5 Tips From Barbara Corcoran for Potential Middle-Class Homebuyers
Up Next:
Check Out:
Thanks to a shortage of inventory, housing prices continue to increase. High interest rates only worsen the situation. Barbara Corcoran, a shark on ABC's 'Shark Tank,' recently spoke with Yahoo Finance to provide actionable tips to make buying a house more attainable that the middle class can use during their home search.
Target Homes That Have Been Sitting on the Market
Seeing a new listing is exciting. However, you're likely not the only one looking at the new house. Corcoran advised avoiding the shiny new listing. 'I would say the most important overall tip is always look where somebody else is not looking, and that's always where you find your value,' Corcoran said.
Instead of visiting the new possibility, dig deeper to find a hidden gem. 'Do your search based on houses that have been on the market nine months or longer. Those people are having second thoughts, thinking of taking a lower offer, ready to move, and that's where you want to put your lower offer,' Corcoran said.
It takes some work, but it may reap a discount.
Be Aware:
Shop Off-Season
Spring and summer are commonly peak home shopping seasons. That increases competition, making it conducive for sellers.
'People don't like to shop in the wintertime or Christmastime. They think it's a bad time. It's a great time to shop for houses because you're not going to have any competition out there, and they are going to be more likely to take your bid,' Corcoran said.
If you're not in a rush, waiting for the off-season may provide the chance to snag a home at a reduced price.
Don't Be Scared Off by a Fixer-Upper
Purchasing a fixer-upper may not be glamorous, but the savings can be attractive. If you have the know-how, it pays to include fixer-uppers in your search.
'People don't want to bother with [a fixer-upper] because it takes upfront cash, but you could always get a construction loan. [There's] no problem getting construction loans today, and you could find a fixer-upper and add value yourself if you're willing to just wait a few months to do it,' Corcoran said.
Look for Homes With a Second Entrance
An overlooked way to save on a home is to purchase a property with a second entrance. A basement or back-of-the-house entrance qualifies as a second entrance.
That matters because a second entrance may reduce insurance costs. 'You could create a small unit in the basement or the back of the house where you can offset your insurance costs,' Corcoran said.
Before You Buy, Check Climate Risks
Homeowners insurance continues to rise in large part due to climate change, with premiums increasing more than 30% between 2020 and 2023, according to The Brookings Institution.
Purchasing a house in a high-risk area will bring increased premiums. 'Right away you're going to increase your insurance costs probably by close to 20%, [and] some instances 25%,' Corcoran said.
However, this also provides an opportunity. 'The good side of it is a lot of people are afraid of it, and so sometimes if you're not afraid and you want to take that risk, you can make a lower offer and … get a house you like accepted,' Corcoran said.
Buying a house is undoubtedly expensive. Thankfully, with a little ingenuity, you can buy a home for less to create memories in and build wealth.
More From GOBankingRates
Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard
7 Things You'll Be Happy You Downsized in Retirement
7 Luxury SUVs That Will Become Affordable in 2025
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: 5 Tips From Barbara Corcoran for Potential Middle-Class Homebuyers
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
a minute ago
- Fox News
Could Senator Adam Schiff really go to jail over alleged mortgage fraud?
Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director William Pulte sent a criminal referral to Attorney General Pam Bondi in May alleging that California Democrat Sen. Adam Schiff "has, in multiple instances, falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms, impacting payments from 2003-2019 for a Potomac, Maryland-based property." What is the gist of the complaint? That Schiff, while representing a California district in the House of Representatives, falsely listed his posh Maryland home as his primary residence in order to get more favorable loan terms when, in truth and in fact, his California condo, which he designated as his primary residence in order to qualify for a California homeowner's tax exemption, was his real primary residence. Even worse, according to the referral, Schiff claimed his Burbank condo as his primary/principal residence in California tax filings during the same years he listed his Maryland home as his primary/principal residence on loan applications to finance that home. Schiff's response to the criminal referral and to subsequent Truth Social posts by President Donald Trump was one we often see in white collar cases. Per the senator's office, "the lenders who provided the mortgages for both homes were well aware of then-Representative Schiff's Congressional service and of his intended year-round use of both homes, neither of which were vacation homes." That's not much of a denial, senator. The question is whether you lied on these forms or not. Were your answers accurate or not, and if they were inaccurate, were the answers a mistake or intentional? The devil is always in the details in white-collar cases like this. Which representatives of which particular lenders "were well aware" that Schiff intended to use both homes year-round, and why does that matter? The issue is whether Schiff intentionally lied on federal or state forms to gain a financial advantage. If he falsely listed his Maryland home as his primary residence in order to get a lower interest rate, that matters too. (After all, similar alleged falsehoods by Donald Trump were used by New York Attorney General Letitia James to go after Trump in her massive New York state civil action.) Did Schiff lie on California tax forms to gain an exemption he was not entitled to, and, if so, does it implicate any federal criminal statutes? This is what inquiring minds want to know, and we just don't have enough information at this stage to know all the answers. Based on what we do know, how likely is it that Schiff will be indicted for violating one of several federal bank fraud statutes that potentially cover his conduct? Not very likely. Here are several reasons why: The devil is always in the details in white-collar cases like this. Which representatives of which particular lenders "were well aware" that Schiff intended to use both homes year-round, and why does that matter? This leaves open the possibility of a state of California prosecution for filing false tax returns. Would you care to place any bets on that happening? The bottom line is this: Schiff's alleged conduct may be sleazy and his explanation shifty, but a criminal charge at the federal or state level does not seem to be in the offing.
