Who can lead Dumfries and Galloway Council?
A special meeting of Dumfries and Galloway Council (DGC) is to be held after a number of councillors quit the Conservative group which leads the local authority.
It left them with just nine members of the 43-strong council in the south-west of Scotland.
Now a request has been received to hold a special full council meeting within the next 14 days.
If it leads to a change of control it would be the third administration to try running the authority in the space of three years.
More stories from South Scotland
Listen to news from Dumfries and Galloway on BBC Sounds
The Conservatives previously formed the biggest single political group on the council with 16 members.
Seven of them have now left - four to form a group called Novantae and three to create the Dumfries and Galloway Independent Group.
It means their numbers have now fallen behind those of the SNP, which has 11.
DGC confirmed it had received a call for a special meeting on Tuesday which will have to be held within a fortnight.
It could see the current administration replaced after a little more than two years in charge.
Following the decision by a number of Conservative councillors to leave the group there are now nine different groupings or individuals on the authority.
The SNP has 11 councillors followed by the Conservatives with nine and Labour on eight.
Newly-formed Novantae has four, the Democratic Alliance three, Dumfries and Galloway Independents three, Independents three and one each for the Lib Dems and "not-specified".
It means that no coalition of just two groups could achieve an outright majority.
After elections in May 2022, an alliance was formed between the SNP, Labour, Lib Dems and independents to run the council.
They said they hoped to serve the region while working together in the name of "mutual trust and understanding".
However, that coalition fell apart after less than a year and the Conservatives took over to lead an administration without an overall majority.
Earlier this year they were unable to take forward their own budget plans but remained in control.
Now a block of councillors has quit the group - some of them citing concerns about how the west of the region was being represented.
It has swiftly been followed by the submission of the request for a special meeting of the council which could pave the way for another change.
Four councillors quit Conservatives to form new party
However, the other two biggest political groups on the council have already been involved in an administration which folded after less than 12 months in charge.
It would take at least three groups - and potentially as many as seven - to form an outright majority.
It will also be some time before the composition of the council is likely to change significantly.
The next local authority elections are not scheduled until May 2027.
The rainbow coalition that fell apart in 280 days
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Conservatives disown Liz Truss's mini-budget
The Conservatives will "never again" put the UK's economic stability at risk by making "promises we cannot afford", the shadow chancellor will say, as his party seeks to distance itself from former Prime Minister Liz Truss's mini-budget. In a speech, Mel Stride will disown Truss's £45bn package of tax cuts, which spooked financial markets and led to the former Tory PM's resignation in 2022. Stride will say "mistakes were recognised" but acknowledge "the damage to our credibility is not so easily undone". Hitting back, Truss said she had a plan to "turbocharge the economy" and accused Stride of bowing to "failed Treasury Orthodoxy". She accused Stride of being "a creature of the system," adding: "When he served alongside me as Treasury minister, he always went along with officials." The mini-budget was delivered by then Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng in September 2022, after Truss won a Tory leadership contest to become prime minister. The plan, which included big tax cuts and subsidies to reduce energy bills, shook confidence in the UK's financial credibility, led to a rise in mortgage rates and a fall in the pound's value. Truss, who did not ask the UK's independent forecaster to assess her economic plans, admitted "parts of our mini-budget went further and faster than markets were expecting" and stood down after 49 days in office. The mini-budget was scrapped and Rishi Sunak - who had criticised Truss's promises to fund tax cuts with borrowing - succeeded her as prime minister. Labour accused the Conservatives of crashing the economy in 2023 and has repeatedly used Truss's mini-budget as an attack line. Distancing the Tories from the mini-budget, Stride will say: "For a few weeks, we put at risk the very stability which Conservatives had always said must be carefully protected. "The credibility of the UK's economic framework was undermined by spending billions on subsidising energy bills and tax cuts, with no proper plan for how this would be paid for." And ahead of Chancellor Rachel Reeves's spending review next week, Stride will accuse her of "abandoning" financial responsibility. The current Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch was trade secretary in Truss's government in 2022. Stride - who was a key ally of Sunak when he was PM - will say it will take time and honesty for the Conservatives to rebuild trust with voters. "So let me be clear: never again will the Conservative Party undermine fiscal credibility by making promises we cannot afford," Stride will say. In a furious response, Truss argued her economic plan "provided the only pathway for the Conservatives to avoid a catastrophic defeat" in last year's general election. Truss added: "As it was, Mel Stride and too many fellow travellers in the Conservative parliamentary party supported an economic policy that backed high immigration, raised taxes to a 70-year high and pursued unaffordable Net Zero policies - and the electorate delivered a devastating