Planes, trains and more missteps from Labour
By my reckoning, this is the third time the scheme has been abandoned partway through. It will ensure that four diesel trains an hour will be plying the route for the foreseeable future, adding to air quality issues and consuming more fossil fuels.
The overhead wiring for the electric trains currently ends in the middle of nowhere a few miles south of Leicester. New trains being built for the route are bi-mode – that is, equally capable of operating on diesel or electric power. It's all a huge waste – and more proof that, when it comes to investing in the north, the money always runs out.Alan WhitehouseSilkstone Common, South Yorkshire
Polly Toynbee is correct to assert the advantages of rail versus flying, especially for domestic journeys. She does not mention the big drawback of the current UK rail system – unreliability. I live in Aberdeenshire and have family in Birmingham and London. I have given up on using the train to visit family because on many occasions my train has not reached its destination because of cancellations of connections or driver shortages. I now reluctantly fly to Birmingham and London from Aberdeen. I will return to rail (my preferred option) when I can be sure of reaching my destination.Dr Nick WilliamsAuchenblae, Aberdeenshire
Living as I do adjacent to the flight path to Manchester airport, I would of course welcome any reduction in non-essential air travel. But more Eurostar journeys are of little relevance to anyone living outside the south-east because of the cost and time involved in getting to St Pancras. But here's an idea. Now we have an integrated rail network, why not adapt the Interrail idea of allowing the cost of the journey to and from the home station to St Pancras to be covered by the standard Eurostar fare? That would incentivise the use of rail travel to Europe for all of those who currently fly because there is no practical alternative.Michael ReardonCheadle Hulme, Greater Manchester
Polly Toynbee is so right in her analysis of the case against the Heathrow third runway. If our only hope of stopping them is Boris Johnson indeed lying down in front of those bulldozers, we are doomed.Margaret Squires St Andrews, Fife
International Airlines Group, the owner of British Airways, is implying that the cost of a third runway at Heathrow will be so expensive that it can't be done without public subsidy (Heathrow's third runway 'is going to be empty' if it means high fees, says BA owner, 1 August). As air travel comes bottom in the hierarchy of sustainable transport to meet our climate obligations, and the last thing Londoners need is more plane noise and air pollution, I can't think of a single reason for rescuing this venture, particularly as so many other parts of the UK are in urgent need of investment in better rail infrastructure.Jenny Rathbone MSSenedd member for Cardiff Central
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
16 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
First migrants detained under ‘one in, one out' deal as PM vows to secure border
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the Government was prepared to defend itself against legal challenges if migrants seek to avoid being sent back across the English Channel. The migrants detained were among those who risked the Channel crossing on Wednesday, the day the pilot scheme began operating. The first small boat migrants have been detained under our landmark UK-France returns deal. This is what happens next 👇 — Home Office (@ukhomeoffice) August 7, 2025 Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: 'We have detained the first illegal migrants under our new deal before returning them to France. No gimmicks, just results. 'If you break the law to enter this country, you will face being sent back. When I say I will stop at nothing to secure our borders, I mean it.' The pilot scheme was set up as part of a deal announced by the Prime Minister and French president Mr Macron during his state visit to the UK in July. UK officials aim to make referrals for returns to France within three days of a migrant's arrival by small boat while French authorities will respond within 14 days. This is in exchange for an approved asylum seeker in France to be brought to the UK under a safe route. No figures have been confirmed for how many migrants will be sent back, although reports from France have suggested it could be around 50 a week, a small fraction of the numbers making the crossing in small boats. The Home Secretary said: 'The pilot has now begun, so the first migrants who have arrived on the small boats are now in detention. We will then swiftly make the referrals to France and that process will now start to be able to return people to France. 'It's the beginning of the pilot and it will build as well over time, but we're also clear that France is a safe country, so we will robustly defend against any legal challenge that people try. 'We do expect for people to start being returned in a matter of weeks.' The Home Office is expected to launch a campaign in the coming days to make migrants in northern France and elsewhere aware of the new treaty. Ms Cooper added: 'Criminal gangs have spent seven years embedding themselves along our border and it will take time to unravel them, but these detentions are an important step towards undermining their business model and unravelling the false promises they make.' The Home Secretary has acknowledged the accord is not a 'silver bullet' to stop small boat crossings, which are running at record levels so far in 2025. But the Government hopes it will be a turning point as migrants will be sent back across the Channel for the first time. The process for asylum seekers to come to the UK under the 'one in, one out' pilot scheme has also been launched, with adults and families in France able to express an interest in coming to the UK through an online platform set up by the Home Office. They will have to meet suitability criteria, a standard visa application process and security checks. If accepted, they would be given three months in the UK to claim asylum or apply for a visa, and would be subject to the same rules for all asylum seekers not allowed to work, study or have access to benefits. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said just a 'token handful' of migrants had been detained and suggested the pilot scheme would fail. He said: 'Keir Starmer's promise last year to 'smash the gangs' has turned out to be nothing more than a gimmick that didn't work, and this is just the same. 'They are detaining a token handful of arrivals and in return we accept unvetted migrants from France. The whole thing is riddled with loopholes, opt-outs and legal escape routes that will make removals near-impossible.'
