen anything like this," he said. On Tuesday, many displayed posters on their windows in a desperate bid to ensure their house did not become a target. Others draped union jack flags on full display. "British residents," one piece of paper stated. There is a feeling among the crowds here in Ballymena that the police branding them racists has escalated this row further. In a horrifying twist, we got word in the middle of the night that another house had been firebombed. When we arrived at the scene, it was a charred shell. The property was completely gutted. Neighbours described how several hundred "protesters" had gathered outside before hounding the foreign occupants out. One woman was pacing up and down, crying in distress at what happened. Another man, who lived a few doors, down hinted that this community had "had enough" of "people moving in". He lambasted the media and refused to engage any further. As I drove out of Ballymena at 1.30am I witnessed other families dragging suitcases full of their belongings through the streets. They were flanked by riot police, armed with shields, who helped them to safety in a late-night escape. 1:40 It is hard to see where this ends. The talk here is that this unrest is only just beginning. It could go on for weeks - and already there are questions about the pressure that will pile on police who will be desperate to de-escalate this mess.
Sky News
26 minutes ago
- Sky News
Spending review: More cash for schools, NHS and defence expected as chancellor unveils plans
The chancellor will unveil the spending review at lunchtime - with plans to invest billions of pounds across the UK. However, Rachel Reeves will admit that "too many people" are yet to feel the benefits of the government's work so far. In the House of Commons, she will confirm the budgets for each government department over the next three years - with boosts expected for schools, defence and the NHS. Ms Reeves will vow to spend vast sums of money across the country to "ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, their jobs, their communities". She is also pledging to set out "reforms that will guarantee towns and cities outside London and the South East can benefit from new investment". Ms Reeves is expected to say: "This government is renewing Britain. But I know too many people in too many parts of the country are yet to feel it. "This government's task - my task - and the purpose of this spending review - is to change that ... So that people can see a doctor when they need one. Know that they are secure at work. And feel safe on their local high street. "The priorities in this spending review are the priorities of working people. To invest in our country's security, health and economy so working people all over our country are better off." 3:56 Watch live coverage of the spending review on Sky News from 12pm Ms Reeves will formally confirm "the biggest-ever local transport infrastructure investment in England's city regions" - worth £15.6bn - as well as £86bn to "boost science and technology", including by building the Sizewell C nuclear power station. She will also announce the extension of the £3 cap on bus fares, Sky News understands. The cap - which Labour lifted from £2 - was due to expire at the end of this year. Meanwhile, £39bn for a new Affordable Homes Programme over the next 10 years is set to be unveiled, with the government seeking to ramp up housebuilding to hit its manifesto pledge of 1.5 million new homes by the end of this parliament. 10:28 The chancellor will argue: "The choices in this spending review are possible only because of the stability I have introduced and the choices I took in the autumn." One of those choices included cutting the winter fuel allowance for almost all pensioners - a decision the government has now U-turned on at a cost of £1.25bn. However, she is not expected to explain where that money will come from until the budget this autumn. Ms Reeves will tell MPs: "I have made my choices. In place of chaos, I choose stability. In place of decline, I choose investment. In place of retreat, I choose national renewal. "These are my choices. These are this government's choices. These are the British people's choices." But shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said this will be "the 'spend today, tax tomorrow' spending review" - arguing that the government is "spending money it doesn't have, with no credible plan to pay for it". He said in a statement: "Rachel Reeves talks about 'hard choices' - but her real choice has been to take the easy road. Spend more, borrow more, and cross her fingers. This spending review won't be a plan for the future - it will be a dangerous gamble with Britain's economic stability." He went on: "Today, we'll hear slogans, spin and self-congratulation - but not the truth. Don't be fooled. Behind the spin lies a dangerous economic gamble that risks the country's financial future."
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
UN panel urges UK to renegotiate Chagos Islands deal
A UN panel has urged the UK to renegotiate a deal returning the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, saying it "fails to guarantee" the rights of the Chagossian deal, signed last month, returned sovereignty of the Indian Ocean archipelago to Mauritius, but the UK retained the right to run a military base on Diego Garcia, the largest of the Chagos preventing the Chagossian people from returning to Diego Garcia, "the agreement appears to be at variance with the Chagossians' right to return," the UN experts wrote.A Foreign Office spokesperson said the UK-Mauritius deal had been "welcomed by international organisations including the UN secretary general". The panel of four experts were appointed by the UN Human Rights Council, but are not UN staff and are independent from the said by the UK keeping the military base of Diego Garcia, the Chagossian people were hindered from being able to "exercise their cultural rights in accessing their ancestral lands from which they were expelled".The panel called for the current deal to be suspended and for a new agreement to be the agreement, the UK would pay an average of £101m a year for 99 years to continue operating the military base on Diego Garcia, in concert with the Chagos Islands are located in the Indian Ocean about 5,799 miles (9,332km) south-east of the UK, and about 1,250 miles north-east of UK purchased the islands for £3m in 1968, but Mauritius has argued it was illegally forced to give away the islands in order to gain independence from Garcia was then cleared to make way for a military base, with large groups of Chagossians forcibly moved to Mauritius and the Seychelles, or taking up an invitation to settle in England, mainly in Crawley, West then, Chagossians have not been allowed to return to Diego the UK-Mauritius deal was signed last month, two Chagossian women living in the UK - who were born on Diego Garcia - launched a last-minute legal bid to stop it, saying the agreement did not guarantee the right of return to their island of birth. The deal includes a £40m trust fund to support Chagossians, a component that the UN panel also questioned would "comply with the right of the Chagossian people to effective remedy... and prompt reparation". "The agreement also lacks provisions to facilitate the Chagossian people's access to cultural sites on Diego Garcia and protect and conserve their unique cultural heritage," the panel Foreign Office spokesperson said: "We recognise the importance of the islands to Chagossians and have worked to ensure the agreement reflects this."Shadow Foreign Secretary Dame Priti Patel said the Conservatives "have been warning from the start that this deal is bad for British taxpayers and bad for the Chagossian people"."It is why I have introduced a bill in Parliament that would block the [agreement] and force the government to speak to the people at the heart of their surrender plans," she the House of Commons and House of Lords have until 3 July to pass a resolution to oppose the deal being ratified.
