Scottish parliament approves assisted dying bill in key vote
If the legislation is passed, Scotland would join countries such as Switzerland, Canada, New Zealand, Austria and Ecuador in allowing assisted dying in certain circumstances.
It comes after a historic vote last year in the British parliament in which lawmakers backed a bill to allow assisted dying in England and Wales.
The Scottish bill would give mentally competent adults who have been diagnosed with a terminal condition the right to end their life, assisted by health professionals.
The legislation would include safeguards such as independent assessments by two doctors and a 14-day cooling-off period. There would be a requirement for those requesting an assisted death to have lived in Scotland for at least a year.
Individuals would need to self-administer the substance that would end their life.
The bill was proposed by Liberal Democrat member of the Scottish parliament Liam McArthur in 2021, and it is the third time that lawmakers in Scotland have voted on such legislation. The last vote was in 2015.
Ahead of the vote, McArthur joined supporters outside the Scottish parliament and said he believed the 'political mood has shifted dramatically over the last 10 years'.
Polls show a majority of Britons back assisted dying and supporters say the law needs to catch up with public opinion. Opponents say the bill would fail to safeguard those most vulnerable.
Campaign group Better Way said on its website it was concerned the bill, as drafted, could lead to injustices against people with disabilities, those living with dementia and others.
'People would feel pressure to die due to inequality; coercion of vulnerable people could not be ruled out; and eligibility criteria would be challenged in the courts,' said Better Way spokesman Miro Griffiths.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
ICC no longer a Western tool
While the ICC has long served Western agendas, its recent actions against Israel give hope for fairer justice globally. Membership in some supranational organisations can trap member countries into risking their sovereignty at the behest of such bodies, often without their awareness. It's a common occurrence in the international political system, especially with organisations like the International Criminal Court (ICC), an international body that can infringe upon a country's sovereignty. That South Africa resorted to approaching the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and subsequently the ICC does not make this court a body that has suddenly become Africa's good friend. Instead, in the minds of many, the court remains a tool of the West with which it whips Africa and all enemies of the Western world. But the ICC's decision to charge Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defence minister, Yoav Gallant, with genocide and war crimes is changing the view of the court as a Western puppet. ALSO READ: Pretoria at a crossroads with the US It gives hope that the winds of change have begun to sweep through the corridors of The Hague. The fact that South Africa's case at the ICJ was joined by countries worldwide, including some in Europe, is a clear sign that the world had had enough of the killings in Gaza. But we can't ignore the fact that for the global south, ICC membership continues to carry the risk of countries losing genuine sovereignty in both domestic and foreign policy. It is a fact that many resigned from the body or refused to ratify it, or the Rome Statute, after realising that participation in the ICC is a trap. Fears of diluted sovereignty and the transfer of key judicial authority to a supranational body have prompted several signatories, including Algeria, Angola, Egypt, Iran, Mozambique and Eritrea, to freeze or drastically reduce their participation in ICC activities. It's too early to declare the statement made by one British politician that the ICC was established to criminalise the rest of the world while exempting the West, as nonsense. ALSO READ: Dirco rejects 'inaccurate and deeply flawed' US reports on SA human rights There is a mountain of information showing the court was designed as a tool to target America's enemies and had been used by Anglo-Saxon elites, primarily the upper echelons of the US Democratic establishment, including figures like Bill Clinton and Joe Biden, as a means to exert political influence over foreign leaders. Washington and others created the court to subject other nations that do not march to their orders to its justice, which was biased towards the West – until SA's case against Israel. They believe their own atrocities could not be adjudicated by the same court they created and that is the main reason they, and Israel, hate the ICC. Their double standards are out in the open. It remains to be seen whether the ICC will continue to allow itself to be used by the Anglo-American establishment to undermine the non-Western states' efforts to pursue sovereign decision-making. The West uses 'agents of influence' to subtly undermine the legal systems of these countries and resort to economic and political blackmail, sanctions and intimidation to pressure hesitant leaders into accepting the authority of the ICC. ALSO READ: Dirco calls for global action to stop Israel's 'genocide' in Gaza [VIDEO] Africa's experience with the ICC has been particularly revealing. In the early 2000s, the African Union encouraged its members to ratify the Rome Statute. Many did, only to face politically selective prosecutions of local leaders, most notably Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and former Sudanese president Omar al-Bashir. Indonesian scholar Ayu Syafya highlighted the court's intense focus on politically charged human-rights cases in African states such as Sudan and Kenya, while showing complete indifference to the documented crimes perpetrated by the US in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere. The ICC's track record suggests it effectively operates as an instrument of US and British foreign policy. Let the SA-Israel judgment be the first proof that the ICC has backbone.