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
The emerging industry tackling overtourism around the world
It's no secret that social media has changed travel. Holidaymakers increasingly seek to imitate images posted by influencers and their peers on platforms like Instagram and TikTok. In our increasingly digital world, travellers now chase the perfect shot like treasure hunters. That can mean navigating crowds, long lines and sometimes even danger – all for content from the world's most 'Instagrammable' spots. In a widely viewed TikTok video, influencer Zoe Rae (the sister of Love Island star Molly-Mae Hague) voiced her disappointment after visiting Bali. Apparently, it did not look as it did when she saw it online. Her comments attracted a backlash, with critics arguing she was simply experiencing the reality behind the content she and others have helped to promote. Research has found that many influencers and social media users participate in an 'aesthetic economy'. That is, travel is 'performed' for likes, views and brand deals. The result? Holidaymakers are seeking out highly photogenic ('Instagrammable') destinations from which to stage their content. Sometimes 'getting the shot' becomes more important than any meaningful cultural exchange between hosts and guests. The behaviour of social media-induced tourists has been found to be more irresponsible than that of other types of travellers. There were 379 selfie-related deaths between 2008-21, and the quest for the perfect photo can also lead to trespassing and vandalism. Additionally, studies have found that social-media-induced tourists can cause varying levels of damage to the hotspots they visit. This can include environmental erosion, traffic congestion, pollution, increased rubbish and generally making daily life difficult for locals. Stage-managed selfies But the demand has fuelled the development of shadow economies like 'selfie museums'. These have begun to emerge around the world: Chicago's wndr Museum, London's Selfie Factory, Selfie House in Prague, Brazil's Museum Selfie Day in Sao Paulo, to name just a few. Our new study shines a light on these parks – purpose-built, self-contained spaces that give visitors a visually stunning, curated environment in which to create content (most often of themselves). For the price of admission, they get convenient access to lighting, props, professional photographers and backdrops for creating content for social media in 'Instagrammable' places. Selfie parks in Bali, Indonesia, offer rice terraces, swings, nests and other 'sceneography' associated with its destination image. And there are add-ons like dress rentals, professional photographers who can follow visitors around the park, and personalised photo-editing services. Selfie parks can offer soft control over visitors in the form of guards, guides and security cameras to monitor behaviour. And they implement daily safety checks and regularly train staff to ensure guests are supervised as they take photos. This is an important alternative to the sometimes risky behaviour of selfie-seekers in viral hotspots. Of course, the elephant in the room here might be the commodification and inauthenticity that selfie parks represent. Other research has found that locals can be divided about staged photo opportunities, with some seeing them as inauthentic and gimmicky. There is an awareness that these encounters do not represent the real life of locals. Others, however, consider the money to be made and employment that these opportunities can provide. Our findings from Bali showed that the selfie parks are extremely successful – with more than 1,500 visitors reported in low season. The offering has been expanded in recent years to add more photo spots, infinity pools and even a day club. For now, all of Bali's selfie parks are locally owned and managed. This creates an important source of employment, as well as being a launchpad for entrepreneurship among locals. The idea of selfie parks may take a bit of getting used to. But having spaces where people can take photos, videos and create social media content safely, while bringing in revenue and employment for local communities, offers a viable solution. This is especially true of the places that struggle most with the negative impacts of tourists motivated by social media. Love them or loathe them, selfie parks probably aren't going away. And they may represent a broader shift in how people travel, share and consume experiences. In destinations facing an influx of selfie-seeking visitors, they might just be a surprisingly practical solution. Other 'viral' destinations should consider establishing dedicated spaces in which tourists can create content. Destinations like the island of Santorini, nicknamed Greece's 'Instagram island' amid extreme overcrowding alongside other harms, could be the type of place to benefit. If so many of today's tourists are chasing the perfect picture, maybe it makes sense to give them a place designed exactly for that. Lauren A. Siegel is a Senior Lecturer in Tourism
Daily Record
17 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Interest rates cut brings relief to homeowners and borrowers across UK
Interest rates are now at their lowest level in two years. The Bank of England has cut interest rates from 4.25% to 4%, bringing relief to householders with mortgages. Initially, four of the nine-person committee wanted rates to be reduced by 0.25 percentage points to 4% while four wanted to keep rates unchanged, and one member preferred a bigger 0.5 percentage point cut. A second vote was held to secure a majority, which resulted in the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee voting by five to four to cut rates to 4%. Governor Andrew Bailey said it was a 'finely balanced decision', adding: 'Interest rates are still on a downward path, but any future rate cuts will need to be made gradually and carefully.' Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'Since the general election, interest rates have been cut five times and are now at their lowest level for two years – bringing down the cost of mortgages and loans across the UK. 'By bringing stability back to the country's finances, we're putting more money in people 's pockets.' Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Rachel Reeves claims credit for interest rate cuts – but rates are coming down to support the weak economy she has created. "Inflation has almost doubled on her watch and unemployment is rising. 'Interest rates should be falling faster, but Labour's jobs tax and reckless borrowing have pushed inflation well above target. 'With economists warning Labour have created a £50 billion black hole and the Chancellor refusing to rule out further harmful tax rises, Labour are showing they don't understand the economy. Meanwhile, UK inflation will be higher than previously expected over the next few years, while economic growth will be stronger in 2025, according to new forecasts from the Bank of England. Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation is projected to peak at 4% in September, up from a previous estimate of 3.5% as the impact of higher food and energy prices take effect. CPI is set to average at 2.5% in 2026 and 2% in 2027, up from a respective 2% and 1.75% when the Bank last set out its forecasts in May. Gross domestic product (GDP) is expected to rise by 1.25% over 2025, up from the 1% it previously projected.
