&w=3840&q=100)
Apple's Liquid Glass design could be first step towards an all-glass iPhone
Apple is reportedly planning a major design overhaul for the iPhone, aiming to release a mostly glass model in time for the product's 20th anniversary in 2027. According to a report by MacRumors, citing Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple may start making gradual changes as early as next year, beginning with a smaller Dynamic Island on 2026 iPhone models. These changes would align with the company's broader visual shift, hinted at through the recently announced 'Liquid Glass' design language, which debuted with iOS 26 and other platform updates.
Gurman has previously reported that Apple is working on a 'mostly glass, curved iPhone' featuring no display cutouts. While details remain limited, the new model is expected to incorporate advanced display technology that allows both the front-facing camera and Face ID sensors to sit beneath the screen.
This shift could begin with the iPhone 18 Pro series in 2025. As reported earlier by The Information, Apple may implement under-display Face ID next year, with only a small hole in the display's top-left corner to accommodate the front camera. This change would eliminate the current pill-shaped Dynamic Island, significantly refining the front design.
Backing these claims, a 9To5Mac report earlier this year pointed to an Apple patent focused on improving under-display camera technology. The patent describes a display with selectively removed subpixels to improve light transmission—especially of infrared (IR) light—critical for Face ID's functionality. Apple has reportedly faced challenges with IR transmission in past under-display camera attempts.
In parallel with these efforts, Apple is also believed to be working on a foldable iPhone. Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo recently stated that Apple has started finalising key specifications for the foldable device, which is expected to enter mass production in the second half of 2026.
The foldable iPhone is expected to feature a book-style design with a 7.8-inch internal display and a 5.5-inch cover screen. It is also expected to be extremely thin, measuring around 4.5mm when unfolded. Apple may incorporate its under-display sensor technology in the foldable model too.
Apple's Liquid Glass design: What is new
With iOS 26 and other platform updates, Apple unveiled its new Liquid Glass design language. It introduces translucent interface layers, dynamic reflections, and fluid animations that respond to user movement and environmental context. The redesign extends across the system, transforming everything from buttons and sliders to full panels, toolbars, and app navigation. Additionally, iOS 26 brings a new 'Clear' look for the Home Screen, allowing app icons and widgets to appear with a transparent or semi-transparent finish.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
16 billion passwords: How bad is the ‘world's largest data breach'?
New Delhi: On 19 June, a report by cybercrime and data breach reporting platform Cybernews said that a collection of 30 live databases was found with information stolen from individuals around the world—collecting what was claimed as 16 billion passwords and their corresponding credentials. The details reportedly belonged to users who had accounts on the most popular online services—Apple, Facebook, Google and others. Has the breach in question really put most users of the internet at risk? Perhaps not—Mint explains why. What really happened in the alleged data breach? Cybersecurity researchers that Mint spoke with said that the breaches in question were not strictly new or a single consolidated breach, as early reports had claimed. Instead, the new databases are more like master databases where breached information gathered over almost the past decade was put together by an unidentified group or entity. To put it simply, data breaches occur from either unsecured online databases that cyber criminals scrape to collect information, or as part of cyber attacks on large online platforms that lead to the leakage of sensitive information. The largest known data breach so far occurred in 2016, when cyber attackers breached the entire database of once-search and mail giant Yahoo—stealing over 3 billion passwords and related user credentials at one go. Also read: India's big AI test is here: Making sovereign language models work Four cybersecurity researchers that Mint spoke with said that the 'master' database with 16 billion passwords and other corresponding data—such as name, email addresses, dates of birth and other personally identifiable information (PII)—is likely a collection of multiple breaches, dating back to 2015. Is such a widespread data breach even possible? While no number of breaches is outside the realm of possibility, most researchers stated that a single breach exposing such a massive volume of sensitive information at one time is nearly unlikely. 