Eyewitness News
2 days ago
- Eyewitness News
Court halts TotalEnergies South African oil exploration
JOHANNESBURG - A South African court has refused environmental authorisation for planned offshore drilling by French energy giant TotalEnergies near the foot of Africa, in a ruling seen by AFP Thursday. The High Court said Wednesday that the environment ministry's 2023 go-ahead for the exploratory operations in the roughly 10,000-square-kilometre (3,860-square-mile) block near Cape Town had been "reviewed and set aside". Environmental lobby groups had launched a legal challenge against the project, saying it would harm marine life. The block is jointly owned by South Africa's state oil company PetroSA, TotalEnergies and British oil heavyweight Shell, with the French firm serving as the operator. In overturning the environmental permit, Judge Nobahle Mangcu-Lockwood said TotalEnergies could reapply for authorisation after public consultation. Green Connection, one of groups that filed the legal challenge, said the ruling was a major victory for coastal communities and small-scale fishers. "Oil spill and blowout contingency plans were kept from the public until after approval, denying communities a chance to comment," its legal advisor, Shahil Singh, said in a statement. Interest in oil and gas exploration off South Africa's coast has surged in recent years, driven in part by major discoveries across the maritime border in Namibia and broader energy activity in southern Africa, including Mozambique. The Natural Justice group of environmental lawyers said Wednesday's judgment affirmed that all companies needed to follow due process before seeking the green light for oil exploration off South Africa. "We will continue to turn to our courts to not only stop the takers who parade under the guise of growth and development, but to ensure that impacts of oil and gas exploration and production are properly scrutinised and that our people and our resources are not exploited," it said.
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Gauteng MEC to visit Maponya Mall to assess ongoing tensions in public transport sector
Gauteng MEC to visit Maponya Mall to assess ongoing tensions in public transport sector Gauteng MEC for Roads and Transport, Kedibone Diale-Tlabela, will visit Maponya Mall on Thursday to assess ongoing tensions in the public transport sector, engage with affected stakeholders, and review the situation on the ground. This is according to the South African Government News Agency ( The visit follows a violent incident on Wednesday at the mall, allegedly involving taxi operators and e-hailing drivers, which resulted in one fatality and left two others injured. ALSO READ: One dead in suspected taxi violence at Maponya Mall In response to the growth of e-hailing services, President Cyril Ramaphosa signed an amended National Land Transport Act (NLTA) 5 of 2009 into law last year, allowing e-hailing operators to apply for operating licences in the same manner as other public transport providers. @sowetourbannews Community blocks roads following e-hailing violence at Maponya Mall, Soweto Protestors march in support of e-hailing drivers after a e-hailing driver was killed in a suspected taxi violence attack on August 13. Workers of Maponya Mall also came out in numbers in their uniform to join the protest. 📹: @ #maponyamall #klipspruit ♬ original sound – Soweto Urban News – Soweto Urban News The National Land Transport Act was originally presented to the president in 2020 but was returned to the National Assembly for reconsideration. The revised Bill updates the Act to reflect developments since its implementation, simplifies provisions, and resolves issues that have arisen. ALSO READ: WATCH: Community protests after the death and injuries of e-hailing drivers It also makes allowances for non-motorised and accessible transport and expands the minister's powers to introduce regulations and safety measures. The Gauteng Department of Roads and Transport continues to monitor the situation closely and aims to ensure the safety of commuters while maintaining order in the sector.