verdict on that record last summer. "Until Mel Stride admits the economic failings of the last Conservative government, the British public will not trust the party with the reins of power again." In his speech, Stride will also take aim at Reform UK and its leader Nigel Farage. Last month, Farage - whose party is leading in national polls - set out plans to restore the winter fuel allowance, scrap the two-child benefit limit and lift the salary level at which people start paying income tax to £20,000. The shadow chancellor will say Reform's "economic prescription is pure populism". "It doubles down on the 'magic money tree' we thought had been banished with Jeremy Corbyn," Stride will say. Responding to Mel Stride, Reform UK Deputy Leader Richard Tice said his party would "take no lectures on economics from a party" that raised "government spending to 70-year highs and shrank economic growth to 70-year lows". "Meanwhile we unearth Tory-run councils wasting £30 million on a bridge to nowhere," Tice said. They can never be trusted again." The Liberal Democrats accused the Conservatives of attacking Farage's party for "the same fantasy economics" they had pursued. Deputy leader Daisy Cooper said: "It's insulting that the Conservatives think a few warm words will fool people into forgiving them for all the damage they did to the economy and people's livelihoods." How much market chaos did the mini-budget cause? We want to make it easier to have children - Farage Reeves admits some will lose out in spending review
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Will Donald Trump Get to Pick New Supreme Court Justices?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. President Donald Trump may have the opportunity to appoint new Supreme Court justices during his second term in office, legal experts told Newsweek. Why It Matters Trump reshaped the judiciary during his first term, appointing three justices to the nation's highest court. The next few years may grant him another chance to pick a new justice, who could serve on the court for decades. This could have major implications for public policy on issues related to abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, immigration and the scope of executive authority. What To Know Conservative-leaning Justices Clarence Thomas, 76, Samuel Alito, 75, and Chief Justice John Roberts, 70, already face pressure from some on the right to step down over the coming years as Republicans currently hold a trifecta in the federal government. Not only is Trump president, but the GOP holds a 53-seat majority in the Senate. This means no Democrats would be needed to vote in favor of Trump's Supreme Court nominees. Republicans could learn from Democrats about the consequences of their justices not retiring. Late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg faced calls to retire during former President Barack Obama's administration from Democrats who wanted him to pick her replacement, rather than a Republican president potentially getting to do so. However, she declined to do so, continuing to serve during Trump's first term. She died in September 2020—just months before the election in which President Joe Biden would unseat Trump. A photo illustration shows President Donald Trump and the U.S. Supreme Court justices. A photo illustration shows President Donald Trump and the U.S. Supreme Court justices. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty But it was Trump who got to pick her replacement, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, 53, who could continue serving on the court for decades. Conservatives point to that example as to why some of their older justices should retire while Trump can pick their successor. Will Trump Appoint Supreme Court Justice? Legal Experts Weigh In Daniel Urman, a Northeastern University law professor, told Newsweek no one really knows when someone will leave the court, but that Alito and Thomas would be the most likely to retire to ensure someone with similar legal views could replace them on the court. But it may not necessarily be likely because they are now in the majority after years of being dissenting voices they care most about. Pressure from the right may not be convincing to the justices, he said. "Judges and especially Justices are very independent, and I don't think they will be too influenced by the pressure campaign," he said. "It's ultimately a very personal decision and the Ginsburg example is important but she was older and faced more health issues than the current justices." None of the current justices on the court have publicly said they plan to retire anytime soon. Former federal prosecutor Gene Rossi told Newsweek Thomas could wait until after the 2026 midterms to avoid giving Democrats a motivating issue ahead of the elections. "However, if that happens, President Trump will pick a very young and conservative nominee because in his mind, he got burned with Justice Barrett," he said. "And he wants to put his further imprint on the tenor of the High Court." Although many conservatives may like to see Roberts retire, it's not clear that is likely, Stephen Wermiel, professor of practice in constitutional law at American University, told Newsweek, noting that he is only 70. His willingness to stand up against Trump may also leave a question about whether he would be "less than thrilled to give Trump the opportunity to replace him." Thomas, meanwhile, is only three years away from becoming the longest serving justice in history, and Alito also seemingly "still has a lot to say and do in the conservative Court," Wermiel said. "I think it is uncertain whether Trump will have another Supreme Court vacancy," he added. "It is certainly likely that conservatives will start putting pressure on Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito to retire after the current term so that Trump can appoint younger replacements." Trump Could Appoint Loyalist Justice, Experts Say Whether a jurist is conservative