Potential Christchurch Sites For National Erebus Memorial Shared With Families
The sites have been identified as possible locations for the memorial, which will honour the 257 people who lost their lives in 1979, when Flight TE901 crashed into the slopes of Mt Erebus in Antarctica while on a sight-seeing tour.
"The potential sites we shared with Erebus families and members of Operation Overdue are Avon Riverbank in the central city, Cracroft Reserve in Cashmere and St James' Church grounds in Harewood."
No decisions have been made about locating the memorial in Christchurch or which of the potential sites may be selected.
The Ministry is currently seeking feedback from Erebus families on each of the potential sites.
"We are grateful to Erebus families for their continued engagement. Sharing these potential sites is an important step and we will carefully consider their feedback.
"We are committed to building this memorial - for the people who lost loved ones, for New Zealanders, and for those here and overseas impacted by the Erebus tragedy," says Leauanae.
Christchurch Mayor Phil Mauger says the city is honoured to be considered as a possible location for the memorial.
"On behalf of Christchurch, I extend a warm invitation to Erebus families to consider the city as a potential location for the memorial," says Mayor Mauger.
"As a city, we have experienced tragedy and understand the deep impact the Erebus disaster continues to have on people across Aotearoa.
"Christchurch is long connected to Antarctica, we feel a deep sense of responsibility to honour the lives of your loved ones with great care and quiet dignity."
Manatū Taonga Ministry for Culture and Heritage continues to work closely with Erebus families, mana whenua and stakeholders to find a site for the National Erebus Memorial.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
Principals Confused At Ministry's ‘School Days' Directive
A recent Ministry of Education directive on school days has left North Canterbury school principals scratching their heads. Principals say the new Ministry directive, which sets a higher bar for deciding if schools are ''open for instruction'', is confusing and unworkable. Primary schools must be open for at least 382 half days, while area (year 1 to 13) and secondary schools must open for 376 days. But a new Ministry directive advises a school is not considered to be open for instruction unless all year levels are present. Rangiora High School board of trustees presiding member Simon Green said Ministry rules need to be flexible so schools can best support staff and students. ''I understand the Ministry's aim to protect learning time, but a one-size-fits-all directive doesn't reflect the realities of how schools operate. ''Longstanding practices like staggered starts and study leave are used thoughtfully to support both students and staff.'' Rangiora High School principal Bruce Kearney said flexibility is essential for a large school managing nearly 1700 students. He said it was unclear whether schools could finish early for events like parent-teacher interviews or how it affected exam leave. It has been standard practice for secondary schools to run a staggered start to the school year, with different year levels starting on different days, he said. ''But now they are saying all levels need to be at school, which then raises the question around exam leave for trial exams, because it technically means we are not open for instruction.'' He said he suspects it is a ploy to remove teacher only days, which raises the question of how schools will do curriculum days (a teacher only day to upskill teachers on new curriculum) during term time. Schools in the North Canterbury Kāhui Ako (communities of learning) have used curriculum days to bring primary and secondary teachers together. Funding for Kāhui Ako was cut in this year's Budget, but local schools said they planned to continue working together. ''The ability to have year 7 and 8 teachers working with high school teachers is really powerful in supporting that transition to secondary school,'' Mr Kearney said. Rangiora New Life School principal Stephen Walters questioned whether the Ministry considered what the new directive would mean for area (year 1 to 13) schools. ''If one of our year levels is not at school for any reason, it means the school won't be open for instruction. Area schools have 13 year levels with different needs. ''I'm hoping some common sense will come out, because there is a mismatch between practice which is well embedded and these interpretations.'' In its guidance, the Ministry has told schools to continue with their usual practices this year, but the new interpretation would apply from next year. Ministry of Education operations and integration Hautū (leader) Sean Teddy said 'open for instruction' can include online learning and school trips outside the classroom. "Schools are able to have only some year levels and teachers on site for start of year activities but cannot count these toward their minimum half-day requirement unless online learning is also provided for students not attending in person, with teachers available to support their learning." He said further guidance is being developed to provide clarity around exam leave. Schools can continue with their usual practices this year, "so long as the study leave is only for students doing exams, is for a short period, and teachers are available to help students during this time". Mr Teddy said schools need to be open for a minimum of four hours to count as a full day, which allows schools to close early for parent-teacher interviews.
