DNC chair dismisses Zohran Mamdani's refusal to condemn ‘intifada' chants: ‘We are a big tent party'
Martin, elected to lead the DNC in February, suggested that his party welcomes users of the chant associated with violent uprisings against Israel, in an interview with PBS.
'You know, there's no candidate in this party that I agree 100% of the time with, to be honest with you,' Martin said, when asked by 'PBS NewsHour' host Amna Nawaz about Mamdani's repeated defense of the rallying cry for anti-Israel protesters.
3 Zohran Mamdani speaks at a 'Within Our Lifetime Palestine Protest' in front of a sign calling for an 'Intifada revolution' on May 12, 2021.
Instagram/@zohrankmamdani
'There's things that I don't agree with Mamdani that he said, but at the end of the day, I always believe, as a Democratic Party chair in Minnesota for the last 14 years and now the chair of the DNC, that you win through addition, you win by bringing people into your coalition,' he continued. 'We have conservative Democrats, we have centrist Democrats, we have labor progressives like me and we have this new brand of Democrat, which is the leftists, and we win by bringing people into that coalition.'
'At the end of the day, for me, that's the type of party we're going to lead. We are a big tent party.'
Mamdani, an outspoken critic of Israel, has both awkwardly defended activists' use of 'globalize the intifada' and has flat-out refused to condemn it on several occasions.
The Queens assemblyman described the chant as an adage that reflects the 'desperate desire for equality and equal rights in standing up for Palestinian human rights,' in an interview with the Bulwark last month that went viral.
Mamdani later repeatedly refused to condemn the slogan, viewed by some as a call for violence against Jews, in an interview on NBC's 'Meet the Press.'
'That's not language that I use. The language that I use and the language that I will continue to use to lead this city is that which speaks clearly to my intent, which is an intent grounded in a belief in universal human rights,' he told host Kristen Welker on June 29.
3 DNC Chair Ken Martin is interviewed during PBS Newshour on July 10, 2025.
PBS NewsHour
3 Zohran Mamdani at the United Palace in New York on July 10, 2025.
Matthew McDermott
'I don't believe that the role of the mayor is to police speech in that manner.'
Some Democrats, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), have called on the socialist Democratic nominee to clarify his position on the slogan.
If elected, Mamdani would become the first Muslim mayor of New York City.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
15 minutes ago
- New York Post
The Hunter Biden interview shows Democrats are party only for elites
Who represents the Democratic Party in the year of our Lord 2025? This is the question on many of the greatest minds in the nation these days. There are a myriad of arguments, which, in and of itself denotes no one is leading the pack right now. Names like Jasmine Crockett, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Zohran Mamdani are being floated in some circles. While each name may carry weight (most likely for their social media buzz more than anything at the moment), the unfortunate truth of the matter for Democrats is the 'leader' of their party right now isn't one person, it is an idea. Elitism is the head of the Democratic Party. It is what lost them the White House, and what continues to plague them as they flounder to solve the high mystery of the average American voter. Case in point: Hunter Biden. The former first son sat down for a bizarre, jittery interview with some Democrat podcaster. The hourslong interview was laden with expletives and rants about party loyalty, but one segment in particular stood out to me as the perfect example of who/what exactly is leading the Democratic Party. On the subject of illegal immigration, Biden launched into a vulgar rant about all the reasons we need illegal immigrants to stay, and all the reasons our lives would be downright unlivable if we continue on this path: 'People are really upset about illegal immigration? F–k you. How do you think your hotel room gets cleaned? How do you think you have food on your f—king table? Who do you think washes your dishes? What do you think does your f–king garden? Who do you think is here by the f–king sheer f–king just grit and will that they figured out a way to get here because they thought that they could give theirselves and the family a better chance.' That, my friends, is the true head of the Democratic Party. Elitism — the idea there is a ruling class and a servant class and the servant class' most important job in life is providing comfort for the ruling class, and they like it that way because they are just gritty, determined, simple folk who only want simple things for their simple lives. In Hunter Biden's world — the Democrats' elitist world — illegal immigrants (by which Democrats almost exclusively mean 'Hispanics') perform the jobs they can't imagine deigning to do themselves. They wash our clothes, scrub our toilets and clean our hotel rooms. They tend our gardens and pick our food. Most Americans count a few nights a year in a hotel room as a rare luxury. To the Bidencrats of the world, clean hotel rooms are a part of every day life, an expected essential of basic living. Most of us don't have our own gardens to tend, and those who do attend those humble patches themselves, as a form of therapy or sustenance. Bidencrats have gardens, and they can't possibly tend those gardens themselves. That is work for the servant class. I have no data to back this up, but I feel confident in positing that statistically almost every American household takes care of their own dishes. Not the Bidencrats! Dishes are dirty work. They are meant to be eaten from, not scrubbed. Scrubbing is for the people who find great fulfillment in doing manual labor for slave wages. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters You won't find another 30 seconds of content that so beautifully encapsulates the Democrat leadership problem. They don't know who we — Americans — are. They are so cocooned in their upper-crust lifestyles, they think the best argument for keeping around tens of millions of illegal aliens is that all our kitchen staff will disappear. They can't even conceive of an electorate that washes their own dishes and changes their own linens and doesn't have a personal security detail with them at all times. The Bidencrat says, 'These people love to work, so why shouldn't they be working for me?' You'll notice no Democrat ever accuses these people of being dentists or architects. Ever since Donald Trump broke the Internet on Joe Rogan's show, Democrats have been breaking their necks trying to replicate that reach. While they've suddenly developed a keen interest in podcasting, they still cannot make the format work for them, and that is because the liberal podcasters have the same problem as the rest of the Bidencrats — they are led by a bad idea. Everything that springs from the premise of 'US and THEM' is, therefore, poisoned fruit. The fruit of the modern Democratic Party is rotten, born of a tree with disintegrating roots. Kira Davis is an independent opinion journalist and podcaster living in Southern California. Reprinted with permission from the Just Kira Davis Substack.