may not be the only question for Trump, analysts said. Barbara McQuade, former federal prosecutor, told Newsweek Trump could consider loyalty in appointing justices, as some conservatives on the court have been willing to break with him on key issues. "With frustration over some of the decisions by Justices Barrett and Roberts, there would be a push for justices who are not just conservative, but who are loyal to Trump himself," she said. "They could make a significant difference in some of the cases that are percolating up from the lower courts on issues such as birthright citizenship, transgender healthcare, and executive power." Barrett, at times, has been more willing than some of the other conservatives on the bench to break from the president, such as when she opposed his efforts to deport alleged gang members under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 and other key cases. Her independent streak has drawn backlash from conservatives aligned with Trump. Urman agreed Trump may be inclined to nominate a loyalist in the future, noting that he "seems to prize loyalty above all other characteristics in his nominees," and that his appointees could be more aligned with Alito or Thomas than Barrett. What People Are Saying Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Newsweek: "It's likely Trump appoints at least one Supreme Court Justice, and maybe two. The odds increase over his four-year term, especially with Justices Thomas and Alito being in their mid-70s." "Trump's Cabinet and officer appointees during his second term have been largely loyalists without the experience or independent streaks that frustrated him during his first term. His Supreme Court appointment(s) will likely reflect those same values, especially given the importance of the judiciary in standing in the way of his executive orders." Roberts, during a fireside chat in May, reported The Hill: "I'm going out feet first. I say that now. I mean, I'm sure if your health declines, and if you recognize that you're a burden to the court rather than part of an assist to everybody, then, it'll be time to go." What Happens Next It's unclear whether any justices plan to retire in the coming years, but the court will continue weighing in on key legal issues and serve as a check on Trump's executive authority.
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Canadians divided on whether U.S. is an ‘ally' or ‘enemy' country: Poll
OTTAWA - Faced with a trade war they didn't start, Canadians are divided on whether they see the United States as an 'enemy' or an 'ally,' a new poll suggests. The Leger poll, which was conducted online and can't be assigned a margin of error, surveyed more than 1,500 people between May 30 and June 1. Almost a third of respondents said they view the U.S. as a 'neutral country,' while 27 per cent said they consider it an 'ally' and 26 per cent see it as an 'enemy country.' Just over a third of men said they consider the U.S. an ally, compared with one in five women. Almost 30 per cent of women said they view the U.S. as an enemy, compared with 22 per cent of men. Older Canadians, those at least 55 years of age, were more likely to consider the U.S. an enemy than younger Canadians. Regionally Albertans were most likely to consider the U.S. an ally while Ontarians and British Columbians were most likely to see it as an enemy. The difference is starkest between political party supporters, with 44 per cent of Conservative supporters saying they view the U.S. as an ally, compared with 17 per cent of Liberal supporters and 12 per cent of NDP supporters said the same. Comparatively 16 per cent of Conservative supporters said they view the U.S. as an enemy country, while 36 per cent of Liberal supporters and 41 per cent of NDP supporters said the same. U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order Tuesday to double his levies on steel and aluminum to 50 per cent. He claimed the measure will protect the country's national security and domestic industries. Prime Minister Mark Carney has said his government will need to take 'some time' to craft a response to the increased U.S. tariffs. The number of Canadians that report seeing the U.S. as an enemy country has dropped by six points since mid-March. At that time, 32 per cent of survey respondents told Leger they viewed the country as an enemy. The number of Canadians that view the U.S. as an ally also decreased by two percentage points since March, from 29 to 27 per cent, while the number that view it as a neutral country increased by six percentage points, from 24 to 30 per cent. Andrew Enns, Leger's executive vice-president for Central Canada, said that, broadly speaking, the patterns haven't changed much since the organization asked the question in February — when 27 per cent of respondents said they viewed the U.S. as an enemy and 30 per cent said they viewed it as an ally. Enns said the decline in the number of people saying the U.S. is an enemy likely reflects the overall sentiment on tariffs. 'It's still obviously there and, you know, clearly now we're dealing with higher steel tariffs, but the commentary coming from the White House and the Trump administration seems to have dissipated a bit and that's probably helping just tone things down,' he said. Enns said Canada also has a new prime minister with a mandate that might 'take the edge off things.' 'I think that just keeps things more at a moderate level, and I think that reflects in people maybe feeling a little less threatened by the U.S.,' Enns said. Enns said political and business leaders have also sent a consistent message that the U.S. remains an important trading partner. He said that may encourage Canadians to believe there's a way to 'work things out.' The polling industry's professional body, the Canadian Research Insights Council, says online surveys cannot be assigned a margin of error because they do not randomly sample the population. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 5, 2025.