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Seeds for clubs, counting the birds
Garden clubs are invited to grow flowers from seeds to brighten up public spaces. PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES In preparation for National Gardening Week in October, a seed company is offering to help garden clubs get ready to beautify public spaces. Yates will provide seeds and fertilisers to garden clubs, so members can grow seedlings, ready for planting the week before National Gardening Week, October 20-27. ''It could be a public garden, planters in the main street, or a tired-looking roadside garden,'' a Yates spokesperson said. ''If you've got a spot that you think could benefit from being planted with flowers, Yates will provide seeds and fertilisers to you now, for you to grow seedlings, ready for planting the week before National Gardening Week.'' Every garden club that signs up will receive a selection of products for raffling/ fundraising. For further information, contact liane@ The number of Otago people taking part in the garden bird survey increased this year. PHOTO: STEPHEN JAQUIERY Garden bird survey Otago was the regional star in this year's garden bird survey, with 589 counts made, up on last year and more than 10% of the national total of 5800 bird counts. Southland was down slightly and, despite extreme weather during the survey week from June 28 to July 6, the West Coast and Nelson had a response of 80% compared with last year's figures. Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research has led this biodiversity study of urban and rural landscapes since 2007. This survey is the only one of its kind that informs policy makers, scientists, bird enthusiasts and other organisations nationwide who have an interest in the state of our garden birds and their environment. The survey acts as a backyard barometer for our nation's garden birds. It is an early warning system to highlight any health issues, as well as evidence that our birds are thriving. Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research monitors changes in bird populations over time by analysing bird counts gathered by New Zealanders. Results of this year's survey have not yet been released. — Allied Media
The Spinoff
27-07-2025
- The Spinoff
What Canterbury can teach the rest of the country about insurance stress
In Canterbury, some people are still dealing with insurance claims nearly 15 years after the earthquakes – and worsening climate change means more New Zealanders may have this emotional and financial toll ahead of them. Kate Dewes has a four-drawer filing cabinet in the garage of her house in Riccarton, Christchurch; it's filled with documents related to the series of insurance claims and disputed cases she went through to get her home repaired following the 2010 Christchurch earthquake. 'Our general experience was traumatic,' Dewes says. After filing a claim following the initial earthquake, the damage to Dewes' house wasn't completely repaired. She and her husband, Robert Green, asked for the repairs to be fully completed, which became an ordeal that sent them to the High Court, where they had to pay for their own lawyers and expert witnesses. Dewes' case was particularly high profile; it was used as a kind of test case for the Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal and a short film was made about Dewes' experience. It is only recently, after nearly 15 years, that her family has been able to live in a fully repaired home, which doesn't leak or have falling chimneys. 'You saw how I looked in the film – I'm much calmer now. We've got our home back,' Dewes says, sitting in her restored study. Following the Christchurch earthquakes of 2011 and 2011, insurance claims were an ongoing reminder of the disaster. 'From research in Australia, and anecdotally here, we've heard that disputing an insurance claim can be more distressing than the experience of the disaster itself,' says Lauren Vinnell, a lecturer in psychology at Massey University who studies disasters. 'Insurance is a really important part of recovery; if claims are settled quickly, people are less likely to move, businesses are less likely to close.' The years following the Canterbury earthquakes showed this acutely. Ilan Noy, a professor of economics, specialises in the impacts of disaster and climate change at Victoria University of Wellington, and has pored through economic data showing how the quakes reshaped Christchurch. 'Data from eight years following the earthquakes show increased levels of anxiety and stress,' he says. He looked at insurance specifically, comparing people in the red zone who accepted a government buyout of their house at its capital value (CV) to those who made an insurance claim. On a financial level, many people made the wrong choice – they could have got more money from the government than via insurance, or vice versa, with the choice largely influenced by what their neighbours were doing. But people who went through the government buyout process tended to be happier, even if they hadn't got the best deal financially. 'It's a lot more straightforward to tick a box and get the money within weeks,' Noy says. Negotiating with private insurance meant both sides paying for experts, making arguments about what the damage was. 'It's not terribly surprising that that process is more cumbersome than just going with the CV,' Noy says. Cantabrians' experience with insurance disputes, on a financial and emotional level, has something to teach the rest of the country as disasters exacerbated by climate change continue. Natural hazards like flooding, landslides and wildfires are more intense and frequent in a hotter climate. This is already affecting insurance. Areas with recurrent flooding, for example, have had their premiums hiked; Nick Smith, Nelson mayor, has pointed out that the council's hazard map, identifying risky areas, affected insurance premiums and house sales. Hundreds of insurance claims have already been made following the recent Nelson-Tasman floods. An independent reference group led by the Ministry of the Environment recently examined the issue of how to pay for climate buyouts in a report on climate adaptation. 