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Democrats agree to advance military construction, veterans spending bill
Senate Democrats on Tuesday cautiously agreed to advance bipartisan legislation funding military construction and the Department of Veterans Affairs, less than a week after Republicans rammed through a partisan bill to defund PBS, NPR and global aid programs. Thirty-eight Democrats voted for a motion to proceed to the bill after holding a long lunchtime meeting in the Lyndon Baines Johnson Room just off the Senate floor to hash out their strategy. The legislation advanced by a vote of 90 to 8. The bill, which provides $153.5 billion in discretionary funding, passed out of the Appropriations Committee with a 26-3 bipartisan vote. It's the first appropriations bill for fiscal year 2026 to advance on the Senate floor. It includes $342 million to support improved access to rural health care, $3.5 billion for the Veterans Affairs Department to help caregivers, and $3.5 billion to provide services and housing to homeless veterans. Democrats agreed to advance the legislation even though many of them are still furious at their GOP colleagues for passing a rescissions package last week that claws back $9 billion in funding Congress had previously approved for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and global aid programs. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) defended the legislation for being crafted with input from Democrats on the Appropriations panel. 'First, it was done in a bipartisan process, no question about it. Second, it undoes many of the awful DOGE cuts to veterans and, third, we'll have an amendment process,' he said, noting that Democrats only voted for the motion to begin a floor debate on the legislation. Senior Democrats voted for to proceed to the bill, including Appropriations Committee ranking member Patty Murray (Wash.) and Sens. Jeff Merkley (Ore.), Dick Durbin (Ill.), Chris Van Hollen (Md.), Martin Heinrich (N.M.), Jack Reed (R.I.), and Chris Coons (Del.). Several progressives voted against moving the bill, including Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). But Democrats are warning that just because they voted to begin the floor debate on the bill doesn't mean they'll vote to pass it, especially if Republicans block their ability to offer amendments. Merkley, the ranking member of the Interior Appropriations Subcommittee, plans to offer an amendment that would prevent the Trump administration from offering additional rescissions packages under the Impoundment Control Act to claw back funds already allocated by Congress. Schumer argued on the floor Tuesday that Republicans were undercutting efforts to pass bipartisan appropriations bills by pushing rescissions packages. 'We will see how the floor process evolves here on the floor. Given Republicans' recent actions undermining bipartisan appropriations, nothing is guaranteed,' he said. He accused his Republican counterpart, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) of 'sort of talking out of both sides of his mouth' by urging Democrats to support the regular appropriations process but also pushing partisan bills to gut past funding agreements. 'On the one hand, Leader Thune says he wants bipartisanship. Then on the other, he's pushing rescissions packages here on the floor. He's allowing party-line votes to reverse bipartisan funding agreements. Well, you can't have it both ways,' Schumer warned.
USA Today
15 minutes ago
- USA Today
Can Trump pardon Ghislaine Maxwell? When does Jeffrey Epstein co-conspirator get out?