Wall Street Journal
a minute ago
- Wall Street Journal
Today's High-Yield Savings Rates for July 28, 2025: Up to 4.66%
Pay attention to restrictions that sometimes come with HYSAs. For example, some savings accounts limit the number of withdrawals and transactions you can complete in a month. Others might require a minimum deposit to open an account or have limits on your APY based on your balance. How traditional savings accounts work Traditional savings accounts work the same as HYSAs. However, unlike high-yield accounts that are often found online with no brick-and-mortar branches, traditional savings accounts are usually held at banks that have physical branches. In some cases, you can get above-average yields with more traditional accounts held at local credit unions and community banks with physical locations, but often the best savings rates are found with online-only accounts. Traditional savings accounts might have transaction limits, deposit requirements and tiered rates based on your balance. HYSA dependency on Fed rate The Federal Reserve meets eight times a year to announce its benchmark federal-funds rate (sometimes called the Fed rate). This is the rate banks charge each other for short-term lending. High-yield savings accounts are highly dependent on the Fed rate. When the target rate rises, savings yields generally rise as well. For savers, this can mean higher returns for letting their money sit at a bank or credit union. On the other hand, when the Fed cuts its benchmark rate, yields tend to fall. Savings yields can fluctuate regularly, but they are most likely to significantly change when the Federal Reserve announces a cut or increase of its benchmark rate.
Fox News
a minute ago
- Fox News
America must win the AI race — and prepare for the worst
Artificial intelligence is no longer a niche tool for tech labs or science-fiction thrillers. It's now the battleground where the future of American power, prosperity, and freedom will be decided. With the release of "Winning the AI Race: America's AI Action Plan," the Trump administration is rightfully treating this moment as the 21st-century equivalent of the space race or the nuclear age. This bold strategy outlines over 90 policy actions that span three key pillars: Accelerating Innovation, Building American AI Infrastructure, and Leading in International Diplomacy and Security. Each of these pillars sends a clear message to the world: America intends to lead – not follow – on artificial intelligence. And we must. This is a race we can't afford to lose. The Trump administration's plan does what Washington too often fails to do: it combines vision with action. From fast-tracking permits for critical data centers and chip fabrication plants, to expanding the skilled trades workforce needed to maintain those facilities, the plan hits both high-tech and firsthand realities. Crucially, the plan calls for exporting secure, full-stack American AI packages – hardware, software, models, applications and standards – to trusted allies. That's smart policy. In a world where China exports authoritarian surveillance technology, America must counter with liberty-based alternatives. And most refreshingly, the plan defends free speech. It mandates that federal procurement contracts only go to developers of large language models that are free from ideological censorship. That's a huge win for constitutional values in a time when Big Tech algorithms increasingly silence dissent. The optimism in this action plan is well-founded – but incomplete. As foreign policy analysts Matan Chorev and Joel Predd recently warned in their Foreign Policy article, the U.S. must also assume the worst about artificial intelligence – especially artificial general intelligence (AGI). That's the version of AI that can perform at or above human levels across a wide range of tasks. Unlike nuclear weapons, AGI won't announce itself with a mushroom cloud. It may slip quietly into our systems, our economy and even our military decision-making – without a clear warning shot. The nightmare scenario? A rogue AI, either built by an enemy nation or evolving beyond human control, triggering economic collapse or catastrophic warfare. That's why the U.S. must not only pursue victory in AI, but vigilance. Planning for worst-case scenarios isn't fearmongering – it's common sense. The COVID-19 pandemic taught us what happens when leaders fail to prepare for known risks. With AI, we may not get a second chance. What happens if a U.S. company suddenly claims to have developed AGI and asks for national security protections – access to classified data, regulatory exemptions and federal backing? What if China gets there first? The Biden-era playbook of strategic ambiguity and global appeasement won't cut it. America needs break-glass protocols: clear, tested plans to respond to AI emergencies – whether cyberattacks, misinformation campaigns or autonomous systems going rogue. This requires massive coordination across the Pentagon, the Department of Homeland Security, our intelligence community and private industry. The federal government must build the analytical muscle to separate hype from real breakthroughs – and act fast when a threat emerges. Advanced AI attacks may not come with a digital return address. Whether an attack comes from Beijing, a terrorist network or a self-replicating algorithm, our cyber defenses must be able to detect, contain and recover without waiting for attribution. That means hardening critical infrastructure, isolating vulnerable data centers and ensuring military continuity of operations in a high-tech crisis. These aren't science-fiction concerns – they're strategic imperatives. The Trump administration's emphasis on exporting U.S. technology to allies is critical – but we must also export American values. Freedom. Accountability. Innovation with restraint. Our allies want alternatives to China's surveillance-driven tech regime. America can lead that coalition – but only if we speak as clearly about ethics as we do about engineering. David Sacks, the White House's AI and crypto czar, put it plainly: "To win the AI race, the U.S. must lead in innovation, infrastructure, and global partnerships. At the same time, we must center American workers and avoid Orwellian uses of AI." He's right. Victory in AI is not just about lines of code – it's about preserving what it means to be human in an age of machines. Winning the AI Race is a historic first step. It champions free markets, American jobs, national strength and liberty-based governance in the AI era. But we must not mistake ambition for immunity. America needs a dual-track strategy: drive innovation with urgency – and prepare for disaster with equal urgency. Our adversaries won't wait. Neither will the technology. We can – and must – lead the world into the AI future. But let's do it with eyes wide open, grounded in our values and ready for anything.