'In the past, local and central government have offered buyouts of up to the full value of properties affected by natural hazards. These decisions reduce incentives for people to understand and manage their own risk, can distort property prices, and have given rise to an expectation that buyouts will continue, creating a moral hazard,' the report said. It recommended slowly phasing out buyouts over 20 years, as well as changing land-use patterns to reduce future risks. It's not just people in earthquake-damaged Canterbury who will be negotiating with insurers and the government for the value of their primary asset, it will be people everywhere. Vinnell's research team, a collaboration between Massey's Centre for Disaster Research and the University of Canterbury, has just launched a survey, trying to get a better understanding of the experience of disputing insurance claims, beyond Canterbury. 'People in a disaster situation are often physically and psychologically traumatised,' she says. 'We're interested in how this interacts with dealing with an insurance dispute.' Vinnell and the other researchers will use the survey as a starting point, also interviewing people about their experiences. While she expects that most people will have had a negative experience, she's also interested in people who have had disputes resolved quickly, and how they feel about it as a result. The mundane details, of emails and photos, documentation and going through policies line by line, look like office work. But it implicates your home – a major financial asset – and where you can live. Dewes would sometimes stay up all night preparing documents for hearings in the morning. 'When I was up all night with the photocopier going, using my computer, something that kept me strong was knowing that it could help a whole lot of other people settle – but I got close to a breakdown.' Her hope is that her case will set a precedent for others. After featuring in the short film, she had people come to her house 'bawling their eyes out' over their experiences with insurance claims, and wanting to talk to someone about it. Dewes has worked as peace campaigner and researcher; she was able to pay for lawyers and experts and was confident dealing with documents, which isn't the case for everyone. Still, the experience of disputing the insurance claim felt harrowing. 'In the end, the earthquakes were an absolute doddle compared to the insurance company,' says Robert Green, Dewes' husband. Continuing to find the money for lawyers was stressful, as was the fact that Green was diagnosed with cancer in 2013. 'I don't allow myself to think about what I could have done with the last 15 years if we hadn't had to deal with this – you'd just become resentful,' says Green. Dewes imagines more time with her kids and grandkids; less time living in a cold, leaky house, waiting for repairs. Both have practical tips for people preparing to dispute insurance claims. 'Take notes, of everything,' Dewes says. When calling an insurance company, write down what you've discussed; take photos and keep evidence of work you've done on your home in case the cause of damage is debated afterwards. She's also heard of people whose computers and documents are destroyed in a disaster; she recommends digital and hard copies of documents, kept at a different location. Insurance makes calculations to insure homes based on risk and profit, Noy says. But having ultra-high premiums – like, say, $50,000 – isn't a good look as a business, so in areas exposed to severe natural hazards, insurers may simply refuse to insure houses. 'Insurance is always a one-year contract, so every year insurers can recalculate the risk,' Noy says. Events like Auckland's 2023 floods have caused insurers to advocate for greater flood protection in areas where inundation is likely. For politicians, choosing to pay for buyouts of houses after a disaster isn't a financial calculation, but a political one. 'It's more about electability than cost,' Noy says. Telling people that their home, and likely their greatest asset, is now impossible to sell because it can't be publicly bought out or privately insured following a disaster is always going to be unpopular. Noy has called the current system, where the government has no set position on buyouts, the 'worst' possible policy option – especially because money spent on buyouts is money not spent on planning and preparing for future disasters. Vinnell has talked to the Natural Hazards Commission and the Insurance Council, both of which are interested in the outcomes of her research into the emotional effect of insurance disputes. 'We're particularly interested in how one experience might shape decisions to dispute insurance in the future,' she says. Homes are linked to emotions as well as mortgages and bank accounts. 'How much do insurance claims take into account the value of staying in your neighbourhood, choosing to rebuild or repair?' The number of people dealing with insurance disputes is likely to keep rising as disasters continue. 'I can see that this problem is going to get worse because of climate change, let alone another major earthquake,' Green says. Both he and Dewes feel for the many people who share their experience of living in damaged houses, not knowing when they will get a resolution. 'My heart aches for anyone else who has to go through what we went through,' Dewes says.