Officials want to talk to Gislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's co-conspirator serving 20 years in a prison in Florida. Here's what to know. Amid increased outrage over how the Trump administration is handling the case of disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, his co-conspirator is also back in the news. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said July 22 that Justice Department prosecutors asked to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell, an associate and former girlfriend of Epstein. She was convicted of conspiring to sexually abuse minors over a ten-year period and is currently serving 20 years in a federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida. Hours later, the House Oversight Committee said it will subpoena Maxwell to testify before Congress "as expeditiously as possible," Axios reported. House Democrats attempted to vote to compel the release of the so-called "Epstein Files" but House Speaker Mike Johnson shut down House operations early to avoid "political games" even though he himself called for the files' release on July 15. Trump struggling with fallout from Epstein case President Donald Trump is facing unprecedented resistance from his base over the Epstein files and has lashed out at supporters and critics alike over what he called the "Jeffrey Epstein hoax." Before their falling out, Trump was friends with Epstein — who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges — and rumors of his potential involvement in Epstein's grooming and sexual assault of minors have dogged him since. During his presidential campaign, Trump and his allies fired up his base by vowing to release Epstein's alleged client list. After Attorney General Pam Bondi's Justice Department on July 17 released a memo stating that there was no client list, there was no evidence he was murdered while in custody, and there would be no more disclosures despite months of promises of new information, backlash was swift. Many of Trump's previously loyal followers have accused his administration of covering up powerful names and called for a full release of the files. "No one believes there is not a client list," U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Georgia, a close Trump ally, posted on X July 8. Trump opposed appointing a special prosecutor in the Epstein case, but in reaction to the backlash said on social media that he asked Bondi to "produce any and all pertinent grand jury testimony, subject to Court approval.' However, this could take months and would not include witness interviews, texts, photographs, videos or other evidence, said Democratic Rep. Daniel Goldman, a former prosecutor. Meantime, Maxwell's family is fighting to have her released, saying "she did not receive a fair trial." Trump, who has discouraged questions about the Epstein investigation, told reporters at the White House July 22 that the request to interview Maxwell 'sounds appropriate to do.' Where is Ghislaine Maxwell being held? Maxwell is being held at Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) Tallahassee, a low-security federal prison in north Florida. When will Ghislaine Maxwell get out? Maxwell, 63, was sentenced to 20 years. Barring an early release or pardon, Maxwell will be released on July 17, 2037. She was also sentenced to five years of supervised release and ordered to pay a $750,000 fine. What was Ghislaine Maxwell charged with? Maxwell, a British socialite and daughter of publisher Robert Maxwell, was found guilty in December 2021 of conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, conspiracy to transport minors to participate in illegal sex acts, transporting a minor to participate in illegal sex acts, sex trafficking conspiracy, and sex trafficking of a minor. From at least 1994 to around 2004, Maxwell helped Epstein "recruit, groom, and ultimately abuse victims" that both of them knew to be under the age of 18, with some as young as 14, prosecutors said. She identified vulnerable girls, often from single-mother households in difficult financial circumstances, befriended them, remained present during some of their interactions with Epstein, caused some to cross state lines to Epstein's residences, and "normalized and facilitated sexual abuse," the Justice Department said. Jeffrey Epstein case: Read the 2006 Florida grand jury transcripts Can Trump pardon Ghislaine Maxwell? She was charged in a federal court, so the president could commute her sentence or issue a full pardon. Maxwell's family petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court in April to overturn her conviction, saying that Epstein had a non-prosecution and plea agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida in 2008 that protected him and any co-conspirators. The Justice Department, however, has argued the agreement didn't protect co-conspirators from prosecution in other jurisdictions and Maxwell was prosecuted on other charges in Manhattan. Lower courts have rejected her attorney's arguments. Her conviction was upheld by a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York in 2024. According to journalist and Trump biographer Michael Wolff, Trump considered pardoning Maxwell during his first term but was concerned over what she might say. Trump was a longtime friend of Epstein's, calling him a "terrific guy" and once saying, "It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." Trump later said he hadn't talked to Epstein for 10 or 15 years. Trump has sued the Wall Street Journal's publisher and its owner, Rupert Murdoch, after a recent bombshell article revealed that Trump sent Epstein a suggestive drawing with a message in which Trump reportedly alluded to their friendship and shared interests. "We have certain things in common, Jeffrey," he reportedly wrote. The letter was in response to a request from Maxwell for Epstein's family and friends to contribute to a 50th birthday album. According to TMZ, a senior Trump official said there had been no new discussions of a pardon for Maxwell, and there wouldn't be. What happens to Ghislaine Maxwell when she gets released? After she is released, unless she is pardoned, Maxwell will have all the usual sex offender restrictions and a few more. She'll have to participate in a sex-offense evaluation, outpatient sex offender treatment and/or an outpatient mental health program, according to federal court documents detailing her supervised release. She'll also have to submit to polygraph tests and probation officers will be able to search her property, computers, cloud storage, person and more, if they believe she is violating her conditions. Along with that, according to court documents: Contributors: Maureen Groppe, Bart Jansen