'There are estimates of over 5.5 billion unique users on the internet. Given that any average individual would have at least two or three emails, plus accounts linked with around 10-15 online services—served by an average of around five unique passwords, an extrapolated hypothesis can be that a breach of 16 billion passwords would likely impact over 40% of all internet users globally. For this to happen in one single coordinated data breach would be akin to all of Europe, Asia and then some more being compromised at one go—which is nearly unthinkable even in today's cybersecurity climate," said an independent cybersecurity researcher who closely works with various government departments, requesting anonymity. Mint could not independently access the alleged database in question or verify whether the information is updated. However, a scroll through cyber breach tracker Have I Been Pwned by noted cyber security professional and Microsoft regional director for the US, Troy Hunt, signified that passwords that have been in use on Apple, Facebook and Google's platforms since at least 2018 have not surfaced online in the repository's list of breached passwords. Also read: Sovereign silicon: India targets indigenous 2nm, Nvidia-level GPU by 2030 To be sure, Have I Been Pwned is a public repository that regularly scrapes dark web databases for leaked passwords, such as the one mentioned here. What should users do in this regard? Cybersecurity experts stated that, irrespective of whether their passwords appear in breach trackers such as the one cited above, updating passwords once every six months is prudent. Heather Adkins, vice-president of security engineering at Google, said that as part of its global endeavours to ramp up cybersecurity, the company is in the process of collaborating with Apple, Microsoft and others in a global 'Fido Alliance'—which seeks to establish 'passkeys' as a standard for login. 'Passkeys reduce the dependency on passwords, and thus reduce how breaches occur by using the biometric authentication information that is stored on users' phones and laptops. The benefit here is that attackers cannot breach biometric information even if they want, since they require on-device authentication. Various emails and other logins are steadily shifting to passkeys in this regard," Adkins said. Sidharth Mutreja, cofounder and chief technology officer of homegrown enterprise security consultant Rockladder Technologies, added that a second step is to 'enable two-factor authentication." 'As a second layer of security, users should always either use one-time password-based additional verification or use authenticator apps to ensure that their accounts and personal information are not breached even if a password is compromised. Additionally, it's important to ensure that any caller or email sender is personally verified before they are responded to," he added. For now, though, each of the researchers agrees that no user is at 'immediate risk of losing access to all of their accounts"—even though initial reports projected widespread risk, unlike what was seen before. Can attackers still leverage the information? Unfortunately, yes. The presence of such databases means that attackers with deep pockets and ill intent can pay to access such databases and use the information for a wide range of tasks. These include actions such as 'spear phishing'—where attackers use available information about individuals to closely impersonate a potential acquaintance, and dupe them financially or otherwise. Also read: Eye in the sky: India to set up satellites to spy on satellites To be sure, such attacks have become common in India in the form of 'digital arrests' and originate from such databases. A single, coordinated database could thus be a crucial indirect resource for attackers, even if they do not immediately cause any direct harm to users. Will companies handle damages and fallouts, if any? Mutreja said that a coordinated database that collates all breached information under one umbrella 'could create significant liability for enterprises in terms of securing their own platform with database monitoring tools—and put the onus on consumers to instantly and continuously change their passwords." 'There's no one set law that dictates if a company should be liable for a public database—unless a breach in question directly correlates to a company specifically. In such a case, users can directly raise questions on whether companies should have better protected their data. In this case, though, this does not hold," he added. Apple, Facebook and Google—the three major service providers whose information was a part of the breach as per the original report—have not issued any statements or patches pertaining to a data breach of such stature.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Why Apple founder Steve Jobs believed teams should ‘argue' and ‘fight': ‘That's what it's…'
Apple founder Steve Jobs once said that building great teams requires friction – the one that leads to arguments and strong opinions, but resulting in better ideas and stronger people. In a 1995 interview with PBS's Triumph of the Nerds, Jobs recalled a story from his childhood when a neighbor showed him how a rock tumbler worked. He told interviewer Bob Cringely that a widower neighbor showed him a homemade tumbler consisting of 'a motor', 'coffee can' and a 'little band between them'. It was filled with "regular old ugly rocks," water and grit, Jobs told the interviewer, recalling that the stones emerged "amazingly beautiful" after a night of clattering. 'That's what it's like when you get a bunch of incredibly talented people working together,' Jobs said. ''They bump up against each other, they make some noise, they make some mistakes, they have arguments sometimes, they fight — but they polish each other,' he added. Jobs believed that real progress comes when people are forced to challenge each other, not just agree. At the time of the interview, he was running NeXT and was preparing to return to Apple. Former Apple employees, as per a Benzinga report, say Jobs often structured team spaces to encourage such interaction. Engineers and designers were placed close together so they had to confront issues head-on. Similar methods were used later in iPhone development and at Pixar, where open criticism in story sessions was part of the creative process. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Steve Jobs' work habit shared by Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos Pixar's Chief Creative Officer Pete Docter recently said that Steve Jobs would reportedly call colleagues at hours. As per a recent CNBC report, Docter told Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Gala that Jobs would phone colleagues 'at any time, day or night, three in the morning … you're on vacation, doesn't matter'. He further stated that Jobs' after-hours calls were non-negotiable and that the intensity often ignored personal boundaries. Docter's comments come amid ongoing discussions about tech's always-on work culture. He positioned his own leadership style as a contrast to that of Jobs — and to the hustle culture promoted by figures like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos . JOB SCAM ALERT! Don't Let Fake Recruiters Steal Your Money AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Mint
31 minutes ago
- Mint
Apple weighs Perplexity AI acquisition, eyes AI-powered search alternative: Report
Apple Inc. is reportedly weighing the possibility of acquiring artificial intelligence (AI) startup Perplexity AI, as the tech giant steps up efforts to enhance its generative AI capabilities and potentially reduce its reliance on Google for search services. According to sources familiar with the matter, Adrian Perica, Apple's head of mergers and acquisitions, has been engaged in preliminary discussions with services chief Eddy Cue and senior figures leading Apple's AI strategy, reported Bloomberg. While the deliberations possibly remain in their early stages and no formal offer has been tabled, the potential move reflects Apple's growing urgency to secure both advanced AI technology and top-tier talent. A deal with Perplexity could position Apple to develop its own AI-powered search engine, a strategic hedge as its lucrative, long-standing agreement with Google faces mounting scrutiny from US antitrust regulators. That partnership, which makes Google the default search engine on Apple devices, reportedly earns the iPhone maker an estimated $20 billion annually. However, its future remains uncertain pending the outcome of a major antitrust trial. As of now, Apple has not approached Perplexity's management directly regarding a takeover. Meanwhile, the AI firm stated it was unaware of any acquisition discussions. Apple, true to form, has declined to comment. Perplexity, valued at $14 billion following a recent funding round, offers real-time answers to user queries by drawing from current web data, positioning itself as a next-generation alternative to conventional search engines. Any deal approaching its valuation would mark the largest acquisition in Apple's history, surpassing its $3 billion purchase of Beats Electronics in 2014. The competition for AI talent is intensifying. Meta is also in advanced talks to recruit Daniel Gross, co-founder of Safe Superintelligence Inc. Apple, however, is attempting to lure Gross back into its fold. Gross previously sold his startup Cue to Apple in 2013, a move that played a key role in shaping Apple's early AI functionalities. His co-founder, Robby Walker, recently transitioned from leading Siri to spearheading an Apple initiative called 'Knowledge', which is focused on developing a ChatGPT rival using real-time internet data. Internally, Apple has held multiple technical discussions with Perplexity in recent months, evaluating its platform and capabilities. The company is also reportedly exploring the possibility of a strategic partnership instead of a full acquisition. One such option includes integrating Perplexity into Safari as a search engine alternative and embedding its features into Siri. Cue, who oversees Apple's services division, including iCloud and Apple TV+, previously acknowledged Perplexity's promise while testifying at the Google antitrust trial. 'We've been pretty impressed with what Perplexity has done,' he noted, adding that the future of internet search is increasingly being shaped by AI-driven solutions rather than traditional engines. (With inputs from Bloomberg)
